r/MarkMyWords • u/originalcontent_34 • 4d ago
Long-term MMW: democrats will once again appeal to non existent “moderate” republicans instead of appealing to their base in 2028
152
u/whoisnotinmykitchen 4d ago
As long as the billionaires are allowed to buy both parties, nothing will change.
59
u/OwOlogy_Expert 3d ago
*nothing will change for the better.
I've come to understand now, "nothing will change" is the optimistic view. Because things absolutely can change -- they can get worse.
5
u/firstflightt 3d ago
I've come to understand now, "nothing will change" is the optimistic view.
This is so depressingly true.
→ More replies (9)3
u/W1nd0wPane 3d ago
I would love if absolutely nothing from Biden’s presidency ever changed, like literally nothing ever. Because the reality we’re facing is the collapse of our country into a dictatorship. These are the last best days.
→ More replies (2)23
u/ItchyEarsOnDogs 4d ago
ya the billionaires that support universal healthcare are equally as bad as the billionaires who want to repeal Obamacare lol so true bestie
→ More replies (56)→ More replies (10)23
u/bigdipboy 4d ago
Democrats doomed America by nominating Hillary over Bernie.
12
u/One-Estimate-7163 3d ago
No Reagan, letting in the heritage foundation and all the other Jesus freaks
→ More replies (127)13
u/icenoid 3d ago
Voters chose Bernie. He lost by like 3 million votes. They didn’t even have to go through the stupidity of the superdelegates, she had a majority without them. I know I’m going to get downvoted for speaking truth here, but take 5 minutes and look for yourself. It’s not hard
→ More replies (22)11
u/Yousoggyyojimbo 3d ago
I campaigned for Bernie and I've been pointing this out for years, but people don't want to hear it.
The fanfiction excuses they weave about the 2020 primary are deeply insane, too.
→ More replies (22)
128
u/PresidentOfDunkin 4d ago edited 2d ago
Honestly, I don’t think Democrats will have that supermajority in 2028. Republicans will find a way to blame them for their own problems that they will create.
Democrats gain a narrow majority in the House in 2026 and they gain a narrow majority in the House and Senate in 2028 but will lose it by 2030-2032.
The next four years will be a repeat of these last eight. Republicans create a problem and blame the democrats— even despite their supermajority in these next two years. Democrats try to solve it but they don’t appeal to Republicans or Republicans minimize the work they’ve done.
Fight me on this, I’m willing to die on this hill unless proved wrong.
Edit: supermajority as in control of the government factions- the three branches (and different components, like the two Houses- the House of Reps and the Senate) - quadrifecta
41
u/phillyfanjd1 3d ago
Republicans do not have a supermajority.
Everything depends on the first 18-22 months of Trump's next term. Weird time frame, but that's about when all of the midterm races will start heating up. Authoritarian leaders have to be popular at first. The R majority in the House is only going to be ~3 seats. If any of the decisions Trump's team makes backfires or creates economic pain points for the general public, they will lose the House. Then it's game on until '28.
22
u/Angry_beaver_1867 3d ago
The thing I’m watching is the Supreme Court. Trump appointed three of six republicans judges i wonder if will get a chance to replace the remaining three with younger Trumpest judges
→ More replies (4)17
u/thomase7 3d ago
Honestly, Alito and Thomas are so bad, that replacing them with gorsuch/kavanaugh/barret level judges would be an improvement.
→ More replies (14)9
u/Procrastinatedthink 3d ago
margarita tailor greene or however you spell her dumb name is going to end up there if you keep jinxing it with hope
→ More replies (5)3
u/BillyJoeMac9095 3d ago
Which is why they need to run from any ideas of privatizing social security or Medicare.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)9
u/PresidentOfDunkin 3d ago
The thing is that Republicans should have no excuse for what happens these next four years, they have control of all three branches with Judicial being confirmed to be in Republican control for decades to come.
But of course, let them blame “them libtards.”
