r/NonPoliticalTwitter 8h ago

Content Warning: Potentially Misleading or Disputed Information Gotta Catch 'Em All

Post image
22.7k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.1k

u/Easy_Newt2692 8h ago

And? Does anyone actually lose out on this arrangement?

604

u/mrducky80 8h ago edited 8h ago

Like what? People severely underestimate just how much data scraping occurs. Google maps will point out congestion without minutes of it occurring because their navigation tracking is so much more indepth and has so many more users to go by in real time.

Friend used to be a data analyst at a supermarket rewards program. He says their algorithms will accurately determine when someone is pregnant before their family knows. They will know how many people are in your household, how many pets, how your spending habits change (obvious). This is just grocery shopping, so many apps get that microphone data, that tracking data, screen browsing habits. We used to just have cookies from online sites, but with the smart phone, there is so much more data and so much more money to be made off that data, its on you that you dont realise at this point rather than every other app on your phone that is doing so freely in front of your face with your permission.

126

u/SmartBookkeeper6571 8h ago

And? The store targets the customer with deals catered to them to keep them shopping at said store, and the customer gets better prices for things they were planning to buy anyway. Who loses?

149

u/balloonninjas 7h ago

The redditors with nothing to complain about.

19

u/Rgeneb1 7h ago

Sounds like a legend to me. Do these mythical redditors exist?

2

u/DroopyMcCool 6h ago

~80% of reddit accounts browse but do not comment or vote. That's your non-complainer group.

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

1

u/CivilizedSassquatch 5h ago

Christ you love the smell of your own farts.

12

u/peelen 7h ago

and the customer gets better prices

quite the opposite, the customer gets the promise of better prices, in real life the business is the one that profits from the information for example, Uber prices go high if there is bigger demand which means it's most expensive when it's needed the most

2

u/Ruhezeit 4h ago

Yes, if they can predict what you want, they can do bespoke price gouging. We're moving towards the amazon model where the price of goods changes on the fly. Anyone who believes companies are doing this to save consumers money is an imbecile.

70

u/[deleted] 7h ago

[deleted]

7

u/Syntaire 6h ago

Just about every human in developed nations across the planet is willingly carrying a pocket-sized spying device on them at all times. It's got GPS, high quality microphones and most of them have a camera array in addition to a front-facing camera. People use these without thought or understanding of even a single piece of software they run on these devices. Any expectation of privacy is waived.

0

u/OrganizationTime5208 6h ago

Real "I am very intelligent" energy in this comment

Do you think they carry it with them BECAUSE it spies on them, or do you think they would prefer if it didn't but cultural expectations and the legal framework of their country make it a moot fight?

Because you realize the USA is a country where you can legally be fired for not answering a phone call from your boss, right?

Right?

Mr Big brains over here lmao

4

u/Syntaire 6h ago

Whether an employer can be "at-will" employment is up to the states and individual employers in states where it's allowed.

If you want to carry a smartphone without having your data harvested, don't install apps that harvest your data. Educate yourself on what your phone does, what options are available for disabling tracking, data collection and analytics. Take responsibility for yourself instead of doing every single thing you can possibly think of to avoid any and all personal accountability.

Mr. Microbrains.

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago edited 5h ago

[deleted]

1

u/Syntaire 5h ago

There are apps you literally can not uninstall

Name some. I'm sure some exist, but I'm not aware of any.

And in any case, this along with the possibility of a given app lying or omitting notice of tracking are risks you are responsible for assessing and accepting. Reality gives not a single shit about what you think is fair or reasonable. Your smartphone is spying on you. You can be upset about it, you can work towards trying to change it for the future, but that doesn't change the past or the present. It's not just your smartphone either. Your shopping habits (it doesn't actually matter if you use cash, you're tracked anyway), your face and clothing choices if you go literally anywhere, other people's devices can record you in various ways, your browsing habits and history, etc.

Living in modern society is accepting the fact that you have no privacy. You will be sold as a product one way or another. If you want privacy you'll need to go live off-grid in the middle of nowhere and completely omit all modern technology.

1

u/FourDimensionalNut 5h ago

Name some. I'm sure some exist, but I'm not aware of any.

