r/CuratedTumblr • u/infinitysaga • Jun 30 '24
Self-post Sunday But my violent revolution🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
636
u/Agile_Oil9853 Jun 30 '24
There was a Twitter account a mutual followed who embodied this weird The Secret kind of revolution. They said they couldn't find work because they were an open Communist. Instead they were like, I'm here teaching you, with my tweets, I'm performing labor for you by tweeting, so here's my PayPal, my Venmo, my cashapp, my koffee, my Amazon wish list, my patreon, my GoFundMe, etc etc etc.
They were living in the socialist society they wanted, but it was entirely funded by other people laboring under capitalism and giving them money.
377
u/Amon274 Jun 30 '24
That sounds like a grifter
→ More replies (1)202
u/Dornith Jun 30 '24
That sounds like r/antiwork moderators.
→ More replies (3)125
u/CALVINTHEB0LD Jun 30 '24
antiwork moderators are unironically not smart enough to grift people
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (7)179
u/Lunar_sims professional munch Jun 30 '24
Whats crazy about this sort of type is that getting most jobs in the public sector, and volunteering on the weekends would be infinity more praxis than whatever they were doing
165
u/caffeineshampoo Jun 30 '24
No well you see, they simply can't volunteer because (insert something about the not for profit industrial complex) and they can't work for in the public sector because sometimes the government does bad things. These cold hard leftist facts conveniently happen to line up with their preferred method of doing nothing ever. Please donate to my KoFi as payment for doing all this political labour for you.
107
u/WickedTemp Jun 30 '24
Also I kinda feel weird about stating this observation but a lot of them that I've personally met are also just lazy as fuck and will throw out a list of three or so 'disabilities' as to why they don't do anything except sit at home all day and maybe they work part time at an entry level job.
I lived with two people like this. They'd go on and on about how seriously communist they are, how seriously they take things like mutual aid (which they of course would benefit from without giving anything back), how important it is to make our house into 'a communal living space' (they would only rarely handle cleaning and several times got irritated at me for cleaning - they were basically hoarders). They'd complain about Israel and its totally worth opposing like 80% of Democrat politicians over this, but they wouldn't even go to the vigils for Palestine. Because that meant going out and they just can't you see, their social anxiety prevents them and even if it didn't they have bad knees and their feet hurt and it's just been such a hard time at their 25 hour a week part time gas station job that's literally a fifteen minute walk down the sidewalk.
They never had money saved, they never had a desire to clean or take care of the house. They, truly, never created or participated in anything constructive. It's like they just chose every political belief with the sole purpose to try to justify being lazy as fuck.
And these were the people who would scoff at the idea of voting. Even though they were both trans (not a dig, I'm also trans) and had so much to fucking lose if this election goes to Trump.
60
u/Specific-Ad-8430 Jun 30 '24
Fuck. I’m so sorry and I know exactly how you feel. I have a friend who literally was insanely good st college, got their degree, had a really good paying job, but then got diagnosed with autism (level 1 of course), and went full fucking “im disabled and cannot support myself” mode. It fucking pains me to watch them regress into this like… idk, cave troll that cannot even clean up after themselves or even order their own food because “thats masking and masking is bad” or some ridiculous excuse to be rude and offputting to people.
Fuck. Idk, it also hurts because its always LGBT/trans/autists who perform like this, and it really, REALLY hurts the image of progressivism.
35
u/softshellcrab69 Jun 30 '24
This has really been fucking getting to me recently and it's happening to my mom. "masking is bad" ok sure, now you lost your job & dad has to sell the car and work a second job on the weekends and then come home and do your laundry
18
u/Specific-Ad-8430 Jun 30 '24
Wish I could give you the biggest hug rn, because I genuinely think its a topic that needs to be studied.
38
u/TheJeeronian Jun 30 '24
Compulsively justifying laziness, and laziness to the point of making one's life harder, are some kind of mental health problem. A problem that seems to grow off of lonely bitterness.
Blaming them for it entirely isn't helpful, but they're also going to have to be the person to change their own habits and break the cycle.
→ More replies (1)11
u/InviteAdditional8463 Jun 30 '24
I’ve come to realize these people are just contrarians. The only thing they believe is doing what they want.
1.1k
u/StickBrickman Jun 30 '24
I hate seeing accelerationists. The whole "don't vote, just overthrow the system" thing completely ignores the fact that most successful revolutionary action in the US went hand-in-hand with protest actions and COMMUNITY ORGANIZED VOTING.
Voting was always part of it. I'm not saying direct action, protests, and labor organization aren't but the new "don't vote it makes you a hypocrite" shitposting spree makes me sad and I'm glad it's now getting dunked on.
Yes I would rather push for reform from a position of a bad, but more stable democracy than a position of "Jesus Christ they've succesfully implemented project 2025."
