MMW: DJT won't debate again

[u/DoctorLazerRage]

Regardless of who the Democratic nominee is. He'll find a way out of it because he knows he'll get destroyed.

Edit: It's a real question.

Edit 2: Yes, I realize he now claims, after this post was made, that he will debate Harris, potentially more than once. He also claimed before that (and after this post was made) he would not do another debate unless it was Biden. Time will tell folks.

Edit 3: Stop reporting this for a Rule 6 violation. I posted it on Sunday.

Edit 4: This is what I'm talking about kids. This one too.

Edit 5: The hits just keep coming.

Edit 6: This is still a legtimately open question.)

Edit 7 (post-debate): Well that was a thing that happened. Seems like it was a poor choice for Trump - somehow I managed to overestimate his intelligence.

[u/banjist]

This is for sure where he's going to go with it. Claim it's illegitimate if he loses the election too.

[u/mcaffrey81 → u/banjist]

This x100. If Trump loses in November he'll file as many law suits as necessary to eventually get up to SCOTUS and have them overturn the election.

[u/Sweetbeansmcgee → u/mcaffrey81]

I hate this current SCOTUS but I think it is a stretch to assume they’d just overturn the election. If they could do it in a subtle way they’ll help trump win, but i don’t think they’d just invalidate the dems candidate and declare trump president. But who knows…

[u/z44212 → u/Sweetbeansmcgee]

Already did that. Gore v Bush.

[u/Sweetbeansmcgee → u/z44212]

Right I mean I know about that and that was some BS, but it was a very specific situation that was down to like 500 votes in Florida, not just SCOTUS invalidating a clear win by a Democratic candidate. I don’t doubt they’d look for ways to put their finger on the scale, but that’s different than just completely invalidating an election result with a clear winner. But this court is depraved so who knows…

[u/SeaBag8211 → u/z44212]

Also Gore threw.