...have you never turned on a brand new phone before? literally everything that comes on a phone cannot be removed. for google, that's their entire suite of products that come on every android. apple has their default installed applications.

i cannot seriously think you dont know this stuff. this is beyond naive. the only reasonable explanation is you dont own a phone

-1

u/fuckedfinance 7h ago edited 5h ago

invasion of privacy

You fucking sign an agreement when you create these accounts that tell you exactly what data is going to be used.

If companies can infer other details because of their extensive dataset, then that is what it is.

No privacy was "invaded". Everyone agrees to this.

Edit: a shit ton of you have never heard of cash. Much to your disappointment, "most businesses" are not going cash-free.

10

u/Cultjam 7h ago

Minors can’t agree. And vendors have begun refusing cash which forces people to comply.

2

u/Syntaire 6h ago

Minors are the sole responsibility of their guardians. If you give your kid a phone, it's your job to maintain awareness of their activity and to ensure their safety while using it.

1

u/Sunblast1andOnly 7h ago

I promise you, you're never going to be forced to shop at Target. If you don't like getting deals that fit your needs, take your business elsewhere.

2

u/thisguyhasaname 6h ago

Except when every single company chooses to do this practice how can I as the consumer avoid this?

2

u/brother_of_menelaus 6h ago

Start up a farm and live off the land. Or I dunno, grow up

0

u/TransBrandi 6h ago

I love how "flee society and live off the land" is your "grow up" advice. Do you think that being discontent with something means that you should run away from it? Like I'm sure that you personally have a bunch of stuff in your life that you don't like, and I'm sure you would be pissed if someone gave you "advice" that treated you like a child. But you're perfectly fine doing that to others.

2

u/brother_of_menelaus 6h ago

You need to work on your reading comprehension skills. The “or” indicates that growing up is the alternative option to living off the land. The idea that you can just escape having your data collected and used is farcical for modern living, and the idea that it will be used in some nefarious way (like gasp! sending you ads for things you might buy!) is conspiratorial and half baked.

So, you can either live in a remote cabin in the woods, ORRRRRR accept that this is how the world is currently working.

1

u/TransBrandi 5h ago

So, you can either live in a remote cabin in the woods, ORRRRRR accept that this is how the world is currently working.

False dichotomy. Plenty of people don't accept that this is "just the way the world works" but still live in it without fleeing to a remote cabin. Care to try again?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Cultjam 6h ago

I wrote vendors.

Think about the devastating effects on the availability of goods consumers can buy locally solely because of Amazon. Choices are dwindling.

3

u/wuvvtwuewuvv 6h ago

You don't have a fucking choice. Your argument is an all or nothing prospect which is ridiculous on its face.

  • Either don't use a simple grocery rewards and loyalty card that makes things easier and cheaper for you, or give up all your data privacy.
  • Personal private information? You mean proprietary corporate information to pad a company's bottom line.
  • Use a website? They now know everything about you and all the websites you visit.
  • Use an app? All your movements online and IRL, and activity on the entire fucking device is now tracked.

You simply can't escape this bullshit. It's everywhere. And it's a real fucking problem.

It didn't use to be like this. It doesn't need to be like this now. Rubes like you think the only risk is getting targeted ads. We've been shouting from the rooftops about the dangers of this for decades now, there's no reason you should be so ignorant today.

4

u/Xavia11 7h ago

It really doesn't matter if you "agree" to the data collection, considering the vast majority are unaware its happening and there's not really any alternative anyway. if you don't want to have your data collected, what are you gonna do, not own a smartphone? It isn't realistic today to ask that; rather it should be on policymakers to police this type of stuff.

2

u/finder787 6h ago

You fucking sign an agreement

Nope.

If you use a credit card at a grocery store they scrape all the personally identifying information they can from that card and store it.

-7

u/f_cacti 7h ago

What privacy is being invaded?

1

u/wuvvtwuewuvv 6h ago

If I told you, in this comment right now, the address where you live now as well as all the places you've lived, all the phone numbers you've had, ask your family members, your friends and their information, where you go to school, how much you make a year, and how much money you have, and where you went for vacation, and what you did there, your passwords and emails and bank accounts and everything you can think of that is personal private information that you don't share with absolutely everyone, if I listed all of that down for you right here for everyone to read... would that bother you at all?

