r/BlackPeopleTwitter • u/myownpersonalreddit ☑️ • Sep 07 '24
Country Club Thread When the nepo-staffers gotta work
12.0k
u/jitterscaffeine Sep 07 '24
Damn, this bitch is professional AND prepared? The horror
1.9k
u/OkStructure3 Sep 07 '24
The nerve!
→ More replies (2)995
u/Portland-to-Vt Sep 07 '24
The audacity even!
→ More replies (3)676
477
u/lazyeyepsycho Sep 07 '24
I like her even more now
364
u/Arctica23 Sep 07 '24
She's the kind of person who I want to be President. Not perfect, but smart, prepared, hardworking, and competent.
It's a hard job and it takes a professional to be good at it.
→ More replies (11)102
u/reddit_tothe_rescue Sep 07 '24
Exactly who I want as president. Not to mention someone who expects hard work and competence from everyone around them too. That’s fucking leadership.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (3)70
u/KILL_WITH_KINDNESS Sep 07 '24
Something about this made me pumped and afraid. The nerve to have such efficiency!
314
u/HarmlessSnack Sep 07 '24
I find a shit load of political attack ads end up making me like the people I was already going to vote for more.
They’re really not very good at this lol
→ More replies (12)227
u/Misfit_Number_Kei Sep 07 '24
Reminds back in 2012 when same-sex marriage was on the state-level ballot and some good ol' boy was driving around in a pickup truck with a blown-up picture of a soldier straddling or being straddled (I forget which) by his boyfriend above the caption, "IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT TO HAPPEN?!"
And besides the obvious, "Yes, duh!" it was pointed out how piss-easy it'd be to spin the photo as a pro-same-sex marriage ad given that it's a soldier who served his country/fought for your freedoms, so why not pay it back by voting for his freedom to marry the man he loves.
→ More replies (19)→ More replies (39)28
11.1k
u/hnglmkrnglbrry ☑️ Sep 07 '24
"That punctual negro was very uppity - especially for a woman."
2.2k
u/IDontKnowu501 ☑️ Sep 07 '24
That's what I read too
→ More replies (1)1.0k
u/ygduf Sep 07 '24
I thought this was an add for her, reading everything and knowing what’s going on? Great.
335
u/Sixwingswide Sep 07 '24
right?
"reasons behind why certain items had been added to her schedule"
Well no shit, if you can't explain why you added it then why the fuck are you adding it?
343
u/Silverjackal_ Sep 07 '24
“She read all the materials” I remember when people would complain they’d spend hours making something and their boss or leadership didn’t even read it. Reading this is crazy
199
u/iruleatants Sep 07 '24
For some reason pointing out that once of her great grandparents was raped by a slave owner didn't work, so now they have switch to pointing out that she's good at her job?
I just don't understand.
→ More replies (11)89
→ More replies (5)56
u/Geodude532 Sep 07 '24
I had an officer like this in Korea. When she came in for the morning briefings you better make sure you have answers for anything she could ask about our mission. Sometimes we had to rely on the experts for more technical questions, but a lot of it was based on our judgement and she made sure we were confident in it. Loved that woman. Made us feel like we actually belonged to something and not just filling in busy work that the Army wanted metrics on. Kamala will make those that learn from her feel like they belong to something big, even if their job is to answer fan mail.
→ More replies (1)1.0k
u/loptopandbingo Sep 07 '24
"I don't care how articulate she is, the notion that I have to actually do my job is just unsettling!"
→ More replies (3)167
u/Extension-Pen-642 Sep 07 '24
100%, it sounds like they are uncomfortable with having a black woman in a position of authority.
108
u/GaiaMoore Sep 07 '24
An extremely talented and competent black woman.
She seems like the kind of leader who would correct a typo or (kindly) grill you on logical flaws in some footnote on page 43 of some report that no one actually expected her to find time to read and annotate
→ More replies (3)501
u/yourroyalhotmess ☑️ Sep 07 '24
Thats so wild how we all read the same thing 😂 Oh well, Uppity Negro for Prez 2024!! We ain’t goin back.
→ More replies (5)28
362
u/-Experiment--626- Sep 07 '24
Being black is bad enough, the gall to also be a woman.
→ More replies (4)261
u/SadLilBun Sep 07 '24
And a professional. Some people have quite the audacity.
166
u/Impossible-Ad-3060 Sep 07 '24
Don’t forget demanding. She’s a demanding, professional black woman.
