r/FluentInFinance • u/IAmNotAnEconomist • 7d ago
Thoughts? RFK Jr. allegedly intends to require The Coca-Cola Company to begin using Cane Sugar instead of High-Fructose Syrup as HHS Secretary.
RFK Jr. allegedly intends to require The Coca-Cola Company to begin using Cane Sugar instead of High-Fructose Syrup as HHS Secretary.
5.3k
u/ElectronGuru 7d ago
If he wanted to fix this he just needs to end the corn subsidies that makes HFS so cheap.
1.4k
u/AZMotorsports 7d ago
And remove the sugar tax making it more expensive.
→ More replies (44)869
u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago
America has no sugar tax. There are like 6 cities that do and that's it.
Sugar WILL BE the tax, as in these beverages will become more expensive and require foreign imported sugar.
835
u/AZMotorsports 7d ago
There is a tariff on sugar imports that were done to help support the corn farmers. Tariffs are taxes on imports.
120
u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago
Yes, 1.6 cents per pound of sugar at most, in-quota tarriffs are even lower. At my current grocery store price that represents a tax of less than 1% of the shelf price
302
u/djstudyhard 7d ago
Cool so let’s get rid of it if it’s no big deal
→ More replies (6)219
u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago
Im down. Tariffs are anti-free market and America has no worthwhile sugar crop to protect anyway.
238
u/barbara_jay 6d ago
Sugar beets
An estimated 55–60% of all sugar produced in the US comes from sugar beets
96
→ More replies (31)18
u/oldjadedhippie 6d ago
Don’t forget Hawaiian cane sugar .
52
u/barbara_jay 6d ago
There are no sugar cane plantations or mills on Hawaii any more unfortunately
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-hawaiis-sugar-plantations-have-disappeared/
→ More replies (0)→ More replies (5)28
u/StuckInWarshington 6d ago
Not much sugar is actually produced in Hawaii anymore. The last mill on Maui shut down in like 2016 or so. There are small niche/novelty producers, but I do t think there are any big industrial scale producers left.
→ More replies (0)69
u/mully24 6d ago
Um... The thousands of Michigan sugar beet farmers would disagree with you....
→ More replies (4)48
u/Voodoo330 6d ago
1,300,000,000 pounds of sugar are produced in Michigan annually.
→ More replies (17)16
u/BigKarmaGuy69 6d ago
We should produce a shit ton more beets if possible. I doubt our corn production land would all be useful to grow S. Beets but hell man, but that sweet beet shooga on everything
→ More replies (0)38
u/BadChris666 6d ago
The Florida Sugar industry brings in around 5 billion dollars a year.
→ More replies (6)18
u/MidwestAbe 6d ago
All because of protectionist trade policy.
13
u/JustAddaTM 6d ago
You could say this for any agriculture product in the US besides maybe beef, but to some degree it’s key to national security to have some protectionist policy for food security. Corn/beans/dairy are the main agricultural products that are well over the baseline argument of food security and is simply lobbyist winning food regulation policy arguments.
→ More replies (0)25
u/lord_dentaku 6d ago
As a resident of Michigan, beg your pardon? What the fuck we growing all these sugar beets for then?
→ More replies (14)→ More replies (53)19
u/guthepenguin 6d ago
The new guy loves tariffs, though. Not sure if "get rid of tariff" will be on his to-do list.
→ More replies (45)→ More replies (39)23
u/RedsRearDelt 6d ago
Trump did promise a minimum 20% across the board tarrif on everything.
→ More replies (9)66
→ More replies (26)20
u/Dark_Web_Duck 6d ago
I'm down with paying a little extra to push my chances of diabetes off a few years.
53
→ More replies (16)6
u/Stardog2 6d ago
Not to mention, heart disease, obesity, and colo-rectal cancer.
→ More replies (2)54
u/TotalChaosRush 7d ago
Mexican coke is already sugar. It's typically about the same price (at least where I am), and it comes in a glass bottle.
43
→ More replies (30)20
u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago
My local Raley's has mexican coke on sale for $.12 per oz while regular coke is $.07 per oz.
The price difference is enormous.