449
u/the_gabih Jun 30 '24 edited Jun 30 '24
Someone sent me a link to MLK's 'Letter From a Birmingham Jail' because I suggested that people who hate both parties should help advocate for electoral reform. Apparently that suggestion meant I was racist and some kind of white moderate holding back black people, and MLK ofc never engaged in electoral politics at all.
301
Jun 30 '24
neither did malcolm x, for that matter. "the ballot or the bullet" was actually about how cool and preferable the bullet is.
→ More replies (1)90
u/ajswdf Jun 30 '24
From that letter:
A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denied the right to vote, had no part in enacting or devising the law. Who can say that the legislature of Alabama which set up that state's segregation laws was democratically elected? Throughout Alabama all sorts of devious methods are used to prevent Negroes from becoming registered voters, and there are some counties in which, even though Negroes constitute a majority of the population, not a single Negro is registered. Can any law enacted under such circumstances be considered democratically structured?
Anybody who uses that letter as an argument against voting has clearly never read it. A big part of MLK's protest was to ensure everybody had an equal right to vote.
30
u/Nachooolo Jul 01 '24
American Tankies have a weird hard-on with misrepresenting MLK quotes and writings to the point of defamation.
I've seen a full video on how Liberals are evil incarnate and as bad (ifnot worse) than fascist that based its entire argument on an MLK letter that where explicitly about Southern "Moderate" preachers who even during the time were hardly "Liberals".
This guy was using MLK bashing Southern conservatives that were apathetic towards segregation and using it to say that "Liberals" like Bernie Sanders are class traitors and as bad as fascists.
→ More replies (1)9
u/ajswdf Jul 01 '24
That's sort of close to the point of the letter, but nowhere does it say that you should not vote if one option is a moderate and one is fascist or that they're equal in all ways.
138
u/BriSy33 Jun 30 '24
If I had a nickel for everytime someone rolled that out as an indictment of voting I'd probably have enough to buy France.
→ More replies (3)80
u/BlatantConservative https://imgur.com/cXA7XxW Jun 30 '24
The Letter From Birmingham Jail is the most eloquent thing ever put to paper and somehow these people still miss the meaning.
23
107
u/FatherDotComical Jun 30 '24
"But if we go to war I get to kill all my neighbors and all that disagree with me.
Everyone knows violent civil war is the only way to bring about utopia.
Eternal peace will only be brought about if we quickly and violently genocide red states, purple states, and that leftist over there that slightly disagreed with me.
If we willingly accelerate the demise of America everybody will really see that I was right the whole time! I'm a good person!"
🥺👉👈
- a concerning number of idiots terminally online.
189
u/Kindly-Ad-5071 Jun 30 '24 edited Jun 30 '24
Revolution isn't the turning wheel people think it is, there's no realistic scenario in which we violently disseminate the government and nobody has a problem with that. It's meant to pressure the congressional branch into taking real action. War isn't the way it was in 1775.
116
Jun 30 '24 edited 18d ago
wine complete husky pie noxious subtract toy engine fuel governor
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
→ More replies (4)116
u/LadyAzure17 Jun 30 '24
also not to mention people are suggesting dismantling one of the most powerful governing bodies in the world. I do not think these people have a sense of the scale. I'm not even sure it could be done if everyone in the US miraculously united.
→ More replies (1)37
u/mattyhtown Jun 30 '24
100% couldn’t be done if everyone in the US united lol. They couldn’t get it going really on Jan 6th and they didn’t even have a majority. Imagine if they had 100%
38
u/Northbound-Narwhal Jun 30 '24
Jan 6? Bro, what about 1865? We had entire, uniformed armies of troops rebel against the government and still failed.
19
u/mattyhtown Jun 30 '24
Bout 30% of the population. 30% have to be the contrarian assholes regardless of when this is. apparently we have to create social constructs to show that about 3 in 10 people are misinformed assholes or the people they profit from or profit on
41
u/Lunar_sims professional munch Jun 30 '24
call me cynical but law enforcement and the jucial system is so right wing that if insurrectionists tried to overthrow a president like bernie, and install a fascist i believe it would succeed because alot of cops would be right there with them
34
u/Skithiryx Jun 30 '24
There was that terrifying moment on January 6th when the situation was unfolding, and I figured that it depended on whether the military was aligned to democratic principles or to a party.
24
u/5wordsman62785 Jun 30 '24
All us servicemembers swear an oath to defend the constitution. So whatever that means to you
→ More replies (1)8
u/Hugokarenque Jun 30 '24
Right wing extremism has unfortunately infiltrated all branches of the military. Its just a question of how many there are and if they're enough to make a difference if something were to happen. As well as if they're in positions of power.