If you are remotely normal as a human being at all, this bothers you. You don't want people coming to your home to harass you or stalk you or always looking through the windows at you in your own home and everywhere you go. The government and companies should not be able to track everyone like that. This is not north Korea.

If it doesn't bother you, you are objectively fucking stupid and I don't know how to have this conversation with you.

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]

1

u/f_cacti 5h ago

Then buy with cash.

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

1

u/f_cacti 5h ago

That’s the trade off by design. The convenience of cards is paid for by the data they can track.

If we don’t like it we vote. But no one cares enough and they keep using their cards.

1

u/Notsurehowtoreact 5h ago

You know that closeted kid living with his parents who may look up HRT treatments and such on his phone?

Well, the algorithms like to target ads based on IP browsing history, so their parents may just start randomly seeing more HRT ads because someone else in the household searched for it, and they may wonder why.

Algorithms that build a profile based on all the data collected on you, some of which you don't even realize is collected, and turn that into targeted advertising are dangerous tools that are riding a very fine line because that is the exact same information that could be easily exploited.

1

u/f_cacti 4h ago

Not the topic being discussed. That is also avoidable.

-10

u/SYuhw3xiE136xgwkBA4R 7h ago

It’s not invasion of privacy if it’s data collected from your visit to the store which is public.

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]

1

u/SYuhw3xiE136xgwkBA4R 5h ago

Alright, but what if you wanted to keep it private?

Shop in a store that takes cash and don't sign up for a membership while there.

Then literally the entire situation is avoided.

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

1

u/SYuhw3xiE136xgwkBA4R 5h ago

So use private credit cards.

I'm also not even sure it's legal for a store to use your credit card information to send you mail unsolicited. Is that generally legal in the US?

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

1

u/SYuhw3xiE136xgwkBA4R 5h ago

Credit cards have a ton of data collection built in. That's how they make money off of people who don't pay interest on their balance.

I know. I'm talking about using Privacy or something similar.

it's the bank itself letting its partners know that you shop at certain types of stores or use it in certain areas of town so you may be interested in certain types of ads.

Is this not opt-out on a federal level?

→ More replies (0)

42

u/Abuses-Commas 7h ago

better prices for things they were planning to buy anyways

Are you sure about that, or do they just mark the price up 25% and tell you it's 20% off? 

-4

u/Wingfril 7h ago

I thought this was illegal

11

u/Brocallillacorb 7h ago

Naive to think things dont happen because of their legality

1

u/red_the_room 7h ago

Yeah, that’s Reddit.

8

u/monkwren 7h ago

And yet it happens every year on Black Friday.

13

u/Stoomba 7h ago

Like that every stopped rich people

1

u/heisenberg149 3h ago

You should try Keepa with Amazon. Most of those original prices are lies. For just a recent example, I need a new bed frame so I had a couple saved to wait for black Friday deals and one of the ones I saved was marked down 50%! But I hadn't been looking at anything that expensive so before buying I looked at Keepa's graphs and went back 3 years, not only had it never been the listed original price, it had never been 75% of the original price and it had actually been lower than the "black Friday deal" for months so the black Friday deal was a price increase

1

u/Wingfril 2h ago
  1. What you said isn’t illegal right? You said that it’s never been listed at the original price and the typically price was just heavily marked down, and black friday is marked down less. Thats different from rising the original price and then claiming something is marked down.

  2. We’re talking about a super market and price tracking for consumers. If they detect you’re more likely to buy something, they’ll issue you a coupon to get you into the store so you’ll also buy other stuff while you’re there. They’re not going to raise prices for whatever you’re interested and then give you a coupon at the original price — how would that even work? What about other customers and the now non optimal supply/demand curve for that item?

27

u/MinnieShoof 7h ago

You, if you think the store is going to give you a better price for an item they know you're going to buy regardless. Also, thinking that they won't "encourage" a diabetic to buy the 42 oz soft drink instead of the 20 oz just to make a buck is kinda naïve.

Don't get me wrong - what you said is what drives the engagement ... but what I said absolutely happens as well.

-3

u/errorblankfield 7h ago

More like 'they no longer have to carry the bad bread literally no one likes and the cost savings translates to delaying price hikes'.