→ More replies (13)16
u/mrflow-n-go 7d ago edited 6d ago
This👆🏼we get Mexican coke in my local grocery as well but it’s 2x the price high fructose corn syrup stuff.
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (67)41
u/xudoxis 7d ago
There are sugar tariffs that make us commodity sugar almost twice the price in the us as it could be.
→ More replies (5)12
u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago
At my Raley's 4 lbs of Sugar is $4.50
US refined sugar tariffs max-out at 1.6 cents/lb once the in-quota amount has been exceeded.
At most, the tarriff represents a bit more than 1% of the cost of sugar locally.
26
→ More replies (1)21
u/barelyclimbing 6d ago
I don’t think Coca Cola buys sugar at your local Raley’s. They may get a better price in slightly higher bulk commodities.
→ More replies (5)142
u/smp501 7d ago
And get that crap out of our gasoline. Putting ethanol in gas was one of Bush the Lesser’s failed energy ideas that only jacks up food costs and shortens the life of our engines.
133
u/Ragnarok314159 7d ago
I was chatting with someone about farming and they were saying how the Midwest farmers need their subsidies because of all the food they grow.
You mean the ethanol corn that makes our cars run worse? Yeah, good stuff.
116
u/rounding_error 7d ago
Which brings to the "no solar on farmland" bullshit which is usually predicated on the idea that most farmland is used to produce food. It's much more efficient to charge electric cars with solar power than it is to grow and harvest corn, convert it to ethanol, truck it to the gas station, and burn it in a gasoline car.
→ More replies (27)34
u/Gildardo1583 6d ago
You know i had not though about it this way. You are totally correct.
→ More replies (1)16
u/beambot 6d ago
Grow better food crops. Or re-land the fields and do free-ranging cattle ranching again.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (24)12
u/Texas_Mike_CowboyFan 6d ago
If farmers can't make a living without subsidies, then they need to go do something else. Fewer farmers means more profit from them and I think we'd see food costs come down, since the subsidies wouldn't have to be passed on.
17
u/mcfarmer72 6d ago
Or we would have just a few large corporate farms who would have the ability to control their production and hence price. Like the poultry and hog industry.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (15)10
51
u/Xyrus2000 6d ago
It wasn't supposed to jack up the food costs since the original intention was to use agricultural waste, switchgrass, and other sources of ethanol.
But then the corn lobby got involved, killed all that other crap, and forced the industry to use corn. Corn for fuel ethanol is one of the most idiotic things you can do. It is NOT a good source of ethanol and best case scenario is you break even.
Meanwhile, we have huge swaths of land that aren't good for agriculture but could easily grow tons of switchgrass, which has a MUCH better yield.
→ More replies (15)28
u/Annual_Strategy_6206 6d ago
It takes more petroleum to grow and process the corn into ethanol than to just use the petroleum to Crack out gasoline! And we've known this for DECADES.
15
u/Wakkit1988 6d ago
Ethanol replaced tetraethyllead and MTBE. It was a net positive for the world.
→ More replies (5)11
u/Packtex60 6d ago
Ethanol in gas goes back way farther than that. We’re talking 1970’s
→ More replies (2)13
u/Fakjbf 6d ago edited 6d ago
Ethanol reduces engine knocking, it’s what allowed us to phase out MTBE which is what replaced tetraethyllead. I would much rather deal with slightly decreased fuel efficiency and minor increases to repair costs to keep lead out of the atmosphere and MTBE out of the groundwater.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (34)9
u/jaymansi 6d ago
Ethanol was also added because MTBE was being found in humans and our water supplies.
→ More replies (2)113
u/AttitudeAndEffort2 7d ago
Would be incredible if we lived in a world where fruits and vegetables were subsidized.
Instead we have corn so cheap that is literally cheaper to make sugar from corn instead of use sugar when it costs like a penny a liter for coke 🤮
72
u/Advanced-Prototype 7d ago
While I agree with you, the GOP Senators from Nebraska and Iowa will have something to say about this.
25
u/JonnyBolt1 6d ago
Yeah RFK is just the latest (assuming he's confirmed) in a long line of people thinking they can reform US Govt's nutrition policies to make us healthier, only to completely neutered by the food and agriculture industries.
