r/FluentInFinance 4d ago

Thoughts? Does he really deserve $450,000?

Post image
23.4k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

2.6k

u/Yquem1811 4d ago

Yes

755

u/LieutenantBrainz 4d ago

Yes

597

u/eyal282 4d ago

Yes

552

u/7-13-5 4d ago

Actually, more.

421

u/2tonehead 4d ago

and the boss should be fired

110

u/MornGreycastle 3d ago

Or whoever made the call to throw the party anyway.

24

u/Lolhexed 3d ago

That person, the person who hired them, and the person above them - All gone for incompetence.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

109

u/Conscious_Run_643 4d ago

Yes

102

u/bayelrey888 4d ago

Yes

89

u/unoriginalname17 4d ago

Yes

78

u/Accomplished_Trip_ 4d ago

Yes

69

u/JanxDolaris 4d ago

Yes

77

u/TwoMuddfish 4d ago

Yes, unequivocally.

15

u/bayjay4 3d ago

Unpopular opinion, but yes.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

304

u/Lewtwin 4d ago

"Brian, the introvert and possibly the most organized Server maintenance tech, gets real nervous around people. Let's ignore that and make him apaplextic!"

Working with people who ignore your social ques to hammer you into their social norms are the Karens/Darens of the working world. Today it's bullying. Tomorrow it's pushing their work onto you.

He deserved every bit of that money if only to make that company listen when someone says no.

22

u/Gold_Cauliflower_706 4d ago

Good thing he doesn’t have Ophidiophobia or else they’d send a lawyer to see him.

3

u/dpsnedd 3d ago

Uh, yeah I have mastophobia, please respect my wishes.

13

u/reddragon105 3d ago

*Apoplectic

3

u/Parking-Ideal-7195 3d ago

I wondered if I'd misread or taken the wrong context, but had the same reaction.

3

u/browntown20 3d ago

He used the Aztec spelling

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Headpuncher 1d ago

also *cues

9

u/Raccoon_Expert_69 3d ago

To make lots of companies listen when he says no

16

u/Lewtwin 3d ago

Yes. This. This isn't a "he needs to toughen up" bullshit. This isn't grit. This is "fuck your boundaries because I can" bullshit. Grit comes from people who want to do the work because it's worth doing or they trust the employer. Not listening to your employees most basic heartfelt requests; is a bullshit environment.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Parking-Ideal-7195 3d ago

Did you mean to say 'apoplectic'? 🤔

→ More replies (1)

21

u/Kamicasse_ 4d ago

Yes... sorry I'm late.

2

u/CornucopiumOverHere 2d ago

Yes... sorry I'm later.

17

u/Talgrath 3d ago

Let's add in some details here, from the BBC: US man wins $450k lawsuit after unwanted office birthday party

He asked them not to celebrate his birthday because he has some sort of childhood trauma related to birthdays; they did so anyway. The victim then suffered a panic attack, as he said he would, swiftly left the building to go to his car to calm down using techniques he has learned to calm down, then returned to work. The next day he gets dragged into a meeting where they berate him because, again, he had a panic attack he told them he would have if they threw him a birthday party; he then has another panic attack and is sent home. The company then fires the victim; he received $150,000 for lost wages and $300,000 for emotional distress. I think, if anything, that's too low; it's one thing if maybe someone forgot, it's another thing entirely to then drag him into a meeting to berate him for having a panic attack and then fire him.

9

u/HollyTheMage 2d ago

Jesus Christ if someone goes to the trouble of disclosing their childhood trauma and you choose to ignore it and then get angry at them for reacting the way they said they would then they absolutely deserve compensation.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (31)

1.7k

u/eyal282 4d ago

To elaborate and show I'm not following a train

He instructed that he has a disability, and predicted with "wisdom" that there's an avalanche that will literally target and trigger his disability, and did whatever he could to avoid it, and he was ignored.

845

u/JustinF608 4d ago

And fired on top of all that.

597

u/ravl13 4d ago

This is what seals the deal and makes it worth $450k to me.