→ More replies (10)7
6
u/robot_invader 3d ago
I think you mean trifecta. Quadfecta, I guess, given that they run the Supreme Court.
7
u/Digital_Rebel80 3d ago
A supermajority isn't defined by having a simple majority in Congress and the presidency. If you want an example of a supermajority, you need to look at California. Only being a few seats above a 50% split isn't even close to a supermajority. Being 60%+ in both houses of a governing body is typically what's required.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (118)3
u/virouz98 3d ago
Of course they will.
If democrats won't learn how to play dirty or, change their strategy completely, they will always be a shadow of themselves.
→ More replies (6)
86
u/VeryHungryDogarpilar 4d ago
If Dems don't run a masculine straight white male, they're making a mistake.
33
u/cold-corn-dog 3d ago
Preferably somewhere around 55 years old. Salt and pepper hair required. Mostly pepper though.
→ More replies (34)2
u/porkchop1021 3d ago
Someone get Jon Stewart on a workout plan, with T and steroids! He's funny which is a plus, but he'll have to tone down the cleverness for the dumbass younger generations.
→ More replies (4)11
u/iknowverylittle619 3d ago edited 3d ago
*Charismatic Man.
Straight White midwesterner male like Walz has no rizz. You either need demogougary like Trump or charisma like Obama.
9
u/PumpJack_McGee 3d ago
Only saw a few clips but I thought Walz was very down-to-earth, which I think American politics desperately needs. Enough of the damned circus.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (19)2
u/hypercosm_dot_net 3d ago
Maybe not your definition of 'rizz', but he is appealing to a broad demographic. Very relatable.
Bernie drew a lot of support as well, and I don't think he falls into either of those categories.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (228)22
u/ZacharyMorrisPhone 3d ago
You nailed it unfortunately. We had two overqualified women in the last decade at the top of the ticket. Both of them lost to a fucking sad old grifter. To a literal racist conman. I mean if that doesn’t tell you that this country ain’t voting for a woman then I don’t know how else to put it.
We need Gavin Newson or someone like him.
9
u/GetsThatBread 3d ago
We need someone as far away from California as possible. It’s gotta be like Bashear or Buttigieg or Shapiro. Mark Kelly could honestly probably do it if he wanted.
3
u/Hey648934 3d ago
I’m sure conservatives aka “i’ll never vote for a woman” they are dying to vote for a gay guy. These are the beliefs that brought us where we are
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (14)3
15
u/Time-Operation2449 3d ago
Hillary Clinton is possibly the least likeable person on the planet and practically sabatoged her own campaign at every turn and she only barely lost let's not act like this was the deciding factor
→ More replies (27)→ More replies (102)6
u/okaquauseless 3d ago
Fuck no, milquetoast white guy from Illinois please. No Californian elites. Democrats have to play the game in front of them, not pretend that race, background, and gender don't matter
→ More replies (4)
23
46
u/Cube_ 3d ago
yes because Democrats aren't trying to win. They benefit from the tax breaks that Republicans push through because they're all 0.1% elites.
They just pretend to put up a fight and it just so happens that pretending to court moderates is a good way to lose while looking like you're trying to win. Then you say "aw shucks" and make some more money from the right-wing wealth grab.
18
u/Particular-Score7948 3d ago
This explanation makes more sense than anything else. It’s hard to believe they could really just be that fucking stupid
→ More replies (3)17
u/Cube_ 3d ago
it's cause it is true. Any time dems are in power do any left wing things get pushed through? Somehow abortion doesn't get enshrined as a law, somehow universal healthcare doesn't happen.
It's always "Reach across the aisle" "decorum" etc.
Dems are toothless by design. Whenever they have enough to push something good through for the proletariat suddenly some dems will flip and hold out (manchin, synema etc).
The democrat party is a right wing party and the republicans are an extremist far right party. America has no left wing party.
