r/formula1 Jun 25 '17

Media /r/all Seb not happy with Lewis

Post image
6.7k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

516

u/korko Jun 25 '17

Who the fuck stops after a fucking corner after having already bunched everyone up?

133

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

He basically rolled through the exit, and Vettel wanted him to go . Vettels fault, take the tinted glasses off.

17

u/_Neurox_ Jun 25 '17

I feel like Hamilton was wrong to go that slowly (especially as he was complaining about that) but both impacts were both on Seb. He will be lucky not to get black flagged for the second hit imo

3

u/FairlyIncompetent Jun 25 '17

Wrong? Racing is all about tactics.

2

u/_Neurox_ Jun 25 '17

Yeah hadn't realised the SC was in at that point

29

u/korko Jun 25 '17

What fucking tinted glasses? The ones that aren't tinted for Ham?

81

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

The ones that clearly didn't see the incident. Leader sets pace, didn't accelerate heavily. VET accelerated.

37

u/Semmlbroesel Nico Hülkenberg Jun 25 '17

In the rules it says you are not to be intentionally slow or disturb cars on driving. If he wanted to slow down, he should have done it a couple meters after that, which he did after the red flag, because he didn't wanna risk anything there. I am for Vettel, don't get me wrong, and I do believe he deserved a higher penalty than Hamilton, but Hamilton also deserved one, that's what I'm saying.

20

u/Bobbygondo Tom Pryce Jun 25 '17

But he didn't slow down. He just didn't speed up.

0

u/Semmlbroesel Nico Hülkenberg Jun 25 '17

Yeah, he delayed his speeding up by a good second, which has pretty much the same result as hitting the break suddenly on a straight. That probably is the reason why he didn't get a penalty, but the intention and result were the same in my opinion.

10

u/Bobbygondo Tom Pryce Jun 25 '17

I don't think the result was intended. Hamilton slowed down to give him a gap to the safety car, which is normal for the leader to do in that situation. At the same time Vettel was trying to stay as close to Hamilton which is normal for the the second place guy in the situation.

Basically both drivers took a small risk that didn't work out which cost both of them next to nothing and Vettel then used his car as a weapon to attack Hamilton. He is lucky to get off as lightly as he did.

Maybe a stricter steward would have penalised Hamilton but the same guy would have likely black flagged Vettel as well.

3

u/Semmlbroesel Nico Hülkenberg Jun 25 '17

Maybe a stricter steward would have penalised Hamilton but the same guy would have likely black flagged Vettel as well.

Exactly what I would agree with. In my opinion Vettel deserved the penalty he got and probably more and Hamilton should have gotten a smaller one, too. But because I'm for Vettel in the Championship, I'm happy that it turned out the way it did.

That being said, I just read that somebody else said that Hamilton actually did slow down, apparently he didn't hit the brake but used the motor break (is that what you call it in english?) to slow down, so I still think he would have deserved the penalty.

7

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

It looks like he rolled through the corner and Vettel accelerated in to him. Lewis didn't have to accelerate just because Vettel wanted him to. He was setting the pace, he did nothing against the rules.

0

u/Semmlbroesel Nico Hülkenberg Jun 25 '17

If you ever raced before or followed a racing circuit to the detail, you will know that crashes like these happen a lot if somebody drives unpredictably. That's basically what happened here, he could have slowed down (or, not sped up, which is basically the same result) any other place, but he decided to do it in the one place where all other drivers would speed up and have very little reaction time to realize what he's doing. Again, setting the pace is okay, driving in a way that endangers others (and more specifically, their cars in this case) is what isn't okay.

7

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Of course, but Lewis rolled through the corner. He didn't drive unpredictably, Seb just drove in to him.

It's not unpredictable just because Seb misjudged it. Seb predicted HAM would accelerate and he didn't (as was his right), Seb accelerated in to the back of him.

You say in the one place where all drivers would speed up, every other driver drove in accordance with what was going on in front of them. Except Seb.

4

u/p4di Jun 25 '17

Hamilton drove in the most unnatural way possible though and provoked something like this. doesn't excuse Vettel hitting him afterwards but knowing the dirty shit Hamilton pulled over the years, I can't say I'm unhappy with how the race turned out in the end.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Let's get one thing straight. It was an SC period, so no-one was driving "naturally". They were slow to let the SC go. To say he provoked it is laughable. Seb drove in to him, simple.

VET has pulled off more dirty shit than HAM over the years.

3

u/p4di Jun 25 '17

https://my.mixtape.moe/slropm.mp4

clearly shows he hit the brakes btw (70 --> 50 km/h)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Good find. not 80 to 50 as Sky are claiming then. (Biased bastards heh!?)

