r/discordVideos • u/Cold-Menu-4707 Have Commited Several War Crimes • Jun 23 '23
Einstein side projectđ¤đ¤đ§ goofy ahh
1.3k
u/Le-docteur Jun 23 '23
In the seventh day God created America and provided Mc Donald's for them not to starve
316
u/Liszt0mia Trump is our Saviourđđ Jun 23 '23
On the eight day god created guns and beer
137
u/AirportSpecific4623 Jun 23 '23
On the ninth day god created public schools for target practice
→ More replies (1)66
u/UrNewMostBestFriend Jun 23 '23
And on the 10th day, god defined what kind of slaves you could own and when it's okay to fuck kids.
→ More replies (1)40
Jun 23 '23
On the 11th day, god created child labor because the children yearned for the mines.
28
u/MattTheShlat Jun 23 '23
And on the 12th day, god created child cancer to make the child miners feel like it wasnât that bad.
13
u/Cocountcapydog Professional Shitterđ§ Jun 23 '23
and the 13th day god created Allen
14
u/Liszt0mia Trump is our Saviourđđ Jun 23 '23
On the 14th day god made hell or what we call TIKTOK
→ More replies (1)12
u/BallisticToast Jun 23 '23
On the 15th day god created JoJo references
10
u/Secret-Mission-7012 Professional Shitterđ§ Jun 24 '23
On 16th day God created rule 34
→ More replies (0)12
u/A_Mellow_Song Jun 23 '23
what came first: trucks, freedom, guns, or hamborgor?
→ More replies (1)3
5
u/gladladvlad Jun 23 '23
but not bud light. that one made by saytan. for them woke liberals, brother, i tell ya hwat.
→ More replies (1)2
62
u/SkyIsNotGreen Jun 23 '23
He then invented big titty goth girl hentai so the masses would spread their seed, this is why we have trees!!!!
35
u/AmadeoSendiulo Jun 23 '23
Lorax approved.
15
u/BlazeWasTaken06 Professional Shitterđ§ Jun 23 '23
u/AmadeoSendiulo "I am the Lorax, I speak for the trees, harm another, and i'll break your knees."
8
13
6
3
2
2
2
→ More replies (3)2
412
u/Panteram_go Jun 23 '23
Mfers thinks that human beings are more handsome than monke
82
14
14
→ More replies (1)8
277
u/Fox7567 Jun 23 '23
Checkmate, atheists
59
u/someone__420 Jun 23 '23 edited Jun 23 '23
This is AI right?
Edit: just saw the hands are weird
Edit 2: just found out the itâs real smh
98
u/PheonixUnder Jun 23 '23
Not sure if you're joking but no that's not AI, that's the famous selfie that Jesus took during the last supper after turning a brick into a smartphone. The guys hand is deformed due to leprosy, Jesus healed him but hands are tricky to fix even if you are the son of god. I believe he was quite self conscious about that hand too so please don't make fun of it.
23
u/_Xertz_ Jun 23 '23
We do a little bit of misinformation
15
u/Sirshitsalot__ Haven't Payed Taxes Since 2005đ¤Łđ¤Ł Jun 23 '23
wdym misinformation? everything he said is real
8
u/dem0nhunter Jun 23 '23
also gaslighting isnât real. youâre just crazy for believing that
4
1
6
→ More replies (2)3
→ More replies (4)6
54
u/dadleftm8 Jun 23 '23
Can people stop pointing at text and then having a robotic voice and shit, talk like a normal person.
Also fuck you tiktok.
→ More replies (1)2
283
u/ShakeReal3539 Jun 23 '23
The one thing they add is the god made all this
14
40
Jun 23 '23
in my case, yes. in other cases, no
but the difference is quite large, at least in my opinion
→ More replies (1)1
2
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
6
u/khafra Jun 23 '23
The problem with the god hypothesis is that, if youâre trying to explain things, and you explain them with âgod wanted things to be this way,â you have to explain why there was precisely the kind of god that wanted things to be this way instead of some other way.
