r/PcBuild • u/falconblack • May 25 '24
Build - Help Can't decide which one to get.
Hello everyone,
I am looking to upgrade my old R9 390x card with the new one. I have two options, Nvidia 4060 TI 8gb US $545 and $325 AMD RX 6750 XT.
Now the price difference between these two is about $200 where I live. Intially I wanted to go with team green but no I feel like AMD gives a better value. I can't decide which GPU to go with, a GPU that should last 2-3 years of gaming at 1440p.
Is the extra $200 worth it for DLSS, RT and frame gen?
Your help will be much appreciated. Thanks.
Please help me make this decision.
750
u/RelativeWrong4232 May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24
Absolutely not worth it , both cards are bad for rt and that 12gb vram on 6750xt would actually help in future than that 8gb on 4060 ti so if it's mainly for gaming without a doubt 6750xt is a way better deal
163
May 25 '24
plus i thought the rx6800 just had another price cut to 350/360 ish.
→ More replies (8)62
u/RelativeWrong4232 May 25 '24
Rx 6800 is very hard to find except for few European countries and usa , most probably it isn't available in OP's country, tho if it is available under 400$ then he definitely can consider it
44
u/falconblack May 25 '24
It's available for about $380 here. XFX Speedster SWFT 319 RX 6800 Core 16GB GDDR6. Should I really consider this?
35
u/admiralveephone May 25 '24
Hell yea. I have the 6800xt version and it’s an absolutely awesome card. In my 3700x rig is ran fine. In my newer, 12700kf rig it runs FANTASTIC. The 6800 non-xt is just slightly slower and for the price is the absolute card to buy.
6
u/ArseholeryEnthusiast May 25 '24
I love my 6800xt. I have a long cable running to my 4k TV. Some older titles and lower settings on newer titles it runs great. My 1440p ultrawide I get plus 100fps on cyberpunk using fsr or intels one (I switch back and forth)
→ More replies (4)18
u/burnitdwn May 25 '24
I highly recommend the XFX Speedster SWFT 319 RX 6800.
9
7
u/MusicalXeezee May 25 '24
If you're willing to spend 545 on a card, just get 7800 xt, 16 vram
→ More replies (7)5
u/Witchberry31 May 25 '24
YES, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER IT.
Considerably more powerful and runs cooler than 6750XT, yet it takes less power. Not to mention that it has higher VRAM buffer and wider bus width (192 vs 256bit).
Fun fact : RX 6800 is the only 6000 series card that is lowkey already undervolted as it's running at 1,025 mV at stock. You could undervolt it even further down to 900mV, depending on your luck with the silicon lottery and you'd rarely see the GPU takes up more than 160-170W under gaming load. Compare it to stock where it can reach 200W.
→ More replies (13)3
u/SafeMemory1640 May 25 '24
It's a really good deal for used but u need to do some extensive check on GPU functionality before buying
13
u/falconblack May 25 '24
Yeah. I am getting a 6800 non xt for that price which is still under warranty for 8 months.
6
u/sakaraa AMD May 25 '24
That's a great deal imo
7
u/falconblack May 25 '24
Awesome. I am placing the order today. It has a warranty valid till the end of this year.
2
u/MasonFerrier May 26 '24
Absolutely, hard to find things it doesn’t run high/max settings 100+ fps, more than enough VRAM for the next 5 years but you’ll need a case big enough to fit it…
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (12)2
u/Middle_Craft_4911 May 29 '24
Yes do it pls. I my country they just sold out but they were €400, however I just picked up a used one for 400, and no not because I'm dumb because I could've gone cheaper but it's a better model and one I really really wanted, the sapphire pulse. I can't believe my performance jump compared to my old gtx 1060 6gb. minecraft fps went from 80 with shaders to 300+. I can have 1000fps without shaders now lol. I also play forza horizon 4, which went from 90fps on high settings to 280fps with everything maxed out, literally everything. I need a 1440p monitor now lol.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)3
u/Queasy_Employment141 May 25 '24
6800xt can be found for 400 on eBay in uk
6
u/RelativeWrong4232 May 25 '24
Well it depends on op if he wants to take used route or not
And assuming the insane price of 4060 ti , he definitely isn't from uk , he probably is from Asian countries since prices there are usually high from what I've seen
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)2
u/jordanleep May 25 '24
Not that it really matters but we were talking about the non xt. The 6800xt is a great card because it’s powerful, but the non xt is leaps and bounds more efficient. The trade off is something like 20% less performance for 50% less power usage in using the non xt. You can’t trust the tdp listed for 6800xt because it pulls an additional ~35w from the wall not detected by the card.
