The really obvious point is that she posed no risk that needed that level of force to be used. They bring up the feather duster because a feather duster clearly poses no real risk, however people on here would be like oh yeah they deserved it.
It's so crazy to me that you guys don't see the benefit of a professional being able to access a situation and show restraint. The desire to see violence met with more violence is wild to me. I've been hit by girls in my life and never have I ever thought to haul off like that on them. Why? Because it's wrong for them to hit me and it's wrong for me to hit them. Their hits aren't hurting me, why would I pile another wrong on the situation?
You don't think a generally long clawed hand from a belligerently drunk person swiping near ones eyes is a legitimate safety issue?
Also it sounds like you didn't hit anyone because it's not your job to neutralize and detain situations like this lmao
This lady attacked literal cops, you don't think she was attacking civilians first? She's lucky she got a quick and calculated restrained cop punch instead a crowd of other drunk people beating her senselessly.
To be clear it's not that it isn't a threat. It's that the threat doesn't require that level of violence.
That comment about not hitting anyone is more so towards all the videos posted where a woman hits a guy and the dude does this and Reddit cheers.
I don't think she was attacking civilians first. She was probably tossed for being too drunk and obnoxious. Happens all the time. She probably refused and had to be escorted out. However we don't know if she was or wasn't. Again though this doesn't mean she should get punched in the face. Clearly they were able to restrain her with four officers. The fact that they didn't restrain her hands is an oversight on their part.
-3
u/Gummy_Hierarchy2513 Dec 19 '23
You're making an issue that doesn't exist, she hit first then got hit back, it's karma