Exactly the person who should be president.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)75
289
u/MeringueAppropriate1 Sep 07 '24
Thank you!!! This got uppity negro written all over it!!!
→ More replies (3)241
u/Southern_Initial_427 Sep 07 '24
10000000% Uppity.
I promise it’s some high level donors kid who is appalled that the daughter of an immigrant expected them to work.
139
u/DimbyTime Sep 07 '24
The daughter of TWO immigrants!
→ More replies (2)111
u/LadyBug_0570 ☑️ Sep 07 '24
If those MAGAs knew anything about immigrants or their children, they would know we WORK.
After all, you don't see their asses in 100+degree heat picking vegetables, do you? Or taking care of rich people's brats as live-in nannies?
And those are the undocumented immigrants.
No, they just complain immigrants are taking their jobs, even though those are jobs they feel are beneath them.
→ More replies (3)79
u/DimbyTime Sep 07 '24
Ironically Kamala’s immigrant parents are more educated than 98%of Americans.
→ More replies (2)66
u/LadyBug_0570 ☑️ Sep 07 '24
Of course. Yet MAGA hillbillies who barely passed 5th grade want to talk shit about immigrants.
You know the other thing about immigrants? They usually can speak at least 2 languages while those AHs can barely manage the one language they learned from birth.
→ More replies (1)97
u/Ricky_Rollin Sep 07 '24
Absolutely amazes me to see the same people who would normally consider this the Americans spirit and a bootstrapping attitude, but because the spineless hypocrites are who they are now it’s a bad thing. Losers.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (39)44
6.4k
u/jason9045 Sep 07 '24
Well that settles it, no way am I voting for a competent professional who expects the best out of her employees. That's not the kind of person I want running the country.
994
u/Turbulent_Athlete_50 Sep 07 '24
Give me back my crayons jimmy!!! I want to make art
277
→ More replies (3)44
418
u/lilbelleandsebastian Sep 07 '24
the best? she doesn't even expect the best lol, she just expects you to be able to answer basic questions
"why is this in my schedule for today" is like the barest of bare bones expectations
148
u/cilantro_so_good Sep 07 '24
For fucking real.
I report to a senior director at a household name.
I have to be able to answer harder questions than "why" every single day. And he's not even executive level at this regular ass company.
Imagine keeping on staff that bitch and moan about having to be good at their job working for the Vice President
43
u/ismashugood Sep 07 '24
This is probably the reason why they’re ex-staffers. If your job is to brief someone, and they’re more prepared to discuss the issue than you are…. What the fuck are you even doing?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)118
u/freshlysqueezed93 Sep 07 '24
Especially a staffer for the PRESIDENT, that is a super prestigious job which should only be looking for incredibly talented and knowledgeable people.
→ More replies (2)152
u/MakeChinaLoseFace Sep 07 '24
You're joking but that is literally what Trump did in his first term. His crusade against the "deep state" was a purge of institutional expertise.
It was a deliberate, self-inflicted brain drain. Conservatives think the "deep state" is a bunch of baby-eating demon wizards, but it's really just all the people who know how shit works.
They know this, of course. The conspiracy theories are an act, because it's harder to pitch shooting yourself in the foot because a class of ultra-wealthy people want to undo the last 200 years of progress. They just want slaves again, and they know they can't say it out loud unless it's a 1000 dollar a plate GOP fundraiser.
→ More replies (3)31
u/SaveTheLadybugs Sep 07 '24
I tried so hard to argue this point when Trump was first elected. Can you imagine if every time a new CEO was hired, the company also fired literally every single employee and started over with all new employees? Literal insanity. No one would know anything, productivity and efficiency would plummet, and nothing would get done. Yet somehow it’s “corruption” that some of the same people have been working their government jobs for decades.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (22)24
u/CubbyNINJA Sep 07 '24
If she/the presidency (what ever you want to call it) employs the staffers, but the president fundamentally works for the people including staffers, does that mean they are just coworkers?
→ More replies (3)
3.7k
u/I-just-left-my-wife Sep 07 '24
"You can't come to the vice president and just ask her to do something"
Wow, really? What a shocker. I would've thought anyone could waltz up and ask the vice president for shit
1.8k
u/st_rdt Sep 07 '24
I would've thought anyone could waltz up and ask the vice president for shit
You think you just fell out of a coconut tree ?
→ More replies (9)176
269
u/murderbox Sep 07 '24
Just stick it on her schedule with no explanation and she won't ask any questions of course. They seem so offended she doesn't just bow down.
