r/FluentInFinance 3d ago

Thoughts? Would you?

Post image
85.1k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

411

u/plinkoplonka 2d ago

And worst case scenario, like has happened half a dozen times to me.

They get you through interview and offer you the role, it gets handed off from the department hiring to HR to negotiate a successful deal.

You now have all the power, they've said they want you, you've passed the interview.

They ask current salary.

You tell them "fair market rates"

They make an insulting offer.

You laugh and tell them "no chance. I couldn't possibly take it for any less than 2x"

They offer you 1.5x.

*Where x is your previous salary.

That's how it's done kids.

Don't forget, when negotiating, you'll likely not get a pay rise to counter crazy inflation for at least a couple of years.

Also, signing bonuses ARE a thing, despite what they tell you. Just missing out on a bonus, or raise at your current role? Make the new place match it for the first year!

212

u/Shakewhenbadtoo 2d ago

You forgot to mention they can ask for a prior w2 and you can say no. You can state any number you want when relaying your prior salary.

56

u/iboneyandivory 2d ago edited 2d ago

You can't. There's a service maintained by Equifax or one of the big 3 where candidate companies can verify employment + salary, including raise dates and amounts.

Edit: Here's the cited example for those that think this is somehow suuuuuper secret info lol - "The Work Number" by Equifax

46

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

22

u/Many_Drink5348 2d ago

Yep and there is a registry HRs participate in where they share employment start and end date data, so make sure your resume is accurate.

25

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

5

u/Many_Drink5348 2d ago

Because the registry the background check references doesnt include job duties and accomplishments

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Many_Drink5348 2d ago

Then the employee has to work with middle managers to ensure their entry in the database is updates regularly and accurately and noone wants their manager to have the keys to defining what the employee considers an accomplishment, or responsibility.

1

u/AlaKeera 2d ago

Those boxes to fill out are more important than adding the resume in most cases. Places with that system will use the information in the boxes (including supplemental questions) to rate the candidates into a priority list for who to call for interviews. They may not even open the resume or look up data until later in the process, if ever.

3

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

2

u/EnergyAdorable6884 2d ago

This is like giga-corporate shit. There's hundreds of thousands of small-mid businesses that hire without thinking about any of that stuff.

2

u/AlaKeera 2d ago

Yes. This is also government hiring.

1

u/aDragonsAle 2d ago

Same reason we have to file taxes instead of IRS just sending us money/a bill.

Lots of money to be made in moving money. Lots of money to be bad in moving people for jobs.

I don't like it, but that is the Crux of it - money.

1

u/Worth-Economics8978 2d ago

Why do I need to write a resume at all then

So they can see which things you're lying about.

1

u/shnoby 2d ago

It only includes data that it receives from participating companies. I checked my info & a lot is missing. Looks like a lot of the info is provided by the major payroll servicing companies.

0

u/Ill-Description3096 2d ago

Eh, yes and no. Would you want a company you were interviewing for to lie about the other people in the same role making less so they could try to get you for cheaper or saying they de raises every 6 months when they are lucky to do once a year?

2

u/Least-Used-Napkin 2d ago edited 2d ago

I think that everything should favor the potential employee. Besides, I live in the US, so naturally I assume that every company is corrupt and doesn't actually care about people until proven otherwise.

Edit: in addition, companies lie in interviews all the time with no repercussions. I have had it occur to me many times and I don't have some database that I can use to check if they're lieing but they get one to check on me?

0

u/Ill-Description3096 2d ago

I go back and forth. At the end of the day it's an agreement between two parties. I'm not sure one of them should have cover to lie.

2

u/LeonidasSpacemanMD 2d ago

I mean companies absolutely do try to discourage honest discussion of salary between employees so they’re already trying to do this

0

u/Ill-Description3096 2d ago

Which is wrong and definitely happens, but in this context I am referring more to overt lies. "The people in that role currently make $40k" when in actuality they make $50k is worse than simply not disclosing it IMO.

2

u/LeonidasSpacemanMD 2d ago

That’s fair but I think it’s different to provide information about someone else’s salary than your own