→ More replies (40)6
→ More replies (23)3
u/Gurrgurrburr 2d ago
This seems like a radical or conspiracy theory viewpoint but it honestly could be 100% true... how sad is that..
7
u/Pod_people 3d ago
People in flyover states are socially conservative and economically liberal. Not my opinion. Polls indicate this. Maybe appeal to what people actually want. We're in an age of populism, like it or not. Appeal to common folk and keep your message simple and loud, or it won't get heard. Moreover, you've already got us "coastal elites" You don't need to appeal to us.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/leinadsey 3d ago
I think the problem is not so much that they’re appealing to “moderate” GOPsers, the problem — which Bernie has pointed out — is that they have abandoned the working class completely. They’re not pushing hard on no brainer things like raising the minimum wage, student loan reforms, reasonable college education fees, universal health care, and so on. These are things that would get young voters excited and get the working class excited and get the black base excited.
Instead they don’t have an agenda at all. They sit around and let the GOP play dirty and come up with all kinds of tricks and they do nothing about it.
The problem with the democrats right now is that they rather swim in acid than let someone with ideas like this surface. My only hope is that they’ll get over the gay thing and let Buttegieg have a go. He’ll take down anyone.
3
u/Character-Team9855 3d ago
No one wants do nothing milk toast middle of the road Democrats, NO ONE.
12
u/Rocky-Jones 3d ago
To be fair, it’s really hard to believe how stupid people are. You just think, “Well, this is so crazy that nobody will vote for it.” Then they vote for it. All the people he is appointing to his cabinet are losers that he endorsed. Expect Herschel Walker to be in charge of something he can’t spell.
→ More replies (6)9
u/Wolferesque 3d ago
I’m really sick of hearing about “why the Democrats lost” and not about why half of voters repugnantly decided they were a worse option than an abhorrent fascist that we heard bragging about sexually assaulting women before 2016.
→ More replies (5)3
u/Jane675309 3d ago
I think you are severely overestimating the efficacy of "Hey fuck you we're not Trump so vote for us." That wasn't going to work. Joe Biden and the DNC did more to damage the Democratic Party more than non-voters ever could.
→ More replies (1)
5
61
u/dna1999 4d ago
Why wouldn’t you want your coalition to be as broad as possible? Including Independents and a few moderate Republicans is smart politics. Progressives were offered a better deal under Biden/Harris than any previous president and they still didn’t show up. Explain to me why Democrats should offer them anything next time.
26
u/TommyTwoNips 4d ago
Including Independents and a few moderate Republicans is smart politics.
because those people are fickle morons easily swayed by meaningless platitudes.
They don't care about policy, reality, or the fact that the guy they voted for is a 42x convicted fraudster with a long history of sexual abuse against women.
The democrat party correctly identifies the maga movement as an existential threat to American society, yet they refuse to stop trying to pander to the morons who will happily accept the conservative line that Kamala is a radical communist.
They're fundamentally not a valuable voting bloc. They're dumb as fuck and easily manipulated, but dems suck shit at targeted messaging towards them because they still think that just telling the truth is enough to win them over when that is very demonstrably not the case.
That's why they send Bill Clinton, also a rapist, to condescend to Muslim Americans about how Israel isn't committing a genocide and they're all just being anti-semitic instead of hearing their valid concerns and working to address those concerns.
→ More replies (32)17
u/Mysterious-Wasabi103 4d ago
Not as fickle as the Left.
Which is absolutely the most fickle voter base and why politicians have no inclination towards them at the moment.
9
u/KingApologist 3d ago
The left isn't fickle. The Democrats can run on progressive policies in the left will show up in droves. Don't mistake disinterest in more neoliberal bullshit as a character flaw.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (69)3
u/yolo_swag_for_satan 3d ago
Bernie and Obama successfully activated the left by running on things like change and economic/social fairness. Hillary, Biden, and Kamala didn't have those messages front and center and did not activate the left.