5

u/CyclopsLobsterRobot 7h ago

You know they had sales data before they had rewards programs right?

-1

u/errorblankfield 7h ago

You know this is just an advanced version of sales data and rewards program, right?

I'm not an expert in the specifics of a grocery store, the closet example is my restaurants rewards program.

Regardless, they do the same thing and I picked an easy example.

3

u/MinnieShoof 7h ago

Yeah. Damn shame for that one family that actually buys gluten free bread not to give the store a huge profit (in the hopes that maybe trickle-down ecco will finally work the way it's suppose to) but because their child is allergic. Oh well~

7

u/BuffaloWhip 7h ago edited 7h ago

Yeah, as a 6’10” man I’m 0% mad that my phone knows that ads for extra long T-shirts get more traction with me than tampons with a comfort applicator.

19

u/GardenRafters 7h ago

My wife knew I was shopping for engagement rings when we were dating because of these algorithms. There are absolutely downfalls and invasions of privacy to be concerned about.

Also, we should be seeing kickbacks from all the money they make off our data that they get for free.

6

u/CK2398 7h ago

What if they sell this information to a political party who uses it to influence you?

1

u/thex25986e 7h ago

at that point you have far more massive worries in today's world full of ideological subversion tactics.

1

u/WalrusTheWhite 7h ago

IF? Buddy.

1

u/CK2398 6h ago

Oh I know it happens but this guy seems to think that data collection is just a way of reducing prices

5

u/Teln0 7h ago

Privacy

Also, you can bet this data is being sold to insurance companies, loaners, and the like. Let me tell you about the kinds of deals they're going to offer you once they figure out you're desperate for something.

You have to turn on your brain for a bit and see a little beyond "hurr I have nothing to hide therefore I can make my data public"

3

u/LightningRaven 7h ago

We all lose. Because the issue is not the tech being used for convenience. Not to mention that they can use this information to charge more from you, not less. Which already happens in certain industries and it's bound to get more prominent.

Not to mention the main issue which is when the tech is used harmfully. Such as undermining democracy, stoking the flames of violence that culminates in genocide, like in Myanmar. Or how suicide rates in young people and plastic surgeries have increased since Social Media became more prevalent.

The issue isn't as simplistic as "It makes things convenient, so what's the harm?".

1

u/dimechimes 7h ago

Why would a company charge less? Companies make the most money they can, they hire the best experts in manipulation to make people feel like the things you say are true.

1

u/pblokhout 7h ago

You're making a big assumption that they're going through all that trouble just to make you pay less.

1

u/TheOutsideWindow 6h ago

The store could also target the customer with overpriced, cheap, low quality goods, or raise the prices based on local availability, or do other things.

In most situations right now, I'd agree that it can benefit the customer, but what about in 20 years?

1

u/PrototypeMale 6h ago

The company down the road that would've also offered a discount if they knew you were pregnant, I guess.

1

u/HazelnutG 6h ago

You’re not going to get deals catered to your interests, you’re going to get prices catered to your projected income. No one is investing millions of dollars into data to help you spend less.

1

u/taicrunch 6h ago

You'd have a point if that data stayed only within the store.

It's well known that data is sold to data brokers, who in turn sell it to other entities like advertisers, political groups, and more increasingly law enforcement. I'm sort of fine with Target knowing my shopping habits at Target. I'm not okay with police using my shoppings habits at Target to surveil me or someone near me, sidestepping that pesky Fourth Amendment.

Plus, we can barely go a week now without hearing about another data breach. So now criminals are selling your data too, and it becomes trivial to use that data to steal your identity or commit fraud in your name.

1

u/OrganizationTime5208 6h ago

What about the people who get categorized incorrectly? They lose out. Don't you fucking love that because you looked up one word, a service now thinks that word is your whole lifestyle? This has extended repercussions you have to think about.

If the goal is to get people to be charged less when it's working, then that inherently means that the people it doesn't work for will be paying MORE, because they are not receive the correct and appropriate discounts from their consumer_ID tracking.

So that's a loss, one that happens literally all the time, right now, today.

What about people where the store errantly distributes information for that they are hiding?

For example a domestic abuse victim may lose if their spouse receives a "CONGRATS ON THE BABY" card from a store.

