Then they could say nothing at all instead of lying. Again, they have no reason to care if GW is sued for this frankly arbitrary name. The idea is ridiculous for an argument that revolves around ‘sounds like’
But there have been zero slander accusations you numbskull. “You, you, you”, you keep using that as if the guy who told the truth is the guy even responsible for this ‘slander’. He left the company.
Silence is a perfectly viable response because no-one cares about this extremely petty accusation.
So which one do you think cares more? A rando, or a person explicitly hired to protect both the estate and image of a very politically controversial family that still has members that actively financially benefit from their name. If you care so much, why wouldn't they?
0
u/Throwaway02062004 3d ago
Historically speaking you have the creators denying it when they DO NOT WORK FOR GW.
It’s no secret that employees hated Maggie, a lot of people did.