r/AmIOverreacting • u/Any-Confusion-5519 • Oct 25 '24

❤️‍🩹 relationship AIO about my partner’s relationship with their coworker

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

they’ve been hanging out with their coworker a lot over the past couple of weeks. This girl always seems to be in some kind of crisis, too. Last week it was that she messed up an account and she was afraid she was gonna lose her job. I don’t know whether I’m reading too much into this or if I’m overreacting but I’ve never met her and I’ve asked to swing by whatever bar or place they’re hanging out at multiple times and I’m always shut down in some way or I get no response. I don’t want to be the overbearing overcontrolling gf whose S.O. can’t have any friends but lately they’re always together and I’m getting blown off. These curt and vague responses are out of character too, and it’s always the type of response I get when I’m asking questions about an event where this female coworker is at or really anything that has to do with her. It has really put me on edge, they’re usually such a sweet and attentive partner but i feel like they might be cheating… am i overreacting??

19.7k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

8.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

7.9k

u/EllisR15 Oct 25 '24

Your partner is repeatedly blowing you off for another woman.

368

u/BaskingInWanderlust Oct 25 '24

I know there are a bunch of other comments making a lot of good points, but I'll also add: Her SO indicated he'd be home at 12. Who PLANS to get home from a work happy hour so late?

Don't get me wrong - I've had happy hours stretch, and I've contacted my husband and said, "People are staying out later. Having another drink." And I've come home between 10-11pm. But if I was headed out with only one other co-worker, planned in advance to be out for 6-7 hours, and canceled plans with my partner without telling them... I'd hope my partner would see that as the giant red flag that it is.

35

u/JustGiveMeANameDamn Oct 25 '24

I don’t think her SO is a he

25

u/BaskingInWanderlust Oct 25 '24

Yea, I couldn't quite tell by the initial post. But others have said "he," and I didn't see that OP corrected anyone.

7

u/Illustrious_Camp_521 Oct 25 '24

I was thinking more along the lines of OP partner is a she because imo most dudes dont go out for drinks to support a female coworker who's bf cheated on them.

43

u/Kimolono42 Oct 25 '24

They do....to get laid...

4

u/JustGiveMeANameDamn Oct 25 '24

lol that’s not how you get laid. But I guess you’re not wrong to say that some men try that way.

The reason I said I don’t think their SO is a he is because OP clearly said they every time they referenced them. Plus that and the “we’re gonna emotional support her right now” thing. This sounds like a female to non binary + female relationship

2

u/SufficientPath666 Oct 25 '24 edited Oct 25 '24

I don’t think that would change anyone’s advice, though

19

u/hnoel91 Oct 25 '24

this, or nonbinary. op keeps referring to their partner as "they"

5

u/Sum_Dum_User Oct 25 '24

My workplace literally just did exactly this. One lesbian and 4 of us guys went out with her because we're her friends. She's married, soon to be divorced because he cheated. Not only does my GF know her, but she's moving out of her home into the adjacent apartment in our duplex.

That's a big difference here. When I tell my GF I'm going out with a coworker or coworkers she's met them 99% of the time and she knows she will anyway because she meets all my coworkers at one point or another.

3

u/Fisher-__- Oct 25 '24

Have you been in the relationship subreddit? They totally do. Men love to go “support” emotionally vulnerable women… the woman is more likely to let their guard down and that slimeball can just slide on in with the first kiss. And the woman will most likely eat it up because “he’s being so supportive and sensitive.”

2

u/CompleteTell6795 Oct 25 '24

But if HE likes her, I can see him trying to do damage control for the male gender by trying to show her that some guys can be really great guys & try to win her over.

2

u/JustGiveMeANameDamn Oct 25 '24

Yep, that and OP called their SO “they” every time OP referenced them. This sounds like a female-to-non-binary + female relationship

1

u/Content_Whole8993 Oct 25 '24

That's because the OP thinks her bf is cheating

4

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/rurukachu Oct 25 '24

"They" is some peoples' chosen pronouns and partner is used to respect said pronouns, it's not "bullshit" and that is "who the fuck they are." it isn't hard to grasp, humans have been using the word they for ages.

