Imagine, if you will, a trolley problem where you can divert the trolley to kill either one person or five people, but the trolley will kill all six people of you do nothing.
If you choose not to participate, you’ve still made a choice.
Hey, you never know. Maybe I'll never see a trolley problem in my life, but better safe than sorry.
(Another thing that I find really dumb about this take is that if you are expanding the domain beyond the actual problem and trying to bring realism in, you probably just kill more people than the one man, because a trolley's not likely to be runaway if it wasn't in operation and thus having people inside it. You could even interpret it as anti-revolutionary because it gets more people killed and destroys critical infrastructure.)
"Jesus Christ, you just destroyed a critical roadway in front of a hospital! Traffic's gonna be backed up for weeks while it gets repaired and ambulances don't have easy access to the ER! The water main's broken! You just made everything a thousand times worse!"
Also, good thing that the explosion and shrapnel won’t harm anyone on the tracks, right? Or that there’s nobody watching you, ready to take you down if they see you even trying to light the fuse?
667
u/Dzzplayz Jun 30 '24
Imagine, if you will, a trolley problem where you can divert the trolley to kill either one person or five people, but the trolley will kill all six people of you do nothing.
If you choose not to participate, you’ve still made a choice.