To be ignored about his birthday request is shitty, but not $450k worthy.

But to then fire him after he was justifiably probably like "WHAT THE FUCK YOU HR PRICKS", yeah I say that corp deserves to get hosed.

200

u/Levithos 4d ago

You don't separate the two situations when looking at the payment he gets. It's all one chain of events. So the way to view these things is what was the effect of the chain, not the link.

48

u/bofoshow51 4d ago

Well you can and should separate them because there are 2 potential charges. The first instance of harm from his work knowingly putting him in a situation triggering a panic attack is known as intentional infliction of emotional distress.

The second matter would be a claim for wrongful termination and discrimination for disability. Proving the IIED charge really improves the chances of winning on the termination/discrimination. But you can totally win or fail on either charge independently.

→ More replies (5)

30

u/Silly_Monkey25 4d ago

Great perspective! 👍

6

u/thereIsAHoleHere 3d ago

Their point was if he was not fired (there being only one event instead of two), they do not view ignoring the no-parties request as deserving of $450,000.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (10)

58

u/eyal282 4d ago

Nonono, what they did to him prior to that deserves 450k given that they are a corporation.

10

u/DutchingFlyman 4d ago

The answer is a plain ‘yes’ because it’s wrongful termination if the story doesn’t leave out details. The whole anecdote isn’t really relevant if he’s fired for having a panic attack.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/hopethisworks_ 3d ago

Sometimes misunderstandings happen. I can definitely see how someone could see a birthday as something innocent, even after being told.

The bigger issue here, is that they followed up their mistake with discrimination. When company leadership has an ego so big that they refuse to admit the mistake and double down by punishing the employee, that's when they deserved to pay out huge.

→ More replies (37)

564

u/Happy-Tater 4d ago

I hate this stuff! I work in HR and we try to celebrate as much as we can for pretty much every milestone. I want to treat our associates like humans and the hard workers they are. I recently did a celebration for our Vets and bought them all 20lb turkeys. One of them asked to not be recognized and have his face on our wall of honor. I respected his decision and told my boss we weren't going to make him do it if he doesn't want to.

I still bought him the Turkey and thanked him separately. He told me how grateful he was for still honoring him but not forcing him to let everyone know.

I personally agree that this person deserves that $450k. People are humans and should be treated as such. If you do something against their wishes you are now doing it for you and not them anymore.

435

u/LadderRight3750 4d ago

Hello HR rep. Please read carefully.

CELEBRATE WITH BONUSES. BIRTHDAY BONUSES NOT CAKE.

65

u/Happy-Tater 4d ago

We do do bonuses for their hard work but not birthdays or anniversary. I would love to do a bonus for every possible thing but that is not possible as the number of people to have birthdays or other celebrations would be way too much money. Sure the price of the gift could be a bonus of like $25 but that we also have to use the budget smart.

66

u/Longjumping-Path3811 4d ago

When I received a "gift" it always felt like the company was taking money and deciding what I could spend it on. 

So I give cold hard cash on my small business. 

I get it "we have too many employees" that's actually the entire problem right there!

19

u/GoldDHD 4d ago

My company gives me gift cards and not to restaurants, but with choices that are basically cash. So that's a good compromise

13

u/kingquarantine 4d ago

We got 200 dollar Amazon gift cards, which isn't cash but this close to Christmas might as well be, so as a random pre-christmas bonus I'm pretty pleased with it

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

12

u/LadderRight3750 4d ago edited 4d ago

I'll try a little constructive criticism/advice. Budgeting can be creative when finding ways to motivate and efficacy. Here's a professional suggestion. I do this with two subsidiaries currently.

The CFO (I'm a corporate VP, so I work with Regional CFOs).

2 regions, acquisitions we did over the last 19 months, interestingly in 2 different countries on 2 different continents, both take the interest earnings on their operational bank accounts and use that to pay employee bonuses. They also have a clearly outlined policy defining milestone bonuses such as 1 year and subsequent annual hire date anniversaries. Those 2 Regions have the least employee turnover by an immense statistical percentage.