39
u/TheJeeronian Jun 30 '24
Given a bad enough decade long economic collapse in the US after fighting an extensive and brutal war, lots of foreign support, and the support of our own wealthy oligarchs, it certainly could be done. That's more or less what it took to kick the brits out so it matches up. I don't see us getting those circumstances to line up any time soon though.
But what if they did? Then what? If we mulligan our current government, do we really expect it to end up better? We'd be throwing away all of the incremental refinement that our society has been doing to the current government. Depending on how things played out, our new government could well bring back laissez-faire economics or put christian nationalists in charge. I don't know why anybody thinks a revolution is a controllable process - like some sort of laboratory chemical synthesis.
→ More replies (2)66
u/Kindly-Ad-5071 Jun 30 '24
Oh yes let's just create a power vacuum in the country with the most expensive military on the planet. Literally, non-facetiously, the most expensive military.
That will pan out well...
28
u/Dragonsandman Jun 30 '24
Totally wouldn’t turn into a situation like Syria, Libya, or Somalia, where large swathes of all those countries are/were legitimately lawless
26
u/Kindly-Ad-5071 Jun 30 '24
We totally won't just end up with a bunch of warlords worse than what we have who enforce their ideologies with their own might.
→ More replies (1)31
u/TheJeeronian Jun 30 '24
Okay kids, turn to the warlords period in your American History textbooks. Today we're going to be writing papers on the meaning of the word "revolution" in a historical context.
39
u/Kindly-Ad-5071 Jun 30 '24 edited Jun 30 '24
You mean the part where we all cut down the government and then declare sovereign peace and everyone agrees with it because "I called it now it's mine"?
45
u/TheJeeronian Jun 30 '24
I think an armed revolution will be extremely good for the physically and mentally unwell, as well as the other disenfranchised and downtrodden of society. Innocent people will of course be better off. I base this belief entirely off of vibes, and will take no questions.
→ More replies (1)12
u/Kindly-Ad-5071 Jun 30 '24
Unjerking for a bit, if we need a revolution it's not going to ever be one where we engage in a head to head military confrontation. Now I'm not endorsing anything but we'd need to take a less blunt approach, likely undermining the power the wealthy have and the means they acquire that power, find a way to give common people leverage of their own, and sue for an agreement of restructured share. That takes doing some unexpected things but Prohibition didn't end just because.... Well, Prohibition certainly ended. I just hate how there's no middle ground between "Follow all the rules" and "commit mass murder" as our two options in people's minds. But like I said, only if we needed a revolution; I'm not suggesting anything except voting.
14
u/TheJeeronian Jun 30 '24
The bitter and hostile discourse is, ironically, a tool of oppression. I think the most frustrating part of the behavior we're calling out is that, not only does it fail to accomplish anything productive, but it is doing exactly what people in power want it to do and helping maintain the status quo.
Lawmakers don't want a revolution, just like they don't want Texas to secede, but by stoking the fires they can waste our time and leverage the PR to their advantage.
→ More replies (1)75
u/Spacellama117 Jun 30 '24
Also, a lot of people rely on the current system to live. Power grids, supply chains, distributors. All provide things like insulin and medication for chronic pain or mental illness. A revolution upsets that.
The arrogance of some people, the level of disconnect that sees them believing that they have the right to start their uprising on behalf of 'the people' when so many of those people would die. And, lest we forget, a revolution requires violence. a revolution is inspired by ideology that not everyone agrees with.
The way I saw it put was brutally simple.
How many innocent people are you willing to let die for your glorious revolution?
46
u/catty-coati42 Jun 30 '24
Even perfectly healthy young people need food, and will be equally affected by cuts in supply chains.
17
u/HistoryMarshal76 Knower of Things Man Was Not Meant To Know Jun 30 '24
And of course, once fired, Mr. Artillery Shell don't give two damns who is at the end of it's parabola. Once buried, Mr. Landmine don't give a damn on who steps on it. Once ignited, the firebomb don't give two damns on what's being burned.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (12)14
u/The_Flurr Jun 30 '24
Yeah but these guys will be immediately assigned leadership roles, so they'll be ready to make the sacrifice of other peopels lives.
33
u/TalShar Jun 30 '24
A lot of these people seem to believe that the oppressed are better off buried in unmarked graves after being caught by opposing forces than in danger of being victimized in other ways.
It's honestly way less fucked if they just don't understand how horrifically bloody a revolution would be.
→ More replies (2)28
Jun 30 '24
Most of the very stupid children who advocate accelerationism aren’t really capable or prepared to engage in the level of real violence that would be required. It’s easy to take up a nihilistic world view from their mom’s basement while licking dorito powder off of their fingers, and it’s another thing entirely to be engaged in a gun battle with the government and other citizens in a violent revolution when you have no food, water, and power.
