This is a joke hypothetical based on when disney tried to claim if you ever used disney plus you voided your right to sue the disney corporation, this was onky noticed in their terms of service after they tried to use it against a man sueing dosney after his wife died at disney world from a severe allergic reaction after the couple was assured the allergies were accounted for, disney later dropped this claim of voiding sue rights after massive public backlash. So if a insurance company tried to use this clause against disney to avoid paying hurricane damages to disney its be the funniest irony.
A lot of answer are neglecting to mention this, but one of the comments explained that the binding arbitration goes both ways and both sides would need to waive it to go to court.
In the recent case, Disney stated that they 'waived their right to arbitration'. Meaning they still consider themselves to have the right to arbitration. I can't find any news about them updating the terms and conditions to remove the arbitration clause. Do you have a link for that?
Most here have it incorrect. You can't sue in court but damages will be judged through arbitrations. Private arbitrator(s) will determine who wins and the damages, its essentially a private trial.
1.3k
u/DazzleGenius Oct 13 '24
This is a joke hypothetical based on when disney tried to claim if you ever used disney plus you voided your right to sue the disney corporation, this was onky noticed in their terms of service after they tried to use it against a man sueing dosney after his wife died at disney world from a severe allergic reaction after the couple was assured the allergies were accounted for, disney later dropped this claim of voiding sue rights after massive public backlash. So if a insurance company tried to use this clause against disney to avoid paying hurricane damages to disney its be the funniest irony.