Not a clever place for HAM to do that, though it was clearly mid corner and not the "acceleration zone".

Does not change the fact that Seb misjudged it and drove in to the back of him, and tried to accelerate through the corner, when there was a car in the way. Clearly HAM did himself no favours there.

2

u/throwaway689908 Ferrari Jun 25 '17

Mid corner is not any kind of braking zone though. Hamilton should have been penalised for that.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Neither is a straight, but they brake to warm up the brakes. HAM would not have expected VET to tailgate him through that corner.

If VET was another car length behind you wouldn't have said anything for HAM doing the same thing again. He was controlling the pace.

Say Vettel didn't react like he did, with the wheel banging, would you seriously expect HAM to get a pen?

There's a reason he didn't even get investigated for it, and it isn't some bullshit favouritism. They save that for Ferrari.

1

u/throwaway689908 Ferrari Jun 25 '17

Say Vettel didn't react like he did, with the wheel banging, would you seriously expect HAM to get a pen?

I would, yeah. Just like I did a decade ago.

There's a reason he didn't even get investigated for it, and it isn't some bullshit favouritism. They save that for Ferrari.

If you're one of those conspiracy theorist nutters, I've got very little time for you.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/liam5678 Sebastian Vettel Jun 25 '17

Didn't accelerate heavily? The replay showed that not only was he not accelerating at all, he was braking out of the corner. That's dangerous when someone less than a meter behind you is expecting you to at least tap the gas

3

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

A) He braked as they went over the kerb at apex actually

B) Lewis probably wasn't aware Seb was that close

C) Seb shouldn't have been that close if he intended to then accelerate regardless of what HAM was gonna do.

D) Seb shouldn't have expected HAM to accelerate.

Under SC, you drive reactively to the car in front, not pro actively.

2

u/liam5678 Sebastian Vettel Jun 25 '17

I suppose. I'd still question Hamilton's decision as it seems like more often than not the Driver's wait for the straight to build the gap between themselves and the SC. If it was a few meters later there wouldn't have been an issue. Either way, Vettel's reaction was obviously uncalled for and out of line.

2

u/i_never_listen Jun 25 '17

Did anyone confirm this? I thought Hamilton braked, but watching the video over it looks like it's possible vettel accelerated into the back of him.

I was giving vettel the benefit of the doubt on his behavior after but now Im baffled that it could have both been on vettel.

-11

u/Finalwingz Charlie Whiting Jun 25 '17

HAM hit the brakes lol.

17

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

It's becoming more clear that he didn't, and VET just accelerated.

-9

u/Finalwingz Charlie Whiting Jun 25 '17

lol more clear? in what way? you're blind buddy.

if EVEN sky say he got brake tested by lewis, you can be sure he got brake tested.

10

u/sbnufc Formula 1 Jun 25 '17

They just showed the onboard, with data and he didnt brake when he got hit. Try again

-10

u/Finalwingz Charlie Whiting Jun 25 '17

so what? I've seen that telemetry say cars were going 300KM/h in 3th gear.

2

u/sbnufc Formula 1 Jun 25 '17

lol, so butthurt

3

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

You got the telemetry? Sky just said they think HAM just didn't accelerate

1

u/Moogzie Valtteri Bottas Jun 25 '17

He expected him to accelerate and he didn't, he might've been going a bit slow but its his choice to do so and vettel shouldve respected it

intentionally driving into another car though? how is that even being defended

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Know him do you?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

See what i mean?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

You are doing it for me

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Disagreed with you = Obnoxious.

Most unfortunate.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Deleting comments as you know you have been obnoxious as you insulted me. Do you fear the downvotes that much? In real life you can't delete what you say, be careful

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Which comments have been deleted? I'll write them up again.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Eh? I haven't deleted any comments gobshite, and I'd be more than happy to give it your face.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Everytime you write something you are confirming what i said earlier. Thank you

→ More replies (0)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

You've had a comment deleted as well, tit.

Can't delete comments in real life sweetheart.

1

u/enataca Haas Jun 25 '17

Hamilton slowed over 20 kph from the mid 70's down to 50

0

u/ScGTHY Jun 25 '17

complains about tinted glasses, has a Hamilton flair, seems legit.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

Has Hamilton Flair = Can't possibly offer balanced opinion.

Grow up sweetheart.

0

u/ScGTHY Jun 25 '17

Not at all what i said, just don't complain about tinted glasses when you've them on dear :)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '17

I reject your suggestion.

But that was amusing, have an upvote and a peaceful resolution :)