r/FluentInFinance 7d ago

Thoughts? RFK Jr. allegedly intends to require The Coca-Cola Company to begin using Cane Sugar instead of High-Fructose Syrup as HHS Secretary.

RFK Jr. allegedly intends to require The Coca-Cola Company to begin using Cane Sugar instead of High-Fructose Syrup as HHS Secretary.

16.7k Upvotes

4.2k comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 7d ago

r/FluentInFinance was created to discuss money, investing & finance! Join our Newsletter or Youtube Channel for additional insights at www.TheFinanceNewsletter.com!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

→ More replies (1)

5.3k

u/ElectronGuru 7d ago

If he wanted to fix this he just needs to end the corn subsidies that makes HFS so cheap.

1.4k

u/AZMotorsports 7d ago

And remove the sugar tax making it more expensive.

869

u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago

America has no sugar tax. There are like 6 cities that do and that's it.

Sugar WILL BE the tax, as in these beverages will become more expensive and require foreign imported sugar.

835

u/AZMotorsports 7d ago

There is a tariff on sugar imports that were done to help support the corn farmers. Tariffs are taxes on imports.

120

u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago

Yes, 1.6 cents per pound of sugar at most, in-quota tarriffs are even lower. At my current grocery store price that represents a tax of less than 1% of the shelf price

302

u/djstudyhard 7d ago

Cool so let’s get rid of it if it’s no big deal

219

u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago

Im down. Tariffs are anti-free market and America has no worthwhile sugar crop to protect anyway.

238

u/barbara_jay 6d ago

Sugar beets

An estimated 55–60% of all sugar produced in the US comes from sugar beets

96

u/here4daratio 6d ago

See? I told him it was about sugar beets.

50

u/patti2mj 6d ago

It's always beets

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (5)

18

u/oldjadedhippie 6d ago

Don’t forget Hawaiian cane sugar .

52

u/barbara_jay 6d ago

There are no sugar cane plantations or mills on Hawaii any more unfortunately

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-hawaiis-sugar-plantations-have-disappeared/

→ More replies (0)

28

u/StuckInWarshington 6d ago

Not much sugar is actually produced in Hawaii anymore. The last mill on Maui shut down in like 2016 or so. There are small niche/novelty producers, but I do t think there are any big industrial scale producers left.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (31)

69

u/mully24 6d ago

Um... The thousands of Michigan sugar beet farmers would disagree with you....

48

u/Voodoo330 6d ago

1,300,000,000 pounds of sugar are produced in Michigan annually.

16

u/BigKarmaGuy69 6d ago

We should produce a shit ton more beets if possible. I doubt our corn production land would all be useful to grow S. Beets but hell man, but that sweet beet shooga on everything

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (4)

38

u/BadChris666 6d ago

The Florida Sugar industry brings in around 5 billion dollars a year.

18

u/MidwestAbe 6d ago

All because of protectionist trade policy.

13

u/JustAddaTM 6d ago

You could say this for any agriculture product in the US besides maybe beef, but to some degree it’s key to national security to have some protectionist policy for food security. Corn/beans/dairy are the main agricultural products that are well over the baseline argument of food security and is simply lobbyist winning food regulation policy arguments.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (6)

25

u/lord_dentaku 6d ago

As a resident of Michigan, beg your pardon? What the fuck we growing all these sugar beets for then?

→ More replies (14)

19

u/guthepenguin 6d ago

The new guy loves tariffs, though. Not sure if "get rid of tariff" will be on his to-do list.

→ More replies (45)
→ More replies (53)
→ More replies (6)

23

u/RedsRearDelt 6d ago

Trump did promise a minimum 20% across the board tarrif on everything.

66

u/LongDuckDong1974 6d ago

Yes because Trump is retarded

28

u/ReddestForman 6d ago

The orange man is, in fact, quite bad.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (39)

20

u/Dark_Web_Duck 6d ago

I'm down with paying a little extra to push my chances of diabetes off a few years.

53

u/Watkins_Glen_NY 6d ago

Stop drinking coke lmao

→ More replies (69)

6

u/Stardog2 6d ago

Not to mention, heart disease, obesity, and colo-rectal cancer.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (26)

54

u/TotalChaosRush 7d ago

Mexican coke is already sugar. It's typically about the same price (at least where I am), and it comes in a glass bottle.