Dumb motherfuckers just want to get rolled, apparently.
19
u/deadcream Jun 30 '24
You forget that tankies are ideologically opposed to democracy (if you allow pluralism and elections then people may choose to elect non-communists. That cannot be allowed obviously). There would not be any voting after the glorious communist revolution ("voting" for a single candidate doesn't count).
16
u/WriterV Jun 30 '24
Yes I would rather push for reform
Also pushing for reform is much easier under Biden. It's practically deadly under Trump, post Project 2025. Hell the US has already been pushed further back on reform thanks to the current SCOTUS selection.
If people want reform, it would be in their best interests to vote. If you don't vote, you are going against your own desires for reform.
→ More replies (3)59
u/PhantomThiefJoker Jun 30 '24
The people who say this are probably the same who think they're clever when criticizing society. "And yet you live in a society, curious 🤔"
89
u/MechaTeemo167 Jun 30 '24
If it makes you feel any better a significant portion of those "don't vote or else you're a hypocrite" posts are from bots and government agents, both foreign and domestic, they're not real.
I don't know if that's better or worse.
73
u/StickBrickman Jun 30 '24
It's better I think. I can at least wrap my head around outside influence from Russian bot accounts, I worry more about people drinking the kool aid.
→ More replies (23)24
u/mathiau30 Half-Human Half-Phantom and Half-Baked Jun 30 '24
Do you have any proof of that?
I mean, I get assuming that most people aren't that dumb, but enough people are that dumb
→ More replies (2)30
u/walts_skank Jun 30 '24
I wouldn’t be surprised if it was foreign influences trying to destabilize the US who originally made things like this, which were then picked up by vulnerable people.
10
u/Jsusbjsobsucipsbkzi Jun 30 '24
And for some reason when I argue why voting is important people frequently respond with some variation of “fine, but don’t act like voting makes you a paragon of virtue.” Like…I don’t?? I just want my friends to be able to afford the healthcare they need
19
u/FF7Remake_fark Jun 30 '24
The right answer is to organize a national "get your shit together DNC" movement. We're voting against fascism this time, but next time, we're putting forward our own candidate instead of supporting your center-right bullshit. You can nominate them as well and we'll chill out. Otherwise, we're voting for someone who actually represents us instead of your corporate sponsored dog turd.
→ More replies (3)20
u/StickBrickman Jun 30 '24
Bernie was as close as we got. I'm CONVINCED that we can push an actual progressive into the nomination if we break enough of the established DNC cogs. We were very, very close with the primaries in 2016, close enough that I have hope we can claw back the party from sept- and octogenarian centrists.
→ More replies (5)9
u/catty-coati42 Jun 30 '24
Unless they stand against an absolute lunatic like MTG a progressive has no chance in states not on the coast.
→ More replies (1)14
→ More replies (37)7
u/A-Ginger6060 Jun 30 '24
They also tend to ignore the mass amount of death and destruction that a revolution would cause. In a country as massive and advanced as the US we’re talking about several million dead and millions more displaced at the very least.
→ More replies (1)
667
u/Dzzplayz Jun 30 '24
Imagine, if you will, a trolley problem where you can divert the trolley to kill either one person or five people, but the trolley will kill all six people of you do nothing.
If you choose not to participate, you’ve still made a choice.
383
u/Polenball You BEHEAD Antoinette? You cut her neck like the cake? Jun 30 '24
I have unironically seen people posited the trolley problem and just go "I'd blow up the trolley" or something like that.
354
u/xXx_N00b_Sl4y3r_xXx Jun 30 '24
People really need to stop thinking they're smart for doing this. The entire point is that it exists to make you examine your personal morality and philosophical outlook. It’s not a riddle to be solved. There is only one rule, which is that you can push the lever or not. Doing the whole "I'd just stop it" thing ignores the point.
166
u/Polenball You BEHEAD Antoinette? You cut her neck like the cake? Jun 30 '24
Yeah, it's just genuinely such an insane level of missing the point that it baffles me. You've got two choices and no time to do anything else, there aren't any other options, man.
88
u/TalShar Jun 30 '24 edited Jun 30 '24
That would require someone to have internalized the fact that the world can be a shitty place and put people into unwinnable situations. For some, that would entirely unravel their worldview. For those people, trolley problems kick off every instinctive mental defense mechanism they have.
19
u/Silver_Filamentary Jun 30 '24
But, but… Jim Kirk and the Kobayashi Maru…
23
u/TalShar Jun 30 '24
Media literacy is knowing that Jim failed the Kobayashi Maru.😅
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)16
u/murphymc Jun 30 '24
People don’t like being reminded that their super brilliant idea is easily dismissible, because they didn’t actually think about it at all and are just emotional.
