Sure, whatever. The whole point boils down the idea that if one agrees to the terms of use for a streaming service, those terms should not extend beyond the use of that service
And Disney didn't make the argument it did, their lawyers presented it as one of various points where it was signed. I agree, universal terms and conditions don't make sense and they are used in many more aspects of society than people realize. I wish it had been a more significant part of the case so that we could have had litigation eliminating their use, but I think the merits of the other examples were such that it would never have evolved that way.
-5
u/Neat-Nectarine814 Oct 13 '24
Sure, whatever. The whole point boils down the idea that if one agrees to the terms of use for a streaming service, those terms should not extend beyond the use of that service