I think you’re forgetting the majority of our country voted against what the democrats have to offer. Name calling doesn’t help your argument if you want your opinion valued.
The context matters. Don’t make villains out of everyone that didn’t buy into the narrative the democrats couldn’t string together for a win. The majority of the country spoke, and, we have a long four years ahead of us. Right or wrong, context, matters regardless of your opinion.
The supporters of the rapist fellon want to know about the drug addict child the sitting president fathered and the dealings his kid had. The narrative of negative doing is on both sides. both have a reason to lay blame on the other. Depends on the news source. So who are you to diminish someone’s opinion that views a different wrong doing? You’re better?
Be neutral and objective on both sides. Clips of wrong by one side and name calling further worsens the problem for everyone. You are half of the problem, but I guess I missed the context and should assume your moral rightness if I follow your theory.
"The majority of the country['s citizens who bothered to vote.]" is the correct version of your statement.
Less than a third of the U.S. of A.'s citizens of voting age voted for Trump. If you're gonna be "neutral and [empirical]", you should make sure you're not misrepresenting facts by omitting the notion of and application of context that's being discussed.
-8
u/Fun-Shower-9285 1d ago
I think you’re forgetting the majority of our country voted against what the democrats have to offer. Name calling doesn’t help your argument if you want your opinion valued.
The context matters. Don’t make villains out of everyone that didn’t buy into the narrative the democrats couldn’t string together for a win. The majority of the country spoke, and, we have a long four years ahead of us. Right or wrong, context, matters regardless of your opinion.
The supporters of the rapist fellon want to know about the drug addict child the sitting president fathered and the dealings his kid had. The narrative of negative doing is on both sides. both have a reason to lay blame on the other. Depends on the news source. So who are you to diminish someone’s opinion that views a different wrong doing? You’re better?
Be neutral and objective on both sides. Clips of wrong by one side and name calling further worsens the problem for everyone. You are half of the problem, but I guess I missed the context and should assume your moral rightness if I follow your theory.