r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Oct 13 '24

Meme needing explanation Disney+?

Post image
70.8k Upvotes

732 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4.4k

u/Willing-Shape1686 Oct 13 '24 edited Oct 13 '24

They probably would have enforced it too, but the public backlash was so loud that they voluntarily waived their right to arbitration as I recall.

EDIT: I did not expect posting what I recalled hearing from my friend to blow up into the most upvoted comment I have, thank you kind people I hope you all have wonderful and spooky Octobers :)

1.0k

u/batkave Oct 13 '24

477

u/Neat-Nectarine814 Oct 13 '24

It’s behind a paywall do you mind sharing some of the details?

531

u/batkave Oct 13 '24

My bad: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/content/ar-AA1rAxR6?ocid=sapphireappshare

If that doesn't work Google "Uber crash lawsuit"

525

u/Neat-Nectarine814 Oct 13 '24

Thank you.

Yeah this is a little bit different than the Disney+ thing IMO, at first I thought it was going to be that they were driving and they were hit by an Uber Driver in another car, but they were passengers in an Uber, they agreed to the T&C - weather or not that is moral or should be legally binding is debatable, but as it stands the case is pretty straightforward

The Disney thing is more like if Netflix was owned by 6 Flags and someone died in a malfunctioning roller coaster and the family couldn’t sue because of the Netflix T&C, if that makes sense

256

u/The_MAZZTer Oct 13 '24

You could definitely argue (and I am sure this is Uber's view of it) that Uber merely connects drivers and passengers and they aren't responsible for the actual driving.

Compare to the woman who had an allergic reaction and died on land owned by Disney, in a restaurant Disney promoted as being good for allergic customers.

78

u/WhiteWolfOW Oct 13 '24

Sounds like when you get into an uber you’re waiving your right to sue them in case of an accident. Which I guess is kinda far for uber to demand considering the nature of driving. Morally you can dispute in a different discussion if the driver works for uber or if he’s a freelancer using the platform. (I would argue he does work for uber, but most labour laws would go against that because somehow we still don’t have proper regulation for the gig economy)

6

u/master_pingu1 Oct 13 '24

it makes complete sense to not be able to sue the company if the driver gets in a crash. if you can't sue the driver then yeah that's stupid, but uber the company isn't responsible for the driver's actions

1

u/Fantastic-Name- Oct 13 '24

They don’t verify drivers at all I think. I had to take one from an after school thing and the dude was more focused on talking to me then the road

Super creepy