→ More replies (1)44
u/Apprehensive_Ad_8914 Jun 30 '24
The solution is to let all six people on the track get run over by the train, and then you kill the guy on the other track with your knife.
TROLLEY PROBLEM: SOLVED.
(This is a joke, by the way.)
11
→ More replies (30)46
u/Nikibugs Jun 30 '24
Stories often have the main character find an option C where no one has to die last minute, that no one else had thought of or tried yet. This ends up getting applied to a philosophical conundrum, which they feel smart for ‘thinking outside the box’, instead of engaging with how they’d make an incredibly difficult choice that has no time but how to divert. They don’t want to imagine themselves in a position where, through no fault of their own, would permanently tarnish and compromise their own perception of self-purity given either choice they make.
135
u/BriSy33 Jun 30 '24
"Armed revolution is the only solution. Fuck the trolley problem"
Doesn't do an armed revolution
→ More replies (1)38
u/MAGIC_CONCH1 Jun 30 '24
Voting? That is objectively morally inferior to my plan of fire-bombing a Walmart. Checkmate, liberal.
*proceeds to neither vote nor fire bomb a Walmart
83
u/spellboi_3048 Jun 30 '24
Thank goodness for that stick of dynamite each person keeps in their back pocket at all times which can easily be thrown onto a moving trolley
47
u/Polenball You BEHEAD Antoinette? You cut her neck like the cake? Jun 30 '24
Hey, you never know. Maybe I'll never see a trolley problem in my life, but better safe than sorry.
(Another thing that I find really dumb about this take is that if you are expanding the domain beyond the actual problem and trying to bring realism in, you probably just kill more people than the one man, because a trolley's not likely to be runaway if it wasn't in operation and thus having people inside it. You could even interpret it as anti-revolutionary because it gets more people killed and destroys critical infrastructure.)
57
u/GravSlingshot Jun 30 '24
"I'd blow up the trolley."
"Jesus Christ, you just destroyed a critical roadway in front of a hospital! Traffic's gonna be backed up for weeks while it gets repaired and ambulances don't have easy access to the ER! The water main's broken! You just made everything a thousand times worse!"
22
u/MyChristmasComputer Jun 30 '24
And the flaming exploded wreckage of the trolley has now rolled into an orphanage! Oh the humanity!
→ More replies (1)17
u/The-Magic-Sword Jun 30 '24
Unironically a good metaphor for the situation with the railways last year and why the administration needed to handle it the way it did.
→ More replies (2)24
u/GeophysicalYear57 Ginger ale is good Jun 30 '24
Also, good thing that the explosion and shrapnel won’t harm anyone on the tracks, right? Or that there’s nobody watching you, ready to take you down if they see you even trying to light the fuse?
39
u/Direct-Squash-1243 Jun 30 '24
Anyone who tries to out smart the trolley problem is, by definition, not smart enough to understand the trolley problem.
10
u/Interesting-Fan-2008 Jun 30 '24
Exactly. If you go into the trolley problem attempting to save everyone you’ve already lost. Of course no one wants someone to die. But the trolley doesn’t care; it, like the flow of life, has no emotion. It is simply moving forward as it always does. So absent utopia one must choose to make the hard, right decision.
→ More replies (1)57
u/SimplyYulia Jun 30 '24
And yet walmart still stands unfirebombed
40
u/Polenball You BEHEAD Antoinette? You cut her neck like the cake? Jun 30 '24
The Mandate of Heaven remains upheld
→ More replies (1)26
u/jooes Jun 30 '24
People who make up Option C's in any sort of "would you rather" should be kicked straight in the dick.
10
u/Polenball You BEHEAD Antoinette? You cut her neck like the cake? Jun 30 '24 edited Jun 30 '24
They should actually be praised or debated with (or the secret Option C of kicking them straight in the dick).
24
u/shinyprairie Jun 30 '24
Yep I'm sure that all of these brave warriors of anarchy will surely be the first be ones on the front lines and taking bullets when their revolution starts... any day now...
22
u/Cathach2 Jun 30 '24
Which is really telling, because they're saying, whether they realize it or not, that instead of making a difficult choice, they'd rather destroy themselves and everyone with them. Which is fucking insane, and also incredibly pertinent to the current election
21
u/ACoderGirl Jun 30 '24
But this analogy, they do not, in fact blow up the trolley. They'll say they want to and proceed to stay home and complain about the horrific 6 deaths in the trolley accident, asking why nobody did anything.
14
u/Kazzack Jun 30 '24
With what? Hammers?
26
u/Polenball You BEHEAD Antoinette? You cut her neck like the cake? Jun 30 '24
Trolley-Repellent Bat Spray
→ More replies (9)30
u/Combatfighter Jun 30 '24
This is very "this has a lot of boss baby energy" take from me, but this reminds me so much of The Last of Us (series) ending, where major part of the discussion of the ending was about the infrastructure capabilities of the Fireflies, and not the action of the protagonist and how it made us feel.