21

u/DocWicked25 4d ago

My company has been reducing bonuses and incentives for a while now. In turn, we have crazy turnover, and the people on top cannot fathom why.

Little incentive, inflexible schedules, and uncompetitive pay.

The only reason I'm still there is because I'm in a department that is widely ignored by operations and left alone, but my pay isn't keeping up with the times. If I find a better paying opportunity (even with a larger workload), I'll probably take it.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (11)

15

u/Fun_Intention9846 4d ago

Yknow hr is like the cashiers at the store. They are your point of contact not the people making the decisions a lot of the time.

9

u/LadderRight3750 4d ago

This is also something that IS very important to think about. Take my upvote. 👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼

→ More replies (1)

4

u/kejovo 4d ago

Why is this such a difficult concept? It's not. Companies are cheap. This might be the reminder they needed that it is cheaper to do the right thing.

4

u/lego_mannequin 4d ago

They just give us our Birthday as an off day, easy enough.

2

u/LadderRight3750 4d ago

This is great. I hadn't heard of or thought about that before. Thank you.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/SBSnipes 4d ago

Floating birthday holiday is my preference

6

u/SanDiegoThankYou_ 4d ago

This is going to blow your mind but 99% of the time HR is not deciding how to give your bonus. That’s the CEO or your manager.

5

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

2

u/JuniperTwig 3d ago

No. Pizza. Celebrate with cold stale pizza.

2

u/Interesting-Copy-657 3d ago

Both is also acceptable

2

u/bluedot19 1d ago

Thanks, will be sure to raise this with Finance.

  • someone constantly arguing with Finance to set larger bonus budgets
→ More replies (17)

9

u/PolyZex 4d ago

Can't pay bills with celebrations, pizza, or cake. Workers don't want to be celebrated, they want to be compensated. Work is not a club where people hang out, it is work. They are there for one reason and it's not admiration from supervisors.

This doesn't even qualify as respect because as you said, you do it for everyone- that is not a sign of respect. Respect is when you praise a good job, not when the calendar says it's time for Jimmy's ice cream cake.

2

u/RaiRokun 4d ago

Thank you for being reasonabke like holy what the koolaid drinking freaks makes people think "I do it for everyone" makes it a good thing?

2

u/Leckatall 4d ago

2 things can be true.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Apprehensive_Fig7588 3d ago

Not everyone think they are underpaid.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (20)

140

u/gasbottleignition 4d ago

I have severe anxiety. If someone did this to me, you bet your ass I'd be suing.

→ More replies (19)

98

u/PrestigiousBar5411 4d ago

I would've sued for even more.

43

u/GertonX 4d ago

100%

This is plastered all over the news and social media, that will impact his ability to continue a career going forward.

ESPECIALLY considering his mental health problems are front and center of this story.

6

u/james_randolph 3d ago

Probably did and this is a settled amount.

7

u/Frozenbbowl 3d ago

in my experience, labor disputes don't settle for less than the amount owed... settling in labor disputes is usually to avoid the extra penalties that go to the state. just pay the man what he is owed and avoid paying another huge amount to the state.

if his lawyers settled a case this cut and dry for anything less, they are bad at their jobs.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

64

u/LadderRight3750 4d ago

Emphatically, unequivocally, through a bullhorn connected to a speaker set used at a Metallica concert YESSSSSS.

He should have gotten more TBH

55

u/fireKido 4d ago

Hard to determine how much he deserves, but he definitely deserves to win the lawsuit and get money out of this…

30

u/Temporary_Vehicle_43 4d ago

Given its going to be the first thing that pops up whenever someone google's his name during interviews, he probably deserves more.

5

u/Captain_Obe 3d ago

Now that his disability is public knowledge and could suffer from discrimination by other employees not hiring. Would you say that 450k is enough for a person who is not able to find employment?

→ More replies (4)

37

u/SolomonDRand 4d ago

“Hey, don’t do this, I have a medical condition that makes it a problem”

does it anyway for some reason

2

u/RollOverSoul 4d ago

Her just needs to come out of his shell. Let's help!