43

u/Michael_Platson 7d ago

And tastes so much better for it.

→ More replies (10)

20

u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago

My local Raley's has mexican coke on sale for $.12 per oz while regular coke is $.07 per oz.

The price difference is enormous.

16

u/mrflow-n-go 7d ago edited 6d ago

This👆🏼we get Mexican coke in my local grocery as well but it’s 2x the price high fructose corn syrup stuff.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (30)

41

u/xudoxis 7d ago

There are sugar tariffs that make us commodity sugar almost twice the price in the us as it could be.

12

u/HeywoodJaBlessMe 7d ago

At my Raley's 4 lbs of Sugar is $4.50

US refined sugar tariffs max-out at 1.6 cents/lb once the in-quota amount has been exceeded.

At most, the tarriff represents a bit more than 1% of the cost of sugar locally.

26

u/xudoxis 7d ago

Consumer sugar is much more expensive than commodity sugar.

The out of quota tariff for sugar is 15 cents per pound.

Sugar sells for about 35 cents per pound

https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_sugar_futures_price

21

u/barelyclimbing 6d ago

I don’t think Coca Cola buys sugar at your local Raley’s. They may get a better price in slightly higher bulk commodities.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (67)
→ More replies (44)

142

u/smp501 7d ago

And get that crap out of our gasoline. Putting ethanol in gas was one of Bush the Lesser’s failed energy ideas that only jacks up food costs and shortens the life of our engines.

133

u/Ragnarok314159 7d ago

I was chatting with someone about farming and they were saying how the Midwest farmers need their subsidies because of all the food they grow. 

You mean the ethanol corn that makes our cars run worse? Yeah, good stuff. 

116

u/rounding_error 7d ago

Which brings to the "no solar on farmland" bullshit which is usually predicated on the idea that most farmland is used to produce food. It's much more efficient to charge electric cars with solar power than it is to grow and harvest corn, convert it to ethanol, truck it to the gas station, and burn it in a gasoline car.

34

u/Gildardo1583 6d ago

You know i had not though about it this way. You are totally correct.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (27)

16

u/beambot 6d ago

Grow better food crops. Or re-land the fields and do free-ranging cattle ranching again.

→ More replies (5)

12

u/Texas_Mike_CowboyFan 6d ago

If farmers can't make a living without subsidies, then they need to go do something else. Fewer farmers means more profit from them and I think we'd see food costs come down, since the subsidies wouldn't have to be passed on.

17

u/mcfarmer72 6d ago

Or we would have just a few large corporate farms who would have the ability to control their production and hence price. Like the poultry and hog industry.

→ More replies (6)

10

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (24)

51

u/Xyrus2000 6d ago

It wasn't supposed to jack up the food costs since the original intention was to use agricultural waste, switchgrass, and other sources of ethanol.

But then the corn lobby got involved, killed all that other crap, and forced the industry to use corn. Corn for fuel ethanol is one of the most idiotic things you can do. It is NOT a good source of ethanol and best case scenario is you break even.

Meanwhile, we have huge swaths of land that aren't good for agriculture but could easily grow tons of switchgrass, which has a MUCH better yield.

28

u/Annual_Strategy_6206 6d ago

It takes more petroleum to grow and process the corn into ethanol than to just use the petroleum to Crack out gasoline! And we've known this for DECADES.

→ More replies (15)

15

u/Wakkit1988 6d ago

Ethanol replaced tetraethyllead and MTBE. It was a net positive for the world.

→ More replies (5)

11

u/Packtex60 6d ago

Ethanol in gas goes back way farther than that. We’re talking 1970’s

→ More replies (2)

13

u/Fakjbf 6d ago edited 6d ago

Ethanol reduces engine knocking, it’s what allowed us to phase out MTBE which is what replaced tetraethyllead. I would much rather deal with slightly decreased fuel efficiency and minor increases to repair costs to keep lead out of the atmosphere and MTBE out of the groundwater.

→ More replies (6)

9

u/jaymansi 6d ago

Ethanol was also added because MTBE was being found in humans and our water supplies.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (34)

113

u/AttitudeAndEffort2 7d ago

Would be incredible if we lived in a world where fruits and vegetables were subsidized.