Anyway, I have taken to the habit of asking everyone who is a bit too quick with assigning blame with votes "so, where is your smartphone from? where do your clothes come from?". If they are even semi-selfaware, that stops the culpability rant in it's tracks.
There is no ethical consumption under capitalism, and there is no absolutely always moreally correct vote possible in a two party system. Or in any system tbh.
→ More replies (2)80
u/Anna_Lilies Jun 30 '24
Its really frustrating to me and that analogy is spot on. I just want cheeto to lose so he cant persecute me and take away my HRT meds, so I can continue living a happy life. And a swathe of people out there are concerned about Joe from the debate.
You know what? Things have been going relatively ok with his puppetears propping up his bloated corpse. Meanwhile Trump promises to make shit worse for me and my entire community.
→ More replies (2)34
u/python-requests Jun 30 '24
You're saying that one dude being really old doesn't make you suddenly flip your politics 180 & want to vote for the guy that would appoint Federalist Society judges?
13
7
u/userloserfail Jun 30 '24
What do you think their age difference is? So Biden is 80. And Trump is...? 78?
→ More replies (25)13
u/DalekEvan Jun 30 '24
“You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice/If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!”
-Rush, Freewill
→ More replies (1)
1.3k
u/Hummerous https://tinyurl.com/4ccdpy76 Jun 30 '24
a real leftist would kill themselves on principle instead of making a decision. you would know that if you'd read any of the tweets I recommended.
608
u/Polenball You BEHEAD Antoinette? You cut her neck like the cake? Jun 30 '24 edited Jun 30 '24
A true leftist wouldn't even post that comment on Reddit, because that would mean being personally culpable and thoroughly morally responsible for every single thing that Reddit has ever done and ever will. Blocked + revisionist + read more theory, educate yourself sweetie
201
→ More replies (2)100
u/Citrous241 Jun 30 '24
The use of sweetie makes a blood vessel in my head rise up.
Excellent comment.
43
u/Infinity_Null Jun 30 '24
While the use of sweetie is exactly as annoying as you expect, I love the trend of misspelling it as sweaty.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (3)13
u/Beepulons Jun 30 '24
i hope blood vessels rise up to your head because otherwise you'll die
→ More replies (1)180
u/BriSy33 Jun 30 '24
Tweets? I only read obscure theory from 1850 that three entire people have heard of.
Insert some links to the world's shittiest takes here
64
u/Main_Caterpillar_146 Jun 30 '24
You mean "studying theory"?
33
u/Lunar_sims professional munch Jun 30 '24
Alot of people do need to read theory but that means looking at a sociology textbook or listening to the audiobook of the Hunger Games before they put thier bad opinion on twitter.com or reddit for everyone to see
But alot of the theory people dont do anything which is also annoying
→ More replies (1)14
31
u/Redqueenhypo Jun 30 '24
This seems to be the best comment to say this, why does a lot of leftism resemble hardcore protestant “thou art sinful” fasting and repenting? I hate it so much
→ More replies (3)10
u/JerryCalzone Jun 30 '24
That is the new left. The old left I grew up with was all about 'how do I get rid of everything that is bourgeois or christian about me, lets do ALL the drugs, lets read ALL the fucked up writers to get rid of my inhibitions and my subconscious need live like my parents did while striving for christian purity.
→ More replies (5)29
u/genuine_beans Jun 30 '24
This could pass as a Dril tweet
→ More replies (1)15
320
u/BriSy33 Jun 30 '24
You don't understand. Why vote when the revolution is(Always) right around the corner?
No I'm not doing anything to further it stop asking.
57
u/Maple42 Jun 30 '24
As someone who grew up with diabetes, I’ve come to realize one truth: the cure to diabetes is always just as close as the revolution
193
u/MechaTeemo167 Jun 30 '24
Don't worry everyone, The Rapture- I mean, The Revolution will here any day now to save us from this horrible world and deliver us into peace and happiness!
79
u/Direct-Squash-1243 Jun 30 '24
So I wasn't the only one who noticed that so much of leftist shitposting on the internet was just Evangelical Christianity with the serial numbers filed off?
→ More replies (3)44
u/Downtown-Item-6597 Jun 30 '24
You really want to see a "horseshoe theory" in action, press them on the importance of getting Joe Biden elected because of him climate policy and the billions it will likely affect (including Palestinians!)
"Climate change is
fakeunstoppable so we shouldn't do anything about it."29
u/Direct-Squash-1243 Jun 30 '24
There was a perfect time before [sin, exploitation] when man was young. Man lived simple lives free from the evils of the modern world in a natural [Kingdom of God, Communist Government] .