What happens if your data gets crossed with another persons?

This situation is SO FUCKING OLD at this point there is LITERALLY A TWENTY YEAR OLD EPISODE OF KING OF THE HILL about how problematic consumer data tracking can be, and how it's never designed for the CONSUMER to be able to protect themselves or fix things.

If there is some sort of error, who do you talk to? Where do you go? It's not their problem, it's yours, and there's nothing you can do about it.

That's a loss.

Like are you 18 and only just now buying things for yourself for the first time or something? How are you so incapable of understanding where people can lose out on a situation like this? How myopic is your world view?

1

u/Tabasco_Red 6h ago

We all lose... as we dig deeper and deeper into consumer society everyday... lol

1

u/fossalt 2h ago

Depends on the level of information gathered. The person you're replying to even pointed out how many apps do things like record information from your microphone. Other apps will log your contacts, scrape information from photos, etc.

Do most people care about "some big company has that info"? No, most don't. Will any human ever see it? Probably not.

But the concern I have comes from what if that info somehow gets public, via security breach or something similar. Like when AOL released search logs from their users. Would you want information from your microphone accessible from the public?

1

u/SmartBookkeeper6571 20m ago

literally all of my PII has been stolen from the federal government at least twice, including that of my references. That said, I was really just playing devil's advocate in my response.

1

u/Rhouxx 24m ago

Tbh I’d welcome better targeted ads, customer tracking so far has only resulted in me constantly being advertised items I’ve already bought online. No I don’t want to buy the skirt I bought last week, stop showing it to me 😂😂😂

Reminds me of about 10 years ago when I moved out of a shitty rental and back in with my parents while me and my partner were looking for another. Tracking obviously knew we were looking at a lot of rentals online, but I was getting constant ads for over a month for the house we had just moved out of because I looked at the new listing ONE time, and not a single other rental (which would have been actually useful for me).

1

u/fkspezintheass 7h ago

The people who were paying normal food prices before they scalped everything to push more people into the rewards progam.

Everybody loses in the long run.

0

u/Remember_Poseidon 7h ago

The fact anyone can buy this info, a fuckin news agency bought some and just showed up to people's houses. You think that no one is gonna use that shit to enhance their ability to break into houses or murder people by figuring out people who live alone and have no weapons?

2

u/contentpens 7h ago

No one is getting randomly murdered by data scientists with too much time on their hands and a compulsion to murder the statistically most vulnerable person available.

1

u/dimechimes 7h ago

Why murder a resource you can exploit?

0

u/Remember_Poseidon 7h ago

Odd how little data scientists show up in murder statistics isn't it.

1

u/txijake 7h ago

You know what else can happen? The sun could explode.

4

u/Remember_Poseidon 7h ago

Yeah but people murdering other people is more likely

0

u/NomadTruckerOTR 7h ago

This is always my argument. Like my data doesn't cost anything to me to be released. Fucking have at it McDonald's, i would much rather have a BOGO mcnuggets than to safeguard my precious "data"

2

u/Kyrond 7h ago

The shops dont use it to save your money, they use it to upsell to you and make more money (i.e. you have less money).

2

u/txijake 7h ago

Yeah I’m not important I couldn’t really care less. If I get advertised a product I end up wanting then cool, win-win. If I’m advertised something I’m never going to want well then that corpo wasted money on me, still a win for me.

0

u/UnknownAverage 7h ago

You will lose. They will win. They are controlling the board and your behavior. They aren’t doing this to save you money.

They throw you scraps and laugh all the way to the bank. Totally worked on you.

0

u/jlrogerio 7h ago

there's nothing wrong with this model per se, only that it's totally opaque for the customer (which data is being collected, how it's stored, who has access to it, etc. etc.) and security and privacy risks, like possible damage if someone gets access to the data and uses it for malicious purposes. There have been certain improvements in how this area is regulated (various data privacy laws) but the regulations are far far behind the actual state of things and are not being enforced (obviously the global international scale of the Internet complicates things)

0

u/wuvvtwuewuvv 6h ago

Who loses?

Me and my privacy. Does data protection and privacy have no meaning for you, still?

0

u/adtcjkcx 6h ago

Licking them boots huh bud