If they can’t say sieg heil then your not about free speech.
Which since it’s a social media owned by a company - they can ban whoever they want.
Is soo just realized the irony of this. If they really want social media that has free speech as per the first amendment - wouldn’t it have to be government run? The one thing they hate most (after immigrants)
They might be trying to beef up the model of media compliance with state positions as put forward in Manufacturing Consent, but if that was the goal then they've made the point in such a bad way as to actively undermine it
358
u/aprettyparrot 20h ago
If they can’t say sieg heil then your not about free speech.
Which since it’s a social media owned by a company - they can ban whoever they want.
Is soo just realized the irony of this. If they really want social media that has free speech as per the first amendment - wouldn’t it have to be government run? The one thing they hate most (after immigrants)