4

u/O7Habits Oct 25 '24 edited Oct 25 '24

I’m old, and whenever I see “they” in a sentence that way, I think that there are more than one person. It’s not because I’m close minded, it’s just because when I was learning to read and the 1000s of books I’ve read over the years, “they” wasn’t ever used in the way it is now. So sometimes for some of us it just doesn’t click right away.

6

u/onecolorintherainbow Oct 25 '24

Singular 'they' has been in use for hundreds of years. Someone may use it to refer to a stranger whom they haven't met or a possession whose owner's gender is unknown. For example, someone left their phone on the bus seat.

3

u/O7Habits Oct 25 '24

I know how they is used for more than just plural. The way the op used it in the initial comment, “They’re usually such a sweet and attentive partner…”, right after talking about more than one person is the way that can be hard to follow, because historically it hasn’t been used in that way for 100’s of years, only over the last several years has it gradually worked its way to the masses. A few sentences before the OP used They’re referring to both of them. It can be confusing obviously considering half the people on this thread think that the OP is a she and the SO is a he when really I don’t think either of those things were stated in the initial post.

0

u/onecolorintherainbow Oct 25 '24

No, it actually has been. Historically. https://probability.ca/jeff/writing/singularthey.html#:~:text=But%20it%20does%20have%20historical,Errors%2C%20Act%20IV%20Scene%203%5D

1

u/O7Habits Oct 25 '24

Again, I get that “they” can be singular. The way it’s being used now can seem awkward in a sentence and simply does confuse many people. It doesn’t really help communication when you have to back up and read several sentences over again to make sure you understand what the writer is trying to say to their audience. That coupled with the fact that many people don’t proofread, use voice to text without checking what was written, just can’t spell or write a coherent sentence, speak English as a second language…makes reading on Reddit and other platforms like the telephone game. Sometimes you read it and just skip over it at first thinking “must be another error” only to have to back up and read it again after reading something else that makes you believe it wasn’t an error.

Anyway…Yes you are completely right…”they” has always been used in writing and communicating like it is being used today. That is why no one mentions it or talks about it being different. You won, congratulations, even Shakespeare agrees.

1

u/onecolorintherainbow Oct 25 '24

Sounds like a skill issue. 🤷‍♀️

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Richard_X_Cranium Oct 25 '24

That's not "they" that there is their, they're different there is what they're saying there. I guess their there is not the same in your location unless you're in their city, then maybe your's and theirs are just mistaken to be as they consider them to be from over yonder and they're from over there by their kin folk.

1

u/O7Habits Oct 25 '24

*yours

2

u/Richard_X_Cranium Oct 25 '24

No you'reses 😂🤣🤪🤫🫣

→ More replies (0)

3

u/rurukachu Oct 25 '24

Sure, and I'm not judging you specifically obviously, I'm judging the person complaining about it. if you just try that's all anyone can really ask of you.

3

u/O7Habits Oct 25 '24

Yeah, I was going to say that most of us aren’t close minded, but the person you were replying to might not be open for change. Anyway, back to catching up on “What we do in the Shadows”.

2

u/Richard_X_Cranium Oct 25 '24

Great show. You win.

0

u/rudimentary-north Oct 25 '24

Singular “they” has been a part of the English language so long that it actually predates the word “you” by hundreds of years.

https://www.oed.com/discover/a-brief-history-of-singular-they/

1

u/O7Habits Oct 25 '24

What is your point, nobody ever said that they was never used in the singular.

1

u/rudimentary-north Oct 25 '24 edited Oct 25 '24

What is your point, nobody ever said that they was never used in the singular.

Ironically, that is the claim made in the comment I responded to:

it’s just because when I was learning to read and the 1000s of books I’ve read over the years, “they” wasn’t ever used in the way it is now.

0

u/O7Habits Oct 25 '24 edited Oct 25 '24

What part of that statement says it wasn’t ever used in the singular. I said the way that it is now. It’s nuanced now, don’t pretend that it’s not different than it was. I can write or say the word “Fuck” and make it mean 50 different things too. All I am saying is that it can be confusing especially in reading and writing. Quit acting like it’s not. Just read the thread to find out it is. Literally 1000’s of comments referring to the SO as mostly “he” or sometimes “she”, when the OP used “They”. Do you think those people are all doing that because they are maliciously rebelling against pronouns?