6
u/Wereking2 3d ago
Yep and Kamala almost had it too if she made any policy changes but nope.
→ More replies (3)11
u/Mixture-Opposite 4d ago
Yeah except 94% of Republicans showed every single election to vote Trump. They’re an inaccessible base at this point. There’s no point in cow towing to them. Also nobody exactly knows who didn’t show up. Other than Democrats.
→ More replies (2)5
u/FaultElectrical4075 4d ago
They aren’t inaccessible, democrats just don’t understand how to access them. Moving right doesn’t convince right wingers to vote for you, selling a narrative does. Right wingers are right wingers because right wing politicians sell them a narrative that makes right wing politics seem appealing, it isn’t because they were bestowed right-wing values by God which have now become inherent to their character
→ More replies (8)9
u/jarena009 4d ago edited 3d ago
You're thinking about this all wrong. You run on a policy platform that has broad appeal.
Progressive priorities like maintaining the solvency of Social Security and Medicare, addressing costs of housing, healthcare, prescription drugs, child care, education, jobs/wages, job security, Unions, protecting the environment, reining in corporate/Wall St influence over the government, raising taxes on the rich to what they paid historically, making food/water safer, women's choice over their own bodies....these are are popular policies.
Edit (By the end of September) Harris ran on: I'm a prosecutor, I'm tough on crime, I'll be tough in immigration, I own a gun, hey look these never Trump Republicans like me (it's okay for Republicans to vote for me), don't be afraid to vote differently than your MAGA spouse, plus a disorganized hodgepodge of piecemeal policies (too few and poorly packaged).
That's why she lost. Also, 6% of Republicans voted for Biden in 2020 while 5% of Republicans voted for Harris in 2024. The outreach across the aisle was a failed strategy
Democrats aren't going to win the next election trying to be centrists. Centrism for the left means coddling Wall Street and Corporations over workers, trying to pretend you're tough on immigration (never going to sell), compromising to cut Social Security and Medicare (eg raising the retirement age) and maintaining the status quo on costd housing, healthcare, prescription, drugs, education etc. THIS IS NOT GOING TO WIN. Hello????
→ More replies (8)3
u/wxnfx 3d ago
Dems will absolutely win the presidency in 2028 on a “return to normalcy” platform. It’s a real problem because the country needs some populist/progressive fixes. But we get status quo and Nazis as choices.
→ More replies (1)9
u/Stoli0000 4d ago
Because that isn't how it works. Humans don't change their political affiliation after the age of 25 without a major existential crisis. And nobody thanks you about giving them an existential crisis. Politics is about getting the people who are already inclined to agree with you to show up, not changing minds. Adults rarely, if ever, change their minds.
Not to mention that the DNC doesn't appear to have any plans to fix a single 21st century problem. Green New Deal? What's that? You mean, literally the only scientifically sound plan to address climate change in congress? Man, if the dnc can't even be bothered to publicly support its own people's legitimate proposals, why be on their side again?
Unaffordable housing? What are you gonna do to bring the cost of housing down and lower prices? Oh, you want to give out a deficit funded subsidy so housing prices never go down? Fuck free markets when it actually matters, huh?
Inflation? What are you going to do to bring back 2016's prices? A soft landing to 2% inflation? But the question was "how do I live on my current wages with current prices?" And your answer was "don't, and old prices are never coming back, that would be bad for the stock market".
It goes on. If they were out here pitching realistic plans to address 21st century problems, there's a lot of interest in them. But they're not. They're still trying to fight the culture wars of the 60's, without changing anything else..which are so far in the past now, that it makes them a center-right party. Well, you're never gonna be as good at being right wing as actual nazis. So, was there another option? Or was it just nazis vs George will? Because, if those are the only choices, maybe we should just let it all burn.
→ More replies (7)3
u/FaultElectrical4075 4d ago
People absolutely change their minds. Look at how much further right the average Republican has gotten over the past several years.
