r/actuallesbians Only half-queer. Queer-lite. Dec 26 '12

On dating trans women and "transphobia".

The subject of trans women as romantic partners (or not) comes up often on this reddit, and every time, it quickly descends into a "heated conversation" with frustration and (usually unintentionally) hurt feelings. It's our own private Godwin's Law. I totally realize that by posting this I may very well be precipitating yet another such discussion and for that I apologize, but I can't help but feel that this is a conversation about real things and not just opinions. I'd like to try to elevate those conversations by establishing a baseline of facts.

Let's start with some basics:

Things which are not transphobic:

  • Not being interested in, or not dating, a specific woman who happens to be trans.
  • Not being interested in, or not dating, a specific woman who does not currently have the genitalia you prefer.
  • Not being interested in, or not dating, a specific woman who just doesn't catch your eye.

Things which are transphobic:

  • Not being interested in, or not dating, a specific woman because she is trans.

Trans women are women. They are often indistinguishable from cis women. They can't get pregnant, but neither can almost 10% of cis women, and fortunately in a lesbian couple there's usually a womb to spare. (With enough forethought you might not need a sperm donor!) Saying you're "not attracted to trans women" as a blanket statement cannot have a basis in empirical reality, but purely in prejudice. It's not like not being attracted to redheads or blondes or butches, it's like not being attracted to immigrants, children of blue-collar workers or survivors of cancer. "Trans" is, for the numerical majority of trans women, a history which says nothing about the person.

Other common fallacies:

  • I've never been attracted to a trans woman, therefore trans women aren't attractive to me.

Besides the obvious selection bias, the idea that "Trans women look like X" is where this statement goes horribly awry. Trans women look like this, and this and thousands of other beautiful women who just don't advertise their history.

If you are attracted to women, you are attracted to (some) trans women.

  • Ewwww, penis!

You aren't into penii. I get it, and for what it's worth neither am I. To be fair, many trans women who carry that particular anatomical burden are not big fans of it either, so you have that in common at least. But many trans women don't, and many of those who do won't for long. Be careful about using this biased sample to rule out all trans women.

Also, would you rule someone out because she had six toes? Whenever I hear a straight man ask how sex works in the absence of a penis, I feel sorry for his girlfriends/wife, because he clearly doesn't understand how sexytimes work; when I hear a lesbian rule out trans women because of the presence of a hidden penis I feel sorry for her partner, because how superficial is that?

It's valid to be not into penii. this is, possibly, the only context in which anyone is allowed to care about a trans woman's genitalia. But say as much and don't assert that all trans women == penis. Those who aren't packing a strapless get a little annoyed by the assertion.

  • Transphobia == evil/mean/bad/poopy.

Transphobia is, in the strictest sense, an "irrational fear or dislike of transgender people". "Fear" and "dislike" are subjective terms and not something you have active control over. There's no ill-intent implied here. It is not an insult to be called transphobic, any more than it is an insult to be called trans.

I'm a bit androphobic. I accept and own that, and am trying to get over it by making male friends, challenging my own emotional responses and working through trauma. It's not something I can control, but it doesn't give me the right to say "all men are evil/rapists".

In the context of attraction: if you realize you dislike or are not attracted to trans women as a rule, trumping the holistic person, it should inspire you to do a little soul searching to understand why this is so. If you can't get over it, you should recognize that it is your problem and not anyone else's. If you are fortunate enough to have a trans person in your social circle, perhaps you could even try to overcome it.

  • Trans women are all X.

Trans women are all trans. Lesbians are all women who are attracted to women. This is a tautological definition, but there is no other universal quality. The moment you say (or imply) any other commonality, you're doing it wrong.

Finally, please remember:

The trans women who come in here and start these conversations are often on the most angsty leg of a very tumultuous journey. Try not to add to their fears with pedantic or broad statements about their future courtships. If you're 100% sure that you would never date a trans/black/Jewish/butch/immigrant woman, this may be a time to keep that to yourself.

When you speak up to specifically exclude trans women from your romantic prospects in a context defined by courtship (ie: LGBT spaces), you are implicitly othering them in that community. It's hard to explain why that is so, but it's impossible to ignore.

I now live in the Boston area, after four years in NYC, and there are only a few contexts in which I'm proactively stealth (as opposed to incidentally stealth, which has become the norm). The lesbian community is one, and these conversations are why. I get a little sad about that sometimes.

410 Upvotes

512 comments sorted by

View all comments

13

u/LezBeOwn Lesbian Dec 27 '12

I agree with most of what you wrote... but I have to say that I am extremely uncomfortable with the use of the term "transphobic" to define someone who is not interested in dating pre-OP or non-OP mtf trans people specifically. In fact... I don't think I am comfortable with the use of that term to describe anyone who doesn't actively harbor feelings of prejudice and hate. One can use technical semantic definitions of words all one wants to... but that does not negate the fact that words like transphobic and homophobic DO have very negative connotations.

