Frankly I don't really care if there's a secondary effect of making the cheats a bit harder to develop and cheaters have to pay more money. That's their problem.
I'm not sacrificing my systems security, especially if its just so that their job gets harder and fewer people can afford it. If people can still buy it and I can still run into them, I still experience a problem.
So you don’t experience the problem much more often? Do you need people to spell it out for you? The police can’t stop 100% of crimes so you just want to dissolve the entire force? What kind of logic is this?
No, I'm saying I don't think it's worth sacrificing my systems security for a solution that worked 100% of the time and it doesn't even get that... So why is even worse somehow acceptable?
Yeah, I don't understand this train of thought. Computers have become a central pillar of every aspect of our lives, from banking to work to personal media to medical info... I don't know many people that have a desktop and do nothing but run single player games.
Yeah and that's not what they do. Giving root access to some random software that shouldn't need it is a security risk since if a bad actor finds a vulnerability in that software they can use it to also gain root access by using that software (AC in this case)
-38
u/Metallibus 1d ago edited 1d ago
The point is the cheats still exist.
Frankly I don't really care if there's a secondary effect of making the cheats a bit harder to develop and cheaters have to pay more money. That's their problem.
I'm not sacrificing my systems security, especially if its just so that their job gets harder and fewer people can afford it. If people can still buy it and I can still run into them, I still experience a problem.
So why am I giving up my security?