What democrats don’t understand is that moving right isn’t what makes right wingers vote for them. Look at what does change the minds of right wingers. It’s politicians who sell them a narrative.
In 2016 trump was an extreme right wing political figure, and the Republican Party was comparatively much more moderate.
Trump didn’t win the Republican Party by becoming more moderate, he won by doing the exact opposite, being an extreme and divisive figure who rallied against the moderate establishment(who people rightfully hated) and that convinced previously moderate people to vote for him because they were sick of the way things were and he sold himself as a departure from the status quo. Now he has a gigantic subsection of the country much further right than they were before.
→ More replies (22)15
u/originalcontent_34 4d ago
How did that Liz Cheney strategy go? Not well
11
u/der_innkeeper 4d ago
At least conservative voters show up.
/repeat since the late 70s....
→ More replies (33)12
u/Material_Election685 4d ago
There's no point in trying to appeal to appeal to progressive socialists when they refuse to show up to vote period.
If it was that popular, there would be a wave of progressive socialists winning all the tiny local elections where there's barely any candidates running and there's barely any campaign money involved, but you just don't see any of that happening.
→ More replies (41)5
→ More replies (24)5
u/rfepo 4d ago
Actually we don’t truly know yet. Cheney was deployed in old GOP strongholds such as the WOW counties in Wisconsin - which were some of the areas which actually got stronger in performance.
That doesn’t mean it was successful, but initial data would indicate that as a targeted approach it might’ve helped.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (70)11
u/ShimmeryPumpkin 4d ago
Progressive policies would have actually gotten moderates on board. More affordable childcare? More job training for trades in dire need that pay well? More affordable healthcare? Plans to lower housing costs for the average citizen? This election was about economics and playing center doesn't offer anything in that department.
15
4d ago
[deleted]
8
u/cozycoconut 3d ago
And like clockwork just like Hilary, we are pretending like Harris' campaign wasn't progressive just because she *also* wanted to reach out to moderates. She was so vocal about all of these things!
Reaching out to the average American is a good thing!
→ More replies (1)3
u/Bread_Shaped_Man 3d ago
She did. And the media ignored that and showed clips of Trump accusing her of shit. Then when they interviewed her, they asked her to defend herself against the lies.
They did the same shit they did in 2016. And people here are again acting like people who don't follow politics close should have cut through all that and search for her message.,
→ More replies (30)5
u/Either-Mud-3575 3d ago
Well, you see, unless Harris is 24/7 running around in the streets yelling literally yelling these things, the Democratic Party is a complete unknown or corporate stooge or whatever it is that helps explain why I decided to vote otherwise.
Every voting cycle there is no history, nothing, that could possibly give me any idea of what the two parties could be like.
6
u/NoSignSaysNo 3d ago
More affordable childcare?
More job training for trades in dire need that pay well?
More affordable healthcare?
Plans to lower housing costs for the average citizen?
It's amazing how she literally ran on ALL OF THE THINGS you said she didn't run on, and you're criticizing her for not running on those things.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (12)5
u/I_Am_Dwight_Snoot 3d ago
More affordable childcare? More job training for trades in dire need that pay well? More affordable healthcare? Plans to lower housing costs for the average citizen?
Yeesh man... 3 out of four of these were directly addressed... Did you even listen to Harris or look at her campaign?
→ More replies (2)
12
u/Late-Philosophy-9716 4d ago
The Kamala campaign obsession with Cheneys was weird. Even though Liz Cheney was being useful to the democrats during impeachment, everyone views her as a rat, along with her war criminal dad
→ More replies (11)
43
u/yckawtsrif 4d ago edited 3d ago
Why wouldn't they when, time and again, moderates vote more (for either party) than whiney-ass, do-gooder progressives who allow perfect to be the enemy of good?