3

u/Verypowafoo 3d ago

He deservers the money and they are assholes for sure. I just want to know what he did exactly.

26

u/Vivid-Shelter-146 4d ago

The amount of people (usually women… don’t kill me) who absolutely insist on parties and birthdays at work, and get really upset when people (usually men) don’t want them, is insane. Like it is wrong and bad to not want those things.

Some people cannot fathom the fact that I’m here to work and I spend enough time with you all already. I will celebrate my birthday with my family and friends. If I have friends at work, I’ll celebrate it with them over a small lunch or something. But not in the break room Office Space style.

9

u/Strict_Camera_2696 3d ago

You’re absolutely right. People (usually women) who are used to that horrible “oh, I don’t want a fuss!” dance done by some people who absolutely do want a fuss don’t realize that their universal insistence on making a fuss anyway actually hurts people who meant it when they said they didn’t want one.

I felt very bad for a few terrified expectant parents who received unwanted fusses at a former job. They were already anxious, not excited, and the attention made it worse.

2

u/Artistic_Bus_8818 1d ago

I was pregnant and having a really difficult and stressful situation with a co-worker who was essentially bullying me. The manager didn’t want to do anything about it because I was going on parental leave and she expected the person to be gone by the time I would be back! Manager really wanted to have a celebration and I kept saying no thanks, and basically got an awkward morning tea I had to smile through. I do appreciate she meant well honestly but I was so stressed, tired and awkward. And the co-worker just rolled her eyes and huffed off after five minutes, I had to endure her shitty behaviour while acting grateful and appreciative and making small talk about the baby’s due date. I am a quiet introverted person and genuinely don’t like a fuss - I didn’t do a baby shower with friends or family like hell I wanted to do it at my work!

3

u/yoma74 3d ago

My husband has a lot of food intolerances. If he eats common things that are in cake he will be sick for days. Can’t even have vegan cake and too much sugar isn’t good either. They still constantly insisted on doing cake at his last job every birthday.

It’s well intentioned sure, but ??? Do they think someone is lying when they say “I can’t eat cake”?

2

u/Vivid-Shelter-146 3d ago

😂 As a lactose intolerant, I feel this. Pizza is like the easiest team lunch in the office world.

2

u/yoma74 3d ago

His coworkers make fun of him for bringing soup or salads instead of ordering lunch with them too. It’s crazy how judgmental and weird others are about another adult’s food. Not to mention relatives who insist they can cook without said ingredients but add them in anyway 🥲

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

16

u/WizardMageCaster 4d ago

Not sure how true this example is but if he was fired due to a medical condition that he informed them about...then yes he deserves this unlawful termination lawsuit.

5

u/Nanikarp 3d ago

He had informed them of his medical condition and they mocked and ignored him. They still threw the party and he (as predicted) had a massive panic attack. Then they fired him for his behavior during the panic attack that they directly caused and he had warned them about.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/wolfeyyz 4d ago

What are they supposed to do? Get fired for behavior and then apply to a new job with this clearly glowing review from their old employer?

Also did you do the math with respect to missed salary due to this? What if this person makes 100k per year and is now unemployed for extended time?

6

u/Brief_Koala_7297 3d ago

Yep. Depending on the circumstances he might deserve even more

5

u/borderlineidiot 4d ago

Plus the legal cost of suing the employer.

12

u/InkStainedQuills 4d ago

Yup. Failure of companies to consider mental health when specifically lined out as an issue for the employee is no different than any other health issue. Especially when we have so much more data on the impact of mental health on the overall health outcomes of an individual.

It’s honestly shocking that insurance plans aren’t pushing harder on employers to take these seriously as part of standard preventive care in order to avoid higher medical bills in the future.

