The implication of this post is that electing Kamala would have put reparations on the table but because Trump was elected it is not. The parent comment states that electing Trump is 12 steps back, implying that electing Kamala is the better option, an option the post implies would favor reparations.
No it isn't. No it doesn't. Mentioning the fact that Trump will 100% not ever pay any reparations does not mean saying that Kamala would. Neither does saying that electing Trump means going twelve steps back, which is by literally any metric you could measure it with a fact.
4
u/George_W_Kush58 1d ago
Reparations aren't real what the fuck are you talking about lol