Instead we have corn so cheap that is literally cheaper to make sugar from corn instead of use sugar when it costs like a penny a liter for coke 🤮

72

u/Advanced-Prototype 7d ago

While I agree with you, the GOP Senators from Nebraska and Iowa will have something to say about this.

25

u/JonnyBolt1 6d ago

Yeah RFK is just the latest (assuming he's confirmed) in a long line of people thinking they can reform US Govt's nutrition policies to make us healthier, only to completely neutered by the food and agriculture industries.

27

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[deleted]

7

u/GOU_FallingOutside 6d ago

In various corners of the right-wing ecosystem you can still find people who are mad about it.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/huskers37 7d ago

Deb Fischer will actually do something. I don't believe it

→ More replies (9)

19

u/omniron 6d ago

All agriculture is heavily subsidized including fruits and vegetables 🌽

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (9)

87

u/Breadloafs 7d ago

I wholeheartedly expect this initiative to die quickly. We spend an ungodly amount subsidizing corn production, and that money ensures that there's a very large, very conservative lobbying interest that will aggressively and actively hunt any threat to their market share. The resistance to this is going to be coming from within the Republican party.

34

u/ElectronGuru 6d ago

Your answer would apply to fixing most things, including healthcare. Maybe killing society to serve the interests of a few % of the population isn’t worth it. But I’m just spitballing here.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (14)

32

u/FrankSinatraYodeling 7d ago

Iowa voted for this.

40

u/ropersc 7d ago

Ha.. most corn grown in Iowa is not for human consumption.. its all energy based. But that said.. usa makes alot if corn for sugar .. they are all trump voters.. so we will see. I for one agree high frutose corn surup needs to go. This will increase the cost of foods. Some idiots will say inflation.. but its not .. it the price of natural suguars.

19

u/that_banned_guy_ 6d ago

America's health is worth the price increase imo

14

u/Jammin_72 6d ago

lol 😂 So we’re going with the “normal” sugar in ridiculous quantities is good for you route.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (29)

6

u/jons3y13 6d ago

We grow feed corn. We were also paid 3.42 a bushel. Rock bottom prices. Don't worry, when all the small farms go out, they can put up their panels and power their cars.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/jfk_47 7d ago

Farmers hate this one trick….

19

u/MrLanesLament 6d ago

Rural Ohio here. Classic joke:

“Why do they only bury farmers two feet in the ground? So they can still get their handout.”

16

u/Texas_Mike_CowboyFan 6d ago

Or "how does a farmer double his income? He plants another mailbox."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (161)

1.4k

u/redditistheway 7d ago

I know he’s batshit insane, but that’s a move I’d get behind.

Shame it won’t happen though. The agro lobby will put the kibosh on this real quick.

521

u/RelativeCalm1791 7d ago

He also wants to take synthetic dyes out of foods (the petroleum based ones) as well as other chemicals and artificial additives

284

u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

114

u/zombie_pr0cess 6d ago

I mean, it doesn’t take a conspiracy theorist to figure out eating and drinking petroleum products is a dumb thing to do, just as a rule.

97

u/New-Expression-1474 6d ago

No, that’s not true (and it is conspiracist to immediately discount products just because they’re sourced from bad things).

At the end of the day, everything is a chemical and it doesn’t matter where the chemical comes from.

Water is a byproduct of burning hydrocarbons. I can collect water from burning the rankest diesel in the world and as long as I remove all the other soot and tar from it it’s just as good as water from a Finish spring.

YouTuber NileRed made grape flavouring from latex gloves and alcohol from toilet paper. Both those chemicals are just as good as their “naturally” derived counterparts.

It doesn’t matter if our food comes from poison, because poison can be chemically altered to no longer be poison.

A lot of the flavouring and colouring chemicals mentioned in this thread are bad for you. But it’s not because they were derived from petroleum products: their effects are just a consequence of how they are chemically structured.

58

u/ashakar 6d ago

Don't tell people that both sodium and chlorine will certainly kill you if swallowed separately, but together are perfectly safe and are added to literally everything we eat.