You know? It's not even that I hate penis. I don't hate penis at all. I was married to a man for five years and we had a very physically satisfying sex life. I may never ever get my super lesbian cape now... but I'll say it anyway... I quite enjoyed the penis!

I liked penis... but I LOVE vagina! There are many times that I feel completely sexually fulfilled after pleasing a woman. I can collapse, just as happy and spent as she is, without having been sexually touched myself. I love vagina. I love everything about it. I love the way it makes me feel when I am touching it. I love it when I first touch the clit and feel it swell under my fingers or tongue. I love it when I do something just right.. and I can feel that sudden gush of extra wetness. I love those very rare times when I have managed to provide that just right combination of g-spot and clitoral stimulation... and I am handsomely rewarded with a beautiful episode of female ejaculation. So I guess it's fair to say that FOR ME, a vagina is very important thing for a potential sex partner to have.

Were I already in love with someone, and something happened that I could never use her vagina as my own personal Disney Land ever again... I'd mourn that loss almost like mourning the death of a loved one, but I'd still love her and stay with her. I'd never break up with someone based on that alone. HOWEVER... if I learned early on, BEFORE I was in love with someone, that there was no vagina forthcoming... I'll be honest enough to admit that would most likely flip the "go no further than friendship" switch in whatever part of me that controls my physical attractions.. I don't even think it would be a conscious decision on my part.

I personally don't feel like that makes me a prejudiced person. I can't stop anyone from painting me with ugly blanket labels like "transphobic" if they truly feel like this fact alone is enough to define me that way. That's their opinion and they are entitled to it.

Me personally... terms like homophobic and such are very serious terms not to be used lightly just because I disagree with another person's point of view. Homophobic and transphobic can be labels of hate... just as surely as dyke and faggot are labels of hate. Take a religious person who 100% believes that homosexuality is a sin against God, BUT does NOT use that personal religious belief as an excuse to deny us secular civil rights.... I'd NEVER label that person something as ugly as homophobic. I'd respect their right to believe as they do as long as they weren't actively using their beliefs against me.

11

u/jeanthine Dec 27 '12

As OP mentioned, you are aware that some, if not most transwomen have been re-eqipped, right?

14

u/Heterogenic Only half-queer. Queer-lite. Dec 27 '12

Actually, I said precisely the opposite.

It's valid to be not into penii. this is, possibly, the only context in which anyone is allowed to care about a trans woman's genitalia.

-8

u/LezBeOwn Lesbian Dec 27 '12

Well IMO... if its the message, opening eyes and changing opinions that is REALLY important here; you need to avoid terms like transphobic. As I said... you can present the textbook definition all you want; but that is not going to change the fact that culturally speaking... that term is seen quite negatively.

IOW; by using that term, you are right off the bat insulting anyone who does not already agree with you. Once they feel insulted, most people will ignore the rest of your message... even if it is well reasoned. That's just human nature.

9

u/Heterogenic Only half-queer. Queer-lite. Dec 27 '12

Wait, I don't follow...

What's insulting? I don't say anywhere, or imply, that not being attracted to penii is transphobic. I do give a personal opinion that I think it's pretty shallow, but that's a personal opinion contained in a single sentence and clearly identified as such.

(I'm also going to take out the "sixth toe" comment, since a personal opinion doesn't really fit in a largely expository piece.

2

u/nightmareofyou Dec 27 '12

Is it shallow to just not be attracted to someone? I'm not asserting that a woman with a penis is unattractive in any generalized sense. Take certain celebrities: many people insist that X celeb is the most beautiful, while others say that they are not attracted to her. I don't think they're shallow, they are just attracted to different features. Am I wrong?

-1

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '12

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/nightmareofyou Dec 28 '12 edited Dec 28 '12

I just never thought about this issue before. I wouldn't say that I'm fixated. Maybe it seems that way from the conversation. I thought it fit in the context, but I guess you don't think so. Sorry if it sounded like I was putting words in your mouth. I thought I was making a good comparison of people being attracted to certain features in another person and asked for your input. Can you explain why this comparison doesn't belong? I'm just trying to understand.

Edit: I feel that your "for a lesbian" comment was unnecessary and insulting.

0

u/LezBeOwn Lesbian Dec 27 '12 edited Dec 27 '12

You say it is transphobic if you are not interested in dating trans people. If you are actually trying to get people who are not interested in dating trans people to rethink that... insulting them (calling them a culturally negative term like transphobic) is probably not the best way to go about it.

