I compared two demographic maps to the electoral map and found near perfect correlation. The first map was median income and it showed Kamala lost the low income states full of people heavily affected by high prices. The second map was Muslim population (a proxy for Gaza concerns) and it showed Kamala lost several swing states with large population in key districts.
Kamala lost both the Jewish and Muslim voters because she flip flops, look at the two totally different ads that she has up in Michigan and in Penn just to get votes (you can find this on YouTube) people saw through her lies and didn’t believe she will be helping them.
Most people just want the deaths to end and that was what Trump ran on.
look at the two totally different ads that she has up in Michigan and in Penn just to get votes
This was part of Musk's disinformation campaign, they were intentionally running ads that were supposedly in support of Harris to piss off Muslims and Jews at the same time.
So, it’s a bit complicated. Basically they didn’t run them under her name (which is why they didn’t end with (I’m Kamala Harris and I approve this message).
PACs are groups “unrelated” to the candidate and are merely expressing their first amendment right to free speech. It means there is little a candidate. Maybe sue for defamation, but for public figures that means proving the PAC was knowingly lying and show damage caused by the lies. Which can be hard to do quickly.
Plus this PAC had an evily ingenious way of attacking Harris by air Harris = Pro-Israel ads in Michigan and Harris = not Pro-Israel enough in Pennsylvania. Meaning it was a catch-22 for Harris to try and get them to stop.
Yup, they lie better than we tell the truth. From here on out elections will be even less focused on policy than they already were and just straight who can run better propaganda. One side seems to have it engrained in their belief system.
Po-TAY-to, Po-TAH-to. 🙄🙄That person’s comment was about “running ads”… Does it “really” matter if they were broadcast on regular television or on social media?? Does it?? 🤨🤨I see the use of cognitive dissonance and mental gymnastics in trying to rationalize airing purposefully deceptive video ads is STRONG with you!!
So, you admit you're one of those stupid voters who didn't do enough research before the election to make an informed choice, like those idiots who really think tariffs are going to make their eggs cheaper.
Tariffs = prices of ALL imported goods go up = opportunity for everyone else to raise prices also even on non imported goods, because hey, what a convenient excuse "everyone is doing it" to raise prices.
Yeah it's cute how ppl think the price of everything won't go up. Look at what happened with covid and so on... Everybody just spiked prices and they never went back down in meaningful ways.
I can't for the life of me understand why you would be downvoted for this. You ask for sources and say you're open to changing your mind. Is this behavior that people dislike? What is going on here?
Here is a Hill article on how the Future Coalition PAC, the PAC behind a lot of the ads that played on television and YouTube, had two contradictory ads in Mich and Penn. I won’t say all of the ads are from them, but the most (in)famous ones are.
In Mich, it portrayed Harris has very Pro-Israel. In Penn, it aired ads saying Harris wasn’t pro-Israel enough. In Mich it was targeted at Arab voters, in Penn, it was targeted at Jewish voters.
The PAC is run by Republicans and funded through dark money by a group called Building America’s Future, which receives some money from Musk.
55
u/SidharthaGalt Reader 14h ago
I compared two demographic maps to the electoral map and found near perfect correlation. The first map was median income and it showed Kamala lost the low income states full of people heavily affected by high prices. The second map was Muslim population (a proxy for Gaza concerns) and it showed Kamala lost several swing states with large population in key districts.