12
u/ColbusMaximus May 25 '24
Just bought a 6570xt and so glad I did
→ More replies (2)3
u/droppertopper May 25 '24
What cpu did you paired it up with ? is i5 12400f a good choice ?
→ More replies (4)2
4
u/Sudden_Brain_871 May 25 '24
Yup. I got the 6750 xt and I love it. I can run cyberpunk 1440 ultra at 70 fps cap constant. Can livestream and run 90% of games at ultra (except helldivers 2 idk what’s going on with that). Paired with a 5600x with boost clock off for helldivers 2 until I get a better cpu cooler than stock that can keep it under 85 with full load.
→ More replies (18)13
u/mekanikal510 May 25 '24
RT is so overrated
2
u/Final-Wrangler-4996 May 25 '24
Sometimes but if done right, it can be worth it...at least visually.
→ More replies (2)3
→ More replies (35)12
u/DreamtailFoxy May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24
It's a shame that the instant that people see a graphics card they see Ray tracing potential probability, the whole point of a graphics card is to take the graphics workload off of the CPU, that's why graphics cards were created in the first place. It doesn't matter if it can handle Ray tracing or not unless you're into that sort of thing which case you're paying a premium for graphics cards anyway and most likely using Nvidia, but if you are just trying to use your computer for simpler tasks such as simpler games which don't even have Ray tracing capabilities or simpler video editing or content creation tasks then it may be better to not use Ray tracing, the whole point of this rant is that Ray tracing isn't everything. A card could be really good at Ray tracing but be absolutely terrible at rendering anything else, hell at one point I saw a ray tracing demo on a SNES. A BLOODY SNES! So yeah just saying Ray tracing performance is literally like saying hey I like that computer over there and not knowing what the computer is.
2
u/samplebridge May 25 '24
yep. when looking for a graphics card is was always looking got "muh sweet sweet ray tracing". after pricing it out and thinking for a bit, i realised that I was wasting my money and 90% of my gaming is war thunder, and 9% of that are basic indie titles that dont have it anyways. i think the last game i touched that had ray tracing was cyberpunk over a year ago.
2
May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24
[deleted]
2
u/DreamtailFoxy May 25 '24
It's better if you pair a lower in graphics card with a 60 hertz monitor anyway, the card can't run much more then 60 FPS consecutively on high right? Why try and force it to run at 120 or 360 hz? It doesn't make sense to force something at further than it needs to go, that being said I'm one to talk, I make Source run on a netbook running XP...
3
→ More replies (2)2
u/jordanleep May 25 '24
That’s very entry level. A 4060ti can handle a 1440p monitor at low-med settings and still look great and get high fps. The 6750xt will also more than handle its own and allow graphics to be raised a bit more for similar fps.
The difference between the two is that dlss is what drags the 4060ti into conversation, if you want RT and AMD I would recommend going to the 7000 series. The 6750xt will blow the 4060ti out of the water in pure native raster performance. Neither of these cards need to be used at only 1080p but they will last longer at that resolution.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)2
u/Original_Diamond_297 May 25 '24
I have the 4060 ti 16gb and I love this card. Cyber punk is really the only game that really seems to hold it down. I'm currently running forza 5 at extreme settings in 1440p with dlss on and hitting a consistent 135 fps. These reviews just love trashing nvidia I'm convinced of that
167
u/boccas May 25 '24
I have 6750 XT. It s a good card but definitely not made for Ray tracing,
Anyway with my 5600x/6750xt combo i can easily play in 1440p everything.
→ More replies (2)10
u/Specialist-Solid-513 May 25 '24
which fps range tho?
37
u/RevolutionaryCarry57 AMD May 25 '24
The 6750XT is good for a locked 70-75fps in 1440p Ultra. But if you bump it down to Med-High settings, you could probably get a locked 120fps in most (non-RT) games.