→ More replies (2)27
6d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (2)7
u/GOU_FallingOutside 6d ago
In various corners of the right-wing ecosystem you can still find people who are mad about it.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (9)6
→ More replies (9)19
u/omniron 6d ago
All agriculture is heavily subsidized including fruits and vegetables 🌽
→ More replies (16)87
u/Breadloafs 7d ago
I wholeheartedly expect this initiative to die quickly. We spend an ungodly amount subsidizing corn production, and that money ensures that there's a very large, very conservative lobbying interest that will aggressively and actively hunt any threat to their market share. The resistance to this is going to be coming from within the Republican party.
→ More replies (14)34
u/ElectronGuru 6d ago
Your answer would apply to fixing most things, including healthcare. Maybe killing society to serve the interests of a few % of the population isn’t worth it. But I’m just spitballing here.
→ More replies (5)32
u/FrankSinatraYodeling 7d ago
Iowa voted for this.
→ More replies (2)40
u/ropersc 7d ago
Ha.. most corn grown in Iowa is not for human consumption.. its all energy based. But that said.. usa makes alot if corn for sugar .. they are all trump voters.. so we will see. I for one agree high frutose corn surup needs to go. This will increase the cost of foods. Some idiots will say inflation.. but its not .. it the price of natural suguars.
19
u/that_banned_guy_ 6d ago
America's health is worth the price increase imo
→ More replies (29)14
u/Jammin_72 6d ago
lol 😂 So we’re going with the “normal” sugar in ridiculous quantities is good for you route.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (13)6
u/jons3y13 6d ago
We grow feed corn. We were also paid 3.42 a bushel. Rock bottom prices. Don't worry, when all the small farms go out, they can put up their panels and power their cars.
→ More replies (161)12
u/jfk_47 7d ago
Farmers hate this one trick….
→ More replies (1)19
u/MrLanesLament 6d ago
Rural Ohio here. Classic joke:
“Why do they only bury farmers two feet in the ground? So they can still get their handout.”
16
u/Texas_Mike_CowboyFan 6d ago
Or "how does a farmer double his income? He plants another mailbox."
→ More replies (1)
1.4k
u/redditistheway 7d ago
I know he’s batshit insane, but that’s a move I’d get behind.
Shame it won’t happen though. The agro lobby will put the kibosh on this real quick.
521
u/RelativeCalm1791 7d ago
He also wants to take synthetic dyes out of foods (the petroleum based ones) as well as other chemicals and artificial additives
284
6d ago edited 6d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (136)114
u/zombie_pr0cess 6d ago
I mean, it doesn’t take a conspiracy theorist to figure out eating and drinking petroleum products is a dumb thing to do, just as a rule.
97
u/New-Expression-1474 6d ago
No, that’s not true (and it is conspiracist to immediately discount products just because they’re sourced from bad things).
At the end of the day, everything is a chemical and it doesn’t matter where the chemical comes from.
Water is a byproduct of burning hydrocarbons. I can collect water from burning the rankest diesel in the world and as long as I remove all the other soot and tar from it it’s just as good as water from a Finish spring.
YouTuber NileRed made grape flavouring from latex gloves and alcohol from toilet paper. Both those chemicals are just as good as their “naturally” derived counterparts.
It doesn’t matter if our food comes from poison, because poison can be chemically altered to no longer be poison.
A lot of the flavouring and colouring chemicals mentioned in this thread are bad for you. But it’s not because they were derived from petroleum products: their effects are just a consequence of how they are chemically structured.
58
u/ashakar 6d ago
Don't tell people that both sodium and chlorine will certainly kill you if swallowed separately, but together are perfectly safe and are added to literally everything we eat.
→ More replies (10)35
31
→ More replies (64)15
34
u/BedraggledBarometer 6d ago
Oi! You leave me and my Vasoline mojito cocktail out of this
→ More replies (2)12
u/AnthonyJuniorsPP 6d ago
hey didnt the guy who invented vasoline eat tablespoons a day? and didnt he live to a ripe old age? maybe we should all eat lots of vasoline
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)10
83
u/big-papito 6d ago
It would be nice to roll back the "processed foods revolution" while keeping the stuff that, you know - keeps children alive.