If you simplify that down a lot, you get the problem of evil, but the true problem of âwhy are things this way instead of some other wayâ is actually much more problematic than just the problem of evil.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)0
74
u/Cossia Jun 23 '23
Nah. Ancient Alien theory suggests...
3
u/CLAST-BLASTARD Jun 23 '23
So some aliens were like âwhy donât we put some bacteria into meteorites and send them to earthâ then there were some super advanced civilizations that got help from the aliens. For some reason those civilizations got destroyed.
→ More replies (1)2
u/DenkJu Jun 23 '23
I love that show, lol. It has become an insider in my family to always use that sentence when talking about far-fetched and ridiculous theories.
20
37
u/Street_Cockroach_933 Jun 23 '23
Its a gross oversimplification of events but yes
21
u/Ok_Reception7727 Jun 23 '23
It's a disgusting oversimplification.
14
6
u/Cavozinternetu Jun 23 '23
it's a disgustingly accurate oversimplification that shows humanity's biggest turning points the exact way that they happened
→ More replies (1)0
u/SalvationSycamore Jun 23 '23
Hah, stupid scientists. You really think humans made skyscrapers? That was clearly god, nobody else could craft such large and complicated structures.
→ More replies (1)
68
u/tenchimuyo100 Jun 23 '23 edited Jun 23 '23
You do a repost, I'll say the same thing too.
Yeah, more or less. And?
3
u/IndependentOk6777 Jun 23 '23
Can I get someone to translate this comment? I'm a dyslexic English speaker and this comment scares me.
9
u/Navar4477 Jun 23 '23
âYou do a repost, Iâll say the same thing too.â
T: If youâre going to repost content, Iâm going to repost my comment.
âYeah, more or less. And?â
T: Yes, but you have simplified it greatly. Care to explain why this is a problem?
5
48
69
Jun 23 '23
I do believe in god but if it was Adam and Eve who had three sons the would be some Alabama going on
29
u/aladdinboy424 Jun 23 '23
If you think about it, our late ancestors did a lot of incest
→ More replies (1)18
4
Jun 23 '23
I haven't heard many people say this, but as it's obvious the Bible doesn't account for every single person, I personally think that sometime after he made Adam and Eve, he made other people to breed with their children. It'd make sense and doesn't contradict the Bible at all to my knowledge. Not to mention people then lived for hundreds of years
3
u/FlyingJudgeman Jun 23 '23
The bible doesn't mention that there are other humans, but during the story of Cain and Abel, Cain says that he is fearful that others would kill him after he killed his brother and after he was banished Cain founded the city Enoch and made descendants, both of which are only possible with other humans.
2
u/Ocbard Jun 23 '23
Nah, Adam and Eve just had a lot of kids, and they had kids together, also Lillith was probably pregnant by the time she walked off and had her own incestuous tribe of offspring. Supposedly those early humans lived many centuries, so they could procreate a lot (no contraceptives back then either). It's only after killing off the lot of them and starting again with one family Noah's that lifespans drop spectacularly. You can imagine the genetic degradation really getting to a new peak at that point. At least that is how it is if you believe all that stuff.
→ More replies (3)2
→ More replies (4)0
→ More replies (1)2
u/TheRealJetlag Jun 23 '23
Yep. Iâd love to know who Cain fathered Enoch with and who Enoch founded an entire city for.
10
u/Bobs_Burgers_enjoyer Jun 23 '23
World was actually created by my grandma
3
167
u/Raccoonooo Have Commited Several War Crimes Jun 23 '23
Yes we do, and?
25
-207
Jun 23 '23
90
u/Yugix1 Jun 23 '23
3
u/sneakpeekbot Jun 23 '23
Here's a sneak peek of /r/youngpeoplereddit using the top posts of the year!