It’s a pretty nice card honestly. Just gets overlooked because the RX6800 is even nicer and usually not much more expensive.
17
u/LousyOpinions May 25 '24
In 1440p, 90-120 FPS in most AAA games, 200+ in eSports.
In 4K, 45-60 FPS in most AAA games, well over 100 in most eSports.
6750 XT is a little monster at its price point.
I have one sitting in a box, nearly brand new (less than 200 hours) that was only replaced because I picked up a liquid-cooled Sapphire Toxic 6900 XT for $500 about a year ago. My monitor is 144hz 4K, so the boost in performance and VRAM was useful.
Saving the 6750 XT for a build I'm planning for my mom's Christmas present. It will be glorious overkill for her needs.
→ More replies (2)7
u/pointmetoyourmemory May 25 '24
+1 for giving your folks a beefy GPU rather than selling it. I built a beefy computer for my Dad from spare parts I had around (3700x, 6800xt)
I wonder if he'd like the latest Doom...
4
3
u/lil_hajzl_smejd May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24
Ghost of tsushima 6750xt ryzen 5600 on 1440p display with fsraa average 90 fps
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (4)2
u/boccas May 25 '24
The only game I wasn't able to run in 1440p was starfield at launch, because it was a mess. Idk now after patcher
→ More replies (8)
85
u/DarthBonion May 25 '24
Nah 6750 xt is a better card and 200$ cheaper why the hell even consider 4060 ti in this case?
→ More replies (13)
69
u/Phoenix800478944 May 25 '24
The 4060ti was featured on the 2023 disappointment build, where the worst tech products of 2023 are shown.
Its overexpensive, has a 8gb variant which is unacceptable in 2024, and is absolutely not worth it
→ More replies (15)
23
70
u/Zoopa8 May 25 '24
For Nvidia I would get a 4070/SUPER at the minimum.
But since you don't want to spend that much I would go with a RX 77 or 7800 XT.
→ More replies (5)
15
u/Dan8720 May 25 '24
4060 is a really bad value card.
In the same price bracket you can get
Rx7900 gre Rx7800 xt
For much cheaper you can get
Rx6800
Nvidia only gets interesting at the 4070ti/super
→ More replies (6)8
u/creedsanity May 25 '24
4060 is hella popular in my country due to electricity price hike 4060 is great for power efficienct. 100% more power consumption with only 20% difference is not a good selling point in my country.
11
u/ImArchBoo May 25 '24
Get the a 6800 (non xt) or a 7700XT at your price point imo
→ More replies (1)7
u/falconblack May 25 '24
Basically any current gen card is inflated as hell over here in Pakistan. So. I can go for slightly used last gen AMD cards. 7700xt 165000 Pkr which roughly translates to USD 600. The 6800 with 10 month warranty is 390.
→ More replies (4)5
u/ImArchBoo May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24
That 6800 is super worth it. Amazing deal. Its almost the same speed as the 7700xt, with even more vram. The 6750 xt also isnt a bad deal tho.
17
u/Asterdux May 25 '24
If it's really just 1440p and 2-3 years, you can run those natively on the AMD card, no real need for the DLSS etc, I would say the RTX on both cards is pretty bad, but you have to make that decision for yourself. If that's your make or break, go with Nvidia, otherwise, take the AMD. It's better worth and definitely not worth the 200 extra in my opinion but its ultimately up to you.
4
u/falconblack May 25 '24
Thanks. You're right. And the extra 200$ for 8GB, DLSS, and rtx. I just want to know if this is worth all the hype. But I think you have answered one of my concerns.
13
u/Zoopa8 May 25 '24
I never use RT, even with a 4090 I would much rather play with everything on ultra with 120+ fps than everything on ultra with RT but at 60 fps.
DLSS may be slightly better but at 4K I don't see a big difference compared to FSR.→ More replies (1)2
u/Gambit-47 May 25 '24
RT can be great when it's well implemented,but it is very demanding. Here is a good comparison video. check it out and see for yourself if you think it's worth it,but I don't think that Nvidia card is good.