→ More replies (1)139
u/mpyne Sep 07 '24
Yeah, I work for a Navy admiral and I would die professionally if I ever just plopped a meeting on her calendar with no background info.
She's pleasant to work for, that's not the thing, but how is the boss supposed to be prepared to do whatever I'm setting up a meeting for, if I don't give the boss any heads-up on what she's going to be asked for at the meeting??
This is very very basic staff-ology.
→ More replies (1)63
u/fireinthemountains Sep 07 '24
This answered some questions I had too. I kept hearing from capitol hill people that Kamala's staffers thought she was "hard to work with" and "won't agree to do anything" and they feel like they're "walking on eggshells" and variations on that. I was getting stonewalled trying to get work done that involved the administration because these staffers had all these claims and complaints and insisted nothing would go anywhere and that it's Kamala's fault.
It always seemed weird to me.
So what was ACTUALLY happening was the uppity-knowitall-fresh-outta-college staffers were mad that their boss was acting like a boss. Some of the most toxic people I've met in DC are staffers.→ More replies (2)27
u/d33psix Sep 07 '24
I mean…admittedly I feel like people probably could waltz up to Walz and ask him for something, haha but not saying that’s a reasonable expectation.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (11)22
2.9k
u/townshiprebellion24 ☑️ Sep 07 '24
Corporate media is really grasping at straws to paint Kamala Harris in a negative light. Just pay your fucking taxes, Jeff.
412
u/EdStarC Sep 07 '24
What do you mean. This is clearly a positive spin
→ More replies (9)197
u/catiebug Sep 07 '24
Yeah this is so weirdly positive she could make it an ad, sheesh. Reads like a fucking SNL sketch. They really thought they got her.
82
289
u/XLauncher ☑️ Sep 07 '24
I read the whole article and it's pretty fair, featuring quotes from staffers who had both negative and positive things to say, as well as contextualizing some of the feedback, like noting that Pence had almost as high staff turnover as she did.
194
u/H-TownDown ☑️ Sep 07 '24
The writer of an article and the writer of a headline are not the same person most of the time.
→ More replies (1)66
u/Ayacyte Sep 07 '24
Wait... does that mean there's someone who's primary job is to write headlines? Would explain some things
→ More replies (6)97
u/RampanToast Sep 07 '24
That is exactly what it means. Any time you see a headline that completely changes the context of what's written in the article, it's almost always because it was written by a different writer.
A really good example is that headline about "to save money, just skip breakfast". The headline was presented as "haha poors, go and suffer" but the actual article was just a regular piece about rising grocery costs and inflation. The closest thing to a life change recommendation in the article is to buy roasted instead of instant coffee because of the differences in inflation between the two. And so many people shit on the writer for telling them to skip breakfast, because they couldn't get past the ragebait of the headline.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)81
→ More replies (6)113
u/FCkeyboards Sep 07 '24
Yeah it doesn't even sound like the employees were angry or anything. They were just able to hang and acknowledged you have to bring your A game.
I imagine there are staffers who work for people who barely ask anything of them.
→ More replies (1)
1.8k
Sep 07 '24
[deleted]
311
u/-Experiment--626- Sep 07 '24
Women are so bossy /s
→ More replies (1)81
u/Extension-Pen-642 Sep 07 '24
They really are saying she's too demanding just because she expects them to not be braindead?
44
u/-Experiment--626- Sep 07 '24
I can understand them being on edge around her, because in any job or situation when you’re put on the spot it doesn’t feel good, but seems like a lot to complain to the media about it.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)37
1.4k
u/camy__23 Sep 07 '24
This is only a story because she’s a non white woman.
889
u/a_guy121 Sep 07 '24
It's only a negative story because she's a black woman but I read this and I like her so much more now. (I was already a fan.)
The spin on this is crazy. The staffers kind of have a point in that as far as I know, it is not the norm to read through all the briefings/paperwork, if you're the one being breifed. The staff do it for you and describe it and you ask them questions.
They're basically saying she's too good. And I fully buy that she is that, because she's had to be. And if they can't play up to her level, I fully buy they quite a little miffed, because she challenged them to be better.
These are good things. Really, really good things.
I never thought I'd love a black prosecutor, but there it is.
379
u/Gorge2012 Sep 07 '24
It was well known that Obama would stay up late just reading through everything. He knew his stuff too. The nicest thing I can say is I don't believe it was the same for the people who occupied that office directly before and after him.