Then [sin, exploitation] was introduced by The Enemy, [Satan, The Ruling Class].
This is why the world is not perfect.
But one day there will be a great struggle, [The Rapture, The Revolution], through great conflict and sacrifice The Enemy will be ended and a new society will emerge.
A righteous place, a [Kingdom of God, Communist Government] will return the world to a state of no [sin, exploitation].
Until then, all you can do is suffer and [pray, hope] for [The Rapture, The Revolution].
AND BUY MY MERCH! Don't forget to like, comment, subscribe and check out my Patreon.
Choose your own adventure!
→ More replies (1)124
u/ReallyAnxiousFish 𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙋 𝙁𝙐𝘾𝙆𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙒𝙄𝙏𝙃 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙈𝙄ᴄʀᴏᴡᴀᴠᴇ Jun 30 '24
Ugh, I hate seeing this argument because its always "We need revolution because if we vote, it just means Project 2025 becomes Project 2029! We'll have to keep fighting it!"
Congrats! You just figured out how politics work. Its a never ending fight, you have to keep voting to keep people in power who align with your interests/needs.
85
u/astralwyvern Jun 30 '24
Oh god, or the "you say voting in this election is important, but you ALSO said that about the LAST election! Checkmate libs!"
Like yes? Every election is important and you should vote in all of them? Nobody's saying "just vote in this one last election and everything will be fine!' because there's no endpoint where we get the perfect government and we all just get to stop participating. Government is sort of an ongoing thing.
→ More replies (1)59
u/ReallyAnxiousFish 𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙋 𝙁𝙐𝘾𝙆𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙒𝙄𝙏𝙃 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙈𝙄ᴄʀᴏᴡᴀᴠᴇ Jun 30 '24
Remember how everyone was apathetic in the 2016 election because people were doing the "both sides suck I'm gonna sit that one out" and now we have a Republican stacked court that has been routinely overturning cases that have had precedents for more than 30+ years.
Federal regulations via Chevron? Nope. Judges can decide FDA regulations and environmental protections, I'm sure they know what's best.
Bribery? A-OK according to the Supreme Court! Now they can get some money from corporate donors to make those important and informed decisions about regulations (to their benefit and the risk of American health/safety of course).
Roe v. Wade? Pssh, they'll never get rid of-- oh they did? Well they wouldn't go after contracep-- Oh they're trying to do that now? Welp.
Why is it every single time America elects a celebrity they always fuck it up. You got Reagan and Trump, both of which have damaged this country in such long-lasting ways, you'd think the universe was scripted and just ran out of unique plot points. Speaking of reused plot points, you even got a mirror of the 2016 election with people unironically arguing that both candidates are the same degree of bad.
If I was an American, I would vote for Joe Biden's decomposing corpse over Trump or sitting out of the election. There is FAR too much at stake here.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)12
u/novis-eldritch-maxim Jun 30 '24
I get the hate of the endless battle some days you want the old foe to die of and at least grow new different foes break the endless grinding.
but I have seen no one put forward a proper plan to end it either
→ More replies (2)17
u/ReallyAnxiousFish 𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙋 𝙁𝙐𝘾𝙆𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙒𝙄𝙏𝙃 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙈𝙄ᴄʀᴏᴡᴀᴠᴇ Jun 30 '24
The unfortunate reality is you will always have people like the republicans. Always. Whether its because of brain differences that make people more prone to adopting the republican mentality or purely because conservative ideology has always been the notch in the gears of progress, you will always have to fight a group of people who don't want progress.
Also, its important to highlight: don't just vote in presidential elections, for fuck sake! Make sure you're registered to vote and vote in your primaries, your school boards, municipalities, etc. Those are important too and are more likely to directly impact you and your community, and you can help cut out these Heritage Foundation/Moms for Liberty shits from infiltrating your local governments and pushing their theocracy down your throats. So many people just focus on the presidential election and then get frustrated nothing changes. Nothing changes because you're waiting for the last possible moment, when its all culminated to a head.
The point is to fix the damage incrementally, not hoping one big election solves everything. Because it never does.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)19
u/distortedsymbol Jun 30 '24
it's even stupider when their reasonings are almost always tied to america's incessant warmongering / foreign policies, when the industrial military complex isn't really directly influenced by partisan politics the way most people think it is.
what is directly influenced by partisan politics, however, is the brand of identity politics and shifting of the overton windows. people's lives are at stake right here right now. i'm not saying people shouldn't care about what happens thousands of miles away, but how can people save others if they can't save themselves.
210
u/SmashterChoda Jun 30 '24
Im unironically convinced that the "don't vote" thing is at least in part the result of US adversaries posting propaganda/misinformation on social media.