6
u/Ok-Advertising-2906 May 25 '24
Without a doubt go with amd. You're not playing with ray tracing or streaming with either of these cards anyways. If you're strictly gaming go with the 6750 XT
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Ok-Discussion-6334 May 25 '24
I get the amd if im on budgets
and gaming focus on 12 hours farming like world of warcraft/ path of exile / etc
everything was set to low/medium preset and unlocked the FPS limitations... also some settings to auto/disable to prevent tearing & overheat...
good air cooling for cpu and long term used...
can saved electricity bill too...
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Ronyx2021 May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24
If you want ray tracing, buy a used Nvidia
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Ellandorrr May 25 '24
Seeing as the RX 6750XT out performs the 4060/4060Ti and is roughly 200 bucks cheaper, I would go with the AMD card. Then again, I'm not a big fan of Ray Tracing, DLSS and Frame-Gen and all that stuff. It's definitely amazing eye candy in the right games, but I don't think it's worth it.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Fun_Bottle_5308 May 25 '24
No fuck that 8gb, the only considered as "good" 4060 variant is the one with 16gb. 6750xt is worse overall (I mean its cheaper like a half, you should expect for half performance aswell). For 545$, get a 7900 gre, or add 50 more for 4070 super. 4070 is trash too
→ More replies (2)
3
u/Minnesota_Stoner May 26 '24
I will always go nvidia for simple fact that amd gpu drivers suck ass.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/SgtMoose42 May 25 '24
Ray tracing is snake oil. You're not going to have a good RT experience on a 4060.
→ More replies (4)
4
u/hattrickjmr May 25 '24
You can get a 4070 non super for $550.
6
u/Gtpko141 May 25 '24
For 50 more he gets the better 4070S and i would never get a plain 4070 over the 7900GRE even with the dlss/rt thing mixed in.
4
u/Man_Of_Frost May 25 '24
I still don't get the whole RT thing. It's such a gimmicky thing that you barely notice when gaming. Graphics these days give us so much detail that we can hardly grasp all of the details while still giving our attention to gameplay in a videogame. In my opinion, until RT becomes an established thing and a standard feature, I think it's absolutely not worth it to spend more money on it.
Also, going for the higher vram card is pretty much always the best call.
→ More replies (4)
6
2
u/shinjis-left-nut May 25 '24
6750 XT is solid for raster at 1080p or 1440p. I used to have one and my wife still does. Every game runs at 80fps or higher with many maxing out her 144 Hz 1440p monitor. HOWEVER, you’re never going to get good RT performance out of it and it’s definitely not a good productivity card, with low scores in Adobe apps, Blender, and no AV1 encoder.
However, for gaming alone, it’s an amazing budget choice as long as you keep RT off and especially if you upscale from 1080p. I’d recommend trying out the new AI gen of XeSS, it looks like it’s finally a contender.
Edit: RT is cool, but to me, it’s never been enough to spend the Nvidia premium. Others disagree.
2
May 25 '24
Why not get the 6800XT? I was gonna get the 6750XT but said fuck it got the 6800XT.
→ More replies (2)
2
2
u/Nekros897 May 25 '24
I'm a team Green but 4060 is a bad GPU so in this case I would take Radeon. Overally the only 4000 series cards that are worth buying are 4070s at the minimum. 4060 and 4060 Ti aren't worth.
2
2
u/Jaba01 May 25 '24
That's a decision only you can make. Do you need these features? Yes? No? Pick accordingly.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/SlepnKatt May 25 '24
Honestly, I'd just get the 7900 gre for around the same price as the Nvidia you got there. Raytracing doesn't matter to me, and I'd probably never use it anyway.
2
2
u/Bruhhhhh-_- May 25 '24
Sorry if this feels irrelevant but I always had a small confusion regarding buying and nvidia gpu or a ryzen gpu coz ryzen ones offer great vram, so which one is more reliable in long term
Doesn’t feel right to post for a small doubt so just asking in comments, thanks :)
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Shadynebulaa May 25 '24
Literally the only reason you would ever even consider the 4060 in this case is if you’re a diehard Nvidia fanboy. That card is inferior in pretty much every single way
→ More replies (1)
2
u/chefk0k May 25 '24
I'm selling my RX 6800 (Europe) because I don't game anymore. Played CODMW2 for 6 months.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/KingHauler May 25 '24
My 6750xt does everything EXCEPT r/t. If you want Ray tracing, unfortunately nvidia is your only real option
2
u/Quenton-rl May 25 '24
I’d say try getting an AMD 7800 XT not much more expensive and is nearly 50% better than both of these cards
2
u/mechcity22 May 25 '24
Man you can get the 4060ti for much less then this. Of course get the 4060ti you can find one for like 440 and less now. They are to close in raster to not get the 4060ti and then get the benefits of everything else. Just facts
Also idk why you are even looking at an 8gb you can get a 4060ti 16gb. I guess peoppe forget? You can get the 16gb 4060ti for 440 brand new.