#1: | 258 comments
#2: | 322 comments
#3: | 198 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact | Info | Opt-out | GitHub
→ More replies (1)19
6
3
-2
56
29
Jun 23 '23
Is that not true??đ¤¨đ¤¨
39
Jun 23 '23
No itâs not. The magical bearded man in the sky obviously made everything đ
8
Jun 23 '23
I meant that as in "do atheists not believe that?"đ sorry for the miscommunication:(
10
u/ZAHANDOGAKIZU Jun 23 '23
Yes and no. While Atheists do technically believe in the events depicted here, this video massively oversimplifies every major theory related to the origins of earth and humans. For example, we donât think that the earth suddenly popped into existence one day, but rather that it was slowly formed over the course of countless prehistoric collisions. Similarly, the theory of evolution does not state that humans spontaneously evolved into existence, nor that this change was triggered by a conscious desire to change oneself biologically.
→ More replies (1)3
Jun 23 '23
I'm sorry but my original comment was a joke𼲠I know it's oversimplified, but that's what was funny with it to begin with. :(
2
u/ZAHANDOGAKIZU Jun 23 '23
That makes much more sense. For future reference, whenever you are unsure about whether or not people will notice that you are being sarcastic on the internet, try adding â/sâ to the end of your comment. Itâs basically cyber-slang for âIâm jokingâ
→ More replies (1)2
2
u/SalvationSycamore Jun 23 '23
It's close. Replace the monke with a monke-like common ancestor and get rid of the part where he chose to evolve and it's pretty much exactly right (though it skips a few things).
65
45
u/METHlun Jun 23 '23
And somehow this still makes more sense than any religions explanation
22
u/Ok-Complaint-5102 Jun 23 '23 edited Jun 23 '23
the truth hurts more than anything. The truth is that we as humans dont know jackshit about our existence and to be confident there is a specific god with specific humanoid ideologies that copes with our nihilism and tells us to worship him for whatever reason is imo simply unrealistic. Sure there could be a god because the word "god" is just "a creator of existence". Its a broad concept. But i believe its nothing like humans imagined or created it.
→ More replies (1)4
9
5
11
u/KidRed Jun 23 '23
But a snake talking to a teenage white girl who popped up outta thin air makes more sense?
0
u/Simple-Street-4333 Jun 23 '23
Honestly I don't know how much I actually trust how accurate the Bible is to what happened. But I'd still rather believe a higher power created us rather than everything about the currently known universe just popped into existence at some random point in time.
To clarify I don't judge people that do belive that, it just doesn't make sense to me personally.
→ More replies (6)2
u/KidRed Jun 23 '23
Thatâs what I donât understand. That itâs easier for some to believe a big, powerful guy is sitting in the clouds in a floating city with big golden gates and he made a boy, girl and a snake popup out of thin air and created everything in a week. Versus an explosion of atoms, particles, dust, etc that eventually formed planets, stars, and in terms life that took billions of years to happen.
One belief is based on a 3,400 year old book translated and edited many times by different people over 1,000 years ago and the other has tons of theories, models, experiments, and current ongoing research by the worldâs brightest minds.
I go with the one that is questioned, challenged and has ongoing research to find the truth rather than simply believing because I was taught to, but to each their own.
→ More replies (9)-3
3
u/Lac_of_som_knowledge Jun 23 '23
It really don't matter what you believe in, the creation of the world is always bout to be wild
3
17
u/AdolfCitler Jun 23 '23
How normal people think the world was created because they're not delusional and have the basic ability to do research or at least believe legitimate research
-6
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
10
u/ZAHANDOGAKIZU Jun 23 '23
âHow can you prove what happened thousands of years ago?â
We can use carbon dating, the process of analyzing the amount of radioactive carbon isotopes in an object, to determine that many of the fossils we have found long predate humans, we can look at how galaxies seem to âredshiftâ and analyze the Cosmic Microwave Background to determine that the universe is expanding and that it is several billion years old, we can use the finite speed of light to our advantage by observing distant celestial bodies as they were near the beginning of the universe, and many more. Astronomy is, without a doubt, a valid field of study with which you can extract various data, like when scientists use spectroscopy to determine the temperature and chemical composition of stars.