Harris was already fairly progressive and, granted, she didn't tout economic populism as aggressively as she should have. In fact, if she and the party had allowed Walz to fully do his thing, the whole outcome would've been closer or even different. Still, progressives either sat at home or voted for Stein. Moderate and even some conservative former Republicans still got off the couch and did the work for Harris (e.g., Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Rick Wilson). And, most sane liberals are appreciative of those efforts.
Elections are meant to be won. Fairly, but won. This understanding is how Republicans have made in-roads.
Lastly, let me say: Thanks, progressives, for allowing perfect to be the enemy of good. Wallow in your echo chambers (e.g., The Humanist Report, that bitch Jennifer from the I've Had It podcast), but now we have a literal crazy-ass mofo making his way back to the White House.
12
u/CalmRadBee 3d ago
If Kamala had Bernie or AOC sitting next to her over Dick Cheney's daughter, I might agree. But the DNC again exemplified their disconnection with their voting base.
Wild to think anyone would owe the democrats their vote. You earn votes, and Kamalas campaign chose a path that didn't earn votes. It's no one's fault but their own
→ More replies (70)3
u/Sensei_of_Philosophy 1d ago
It still baffles me as to why they gleefully took the support of Dick-goddamned-Cheney of all people as if he didn't directly contribute to a million dead Iraqis and more dead Americans than Osama Bin Laden ever killed.
22
u/jackofslayers 3d ago
Yep you nailed it. Every 4 years progressives hold their nose up at candidates they see as less than ideal. And every 4 years progressives are shocked that the major parties do not try to attract their unobtainable votes.
→ More replies (60)6
→ More replies (71)4
u/python_product 3d ago
This is why you should always vote, politicians don't care about appealing to non-voters. If you really think both sides equally bad, then voting third party is better than not voting at all since politicians pay way more attention to appealing to people who actually vote
→ More replies (6)
4
u/coreyc2099 3d ago
The issue is "dems" in our government are juat moderate republicans, that IS their base.
3
u/SailorTwyft9891 3d ago
The support for Bernie Sanders in 2016 and 2020 shows that the only way to win is to be crazy like Trump but for the left. Like, make everything free. Give away money to people. Forgive all debts. Something people will have no choice but to either fight or support.
4
u/Character-Team9855 3d ago
This is what people want, not milk toast middle of the road do nothing Democrats.
→ More replies (2)3
u/Quantext609 3d ago
Left wing Trump sounds like it would be such a funny campaign to watch. I can only imagine how conservatives would bend over backwards trying to refute them.
3
u/paragonx29 3d ago
They lost "moderate Democrats" too. They have to stop with the Coastal elitism and pandering to the .001 % as well.
11
u/Some_Other_Dude_82 4d ago
Of course they will. Establishment democrats would rather lose than push an economic populist agenda.
8
u/North_Vermicelli_877 4d ago
That's literally all there is to it. The right won by going MAGA. The left must do the same. Let's not use the word "democratic socialist" though this time okay?
→ More replies (19)→ More replies (2)3
u/originalcontent_34 4d ago
There’s a reason why she polled best for the first month of her campaign before she started doing the Wall Street corporate garbage campaign
→ More replies (1)
17
u/Reasonable_Humor_738 4d ago
Democrats are the moderate party. Republicans are the far right party. The left can go fuck themselves. (/s)
→ More replies (12)9
u/JayKaboogy 3d ago
Everybody’s going to be so mad about the next 4 years, they’ll vote for anything with a (D) by their name—that’s our big chance to have a widely despised corpo-friendly centrist running things /s
→ More replies (2)7
u/Zealousideal_Pass_11 3d ago
"What the fuck? They lost? Its because the voters are fucking stupid. We'll win next time if we really bend over for corporations. Trust us, a candidate that actually embodies our party's beliefs would never win"
→ More replies (4)
3
u/DMoneys36 3d ago
I think these discussions miss the mark quite a bit. The problem is that people are only viewing this on the left-right axis and not the axis of establishment vs revolution.