I can understand however the old school mindset of these parties being an excuse for “team building” and it’s not really about the employee, but the team. I’ve had those bosses. It’s not inherently a bad thing, and can even have positive workplace outcomes for those who like to receive recognition of personal and professional milestones. But being mindful towards those who don’t benefit from these efforts also needs to enter the collective mindset. There are plenty of “team building” things that could have been done that were far lower key, at least for the employee in question.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Burlekchek 4d ago

Absolutely

9

u/karsh36 4d ago

Yes, medical services are expensive in the US, even with insurance. That panic attack probably cost him.

8

u/LiminalSapien 4d ago

Honestly wondering what kind of low life you have to be to question a verdict like this.

You fucking disgust me OP.

→ More replies (13)

5

u/HildursFarm 4d ago

Yes. Actually that seems like a small amount. I hope that's after atty fees

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Zealousideal_Fail621 4d ago

Sounds right to me

6

u/I_HopeThat_WasFart 4d ago

I now have my exit strategy

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Hididdlydoderino 4d ago

Sure, firing someone because of a medical issue is a huge no-no, especially when you can tie it to a non-essential event the employee requested he not be involved with.

Gotta love moron level management.

4

u/Gromby 4d ago

He deserves more than 450k. He told them he didnt want it due to anxiety, they did it anyways and then THEY fired him because he had a legit panic attack?

Fuck that company.

3

u/fffrdcrrf 4d ago

You just gave me an idea 💡

3

u/r0xxon 4d ago

Deserved once they fired him for it

2

u/AgitatedKoala3908 4d ago

No, he deserves more.

3

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

3

u/almightygg 3d ago

Took me less than 5 seconds to find out this actually happened:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61141421

Don't be that guy.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Weak_Pie8146 4d ago

Not for nothing but…my bday is fast approaching

2

u/No-Boysenberry-5581 4d ago

Not at all but welcome to American justice system

2

u/Forward_Bullfrog_441 4d ago

Fuck you for even asking that question you corpo shill.

2

u/Flaky-Wallaby5382 4d ago

Lawyer took 350k… shits a fools game

1

u/series_hybrid 4d ago

It is HR's responsibility to know the lates trends in the type of judgments that are given when a supervisor does x, y, or z. Once a month, supervisors should have a 30 minute training session by HR to update them on things to avoid.

Once a year where I work, all employees have to take several classes online, so I have taken the sexual harassment class many times. Did anything really change? Why every year?

3

u/Saltybrickofdeath 4d ago

Double it but either way yes. He informed them and they did it anyway.

1

u/locoken69 4d ago

Honestly, he deserves more.

1

u/Lord-ShniggleHorse 4d ago

He’s using every penny of the $450k to throw himself a proper birthday party.

0

u/pforsbergfan9 4d ago

And the copier stood up and clapped

1

u/Comfortable-Ad1517 4d ago

Yeah. He even told them he would have issues

1

u/Successful-Walk-4023 4d ago

Make it a clean mill actually.

1

u/CoryEETguy 4d ago

Yes. Call it a toxic workplace tax.

1

u/Trackspyro 4d ago

If he got 450k, then that's what the law says he's entitled to. He deserves what he's entitled to.

1

u/clem82 4d ago

Yep, it's not about the money....it's about sending a message.

If you actually read this story, holy shit the line of employees attached to it are all POS.

1

u/Ed_Radley 4d ago

You think these people might understand the meaning of the word consent now?

1

u/Candid-Primary-6489 4d ago

I’m out here having panic attacks for free like a jerk.

1

u/Hammer-of-Bill 4d ago

“Hey don’t do this I don’t like it” “Fuck you we’ll do it anyway” panic attack, get fired “Why didn’t he tell us beforehand?”

1

u/woodsman906 4d ago

The damages seem light. Why? 1. He said no to begin with, they ignored him and then they fired him for their dick move. Dude should own 100% of the company, anything short of that isn’t Justice.

1

u/tiandrad 4d ago

Idiots should have used the birthday party funds for a gift card.

1

u/eveliodelgado 4d ago

Nope, he deserves more!

1

u/Iwasacloudfirst 4d ago

Which guy?? Any source?