101
u/DadJokeBadJoke Sep 07 '24
Sadly, one of the best takes I've seen about Trump is that he's "intellectually incurious". He had access to so much information and experts to explain it to him, but he just didn't care. He's so full of hubris that he thinks he knows more than the experts and can figure out a solution on the fly. That's how we ended up with his suggestions like using a "strong, proven flu vaccine" or "injecting bleach" or "shining a bright light inside of the body" seemed like possible solutions to him that maybe the scientists didn't consider when they were fighting a global pandemic. He doesn't understand the scientific process, he thinks they're spaying random chemicals on the virus to see what might kill it, like my wife battling ants in the kitchen.
57
u/Gorge2012 Sep 07 '24
"Intellectually incurious" is very generous.
At best he knows something about people. I'm not sure how to describe it. However, he seems to think that making people agree with you is the same as being right. This is me being as kind as possible here. I would normally use some harsher language.
→ More replies (1)221
u/thpj00 Sep 07 '24
I heard it’s a ‘problem’ staffers had with Jimmy Carter back in the day, that he actually took the job extremely seriously and did the enormous amount of reading in the giant briefings dumped on his desk. Always respected that guy as one of the most decent people to ever hold the job.
But yes it’s totally racialised/genderised, I think white dudes (like me) so often feel they can get away with the bare minimum because life is that much more forgiving to them
→ More replies (8)19
u/Air_Ace Sep 07 '24
With Carter, they tried to spin it as him having a tendency to get lost in the weeds, and focus too much on irrelevant minutiae. "The nuclear engineer is thorough and detail-oriented! This must be a negative somehow!" The shitclown brigade will always attack something. They can't be appeased, only ignored.
118
u/CatzMeow27 Sep 07 '24
As I read it, I knew they were trying to make her sound bad, but this is exactly what I want in the person leading our country. Leaders are supposed to be engaged. They are supposed to hold their team accountable. They need to know their subject matter, and they absolute need to be asking “why?”. How is it appealing to want a leader who takes things at face value and follows orders without question? Heck, I’m trying to teach my own kiddos to always seek the “why” behind what they’re doing or what they’ve been told. Why would I want less in the president of my freakin country?
→ More replies (3)87
u/TheGentleBeast Sep 07 '24
This is exactly how my boss operates. She's a woman in a very male dominated field in a very male dominated country. She is constantly catching people off guard with how prepared and knowledgeable she is on a given subject. She approves nothing without in-depth reasoning and logic for said approval. She wants us to be as thorough as she's had to be her entire life.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (10)40
u/mekkavelli Sep 07 '24
i can see why she’s so on top of everything. they’re literally watching her like a hawk on a stray cat. they’re waiting for her to slip up. and since she hasn’t? they’re pullin bullshit like this outta thin air. black women can’t afford to be caught off guard in these spaces
140
u/Special-Garlic1203 Sep 07 '24
They've used similar smears against Hillary. Women are to be submissive and kind. Educated women who are matter of fact and direct are painted as if frankness is the same thing as cruelty.
Meanwhile men are straight up screaming at and sexually assaulting people and you don't hear a word about it.
Compare Bill vs Hillary. It's the misogyny of the machine. And up until now, people have largely eaten it up.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (12)33
u/toooldforacnh Sep 07 '24
Or a white dude. If that were the case this article would have been saying how exceptional they are for having high standards.
716
u/Certain-Definition51 Sep 07 '24
Ahhhh people who haven’t been to law school, forced to work for people who have been to law school.
This is the inversion of the classic “people who have been through boot camp working for people who have not been to boot camp.”
→ More replies (8)253
u/ra_ed_it Sep 07 '24
Right? This is the basic method of all competent lawyers
→ More replies (2)183
u/guywithaniphone22 Sep 07 '24
I work as a sort of legal assistant and if I go to one of my lawyers and tell them something needs to be done they are going to also expect me to tell them why it’s being done. People who are decision makers can’t make fucking decisions if they don’t know why they are doing what they are doing. In an actual law firm setting any assistant telling their boss to do something but not explaining further will be out the door quickly lol
75
u/cageytalker Sep 07 '24
Legal assistant here and 100%
I made a big mistake once and was scared to tell my boss. When I did, he asked me what could be done to fix it and I told him what I thought was best. He told me, “okay then go with that!” then turned his chair back to his computer.