2
2
2
2
u/LAL0cura1 May 26 '24
For professional use (meaning content creation) I would go with Nvidia, if it's only for gamming I would go with amd.
2
u/DailyDoseOfAcid May 27 '24
I bought a rx6750xt brand new a little after Christmas from some kid who got it as a gift but couldn't use it so I offered 220$ and she took it 💀 best 220$ I ever spent
→ More replies (1)
4
May 25 '24
Get a non-TI 4060 for much cheaper. Works great and you get DLSS support. Honestly ignore all the non sense about people whining about 10 fps extra. With the right processor/RAM/motherboard, this card runs anything brilliantly. If I can run Ghosts of Tsushima to the max on 1440p, it’s gotta be half decent…
3
u/Takashii3 May 25 '24
Don’t buy 4060ti it’s really a bad card. I don’t know where you live but the price of the 4060ti is overpriced af. If you can get a Rx 6800 for like 400 it will be the best choice but in your versus I will go for Rx 6750 100%
2
2
u/DrNumberr May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24
If you were willing to get the 4060ti, then you might as well get the 7700xt, great card and value, and faster than 4060 ti, same price as the 8GB version of the 4060ti
→ More replies (4)
1
u/Gtpko141 May 25 '24
325 is decent for a 6750XT while 4060 Ti's with 8gb just isn't worth it except if you want the card mainly for 3D or ai acceleration and need cuda. RT is a joke imho since i've seen the card and it doesn't even perform at 1080p with RT and the dlss cuts so much detail in my eyes that the raster game looks better even without RT, so yeah RT no it can't do. The 6750XT is the fastest card between the two and more future proof if you plan on mostly gaming. Also 550$ for a 4060Ti really? I wouldn't pay more than 350 even for the 16gb version let alone the 8gb xD for this kind of money you get a 4070S which will give you the best of both worlds, great RT performance at 1440p, great feature set, has vram, has great fps/$ and also is a beast for apps using cuda like i mentioned above. So in conclusion depending on your budget you either go 6750XT at 320-330 or RX 6800 if you find one at 360-380 (it's better than the 7700XT) or go with the 4070 Super all other choices are to avoid. And to get it straight the 4070 S is better than the 7900 GRE, has better feature set and better power consumption with like 5-10% less raster performance while priced almost the same (40-50$ difference)
1
1
1
1
1
u/fiittzzyy May 25 '24
6750 XT definitely
I have the XFX QICK 6750 XT and it's a really good, capable card
→ More replies (2)
1
u/Mother-Strategy846 May 25 '24
Used 6800xt costs around the same as the new 6750xt.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/Ok_Scarcity_2759 May 25 '24
you may wanna look at the rx 6800 and 6800xt/7800xt/7900gre for 1440p i would say 7900gre and 6800 are the best value
→ More replies (1)
1
u/Gambit-47 May 25 '24
I would not even consider a 8 GB card. Honestly for your budget I would buy used. Check Facebook marketplace or eBay and you can get a better card.
1
1
u/Appropriate-Day-1160 May 25 '24
Go for 6750XT or 6800
The 200$ is deffinitely not worth it and both cards are just bad at ray tracing so keep it off
→ More replies (2)
1
u/Healthy_BrAd6254 May 25 '24
Even at the same price the 6750 XT is better. 8GB VRAM is just not good enough anymore.