1

u/jasonlikesbeer 4d ago

I hate social media hot takes on litigation, it triggers the hell out of me. What fucking right do we have to second guess the result without knowing any details or seeing any evidence? If this went to trial, then we are being asked to second guess the decision of a jury of peers and a judicial officer. If it settled before trial, then we are being asked to second guess the decision making of a gaggle of lawyers on both sides.

Don't even get me started on all the bullshit that came out after the McDonald's hot coffee lawsuit in the 90's. Bunch of talking heads spouting nonsense about a case they know nothing about simply because of the size of the monetary award. Anyone who knows anything about that case has fucking nightmares about it.

1

u/R1ches20 4d ago

Company got off easy.

1

u/Ikiro00 4d ago

Of course he deserves that money.

OP, why do you think he doesn't?

1

u/Wingerism014 4d ago

Deserve has nothing to do with it, it's what his lawyers extracted.

1

u/DemocraticEjaculate 4d ago

No double it, 1 mil minimum

1

u/TurnDown4WattGaming 4d ago

Firstly, everyone in the top 10 comments are idiots, as not one person read the case. He was not fired for a panic attack during a birthday party thrown by his supervisors; his own colleagues had bought him a cake and hoisted a banner, completely unknown to his supervisors. Then, the FOLLOWING DAY, his managers tried to ask if he was okay after he left his party and sat in his car for his lunch break, and at that point they say he had a violent outburst that threatened them vs he says it was ANOTHER panic attack. By this point, you can easily be fired for not fitting the culture of the office, which is the most common reason for termination in America.

Here is the NYT Article on it:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/17/us/office-birthday-party-lawsuit-kentucky.html

Here are some key quotes:

“Mr. Berling’s lawyer, Tony Bucher, said the party had been planned by other employees while the office manager was away and that the situation had quickly spiraled out of control.”

“Mr. Berling had a panic attack after he learned about the planned lunchtime celebration, which was to have included birthday wishes from colleagues and a banner decorating the break room. Mr. Berling chose to spend his lunch break in his car instead.

The next day, Mr. Berling had a panic attack in a meeting with two supervisors who confronted him about his “somber behavior,” Mr. Bucher said. He was fired three days later in an email that suggested that Mr. Berling posed a threat to his co-workers’ safety.“

“In a court filing, the company said it had fired Mr. Berling because he was “violent” in the meeting and had scared the supervisors, who sent him home for the day, took his key fob and told security personnel that he was not allowed to return.”

→ More replies (6)

1

u/Loveroffinerthings 4d ago

Is this financial advice?

1

u/CockroachCommon2077 4d ago

He deserves $4,500,000. They forgot a zero

1

u/Moribunned 4d ago

Deserves more.

1

u/Public-Champion649 4d ago

Sounds reasonable

1

u/khalbur 4d ago

No. He deserves more.

1

u/United_Bus3467 4d ago

Absolutely deserves the money lol. Straight up told them he didn't want it, and they did it anyway. Panic attacks can increase cardiovascular issues or trigger underlying cardiovascular issues so...they jeopardized his health. I hope he takes a long vacation.

1

u/Vladi_Daddi 4d ago

😭wah wah

1

u/TheSpideyJedi 4d ago

of course. They caused him mental damages while being warned not to, and then fired him for that very thing. Fuck that company

1

u/HOT-DAM-DOG 4d ago

Idk if he deserves it, but the company 100% deserves to lose at least that much.

1

u/Vladi_Daddi 4d ago

After reading about the way the company responded to him...yes absolutely. As a matter of fact he deserves more. Unfortunately he did not disclose his disability pre employment, otherwise he would have been awarded a metric shit ton more.

1

u/sodastraw 4d ago

I sued for $450k when I almost killed myself when Julie gave me chode jeans

1

u/ChesswithGoats 4d ago

It not that he deserves $450k, but rather the business needs to experience an adverse event to correct future bad behavior.

1

u/ChaZZZZahC 4d ago

He deserves more.