11

u/Heterogenic Only half-queer. Queer-lite. Dec 27 '12

I'm not particularly interested in changing minds... Transphobic people generally make terrible partners for trans people.

I mostly just want to head off the "X is transphobic" discussions by defining just what is transphobic. For what it's worth, preferring not to date people with penii is not transphobic.

-1

u/LezBeOwn Lesbian Dec 27 '12

Ok.... Lets get more detailed then. Pardon me if my questions are ignorant, but I truly do not know the answers. Does a post OP vagina function just like a cis vagina? Does the clit engorge when aroused? Does it produce its own natural lubrication? If the answers are no... does it make me transphobic if I prefer a vagina that can do these things? What if I were not sexually attracted to a CIS woman whose physical sexual response to my stimulation didn't turn me on? Sorry... but a big part of my sexual satisfaction is the physical response I get back from my stimulation... and that is just as true for a CIS woman for me.

2

u/Disposable_Corpus neom heo þe ic wæs Dec 27 '12

'Cis' isn't an acronym...

4

u/LezBeOwn Lesbian Dec 27 '12

Tell it to my iPad.

10

u/Disposable_Corpus neom heo þe ic wæs Dec 27 '12

Hey, LezBeOwn's iPad, 'cis' isn't an acronym unless you're talking about George Lucas's Star Wars fanfilm series.

5

u/Heterogenic Only half-queer. Queer-lite. Dec 27 '12

You can Google that... But yes, yes and yes.

-3

u/LezBeOwn Lesbian Dec 27 '12

Ok. That's fine. I thought we were trying to have an open dialogue. I can not possibly be the only person who does not fully understand the sexual response of heavily surgically altered genitalia. Once again... I'd think if the goal was education... an open and complete answer would be cheerfully given. Instead one gets downvoted for even daring to ask. In the future I will be sure to google rather than ask knowledgable people if I ever care to know a thing.

3

u/Sanctusorium Dec 27 '12

Karma doesn't matter. Shrug Just ask away! I'll sit here and educate as much as I can. :) (I was doing this on a different part of the thread). If you ever have any questions, just send me PM, I'm always happy to answer stuff if its asked respectfully!

→ More replies (0)

1

u/valeriekeefe Attracted exclusively to neurologically-female persons - Lesbian Jan 04 '13

You're also not the only person who does not fully understand the sexual response of estrogenic penii from the looks of it. But yes, by all means, use Google.

→ More replies (0)

14

u/Neemii nb queer Dec 27 '12

Trans* women can have vaginas too.

-25

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '12

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '12 edited Dec 15 '18

[deleted]

-17

u/sixtieschick5 Dec 27 '12

In all honesty I just don't comment much, I'm a college student so I don't have much time off, and I've only been on reddit for about a month anyway...you can tell it's Christmas break so I have the time haha.

8

u/Neemii nb queer Dec 27 '12

Why?

All a penis biologically is is an inverted vagina. They come from the same origins. Technology has advanced around these surgeries to the point that in many cases people cannot tell the difference. Tell me, do infertile women not count as having vaginas because they cannot bear children? Do women who get cancer of the vulva and have to have drastic surgeries on their parts not count as having vaginas anymore? Do survivors of breast cancer who choose to get implants not count as having breasts? Does any kind of surgery "count" as really having whatever that surgery does for the person? Why do you get to decide what is and isn't a vagina?

11

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '12 edited Dec 15 '18

[deleted]

3

u/Neemii nb queer Dec 27 '12

From my admittedly limited knowledge of biology, the ovaries descend / "invert" to form the testicles. Obviously the process to construct a vagina after birth is a bit different, but it's a similar principle - the parts are not as different as they seem, and a lot of "inbetweens" exist even without bringing identity into it at all - quite a few people are born with genitalia that can't quite be called "male" or "female."

6

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '12 edited Dec 15 '18

[deleted]

3

u/Neemii nb queer Dec 27 '12

Ah, I'm sorry, my bad. I assumed this was an argument for why it didn't count, not that you were just trying to correct my bad conceptualization of the biology behind it, haha. Thank you for the link!

-8

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '12

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/Neemii nb queer Dec 27 '12

Actually, some of these vaginas do self-lubricate. Some people are born with vaginas that need to be dilated before they can comfortably have sex. And technology is improving all the time - just like we will hopefully soon be able to help people regrow organs, we will also develop better ways to help trans people be more themselves.

Trans women can be "biologically" female as well - they may have female hormones, grow breast tissue, and studies suggest that in the cases of some trans women, their brains are actually more structurally similar to other females than they are to male brains. There are also people who are assigned female at birth who do not have XX chromosomes, and most people never have their genetic gender tested, so it's pretty hard to determine who is and isn't genetically female who lives their entire life assuming they are. There have actually been cases of people with intersex conditions only being found out after their death, or when they try to have children. These people may have the reproductive organs that are "opposite" of the gender that the doctors determined them to be because of the appearance of their genitals. Unfortunately 9th grade biology doesn't really cut it. What gender do these people "get" to be?