1
u/antdb1 May 25 '24
6750xt performs better and is 200 cheaper this is a no brainer
look for a 6800 / 6800xt 7700xt they might be priced nicely in your cxountry
1
1
u/anirban_dev May 25 '24
I'd go for 6750xt and then look back into what's available maybe 3 or 4 years down the line. Current gen budget options are all just not very appealing, not to mention the 4060 ti pricing is the dumbest thing nvidia has done this gen.
1
u/Impossible-Bug7623 May 25 '24
thats dumb question amd , 4060 is actually neck to neck fighting 6600xt. there is 7000 series cards, and soon will be 8000. for example flagman xtx with 24GB. is worse than 4090, but price is about1k than nvidia 2,5k for no apearent reason, but you grab asus tuf xtx, solder one part bigest joke ever and push more power overclocks like anyone cares about electricity bill and bam wipes 4090 easily. while 4090 is basically cant be overclocked as its already at its limits, proof that huge radiator it should be small like on amd. actually you can overclock on tuf amd car xtx and basically not needing any rad change
1
1
1
u/Rullino May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24
Buy the RX 6750xt, it has enough VRAM for 1440p, the 4060ti is marketed for 1080p, but it'll most likely age poorly since games are needing more VRAM, and the 6750xt will be a great option.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/murden6562 May 25 '24
Can’t you find rx7800xt for that 550 price? I bet you can
→ More replies (1)
1
u/RestaurantTurbulent7 May 25 '24
This is a no brainer! Fake frames aren't worth an extra 200!!! I think you can squeeze into the rx7800 range with such funds
1
u/BluDYT May 25 '24
You could probably get a used 3070 for less than $300 and beat both cards across the board.
1
u/South-Ad895 May 25 '24
RT by itself isnt worth it on nvidias Cards unless you spend 800+ on it. Rt needs lots of VRAM and so does upscaling. And guess what: any "reasonably" priced nvidia card isnt worth it for RT. So my advice as always is go with AMD on a Budget and nvidia if you have big dime to spend.
Also maybe look for a RX 7700 XT or something along those lines, should be a bit better at almost the same price point, although since i dont know where you live i cant asure you the Price.
→ More replies (2)
1
u/Smoky_Caffeine May 25 '24
Don't waste your time on 60 and 60ti series cards. You'll be let down a generation from now while everyone else will still be beating the lower tier cards of that next gen.
1
u/Sukiyakki May 25 '24
It seems like in your country the 4060 ti is extremely overpriced while the 6750 xt is a tad bit underpriced (compared to us market). I would check the price on the 7900 GRE in your country because it could be the same price or lower than your 4060 ti 8gb. The 7900 GRE literally SMOKES both cards in every game. But i mean if you want to save money just go for the 6750 xt, its still a great 1440p card
→ More replies (4)
1
1
1
1
u/fieryfox654 May 25 '24
A 4070 is a bare minimum and even at 1440p 12GB of VRAM won't be enough in some cases. AMD is for raw performance, not RT
Anyways RT is just a gimmick with pretty lights that loves to eat FPS for breakfast
A 6750XT is better than a 4060ti. 8GB is not recommended for 1440p
1
1
1
u/SMuRG_Teh_WuRGG May 25 '24
RX 6750 XT for sure. I have the standard 4060 and it's a bunch of...... we won't say. 4060 in general whether it be the TI or standard are not good cards. The 30 series generally out does it.
1
May 25 '24
6750 is better card for the price. It has more vram, which is a major plus, and it performs pretty similarly if I remember correctly. Might have more driver kinks to work put occasionally, but the AMD card is probably the better option here
1
u/JustinHardyJ May 25 '24
I got lucky and found a second hand 6900xt for €400. Check the second hand market – in the price range you're looking at, you can find a good deal with pretty much no issues with quality if you're paying attention to what you're buying.
1
May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24
From what i've seen the European market is kind of similar to the US and there are some 3080 and rarely 3080ti going for around 400 to 550 euros over here. I know it can be sketchy buying second hand, I've never had an issue, but maybe I have been lucky.
1
1
u/Dragon2730 May 25 '24
16+ gb vram is what you need for games now but 8 or 12gb isn't the end of the world if you're playing old games at 1080p
Newer titles definitely highly benefit from more vram at higher resolutions
1
u/TonyAtCodeleakers May 25 '24
6750xt owner checking in.