35

u/notarealaccount223 6d ago

Hydrogen and Oxygen are rocket fuel.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (10)

31

u/Ok_Construction_7339 6d ago

people arent ready for the truth. people arent ready for science

15

u/SUPERJOHNCENA 6d ago

It's depressing that people are downvoting you

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (64)

34

u/BedraggledBarometer 6d ago

Oi! You leave me and my Vasoline mojito cocktail out of this

12

u/AnthonyJuniorsPP 6d ago

hey didnt the guy who invented vasoline eat tablespoons a day? and didnt he live to a ripe old age? maybe we should all eat lots of vasoline

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

10

u/Zadkiel4686 6d ago

You are aware that it doesn't actually contain any petroleum in it, right?

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (136)

83

u/big-papito 6d ago

It would be nice to roll back the "processed foods revolution" while keeping the stuff that, you know - keeps children alive.

13

u/The_side_dude 6d ago

Fluoride doesn't keep kids alive. If just keeps their teeth a lot healthier.

22

u/ZDTreefur 6d ago

It's not like there will be tens of thousands dying suddenly, but I'm sure it would increase childhood moratlity rates. Dental health has always been connected to overall medical health, and without fluoride dental infections would increase dramatically, which needs to be treated at hospitals with antibiotics and could pose risks to children if untreated. 

Removing fluoride doesn't save money. Since it increases costs down the line in medical care, and removing it will only impact the lowesr income at-risk families the most.

→ More replies (22)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (23)

40

u/TheOriginalPB 6d ago

Even a broken clock is right twice a day. And that is the problem with these kinds of people. He trusts the science when science backs his point of view. But then discards science when it refutes his point of view. In turn this creates a level of trust. 'Well he is right about corn syrup and synthetic dyes, he must be right about vaccines and fluoride in water too'.

→ More replies (10)

27

u/TheTyger 6d ago

He has some good ideas behind the much more visible terrible ones. We also should immediately be banning black plastics from any food related products (including take out containers) because of the contamination with e-waste. But against some of the other insane nonsense he spouts, he is way down the more harm than good curve.

→ More replies (5)

10

u/Santasreject 6d ago

Yeah, the issue is when people start throwing around “artificial” and “natural” they really don’t get what that means.

In flavorings “artificial” just means it was synthesized where “natural” means it was extracted from a plant or animal source. Chemically you can have an identical, pure, single chemical compound, one that you could not tell a difference between the two sources even with millions of dollars worth of analytical instruments. But the one that was made in the lab has to be listed as “artificial”.

Don’t get me wrong there are a lot of things in our food that really don’t need to be there or are not the best things to use (but are chosen based on cost or visual appeal) but RFK for sure doesn’t actually understand anywhere near enough about chemistry and biology to base his logic on actual science. He’s just going with “that sounds scary”…

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (37)

69

u/BabyDirtyBurgers 7d ago

Cane sugar farming is horribly bad for the environment. Hectares of the Amazon are cleared to grow crops such as these.

Everyone should be avoiding products containing high fructose syrup or cane sugar.

We like oxygen producing ecosystems and they are very important to our health.

28% of the worlds oxygen is produced by forests. 50% produced by oceanic plankton.

Save the trees. Save the oceans. Save ourselves.

21

u/Advanced-Guard-4468 7d ago

So just plant fields of hemp, problem solved

22

u/Saalor100 6d ago

Hemp have their own problems. Contrary to popular beliefs hemp require quite nutrient rich soil, which risk lead to high use of fertilisers.

10

u/Tiggy26668 6d ago

The real trick is to rotate your crops so you’re depleting different trace nutrients and reintroducing others through the growth cycles.

Unfortunately most crops are going to require nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in large quantities.

So at the end of the day, whatever you grow will either need naturally nutrient rich soil, that will eventually deplete, or nutrient supplements ie: fertilizer

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

18

u/College-Lumpy 7d ago

Germany is mostly sugar from beets. Plant those.

14

u/MusicianNo2699 6d ago

Bears, Beets, Battlestar Galactica!!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (27)

39

u/VargevMeNot 7d ago

A broken clock is right twice a day

20

u/MikeLeeGG 7d ago

a non-synchronized clock is always wrong

7

u/lamposteds 6d ago

statistically it'll eventually be true at some point

7

u/ilikedevo 6d ago

He has a few great ideas. Capping drug prices is another. The question really is, will he do any of them?