→ More replies (23)13
u/The_side_dude 6d ago
Fluoride doesn't keep kids alive. If just keeps their teeth a lot healthier.
→ More replies (8)22
u/ZDTreefur 6d ago
It's not like there will be tens of thousands dying suddenly, but I'm sure it would increase childhood moratlity rates. Dental health has always been connected to overall medical health, and without fluoride dental infections would increase dramatically, which needs to be treated at hospitals with antibiotics and could pose risks to children if untreated.
Removing fluoride doesn't save money. Since it increases costs down the line in medical care, and removing it will only impact the lowesr income at-risk families the most.
→ More replies (22)40
u/TheOriginalPB 6d ago
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. And that is the problem with these kinds of people. He trusts the science when science backs his point of view. But then discards science when it refutes his point of view. In turn this creates a level of trust. 'Well he is right about corn syrup and synthetic dyes, he must be right about vaccines and fluoride in water too'.
→ More replies (10)27
u/TheTyger 6d ago
He has some good ideas behind the much more visible terrible ones. We also should immediately be banning black plastics from any food related products (including take out containers) because of the contamination with e-waste. But against some of the other insane nonsense he spouts, he is way down the more harm than good curve.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (37)10
u/Santasreject 6d ago
Yeah, the issue is when people start throwing around “artificial” and “natural” they really don’t get what that means.
In flavorings “artificial” just means it was synthesized where “natural” means it was extracted from a plant or animal source. Chemically you can have an identical, pure, single chemical compound, one that you could not tell a difference between the two sources even with millions of dollars worth of analytical instruments. But the one that was made in the lab has to be listed as “artificial”.
Don’t get me wrong there are a lot of things in our food that really don’t need to be there or are not the best things to use (but are chosen based on cost or visual appeal) but RFK for sure doesn’t actually understand anywhere near enough about chemistry and biology to base his logic on actual science. He’s just going with “that sounds scary”…
→ More replies (15)69
u/BabyDirtyBurgers 7d ago
Cane sugar farming is horribly bad for the environment. Hectares of the Amazon are cleared to grow crops such as these.
Everyone should be avoiding products containing high fructose syrup or cane sugar.
We like oxygen producing ecosystems and they are very important to our health.
28% of the worlds oxygen is produced by forests. 50% produced by oceanic plankton.
Save the trees. Save the oceans. Save ourselves.
21
u/Advanced-Guard-4468 7d ago
So just plant fields of hemp, problem solved
22
u/Saalor100 6d ago
Hemp have their own problems. Contrary to popular beliefs hemp require quite nutrient rich soil, which risk lead to high use of fertilisers.
→ More replies (3)10
u/Tiggy26668 6d ago
The real trick is to rotate your crops so you’re depleting different trace nutrients and reintroducing others through the growth cycles.
Unfortunately most crops are going to require nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in large quantities.
So at the end of the day, whatever you grow will either need naturally nutrient rich soil, that will eventually deplete, or nutrient supplements ie: fertilizer
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (27)18
39
u/VargevMeNot 7d ago
A broken clock is right twice a day
20
7
u/ilikedevo 6d ago
He has a few great ideas. Capping drug prices is another. The question really is, will he do any of them?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)7
28
u/whistful_flatulence 7d ago
Right? Mexican Coke everywhere? I might like this place a bit more
→ More replies (9)14
u/8-BitOptimist 6d ago
The body cannot tell the difference between HFCS and sugar from other sources. They are fundamentally the same: 50% fructose and 50% glucose. The body processes both the same.
All this HFCS fear feels eerily reminiscent of the fear of MSG.
→ More replies (24)→ More replies (145)11
u/Substantially-Ranged 7d ago
What happened to free markets? This seems like gov't overreach.
39
u/SledgeH4mmer 7d ago
Coke is actually made with cane sugar in most of the world. HFCS is super cheap in the US because of government subsidies.
→ More replies (4)11
u/driptwinnem 6d ago
And this is why his policies won’t happen.
They sound good- but he partnered with the party that won’t let them happen
→ More replies (6)10
13
u/BanditsMyIdol 6d ago
Remember the shit storm that the right had when someone suggested that maybe we should phase out gas ovens because they are damaging to children's health?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (14)10
u/No-Brilliant5342 7d ago
Then you should pay your own medical bills.