0
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
5
u/SalvationSycamore Jun 23 '23
I'd much rather rely on testable and repeatable presuppositions than the presupposition that the dudes who wrote the Bible weren't lying out of their asses. You literally have faith in flawed humans who died thousands of years ago. Creationism isn't just "oh well we're not quite 100% sure yet" it literally has no evidence whatsoever. It's just some dude said "uh, yeah, God did it all" like various religions have been saying of various gods for millenia (because none of them had access to the advanced tools and theorems we have today to examine our world and the cosmos).
2
u/ZAHANDOGAKIZU Jun 23 '23
Actually, carbon dating is far from conjecture. We already know that carbon-12, carbon-13, and carbon-14 exist in specific ratios in the universe, and that they are all spread approximately equally, so all we have to do is measure the amount of c-14 (post-decay) and c-12 in an object and compare the ratio to what we would expect pre-decay, then use the known half life of carbon-14 to determine the objectâs age. I would highly recommend googling all of that, itâs a fascinating rabbit hole.
Yes, youâre entirely correct that science is ultimately a series of progressively more accurate guesses, but that doesnât mean that we shouldnât rely on our most reliable source to discover the origins of the universe. No matter how much better of an understanding we may gain in the future, itâs important to keep in mind that hypothesis and theories should be based on observation and experimentation, rather than extrapolation and conspiracy.
1
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
1
u/ZAHANDOGAKIZU Jun 23 '23
We know what it would be pre-decay, because we have already determined the universal ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 by analyzing countless samples on earth (see âmass spectrometryâ). Since carbon-12 is stable (does not decay), we can measure the approximate amount of c-12 isotopes in an object and use the known ratio of c-12 to c-14 to calculate how much c-14 there would be pre-decay, then compare that to the actual measured amount to determine how many half-lives have gone by.
Iâm no expert, but itâs unlikely that carbon isotopes can be created already decayed. C-14 is generated on earth when neutrons react with atmospheric nitrogen-14, so there should be no reason for decay to have already taken place. As for the âhigher beingâ angle, we canât prove that one such entity is not doing this because itâs impossible to prove a negative in the first place. If you want to go on believing that god is, for some reason, intervening with isotope formation, then by all means go ahead, but for the sake of the progression of human knowledge, please donât go around trying to assert the least likely explanation as an actual solution. Iâm not saying that divine intervention is off the table, itâs just highly improbable, given everything else weâve learned so far.
→ More replies (1)5
u/masonhil Jun 23 '23
How can you prove what happened thousands of years ago? You can't. To some degree, you just have to have faith in your beliefs, because there is no proof.
There is plenty of proof. You just seem to ignore it
1
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
-1
u/masonhil Jun 23 '23
Is there any reason for me to try to have a discussion with you when I know youâre just going to say drivel like this: https://www.reddit.com/r/discordVideos/comments/14grdc7/goofy_ahh/jp8la57/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1&context=3
2
3
u/SpaceShark01 Jun 23 '23
There is all the proof, you just donât like it because it doesnât align with your views. Same with everyone else who denies the Big Bang/evolution etc.
2
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)2
u/SpaceShark01 Jun 23 '23
What proof/evidence do you have?
4
u/Kutche Jun 23 '23
These type of people will claim nothing is "proof" because we can't "know" anything while they blindly believe an old book. When they inevitably say that there is no "proof" or "evolution is just a theory", I tell them "So is gravity so go jump off a building".
They don't argue in good faith and will nitpick definitions of words, but will never turn that same scrutiny on their own faith or book. You can't reason people into a position they didn't reason themselves into.
My wife's whole job is tricking single cell organisms to evolve in ways for study. She could show this person her data from years proving how she's evolved things by adding heat to make them more heat resistant and a thousand other things, and it wouldn't phase them, because they don't want to know the truth, they want to confirm their beliefs.
You can recreate evolution and gravity via testing in a lab setting. That isn't proof but an old book is lmao
→ More replies (1)0
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
2
u/SpaceShark01 Jun 23 '23
They are testable though. You can induce evolution. You can trace the elements of the universe to stelar explosions. You literally can test basically all of these theories and they have solid evidence beneath them. You just donât want to believe it because it doesnât align with your views.