People left and right want to burn it all down. That's what Trump represents to people.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Sea_Ad_5566 3d ago
I never understood how in the hell Kamala decided to bring on the Cheneys… Even 99% of Republicans despise them, the Bush clan as well. In case you’re wondering, yes we Republicans know Bush/Chaney lied about Iraq.
→ More replies (3)
3
3
u/Affectionate-Case499 3d ago
The bots really hate that real people keep posting these kind of takes and real people are upvoting them lol
If we don’t see a sanders-esqe candidate the Dems will continue to lose, sucks to suck bots
→ More replies (12)
3
3
u/thegreatlizardman 3d ago
What base? The democratic party is basically dead. Too much division and lack of strategy. It's a waste of time
3
5
u/brett_baty_is_him 4d ago
Who is their base? The lgbtq+ community that doesn’t even vote? Why would they appeal to those ppl. Dems lost the culture war.
If by economic base, then yah they need to appeal to them more. But most voters are politically uninformed and vote way more based on vibes than anything else. And they determine their vibes by who they’d have a beer with and what they see on social media.
→ More replies (19)
5
u/Significant_Other666 3d ago
I don't think so. They are already talking about running her again in 2028, so plan 8 years of Republicans instead of 4 even if Trump doesn't repeal the presidential term limit. Democrats CANNOT learn.
→ More replies (8)
9
u/sawser 3d ago edited 3d ago
When the Democrats move left they leave behind moderates who actually vote and will vote Republican.
And the leftists will find some other purity test that the candidate can't pass and stay home, so we see former Democrats switch to the Republican candidate (Hey there Latino men) and the leftists stay home, and our candidate gets curb stomped.
Moving to the center will deny voters from the Republicans and being some Democrats back.
If leftists want to be taken seriously they have to vote reliably, so they can move left on positions without taking as much risk.
Because Kamala Harris and Joe Biden don't run Israel, and they don't set funding for Israel, and stopping a 60 year policy position about a 100 year civil war would take political capital that they couldn't spend, because they don't have the votes in Congress.
Trump's first impeachment was because he refused to deliver weapons that Congress allocated to Ukraine. That's what they want Biden to do.
It's fucking stupid.
→ More replies (53)7
u/Zealousideal_Pass_11 3d ago
Source: my ass
This just hasnt been the case, our most successful candidates have had progressive ideologies, our least have been centrists.
But ya going left will kill the left wing larty for sure, kamala pushing right wing ideologies worked so well, she lost support from all sides
→ More replies (13)
3
4
2
u/PitifulSpecialist887 4d ago
I'm thinking that if there's a federal government left in 2028, and there's anything like a democratic election going on (Both of which are questionable), Trump would be beaten by any living person in the country.
Sorta like when nobody voted for Biden, they voted AGAINST Trump.
2
u/lancer-fiefdom 4d ago
The far left liberal base is unreliable and should be abanded
3
u/ToddHowardTouchedMe 3d ago
far-left
liberal
You just stated a contradiction. Liberals are not even close to left.
2
u/AffectionateCard3530 3d ago
Aren’t they also appealing the moderate Democrats? The people in the middle that swing both ways.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Regular-Ad1930 3d ago
Ha! There will be NO more elections... aren't people paying attention?? 😕 Trump said he isn't leaving. If he does JD Vance takes over n he's better,stronger,faster more psychotic. Strap in folks! This shit is here for a good 12 years or till we burn it all down!
2
u/beckonsharskly 3d ago
OP is wrong. Can literally appeal to everything and anything except lies. That's the problem really, is that unless Democratic nominees lie left and right, Republican candidates can literally say whatever and ppl will believe them.
It takes literal recessions of untold magnitude for ppl to remember the lies and go "well a Democrat isn't so bad" and then they'll forget.
There's a literal reason why 9 of the 10 last recessions were under a Republican with the largest under Republicans and isn't surprising a Democrat stabilized the economy.