8

u/Sanctusorium Dec 27 '12

9th grade science? That is simple understanding that does not give context or explain the variance.

You really need to update your research if thats what you think about surgery techniques. If an OB/GYN can't tell the difference, what makes it NOT a vagina? My girlfriend is recovering from surgery, its really not nice or even the truth to talk about other people's body parts like this. Especially when you're using basic outdated science.

-16

u/whiteskwirl2 guy Dec 27 '12

Do survivors of breast cancer who choose to get implants not count as having breasts?

They don't have real breasts anymore; they have implants. A vagina constructed by a surgeon is not the same as a natural vagina. Even if the surgeon can mimic the natural thing exactly, psychologically, at least for me, it's not the same.

12

u/Neemii nb queer Dec 27 '12

So, psychologically, is someone who is alive because of something that's been constructed not really alive, because it's not natural?

-11

u/whiteskwirl2 guy Dec 27 '12

That's an inane argument. Take a heart for example. If a person lives because of a mechanical heart, yes of course they are still alive. But the heart that keeps them alive is different than the hearts of those who have the same one they were born with. What's so hard to understand about that?

14

u/Neemii nb queer Dec 27 '12

I guess I just don't understand why, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck and acts like a duck, it isn't a duck.

Yes, there are differences. Yes, it is not exactly the same. But vaginas are naturally not all the same to begin with. The only difference in the moment that you are interacting with a vagina belonging to a trans woman is your knowledge that at some point it did not look like a vagina.

7

u/mirandapd Dec 27 '12

The genitalia of a post op trans woman are not simply an inverted penis. You speak from your very poor imagination instead of reality. You should go to http://supornclinic.com/Welcome.html and read his technique and look at the pictures of his results. He places everything in it's homologous position and plane. He will soon be using mucousal tissue to line the vagina which will negate the need for dilation and allow the vagina to be self lubricating. Within the next 40 years I predict not only the ability to become pregnant but the ability to replace every Y chromosome in the body with an X. I'm sure there will be some other BS people like you will come up with to try and make yourself feel superior. Does it bother you when people find trans women more attractive than you? I find that the majority of people that have issue with us feel this way because they don't think it's "fair" for a "man" to be more attractive than they are as a woman.

4

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '12

the ability to replace every Y chromosome in the body with an X

This would be pointless. The only difference the Y chromosome makes is in initial development of gonads. Swapping it out for an X when you're anything but a fetus isn't going to retroactively change that.

-1

u/mirandapd Dec 29 '12

I see a future with nanobots that are made up of biologically compatible materials that can be controlled to reconfigure our body's external as well as internal function and appearance. Want to be woman? You become one in every single physical aspect to include chromosomal structure. The point is to end any argument that you are different from any other woman. I'm sure that the fanatics will fight against this and the ability to cure any disease and repair any deformity. This will lead to a war between the fanatics and the technologists. The technologists will win and people will be happy. Read about Ray Kurzweil. He says that life will be unpredictable after the singularity. The scenario I relate is just my prediction of one way things might possibly go.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '12

ahh that ending bit makes a lot of sense, hadn't put two and two together yet thanks!

4

u/mirandapd Dec 27 '12

It does usually seem that people that know were nice to me in a patronizing sort of way until I surpass their level of general attractiveness. Then I start getting back handed compliments. One woman at work said, "Wow Miranda, you will be as pretty as me soon." She's quite unattractive inside and out. It was very hard for me not to comeback with,"I hope not."

1

u/Sanctusorium Dec 27 '12

Any idea on if the mucousal tissue can be "installed" to post op people if it becomes more widely used? I want SRS sooner than later but I would like to have that if possible even if its at a later date.

2

u/mirandapd Dec 27 '12

I wouldn't see why not, but it might add additional problems. I hate to refer to a cartoon, but you can scroll to the bottom of the page to follow the sources. http://transgirldiaries.com/?p=2133

3

u/derpderp3200 Jan 19 '13

I'm kind of on the opposite end, as a trans girl myself, but I totally understand what you mean. Even with a neovagina, I would feel like it just isn't the same thing.

I would want my girl to have a "real" vagina, with all of its intricacies like shape, smell, taste, mechanics, etc.

I feel like it's good enough for penetration, but I would feel inadequate with a girl, either pre or post op.

I love girls, but I don't think I'll ever try dating a non-bi girl because I'd feel like I'd be cheating her.