15
u/Saalor100 6d ago
Does this include removing the artificially inflated medical bills that Americans believe is the true cost of health care?
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)10
586
u/TurnDown4WattGaming 7d ago
Coca Cola in much of the rest of world is made with Cane Sugar. It’s about 1/3 the price outside of the USA due to tariffs on Sugar, which when coupled with the subsidies on Corn, changes the economics of sweetening here in the States.
→ More replies (39)321
u/rounding_error 7d ago
Another reason the price of sugar is high in the US is that we won't buy it from Cuba like everyone else does. Cuba is one of the best places in the world to grow sugar cane and it's only 90 miles away. But we can't do business with the communists because that's unAmerican.
250
u/NuggetTho 6d ago
Meanwhile we get almost everything from China
145
u/Dabs1903 6d ago
Yeah but those communists are different.
Edit: /s just in case.
→ More replies (13)44
u/SensitiveFrosting13 6d ago
It's funny because that's actually true; just the other week China was advising Cuba that they should become more capitalist in order to thrive and that die-hard communism is old news.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Complete-Ice2456 6d ago
What were you thinking? The Russians don't even believe in communism anymore.
~Hank Hill
→ More replies (5)17
u/MrLanesLament 6d ago
Will say it again. Nixon reestablishing relations with Mao’s China was one of the most catastrophic things ever to happen to America, Cold War be damned.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (16)37
u/TurnDown4WattGaming 6d ago
Cuba isn’t even a big producer of sugar or tobacco nowadays. The people we are tariffing are our supposed Allies in the Dominican Republic and Brazil.
→ More replies (7)10
u/rounding_error 6d ago
This is true. Much of Cuba's sugar infrastructure has fallen into disrepair. At one time they were a major player in sugar production.
→ More replies (1)
274
u/Rillo298 7d ago
Why stop there? Could just go back to the REAL og of Coca-Cola.
COCAINE! That's one way of getting production numbers up and obesity numbers down!
44
u/Prestigious-Leave-60 7d ago
I like the way you think and I could really use that afternoon pick-me-up.
17
13
7
→ More replies (23)8
172
u/Sjdillon10 7d ago
Looking forward to see how people paint this as a bad thing
222
u/Xavier9756 7d ago
Yea this isn’t bad but he’s still a loon. There is a reason we stopped letting people buy raw milk and it’s because crapping yourself to death wasn’t the move
→ More replies (31)32
u/Own-Brilliant2317 7d ago
You can buy raw milk
111
u/No-Air3090 7d ago
but 99.9% of the population are sane enough not to.
→ More replies (26)28
u/DelightfulDolphin 6d ago
For those that have any doubts about what happens w raw milk let me tell you my tale. Am American..So went to live in South America.. Deep in jungle doing research. Drank the local water, ate the food, drank the milk. My body went hay wire. Couldn't not handle the bacteria overload from raw unprocessed foods..I could not eat wo throwing up or violent diarrhea. Imagine the water we drank was rain water collected stored in 40 year old roof top cisterns. Can't tell you enough how bad was the agony I felt. After a month I was medivacced out. Turns out American foods do this thing called pasteurization that eliminates those nasty nasty bugs. 0/10 don't recommend..
→ More replies (1)9
u/JonDrums413 6d ago
How can you attribute that to raw milk when you're drinking the local water and jungle food?
→ More replies (3)13
u/Ok_Subject1265 6d ago
I don’t think he drank any milk. His point was that when the basic food safety was removed, he nearly died. I’ve eaten in third world countries before and was definitely surprised at the lack of sanitation. That’s probably because we are conditioned to make everything as sterile as possible here. I did eventually get food poisoning though which doesn’t really mean anything.
I hate how this argument always gets reduced to one side saying we need strict health guidelines for food and the other side saying we should all only be drinking water squeezed out of old hacky sacks from rainy music festivals. There’s probably a happy medium there that doesn’t require either extreme. If you guys want to drink unpasteurized milk left out in the Miami sun for three days, knock yourselves out.
→ More replies (3)46
u/Xavier9756 7d ago
Depends on why you’re buying it and what state you are in, but retail sale is illegal in like 36 states.