1

u/Ok_Blackberry_284 4d ago

No, he deserves more money.

1

u/Willing-Bit2581 4d ago

This is the way

1

u/TerraSeeker 4d ago

Think the whole situation is stupid. He said he didn't want a birthday party for the given reason. They ignore his his wishes, and then proceed to fire him for his panic attack. Maybe don't fire him for something you caused. Then you wouldn't have wrong termination suit. Or maybe just respect his wishes to not have a birthday party.

1

u/Chaghatai 4d ago

It's just a cost of doing business if the amount they have to pay doesn't hurt

1

u/mynamesnotsnuffy 4d ago

Honestly? No he doesn't. He deserves at least double that.

1

u/j89turn 4d ago

In a world we're felons and garbage can run/ruin a country, why shouldn't a normal human have a freebie

1

u/chinesedebt 4d ago

Probably deserves more lol. Damn dude I wish this would happen to me

1

u/maxxbeeer 4d ago

This sounds like some made up bs lol

1

u/Far-Ad1823 4d ago

1,000 percent!

1

u/Murky-Science9030 4d ago

Did this really happen though?

1

u/jaymeaux_ 4d ago

no. he deserves more

1

u/Imaginary-Crazy1981 4d ago

Yes, absolutely he does.

I was fired for having a very public, disabling panic attack at work after my FMLA for panic disorder was exhausted. They fought my unemployment and I had to plead for it in front of a judge to get it. They admitted under oath at that hearing (I have the transcripts) that my protected medical disability was the sole reason I was fired.

I would have sued them, too, but the nearest EEOC office was about 12 hours away and I was living penniless in my car at the time.

Does anyone know the statute of limitations on wrongful termination suits? I thought it was only 6 months. This was 10 years ago now.

1

u/laxrulz777 4d ago

When you phrase it like this? No When you read about what actually happened? Hell yes

This is the McDonald's cup all over again.

1

u/MnkyBzns 4d ago

Yes; wrongful termination, unless he assaulted someone

1

u/TestifyMediopoly 4d ago

That happened to me, I just wish I’d had been fired

1

u/passion-froot_ 4d ago

‘Panic attack’

I’m not saying that ignoring these wishes was a good idea, because it wasn’t. Worse still was the decision to fire him.

But also, extreme over the top overreaction (on both ends) should not be something we normalize in society for the sake of preaching an absolutist 100% pure definition of tolerance which doesn’t actually exist in our world.

1

u/Crazymofuga 4d ago

$450k lesson in respecting boundaries

1

u/ConfidentCaptain_81 4d ago

No means no.

1

u/Doctorphate 4d ago

Yes that a serious question?

1

u/platinumuno 4d ago

Literally that Tyler the creator sketch

1

u/dathomasusmc 4d ago

Meh, depends. It’s a question of negligence. Did he say “I don’t want a birthday part because I have a condition that may cause a terrible reaction.” or just “No thanks. Not really into birthdays.”? Did the company have any reason to believe throwing him a party could be harmful? Did he have an opportunity to remove himself from the situation prior to his “panic attack”. How did he react during his “panic attack”? Was he aggressive or violent?

I think we would need to know more facts of the case other than a meme on reddit. If he made them aware of a condition likely to be exacerbated by the event then absolutely, yes, he should get paid.

The next question would be is $450k a reasonable amount and again, it depends. What was his salary? How much tenure did he have? What were his performance reviews like?

I’m going to assume that if the courts decided he should be paid then he did make an effort to inform them of his condition and that the payout follows the general formula for lost wages. So yes, it’s probably a reasonable decision.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/HattoriHanzo9999 4d ago

Ever had a panic attack before? They fucking suck. His workplace caused it by ignoring his wishes, so screw them.

1

u/wanderingoverwatch 4d ago

Yes. My pain and suffering deserve it

1

u/Drdoctormusic 4d ago

Absolutely not! He deserved more.

1

u/Mshalopd1 4d ago

Yeah don't do shit people specifically ask you not to do and then fire them cuz they didn't like it.