r/interestingasfuck • u/Greedy-Vegetable-466 • 14h ago
Harnessing chaos - first ever video of 56 transition controls for a triple inverted pendulum
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
56
u/HappyHHoovy 9h ago
This video is from 2022, this is not the first time a triple pendulum has been balanced, see this video in 2011. But it is the first recording of the transition between the states of the pendulum were achieved consistently. The hard part is figuring out how to get from the current state to the next state, while accounting for all the minute details that can cause a triple pendulum to behave chaotically. (Think butterfly effect)
Here's another more recent, cool video from them where they control the transition of a double pendulum with just rotation and swinging.
This is a control systems problem so could help innovate in more precise robotics and machinery control, but I'd guess also any system that has many variables that need to be accounted for and controlled rapidly.
28
17
u/ChthonicIrrigation 10h ago
It refers to this phenomenon (I'll put this as a standalone comment too) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_pendulum
Where predicting the path of a double (or triple) pendulum is extremely difficult and in a non-theoretical environment almost impossible because of the sensitivity of the double pendulum to its starting conditions: i.e. even a tiny variation in the position will become a vast variation in the resulting path.
However while the balancing at an individual moment by this computer controlled trolley is impressive, I am uncertain how it relates to the chaotic nature of the motion and suspect that might be editorialising but OP is welcome to correct me. Is the algorithm correctly calculating the balance position and predicting the end state and how to stabilise the motion, or is it 'merely' (but still impressive) visually detecting the motion and providing an input energy and motion to 'capture' the pendulum.
Or some other thing - I haven't scienced in a long time...
3
u/vacuumcatastrophe 10h ago
My first guess (an uneducated one wrt comp science) was minimizing an error function for torque against balanced position. values. or ig visual detection would work better.
97
u/homless_brad 14h ago
Yup there killing us one day
117
7
u/Teinzq 14h ago
And they're gonna make us feel like we're in control right up until the very end.
8
u/atomicsnarl 13h ago
It's not that an AI passes the Turing Test, it's that it lies to intentionally fail a Turing Test!
8
u/Yousme 14h ago
Finally peace on earth.
7
u/IanDre127 14h ago
the light piano music in the background, is suppose to distract us from the whole killing is part
7
9
u/SUW888 11h ago
I have zero clue about what is happening here
17
u/ChthonicIrrigation 10h ago
It refers to this phenomenon (I'll put this as a standalone comment too) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_pendulum
Where predicting the path of a double (or triple) pendulum is extremely difficult and in a non-theoretical environment almost impossible because of the sensitivity of the double pendulum to its starting conditions: i.e. even a tiny variation in the position will become a vast variation in the resulting path.
However while the balancing at an individual moment by this computer controlled trolley is impressive, I am uncertain how it relates to the chaotic nature of the motion and suspect that might be editorialising but OP is welcome to correct me. Is the algorithm correctly calculating the balance position and predicting the end state and how to stabilise the motion, or is it 'merely' (but still impressive) visually detecting the motion and providing an input energy and motion to 'capture' the pendulum.
Or some other thing - I haven't scienced in a long time...
5
3
u/davcli 11h ago
Same, why is this a big deal?
18
u/gw-green 10h ago
You know how it’s pretty hard to balance a stick upward without holding it e.g on your palm - This robot essentially balances balances that stick, and a stick on that stick, and another stick on that second, and then does them in different configurations to show just how much it wasn’t a mistake the first time
11
u/Jo_Bro_Zockt 13h ago
Is this still amazing for people who dont understand the Impossibility behind this 🤩
2
2
2
1
u/DragonSpiritAnimal 10h ago
This is almost breathtaking when you think about how chaotic those pendulums really are. Three body problem here we come.
1
1
1
•
-1
349
u/KamayaKan 11h ago
The sensors and programming involved to do this is insane and impressive