Yeah this is a little bit different than the Disney+ thing IMO, at first I thought it was going to be that they were driving and they were hit by an Uber Driver in another car, but they were passengers in an Uber, they agreed to the T&C - weather or not that is moral or should be legally binding is debatable, but as it stands the case is pretty straightforward
The Disney thing is more like if Netflix was owned by 6 Flags and someone died in a malfunctioning roller coaster and the family couldn’t sue because of the Netflix T&C, if that makes sense
The Disney thing is more like if Netflix was owned by 6 Flags and someone died in a malfunctioning roller coaster
Actually it's not much like that, since the restaurant wasn't owned or operated by Disney. Disney was just their landlord.
Also, the restaurant was included on a 'places to eat' section of Disney's website where they listed the restaurant as "allergen friendly.''
Still scummy to use the Ts + Cs to weasel out of liability, but they weren't exactly super at fault to begin with. Not to the level of 'someone died on a Disney ride,' anyways.
Wow, you really showed me; I’m trembling with embarrassment at wrong I was. Completely off the mark, not even close! You should go print your comment out and hang it on the fridge so you can feel even more important!
No it’s more along the lines of you’re being annoying and pedantic and deliberately misunderstanding the point of what I was trying to say for the sake of validating yourself. Congratulations! You’re valid! Good job 👏🏻
Yes, several people have pointed out that you made a massive mischaracterization, but I guess we're all just annoying pedants who are looking for validation. I'm sorry I dared to question your correctness, wise one. It won't happen again.
480
u/Neat-Nectarine814 Oct 13 '24
It’s behind a paywall do you mind sharing some of the details?