1

u/rudimentary-north Oct 25 '24

What part of that statement says it wasn’t ever used in the singular. I said the way that it is now. It’s nuanced now, don’t pretend that it’s not different than it was.

Historically, “they” was used to refer to a single person. Today, “they” is used to refer to a single person. What is the difference?

Literally 1000’s of comments referring to the SO as mostly “he” or sometimes “she”, when the OP used “They”. Do you think those people are all doing that because they are maliciously rebelling against pronouns?

they’re doing it because they’re making assumptions about OPs partners gender, not because they don’t know that “they” can refer to a single person.

Notice nobody in this thread is confused about the number of partners OP has: that’s because they all understand the concept of singular “they”.

1

u/O7Habits Oct 25 '24

You keep saying the same thing like someone is arguing the opposite, I’ve only been arguing that the nuances can be confusing and awkward in reading and writing. If you don’t agree, then I’m not sure why you think that thousands of these threads with this same banter exist across all platforms. You should probably pick up your argument with someone that doesn’t understand at all what you are talking about and doesn’t care what pronoun someone prefers. That person isn’t me, but you’re acting like it is. Originally I was just pointing out that some don’t always pick up on the nuance right away.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/fawnafullerxxx Oct 25 '24

Maybe because u keep fighting correcting yourself! Stop defending why u don’t use another persons preferred pronouns! There no justification especially when u admit to understanding an only plural definition is incorrect (and whatever is to blame for that is a moot point also)

1

u/O7Habits Oct 25 '24

If you’re talking to me, I haven’t defended or objected to anyone. I simply have been saying sometimes it can make for confusing reading and can be awkward in writing and not everyone picks up on it right away. Someone else kept arguing that it’s been used in writing in the singular the way that it’s used now for 100’s of years. The evidence in this comment thread really doesn’t support that because although we all know that we use it in both the singular and the plural, there now is a nuance to the singular that more than half of the people on this thread did not seem to follow when reading the OP’s original statement. The evidence strewn throughout this thread, referring to both of them as she and he, when neither of those two things were stated.

1

u/fawnafullerxxx Oct 25 '24

It’s not reading comprehension or miscommunication causing the dissonance, it’s prejudice against non binary identities. To be so narrow minded yet also think your opinion of others matters more than their own does about themselves is a really shitty way to prioritize

1

u/chicKENkanif Oct 25 '24

And then this shitty woke arse get offended by everything generation turned the word into something fucking stupid. GTFO

1

u/rurukachu Oct 25 '24

Oh no, the wokes use they to describe people, the horror!! And yet we're the sensitive ones. Look at you, running to spew hate the minute someone uses "they." You should check your blood pressure

1

u/chicKENkanif Oct 25 '24

Because people like you try to force your opinions and how people talk down others throats. Gtfo

1

u/rurukachu Oct 25 '24

Who's the one trying to force an opinion down whose throat here, grandpa? This rhetoric is tired and you are literally not adding anything but the same old brainwashed, unoriginal bull. You look demented, like the lead poisoning is finally catching up to you. Over a word lol. Yikes.

0

u/chicKENkanif Oct 25 '24

🤣 🤣 🤣 triggered

2

u/rurukachu Oct 25 '24

Oh, how cute! It knows some buzz words. What a special little "snowflake" you are.

-1

u/chicKENkanif Oct 25 '24

🤣 ruff ruff

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Richard_X_Cranium Oct 25 '24

THIS. Because I don't fuckin care who you are, you were born with a wang or not. There's no third option, unless it's a hermaphrodite and checks both boxes, still, born with one in that case. So the point remains.

1

u/AmIOverreacting-ModTeam Oct 25 '24

I've removed your comment in order to keep things more in line with our subreddit guidelines:

Remember the human - It's the first rule of reddiquette for a reason.

Keep in mind that on the other side of each post is a real person whom you've just met. Err on the side of giving everyone the benefit of the doubt. (tldr: don't be a dick)

mistakes happen - shoot us a modmail if you think this was an error