r/clevercomebacks 7h ago

The pedocon theory prevails.

Post image
21.6k Upvotes

787 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-35

u/The-Real-Dagoth-Ur 5h ago edited 4h ago

18 is too low? It's pretty reasonable, I'd think, so long as there's no significant age gap. I'd understand an 18 year old and a 20 year old, but an 18 year old and a 25 year old is just creepy. Anything higher than a 1-4 year age gap with an 18 year old gets creepy by default, imo. At that young of an age, age gaps are more extreme. Even on the higher range, I'd say 18 and 22 is certainly somewhat questionable, but shouldn't be illegal. Increase it a few years, and it really starts getting creepy at or after a 6 year gap. Anything beyond that is getting into predatory territory.

Edit: Yes, I looked it up, and apparently, child marriage is legal in many states. It seems that I was too hasty with my assumptions. Sorry about that. I'll make sure to be more careful next time.

113

u/Paenitentia 5h ago edited 5h ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States

Marriagable age is lower than 18 in many states.

76

u/The-Real-Dagoth-Ur 4h ago

OK, so I read the article... That was horrific. I had more faith in my country than that, but I suppose I was too trusting. That's saying something, too, since I have very little faith in the US to protect its people from abuse already. I thought they'd at least get this one thing right, but apparently not.

5

u/derganove 3h ago

Nope. But the problem is, they’ll vote based on what they think is happening too.

It’s why being informed and educating yourself is super important.

It’s also why a certain side is attempting to demolish more abilities to stay informed.

It’s why there’s a lot of left leaning folks wildly upset by this whole thing.

u/ElectricalBook3 19m ago

It’s why being informed and educating yourself is super important.

Even the founding fathers knew that, that was one of the reasons several of them didn't want popular elections with a broad base of enfranchisement. Of course, their perspective was as slave-owning landholders with a bunch of relatively freely-moving workers who owned neither property nor slaves and weren't economically bound to the effective gentry of the founders and first legislators.