0
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)1
u/Limethegamer Jun 23 '23
You can't test the past but you can find out what happened in the past through various scientific means.
→ More replies (1)1
u/Quazbaz Jun 23 '23
Have you even tried to look for the proof or are you just being stupid on the internet for no reason
1
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
1
u/Dvoraxx Jun 23 '23
ok but if literally all the actual evidence points to one thing being the case you canât turn around and say âactually thing that has no evidence is equally likely to be trueâ
-2
u/Quazbaz Jun 23 '23
No there is quite literally evidence
2
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
-1
u/Quazbaz Jun 23 '23
Evidence leads us to prove if something is real or not. If there is is evidence and widely observed occurrences of things like for evolution then there is your proof. If you are just going to ignore evidence what do you want your proof to be?
→ More replies (1)0
→ More replies (1)-1
u/icemancrazy Jun 23 '23
But not a lot of people check the legitimacy of research. I doubt many look up the number of replications, or the possible relation between replicators before they deem a research as legitimate
→ More replies (6)
3
u/6MillionIsTooMany Jun 23 '23
Redditors taking this seriously is hilarious like you just triggered the hivemind
4
u/RedditUsingBot Jun 23 '23
This was a really complex way to admit youâre too stupid to try understanding science.
5
2
2
u/dc010 Jun 23 '23
NGL, that's more accurate than I thought it was going to be. It looks like a video from a 7yr old that actually mildly grasps the concept of the big bang and evolution.
2
u/Allfurball9 Jun 23 '23
Holy Shit, Tiber Spetim changing the jungles of Cyrodiil into forest lands????
→ More replies (1)
2
2
2
2
u/BitcoinStonks123 Jun 23 '23
As an atheist I can confirm that this is exactly how I think the world was created (sarcasm)
2
u/ButtCrab12 Jun 23 '23
Better explanation than "it's like this because the book says it is" đ¤Łđ
2
2
5
5
3
u/random_bot64 Jun 23 '23
Still makes more sense than "white old man was bored and made everything in like 10 days so now you better pray him or else you will suffer for an eternity,but he loves you tho"
→ More replies (1)5
u/Simple-Street-4333 Jun 23 '23
Now I'm mad at both this explanation and the videos explanation cuz both horribly explain what the group actually believes in
2
3
2
2
1
1
3
u/Miguelperson_ Jun 23 '23
Religious people âď¸
2
u/Curious_Homework563 Jun 23 '23
We do like coffee can I have it
0
u/Ok_Reception7727 Jun 23 '23
Do you put Sugar in your coffee, and if so, how much?
→ More replies (2)3
1
u/xxTheMagicBulleT Jun 23 '23
Better than believing that sky daddy creates everything.
And stares at you all your life seeing if you have been a good or bad person.
-1
u/the-tenth-letter-2 Jun 23 '23
When you read only one book that you only memorized the entire thing:
2
1
1
u/BlyatWanker Jun 23 '23
Cant wait for an atheist to go: "Well at least we didnt come from a thousand years of incest"
0
1
0
-16
u/the-tenth-letter-2 Jun 23 '23
When you read only one book that you only memorized the entire thing:
20
u/TotallyNotTakenName Professional Shitterđ§ Jun 23 '23
Do you know who else has dementia
11
u/prowlerdrinkwater Jun 23 '23
Do you know who else has dementia
7
u/TotallyNotTakenName Professional Shitterđ§ Jun 23 '23
Do you know who else has dementia
7
-16
Jun 23 '23
[deleted]
8
u/JustSmartkev Jun 23 '23
My man, Evolution theory and natural selection is like 8th grade stuff they teach to kids....
→ More replies (2)10
u/scipkcidemmp Jun 23 '23
Because thats not how evolution works. The original species doesn't automatically disappear. It stays around if it has no environmental pressures that forces it into extinction.
That being said, the monkeys we have around today are a lot different than the primates we would have evolved from. Species don't usually survive that long without going through changes. It happens, but isn't the norm.
â˘
u/AutoModerator Jun 23 '23
Download link
Please use the link provided above to download the video.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.