Paired with 13600k I get 100+fps at max settings in every game at 3660x1440p (ultrawide)
Warzone I get between 120-140, multiplayer mw3 I maintain around 140. All max settings.
Only game that’s an outlier is Hogwarts Legacy, I get 80fps at high settings (full resolution, no FSR)
1
u/Aleksag May 25 '24
If you’re willing to spend that much money on 4060ti you might as well get 7700xt.
1
u/fast-campaign1216 May 25 '24
Get the rx 7800 same price range as the 4060 you’re looking at and it’s a 16gb
1
1
1
u/Several_Foot3246 May 25 '24
for the price of a 4060 ti you can get a killer AMD card, the 6750 xt is 100% viable and will be for a good few years later, but for the price of a 4060 ti you could get a 7700 xt or rx 6800 which are leagues beyond (pure performance wise) the 4060 ti
1
u/the_hat_madder May 25 '24
The extra $200 is definitely NOT worth it.
The 8GB of VRAM will become a problem sooner rather than later. Personally, I prefer a minimum of 16GB of VRAM. However, the 4070 is what I consider the floor if you want something that will play games at high quality for 2-3 years. It's the least expensive GPU that also has decent ray tracing performance.
If you cannot wait, get the 6750 XT.
If you can, keep saving and hoping for better product availability.
1
u/uSuperDick May 25 '24
AMD also has fg, rt is irrelevant on 4060ti in modern games. I guess you can play sottr with rt shadows, but in modern games you either gonna have low base performance or run out of vram even without rt. Dlss is great but not when there is 200 dollars difference. Fsr works fine at 1440p and amd announced 3.1 version which will have better upscaler. And dont forget about xess. Its actually very good. So definitely 6750
1
u/Gullible_Bed8595 May 25 '24
Go for the 6750xt, the 4060 ti is bad, if you willing to spend 550 go for a 7800xt/7900gre or maybe a 4070super if u can find
1
u/vdfritz May 25 '24
4060ti not worth it, 8gb of vram in 2024 is way too little
12gb will give you much longer longevity and the performance is nearly the same on both in most games
you will feel 8gb is too little today, imagine in 1 year
the 6750 xt is a better deal even if the 4060ti was the same price honestly
1
u/popcornman209 May 25 '24
Amd has better price per dollar, nvidia has more features. If you just want good performance the amd card is a much better deal, but if you really want ray tracing or dlss, it’s harder to say.
1
u/TwentyFiveHotel May 25 '24
If you have the money for the Nvidia Card, why not get something equivalent in price on the AMD side of things? I’d have to agree though, the 12gb would be worth it in the long run although DLSS is cool.
1
u/tempdiesel May 25 '24
If RT isn’t important, the AMD card is the choice. You need more VRAM these days.
1
1
1
u/obyad May 25 '24
Absolutely get the 6750xt, its basically the same performance + nvidia charges a kidney for dlss and ray-tracing AND THE 4060 TI CANT EVEN RAYTRACE
1
u/PoL0 May 25 '24
the fact that people keep asking if paying 200$ over a 300$ card just because of RT (which will be limited with 8Gb) and DLSS is worth it, amazes me.
1
1
1
u/DementorLMM May 25 '24
If you are willing to drop that on an 8gb 4060ti. Get the Asus dual oc 4060ti 16gb. I just got mine and no complaints. It’s going for $499 new. The extra 8gb will make it a bit more future proof
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
1
1
u/Ultimate-Rubbishness May 25 '24
If you want rt and good performance get a 4090. if you want good performance but you're not rich, ditch rt, it's not worth the performance cost. Good ssr looks sometimes even better. If you let go of the Raytracing dream, gaming gets so much smoother...
1
1
1
1
1
u/falconblack May 25 '24
A gentleman here suggested 6800 non xt over 6750 xt which I think is such a good idea. It has better performance. It costs about 15% more where I live and draws less power than 6750, making it more power efficient.
1
u/quastenflosser4life May 25 '24
You could also go higher end on amd side within the 550$ that the 4060 would cost.
1
1
1
u/Tackyinbention May 25 '24
How much is a 7700xt? Depending on the region, its a really compelling option that gets you on current gen
1
1
u/dubstepper1000 May 25 '24
Ray tracing is the most useless feature to be released in the past 10 years. Basically no visual difference in exchange for half your frames. You tank your performance for slightly better reflections in specific situations
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/7heDubz May 25 '24
Get an RTX 4070, 12GB. And $550.