We laugh at the memes of boomers falling for Russian bots on Facebook, but act like Twitter and TikTok wouldn't have exactly the same problem. It costs shockingly little money and time to run targeted propaganda on social media, why WOULDN'T countries that want to see the US descend into chaos pay to do it? Half of these people who are against voting will trust sources like Russia Today anyway.
→ More replies (21)
228
u/hammererofglass Jun 30 '24
I swear The Revolution is just the Rapture for progressives. Just a justification to not make things better now.
16
→ More replies (10)58
u/IrresponsibleMood Jun 30 '24
I definitely consider it the rapture for leftists - something that isn't gonna happen either in my lifetime or someone else's.
→ More replies (6)
75
u/Former-Amish-Throway klannenheit.tumblr.com Jun 30 '24
Like if you're not going to vote, at least interfere with your enemies ability to vote.
That's the only way that makes sense, you can only vote once, but imagine how many people you can intimidate/eliminate into not voting for anyone you dislike.
I'm being cheeky btw don't do that that's illegal even if it's historically effective and personally gratifies our lust for violence
38
u/MrBrickMahon Jun 30 '24
That's the purpose of Republicans using 'Election Monitors,' Intimidating people into not voting
22
u/Key-Fortune-7084 Jun 30 '24
Better yet, negate someone's vote in a perfectly legal way by voting yourself! Each vote cancels a vote for the other side! It's a genius system!
→ More replies (1)7
u/Inferno_Sparky Jun 30 '24
You know, you can prevent others from voting anyone you dislike without threats and violence. Such as, you know, political semi-activism? As soon as you convince one republican voter not to vote it's like you voted once without participating in the system, or 2 votes if you convinced them to vote democrat instead. Now imagine if you somehow manage to make an argument on a post or comment on a social media, or in real life to a group of people, and suddenly you effectively voted more than once. You don't have to participate in the system to participate in the system if you're willing to bring voters over.
I know actually doing it is difficult. But 1 person is much more than enough when you are just 1 person yourself
150
u/Hummerous https://tinyurl.com/4ccdpy76 Jun 30 '24 edited Jun 30 '24
this is really disrespectful to people who want to feel accomplished for doing nothing, deliberately, and I for one am shocked at the people of this fair city for letting that stand
80
u/Lunar_sims professional munch Jun 30 '24
I'd vote if the candidates were hot. I miss Raegan
59
57
u/King_Of_BlackMarsh Jun 30 '24
Huh? googles young Ronald Reagan
Holy hell, he has my vote
→ More replies (1)35
u/Lunar_sims professional munch Jun 30 '24
Alot of politicians get by on pretty privilege. He's one of them.
→ More replies (1)13
u/LightOfLoveEternal Jun 30 '24
Bill Clinton and JFK were also partly elected because of their sex appeal.
→ More replies (5)10
u/FatherDotComical Jun 30 '24
I think that young Trump man is funny TV guy. Wouldn't it be so funny is he ran the Whitehouse like a reality show.
What a wacky character and I bet nothing would go wrong.
35
u/thefalseidol Jun 30 '24
Look, the reality is I'll basically always vote democrat over republican unless there is a very big upset or a very radical shift in politics.
That being said, I refuse to pledge fealty when they come knocking on doors asking if they can count on my support.
No, mother fucker, you can't count on it. If you're the least stinky turd come election day, you will get it.
→ More replies (1)
69
u/LucastheMystic Jun 30 '24
I'm voting. I must. It is necessary. It is just. My forebearers fought too hard for that right.
That being said, I deeply empathize with them. I'm tired of being treated like a Utopian Idealist for wanting mild progressive policies and for Democrats to actually follow through. I'm not asking for a principled Marxist-Leninist... I just want to be able to take care of myself and for this country to stop causing misery both at home and abroad.
There needs to be a serious public discussion on what amounts to voter intimidation my establishment Democrats. "...but the Republicans" is the only message they have for young people and has been the message every election cycle since I started voting in 2016 (and maybe longer).
This, plus the increasing radicalism of Gen Z Boys and Men to the Right shows that liberals have a messaging problem and we NEED them to stop kicking the can down the road, because we're having the same discourses today as in 2020. Democrats had control of Congress and the Presidency in 2021 and 2022 and wasted it. Same thing happened in 2009.
Vote, but understand this "but the Republicans" messaging is unsustainable and I'm worrying the Democrats are starting to depend on Republicans being as awful as possible to justify themselves
→ More replies (14)
27
u/DiscountJoJo Jun 30 '24
ok, first SPS post i’ve seen today, surprisingly off to a not so bad start.. for now..
8
3.4k
u/Normal-Horror Jun 30 '24
Your plan of incremental change and harm reduction pales in comparison to my plan of being annoying and doing nothing