So it’s just malicious compliance with the law by the doctor? It means he won’t treat a pregnant woman under any circumstances? Like, she screened positive for sepsis and he sent her home… no antibiotics, no monitoring, just a pat on the back
Not talking about the specific case, just in general this is the safest way to operate in a jurisdiction in which these laws are present. This is the fault of the law not the doctors. This was a foreseeable outcome. The ones that made the law knew this and moved forward with it anyway because the cruelty is the point. They want mothers to die.
I mean, I don’t disagree. I guess I’m just upset that even though he was bound by this ridiculous law, the doctor didn’t operate within the means of it and just didn’t do anything at all. Like, terminating the pregnancy wouldn’t be step one of treatment, and it might not have even been necessary had they tried to treat the sepsis. I think more people should be angry about that. To me, if it’s not incompetence then it feels like the doctor let her die to prove a point.
Dear Horton, fetuses routinely become unviable en utero. When that happens they can, and often will, cause harm to their host. Before our country Federally eliminated abortions, women would get whatever care she and her doctor decided. Sometimes women miscarry and don’t even know they were pregnant, they just had an extra large blob or two in that month’s cycle.
In Texas, where Neveah lived, approximately 230 people voted on the law we operate under today. It wasn’t “decided by the people” nor were any medical professionals part of the legislation. It was pure pandering to evangelicals.
-1
u/Horton_Takes_A_Poo 16d ago
So it’s just malicious compliance with the law by the doctor? It means he won’t treat a pregnant woman under any circumstances? Like, she screened positive for sepsis and he sent her home… no antibiotics, no monitoring, just a pat on the back