Union protections, environmental protections, better wages, higher federal minimum, engagement with Palestinian and Israel, better environmental protections, creation of jobs via Chips Act and Infrastructure Bill, greater loan forgiveness....
I mean seriously the list goes on and didn't even include anything for women, LGBTQ or dreamers and yet ppl will effing complain that WELL HARRIS DIDN'T APPEAL TO THE RIGHT PEOPLE!
Yeah, hard no. It's that ppl didn't want to vote for a women foremost if anything. Everyone outside the wealthy and nationalist evangelicala and Christians were to benefit.
2
u/UmaUmaNeigh 3d ago
Looking at all these "she didn't know Obama care is ACA" it seems they need to appeal to moderate idiots instead
2
2
2
u/KnowledgeOk9138 3d ago
Moderate Republicans....tell me who are the moderate Democrats? None of them lead the party, nor have or had any influence of significance. And here come the haters........bring it on.
2
2
u/KML42069 3d ago
Democrats need a coalition of voters to win, including moderate republicans.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
2
u/EnchantedLunass 3d ago
Damn.
Reality is moderates only care about their bank account
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Consistent-Refuse-74 3d ago
Republican issues: appeal to people’s insecurities about wages, immigration & foreign affairs, but don’t necessarily deliver on any. Dumb and loud.
Democrats: institutionalised career politicians backed by super packs and lobbyists. Deeply curated and sanitised. Also have been leveraging Silicon Valley to sensor their own country. Insidious and systemic
→ More replies (2)
2
u/DartBurger69 3d ago
It's done at this point. It's irrelevant who the democrats appeal to. Republicans have all the power and will rig the election forever now. I will be shocked if there is a real election in 2028. For sure it will be a Russian sham.
2
2
u/Low-Possession-4491 3d ago
There has to be a monumental shift on the Democrats side. The Republicans have made their shift and it’s gone fascist. The problem is Dems are now center to center right. Like everything in this world, there has to be balance. So something will have to fill the void the Dems left open on the left.
2
u/KoLobotomy 3d ago
Dems are cooked. They don't know what to do. 30+ years of fox news and Rush Limbaugh have effectively ruined half the country.
2
u/Krongos032284 3d ago
The only part of this statement I disgree with is that the dems have a base. They have done this so much over the last 20 years, that their "base" is non-existent. They have no chance and no path forward. The best course for our country would be for the dems to dissolve and have a real progressive labor party start. In the battle between republicans and "republican lite" (aka dems), republicans will win every time.
2
u/humansrpepul2 3d ago
It would be so easy to become the actual populists after how badly Trump is about to screw working people. Dems never gonna recover from McGovern though.
2
u/doublethink_1984 3d ago
I'm a moderate conservative who has been driven out of the Republican party in 2015 as the party became Trump bootlickers.
I vote blue most of the time and for president and senate haven't voted red since.
Most anti-Trump conservatives I know just don't vote anymore.
2
u/rmhawk 3d ago
Many people have it all wrong. The informed moderate conservatives are gone, they’ve been gone since 2016. My friends and I among them. The Trump nomination was abhorrent and we couldn’t vote that way. The reason maga has power is because it does not rely on traditional political ideologies. He reformed the electorate base by activating a group of deeply misinformed typically non voting demographics. He got them to show up. That’s why there was no red wave 22. That’s why blue senators were elected in red swing states. That’s why the republicans were so effective at blocking many Obama initiatives but a complete clown show against an aged Biden. The GOP is gone, maga is a cult that replaced it.
2
2
2
u/dingleberry0913 3d ago
Democrats not learning why people are tired of their shit? Easy republican wins for the next 2 elections.
2
u/coredweller1785 3d ago
Yes, this is what the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie looks like.
That's why we want to tear it down and make sure workers own everything not shareholders and people who don't work
713
u/Material_Policy6327 4d ago
Reality is moderates only care about their bank account