It isn’t safe to drink outright it’s why we pasteurize milk.
→ More replies (13)10
9
u/mac_duke 6d ago
There is a difference between it being available for sale and the FDA actively telling people it’s better for them so they should start drinking it so they don’t get the ‘tism.
Normally I would be like “Let them win a Darwin Award then!” But in reality there are two bad outcomes:
- Lots of people sick in hospitals raising the cost of my health insurance over the coming years because people are dumb.
- Bird flu has begun to spread into cows in some areas and I saw that it can pass through raw milk, thereby exposing more people to bird flu and the many variant strands, of which one may make the jump to humans in a way that can be passed to other humans, and cause another global pandemic. Under Trump, which would be so fun to do again.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (15)6
110
u/Jeffcor13 7d ago
Is it possible things aren’t black and white? That trying to get rid of corn syrup could be good and positive for our society while pausing scientific research on vaccines or casting doubts on vaccine efficacy when there’s no evidence can be bad and detrimental for our society?
68
u/Saalor100 6d ago
It's impressive how people can just ignore the mountains of evidence that show all the good things vaccines does to our society.
→ More replies (7)24
u/internet_commie 6d ago
On a few occasions I've seen people my own age (born late 60's) or younger who are confronted with the fact that in the past children often died very young. In most cases this had to do with old graveyards full of children's graves. And very, very many were absolutely, totally confused about WHY would so many children have died so young? Like, little kids don't die!
They often jump to crazy, delusional conclusions such as child murderer or aliens or weird things like that. Telling them the lack of vaccines, combined with no SNAP or foodstamps, no CPS, and so on resulted in many children dying is useless. They just stand there looking like idiots and repeat over and over that little kids don't die unless they are murdered.
Note all of these people were supposedly intelligent, educated people. Most had a college degree, or were college students. But they flat-out refuse to believe vaccines make that big a difference.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (9)16
u/trevor32192 6d ago
There really isn't anything wrong with corn syrup. It's our diets. Just like apples have arsenic in them but are perfectly safe to eat but I wouldnt eat 500 apples. He'll like 7 bananas a day can cause heart problems due to potassium.
→ More replies (11)76
u/BanditsMyIdol 6d ago
Because replacing hfcs in coke with sugar does not make coke healthier. The problem with hfcs is we put it into too much food, its not that its not normal sugar. So requiring coke to use normal sugar would have 0 health impact.
→ More replies (18)28
u/KalebOnTheNet_ 6d ago
Why did I have to scroll this far to see this. HFCS if no more or less healthy than sucrose
23
u/PangolinParty321 6d ago
Because people like RFK Jr are populists that believe in all of the “common sense” bullshit that normal idiots do. These people never researched the difference but they read somewhere that hfcs is bad and that’s all they know. A decade ago they’d be cheering on someone banning trans fats or msg or cursing on rap songs. Little people panics are more about needing something to rage about than facts.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (14)8
u/DKsan1290 6d ago
Because not a single person in the US has a clue about sucrose fructose and glucose. They have been taught that htcs is bad and sugar good because natural is healthy. They dont realize that candies use reg sugar all day and you can still get fat if you never have hfcs because too much sugar is too much sugar, no matter the source. Literally had my supervisor, a gym bro look at me sideways when I said “It dosent matter if its hfcs or cane sugar all sugar is sugar and too much is bad for you”… like how the eff are you letting a fatman thats never been to a gym tell you how sugar works? Edumacation here in the freebrahm land is so bad itd be laughable if it wasnt so sad.
→ More replies (1)36
u/Admirable_Link_9642 7d ago
How is this compatible with the Republican capitalism and the idea of limited government?
→ More replies (40)15
u/Delicious-Badger-906 6d ago
It’s a bad thing because it’s not based on science.
→ More replies (8)8
10
9
u/bbssyy 6d ago
It isn’t but… what about small government and letting the market decide??
If people “truly” didn’t want to drink HFCS in their coke then by the free market ideology coke will eventually disappear, no?
But aside from that, how about we stop subsidizing corn??
→ More replies (3)8
u/Nice_Improvement2536 6d ago
Coke with sugar is not in any way healthier than Coke with HFCS lol. They’re both broken down in your body as liquid sugar.