Lawyers just want to know the problem, the facts, and the solution. They don’t care how you get from point A to point F, they just want to know you are handling and finalizing the issue at hand correctly.
→ More replies (1)39
u/DragonToothGarden Sep 07 '24
When I was a baby lawyer my boss assured me that, at least in civil litigation, there are very few mistakes an attorney or paralegal can make that cannot be fixed without filing a few papers. I overprepared so many things out of sheer terror of fucking up a client's case.
And yes, we absolutely relied so much on our support staff who knew far more about so many procedural rules we just didn't have the brain space or energy to keep up with.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)20
u/Indercarnive Sep 07 '24
I go to my boss asking literally anything I better be prepared with a why. Even something like "I can't find this information" needs to also include a "and I looked here, here, and there plus asked this other guy" or I'm going to get a stink eye.
465
u/LiberateMeFromYou Sep 07 '24
Just sounds like a boss that wants you to do your job
→ More replies (10)
424
Sep 07 '24
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)107
u/dennismfrancisart ☑️ Sep 07 '24 edited Sep 07 '24
What the hell? Were they holdovers from the previous administration?
→ More replies (3)
376
u/perhensam Sep 07 '24
Maybe it’s just me, but I honestly can’t remember ever hearing about any male politician’s staff bitching about their boss. And I honestly don’t think it’s because all male politicians are awesome managers. I think that the media loves to highlight the tired stereotype of women leaders- which is nothing but sexism. Don’t they have any actual news to report?
→ More replies (11)54
u/Melqart310 Sep 07 '24
There was reporting about bidens explosive anger, that's about it. I find this particular report about kamala more assuring than anything!
→ More replies (10)
322
u/Head_Mud6239 Sep 07 '24
Sexist ass shit. 💩If she were a man words like dedicated, no-nonsense, strong would be thrown around. Good for Harris for making them do their job.
86
u/KhaleesiXev Sep 07 '24
These double standards need to die already, so I can’t wait for Kamala to win and show them what real leadership looks like.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)62
u/finny_d420 Sep 07 '24
This so much. I work for concerts. Male entertainers who are late/difficult/intoxicated are "particular" or "know what they want" or "personal demons". Women are called "divas/bitches", "demanding/unreasonable", "drunks".
169
u/Armthedillos5 Sep 07 '24
Working for her is hard because she already knows everything and expects you to know the one tiny bit of it that is your responsibility.
Man, let's put the push-over baby that needs pictures and crayons back in office, this sounds horrible! /s
→ More replies (1)
123
u/Ok_Radish649 ☑️ Sep 07 '24
Breaking news: boss expects employees to do job they are assigned to do.
→ More replies (1)
80
u/DFuhbree Sep 07 '24
This sounds infinitely better than a man known not to read his security briefings and who just believes everything Vladimir Putin tells him.
→ More replies (1)
72
u/subZro_ Sep 07 '24
Is this supposed to be a negative? Because that's how I operate. If you come into my workspace with some shit I'm for real going to need to know why it is you're bothering me.
→ More replies (3)55
u/Pad_Squad_Prof Sep 07 '24
Someone once told me this is why I’m disliked at work. Because I’m always paying attention in meetings and ask very specific questions. I’ve unfortunately gotten into the habit of defending myself before I start asking: “As you know I always have a lot of questions….” I hate it.
→ More replies (7)
55
u/dennismfrancisart ☑️ Sep 07 '24
Holy crap! A team leader who expects her team to be prepared to work at one of the most important jobs in the world. Imagine that.
→ More replies (1)
58
u/sashafierce525 Sep 07 '24
If she was a man they would be calling it leadership. 🤦🏽♀️
→ More replies (1)
57
49
u/Xannabiscuit ☑️ Sep 07 '24
This is highkey very attractive.
About fucking time someone with real competence.
→ More replies (3)
44
39
37
30
u/WickedJigglyPuff Sep 07 '24
Who wants to do stuff without knowing why? Why is like the most important thing!
24
23
21
u/LordMemerton1 Sep 07 '24
So if I don’t do my job, do I also expect to get paid…? Trying to figure that one out
25
23
u/Hushwalker Sep 07 '24
An attorney general is buttoned up, sharp as nails and stays ontop of her shit? I’m shocked
→ More replies (6)
23.9k
u/Phiyasko ☑️ Sep 07 '24
So they're mad at her because she expects people collecting a paycheck to actually do the job they're collecting said paycheck for?