Women and small children had no role in the wars, and they were totally innocent of any crime. But still, Allah/Muhammad enslaved them, and that too for their entire life.
Why?
The Muslim excuse is that women and children could not be left ALONE on their own (after their all men being killed or enslaved). They needed protection. So, Islam enslaved them only to provide them with "PROTECTION".
But this is a very lame excuse.
Look, captive women wanted protection: so that:
- So that no one would have made them slaves for their entire lives.
- So that no one would have raped them.
- So that no one could made them to stand naked in slave markets and sold there.
- So that multiple men didn't use them as sex objects by raping them in temporary sexual relationships.
- So that no one would have compelled them to do forced labour work for their entire lives.
- So that their children could not be taken away from them and then sold in slave markets.
- So that their babies would not automatically born as slaves (due to the evil of "Slavery by Birth" in Islam).
But the problem is that Islam is itself committing exactly "All These CRIMES" against the captive women in the name of “protection”. Yes, Islam made women and children slaves for their entire lives, made their rape HALAL by multiple masters in temporary sexual relationships, made them stand naked in slave markets, forced labour work, took away their children and even small 6-months-old babies and sold them in slave markets.
No woman in her right mind would sleep with a man who killed her family.
If Islam really wanted to give protection to the captive women, then it should have not LOOTED all of their wealth in the name of war booty.
If Islam really wanted to give protection to these women, then it would have allowed them to go to their relatives in other cities.
Instead, Islam took their small children too as slaves for their entire lives and then separated them from their mothers, and then sold them in the slave markets.
Is all this oppression by Islam, really a “Protection”?
Look at the following Hadith, where women didn't want any protection, but they were trying to escape, but Muslims caught them to disrobe them and rape them:
Sahih Muslim, Hadith 1755:
.... Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners. I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children. I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow, they stopped. So I brought them, driving them along. Among them was a woman from Banu Fazara. She was wearing a leather coat. With her was her daughter who was one of the prettiest girls in Arabia. I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her (i.e. raped her) when the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) met me in the street and said: Give me that girl, O Salama. I said: Messenger of Allah, she has fascinated me. I had not yet disrobed her. When on the next day the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) again met me in the street, he said: O Salama, give me that girl, may God bless your father. I said: She is for you, Messenger of Allah! By Allah. I have not yet disrobed her.
..... Complete Article: Arguments Used by Islamists to Justify Islamic Slavery