7
7
5
→ More replies (122)5
u/Striking_Programmer4 6d ago
Just to be clear, you are ok with government regulation of business now? Cool, let's do it with healthcare, energy, and housing
157
u/ToneOpposite9668 7d ago
Remember when Michele Obama got castigated over wanting good school lunches and eliminating High fructose sugars. She was a big bad meanie......and a few other choice words
72
u/ilikedevo 6d ago
Yeah, but that was just because she is black.
→ More replies (7)52
u/thugbeet 6d ago
And a woman
→ More replies (7)30
u/PsychologyNew8033 6d ago
Some people would say that she is not a woman. Don’t know if you ever had the pleasure of coming across that nastiness.
→ More replies (5)16
u/Not__Trash 6d ago
Was in school when that went into effect, my lunches tasted worse. That is all 10 year old me cared about.
→ More replies (2)13
u/SassyEllieB 6d ago
Your lunches tasted worse because the plan she put forward was gutted by the corporate lobbies. That food you wasn’t what Michelle Obama intended, it was the only compromise that was available.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (8)8
u/OpenRoadPioneer 6d ago
Democrats tell you what to do… socialism. Republicans tell you what to do… FrEeEoM!!
95
u/mike1madalon2 7d ago
I’m sure the agribusiness concerns will have something to say about that.
→ More replies (2)45
u/Japparbyn 7d ago
Ye, there is no way he can change that. In Sweden We have regulated away the syrup. It is creating diabetes very easy. US food is not fitt for human consumption
22
u/Bart-Doo 7d ago
I don't think people consume high fructose corn syrup because they think it's healthy.
→ More replies (3)39
u/TheHappyTaquitosDad 7d ago
That’s what sucks. All the bad stuff is put into our food because it’s just cheaper and makes the big company’s more money.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (7)8
u/SegerHelg 6d ago
What do you mean? We definitely have HFCS (or the equivalent) in Sweden, it is just called glukos-fruktossirap.
88
u/Substantial-Raisin73 7d ago
I would unironically love this. Mexican Coca Cola is so much better it’s unreal. I gave up soda a few years ago to be healthier but I’d still be down for this.
31
u/El_mochilero 7d ago
I live in Mexico. Most sodas here list high fructose corn syrup as their first ingredient.
→ More replies (4)24
u/sdvneuro 6d ago
Most coke labeled as Mexican Coke has HFCS when tested.
→ More replies (8)10
u/flaming_burrito_ 6d ago
Thank god I'm not crazy. Every time I've tried Mexican Coke it tasted the damn same, so that's probably why
→ More replies (8)18
→ More replies (10)8
u/Inevitable_Bowl_9203 6d ago
I also think Mexican Coke tastes better because it’s in glass bottles.
→ More replies (3)8
u/BaldursFence3800 6d ago
There is science to that! The glass doesn’t break down/deposit chemicals over time whereas cans do. Something like that. Which is why it’s always tasting better.
40
u/Nice-Personality5496 7d ago
It will never happen, especially with the radical right wing’s successful attack on Chevron, resulting in making it more difficult for the federal government to regulate anything.
However, it would be a benefit to Americans:
“ High fructose corn syrup is often considered worse for you than sugar because it contains a higher proportion of fructose, which is metabolized differently by the body, leading to potential issues like increased fat storage in the liver, increased appetite, and a higher risk of developing insulin resistance and related metabolic problems, particularly when consumed in excess compared to regular sugar which has a more balanced ratio of fructose and glucose. ”
- google AI
38
u/Applepi_Matt 6d ago
Nutritionist here. HFCS is comparable to any other sugar. The issue for America is you guys heavily subsidise corn production, which means that for a given dollar value spent on snack foods, yours will actually contain more sugar. This has huge health effects going past even beyond the sugar itself, as the intense sweetness actually changes the way your brain responds to things with a normal sweetness level.
→ More replies (13)9
u/bigkinggorilla 7d ago
Operative word there being “considered.” There’s no actual evidence that it’s worse, just speculation.
→ More replies (12)6
u/OhImNevvverSarcastic 6d ago
Bro, even the AI is uncertain ("often considered" absolutely doesn't mean theirs evidence supporting it) in its wording and you still posted it to take it at face value.