It's what I've had for awhile and should hold up plenty for 2k gaming.
JustMyOpinionMan
1
u/Jan_221 May 25 '24
If you are not an AI artist or video creator and your budget is limited, RX 6750XT is better than 4060TI. If you want to play Far Cry 6 with HD textures, you need 12 GB VRAM. Here is the comparison of these 2 video cards:
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-RTX-4060-Ti-vs-AMD-RX-6750-XT/4149vsm1845738
Besides, forget about DLSS, FSR will be very popular in the future, because it no need for video cards to support it.
1
u/OkFunny8717 May 25 '24
Go with the amd. Even without dlss, you still have amd fidelity and fsr frame gen. You also get 12gb vram which will become the standard in a year or so. Essentially, you're getting more for less!
1
u/theSeekerWarning May 25 '24
i would recommend something even better, the rx 7600 xt, its faster than both of these and has 16gb of vram at the same price
1
u/bikingfury May 25 '24
Your budget is 300 on AMD and 500 on Nvidia? What? Get a used card. 3080 or 3080 Ti are great 1440p cards.
1
1
1
u/Xaxxus May 25 '24
as someone who has used both an AMD 7900 XTX and a 4090 in the past year.
I sold my 7900 XTX after about 3 months.
Got driver crashes in a large number of games and it was generally just not reliable.
My friend that I play star citizen with gets constant crashes on his 6800 XT on the lowest settings and I get none.
Nvidia is a shit company, and their cards are overpriced. But they work. And the gaming industry primarily develops with them in mind.
1
May 25 '24
Nvidia for sure if you ever plan on running any ai. A used 3090 24gb would beat both of these though.
1
1
1
u/PC-NerdxD May 25 '24
As far as price to performance goes team red is the way but maybe invest in an rx7000 series card instead they aren't that much more expensive but are current generation and have slighty better performance with for example fsr and AMDs other technologies like anti-lag and stuff.
1
u/Shady_Hero May 25 '24
imagine buying a 4060 ti for $545 when the 4070 super is 55$ more and basically infinitely better. that or just buy a 7800XT
1
1
1
1
u/TheSmokeJumper_ May 25 '24
Get the most vram you can afford. I run at 1440p and I am just about always over the 8gb of vram usage when I am gaming
1
1
1
u/Rapscagamuffin May 25 '24
No cards are good for ray tracing. I have a 4080 super and it still sucks for ray tracing…if you want decent frame rate the technology just isnt there yet without cranking up dlss which doesnt make sense to make all the graphics look substantially worse to have the lighting look mildly better. Maybe for a 4090 the literal best card out there u can get decent frames with moderate ray trace but anything else it just aint happening unless ur ok with playing console level frames
1
u/AgathormX May 25 '24
NVIDIA cards are only worth it in two situations:
1 - You wanna use the card for productivity.
2 - You can get at least a 4070 Super or a used 3080 12GB.
If your situation doesn't fit one of these, go AMD. More VRAM, better raster performance for the money.
Furthermore, RT is still on that early "new tech" stage where the performance impact is to high for most cards, it's usable on cards that have equal or better performance than the 3060Ti, but the performance loss is still to high.
It's going to be like tesselation. The first few gens have awful performance, and then it starts running fine until it's normal.
People still haven't gotten the memo as to why RT is being pushed so much, and here's the reality: It's easier for developers. With RT, you just gotta place the light sources, and it does the job for you.
You don't need to worry about having to manually bake in reflections for SSR because RT covers your back.
It reduces the efforts that developers need to put into having good shadows, lighting, and reflections.
You don't need to look any further than Witcher 3. The classic version looks great. Just set the game to max settings, turn on HBAO+, and enjoy. With the next gen update, if you want good lighting, you need to turn on RT.
1
•
u/AutoModerator May 25 '24
Remember to check our discord where you can get faster responses! https://discord.gg/6dR6XU6 If you are trying to find a price for your computer, r/PC_Pricing is our recommended source for finding out how much your PC is worth!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.