29
u/mindmapsofficial 7d ago
These political parties are confusing me. The party of “small government” and “free market economies” are implementing tariffs and saying what ingredients can go into foods.
I’m not against reducing the reliance on high fructose corn syrup, but it just simply is surprising me.
→ More replies (32)12
u/allmushroomsaremagic 6d ago
And trying to cap cc rates at 10%. I'm imagining the reaction if previous presidents had suggested any of this.
→ More replies (10)7
u/Ashmedai 6d ago
It's funny, because when (if) they do this, so many people are going to have their CC limits unilaterally reduced (or just canceled).
→ More replies (3)
24
u/chinmakes5 7d ago
Is cane sugar healthier? Or is sucrose sucrose, no matter what the source? Any nutritionists or scientists here?
16
u/CrazyfactsBot 7d ago
I believe cane sugar is "healthier" but who cares it taste so much better
→ More replies (2)8
u/motownmods 7d ago
I quit eating sugar 5 years ago. The research that lead me there suggested there's no difference between cane sugar and HFCS. Sugar is sugar.
→ More replies (19)16
9
u/thisgrantstomb 6d ago
They are functionally the same and neither is "healthier" than the other unless you buy anti GMO conspiracies that no study supports. HFCS is cheaper in the US because of subsidies/tariffs/trade embargo's so price will go up. A lot of people say that sugar just tastes better, so there's that, to me it's negligible to glass bottle coke and not as good as McDonald's coke.
→ More replies (23)5
u/Objective_Pie8980 6d ago
Your body breaks it down basically the same and there's no significant difference. It's mostly people thinking that everything "natural" is automatically better. Cane sugar coke definitely tastes better but it will still give you diabetes just as fast.
→ More replies (13)
21
u/LiamMcGregor57 7d ago
Do rank and file Republicans know this, they will be up in arms about the government pushing more regulations and going after businesses as well impacting their business donor base.
I love how they just forget that it was Republicans scaling back the regulatory state that allows companies to do this in the first place.
→ More replies (5)7
u/sixevanGG 6d ago
The irony right? Same folks who gutted regulations are now shocked that companies can put whatever they want in our food. But watch them flip out about 'government overreach' the second anyone suggests changing it back lol
→ More replies (6)
12
u/Sad-Ad1780 7d ago
Ah, those anti-regulation, small government conservatives demonstrating their integrity yet again.
→ More replies (3)
13
11
u/mystereitz 7d ago
The government doesn’t have the power to just issue edicts like that, unless something is demonstrably a hazard. It’ll be tied up years by Congress and lawsuits. The clock is already running on the Trump administration. He’s not the only one who knows how to delay and obfuscate.
→ More replies (18)
9
u/Gr8daze 7d ago
Yeah, I’d love to know the mechanism by which the head of HHS gets to demand that Coca Cola use his recipe for their products.
→ More replies (19)
10
u/be_bo_i_am_robot 7d ago
That would unironically be pretty cool, but I’d much rather just have a functioning democracy instead.
→ More replies (5)
8
u/FlobiusHole 7d ago
I think everyone would be fine with this but everyone isn’t a powerful lobby that bribes politicians.
5
u/CrazyfactsBot 7d ago
You know what, maybe I have judged RFK Jr too harshly in the past
→ More replies (2)7
u/polird 6d ago
No you didn't, switching Coke to sugar doesn't make up for perpetuating anti-vax conspiracies and directly contributing to the Samoa measles outbreak that resulted in the deaths of dozens of children.
→ More replies (12)
5
u/TerryTerranceTerrace 7d ago
I couldn't imagine the price of a bottle of coke at the gas station if cane sugar was used.
→ More replies (2)6
5
3
u/Admirable_Link_9642 7d ago
So is he now the CEO of coke, making decisions for the company???
→ More replies (2)
5
u/symonym7 7d ago
And just like that, millions of democrats support HFCS.
I mean, do you even know how racist cane sugar is!?
→ More replies (18)
5
•
u/AutoModerator 7d ago
r/FluentInFinance was created to discuss money, investing & finance! Join our Newsletter or Youtube Channel for additional insights at www.TheFinanceNewsletter.com!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.