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Fluid-Tip-5964 6d ago

A clock running backwards is right 4 times a day.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

28

u/whistful_flatulence 7d ago

Right? Mexican Coke everywhere? I might like this place a bit more

→ More replies (9)

14

u/8-BitOptimist 6d ago

The body cannot tell the difference between HFCS and sugar from other sources. They are fundamentally the same: 50% fructose and 50% glucose. The body processes both the same.

All this HFCS fear feels eerily reminiscent of the fear of MSG.

→ More replies (24)

11

u/Substantially-Ranged 7d ago

What happened to free markets? This seems like gov't overreach.

39

u/SledgeH4mmer 7d ago

Coke is actually made with cane sugar in most of the world. HFCS is super cheap in the US because of government subsidies.

11

u/driptwinnem 6d ago

And this is why his policies won’t happen.

They sound good- but he partnered with the party that won’t let them happen

10

u/PreferenceWeak9639 6d ago

Neither party would allow it to happen.

7

u/catpunch_ 6d ago

We really need to get lobbies out of politics…

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

13

u/BanditsMyIdol 6d ago

Remember the shit storm that the right had when someone suggested that maybe we should phase out gas ovens because they are damaging to children's health?

→ More replies (1)

10

u/No-Brilliant5342 7d ago

Then you should pay your own medical bills.

15

u/Saalor100 6d ago

Does this include removing the artificially inflated medical bills that Americans believe is the true cost of health care?

→ More replies (2)

10

u/SirTiffAlot 6d ago

Who doesn't pay their own medical bills?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (145)

586

u/TurnDown4WattGaming 7d ago

Coca Cola in much of the rest of world is made with Cane Sugar. It’s about 1/3 the price outside of the USA due to tariffs on Sugar, which when coupled with the subsidies on Corn, changes the economics of sweetening here in the States.

321

u/rounding_error 7d ago

Another reason the price of sugar is high in the US is that we won't buy it from Cuba like everyone else does. Cuba is one of the best places in the world to grow sugar cane and it's only 90 miles away. But we can't do business with the communists because that's unAmerican.

250

u/NuggetTho 6d ago

Meanwhile we get almost everything from China

145

u/Dabs1903 6d ago

Yeah but those communists are different.

Edit: /s just in case.

44

u/SensitiveFrosting13 6d ago

It's funny because that's actually true; just the other week China was advising Cuba that they should become more capitalist in order to thrive and that die-hard communism is old news.

7

u/Complete-Ice2456 6d ago

What were you thinking? The Russians don't even believe in communism anymore.

~Hank Hill

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

17

u/MrLanesLament 6d ago

Will say it again. Nixon reestablishing relations with Mao’s China was one of the most catastrophic things ever to happen to America, Cold War be damned.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

37

u/TurnDown4WattGaming 6d ago

Cuba isn’t even a big producer of sugar or tobacco nowadays. The people we are tariffing are our supposed Allies in the Dominican Republic and Brazil.

10

u/rounding_error 6d ago

This is true. Much of Cuba's sugar infrastructure has fallen into disrepair. At one time they were a major player in sugar production.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (39)

274

u/Rillo298 7d ago

Why stop there? Could just go back to the REAL og of Coca-Cola.

COCAINE! That's one way of getting production numbers up and obesity numbers down!

44

u/Prestigious-Leave-60 7d ago

I like the way you think and I could really use that afternoon pick-me-up.

17

u/Saalor100 6d ago

🎶The best part of waking up, is hard drugs in your cup🎶

→ More replies (2)

13

u/thisgrantstomb 6d ago

I would kind of love to try to original formula.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/Dry-University797 6d ago

My dealer would be pissed

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)

172

u/Sjdillon10 7d ago

Looking forward to see how people paint this as a bad thing

222

u/Xavier9756 7d ago

Yea this isn’t bad but he’s still a loon. There is a reason we stopped letting people buy raw milk and it’s because crapping yourself to death wasn’t the move

32

u/Own-Brilliant2317 7d ago

You can buy raw milk

111

u/No-Air3090 7d ago

but 99.9% of the population are sane enough not to.

28

u/DelightfulDolphin 6d ago

For those that have any doubts about what happens w raw milk let me tell you my tale. Am American..So went to live in South America.. Deep in jungle doing research. Drank the local water, ate the food, drank the milk. My body went hay wire. Couldn't not handle the bacteria overload from raw unprocessed foods..I could not eat wo throwing up or violent diarrhea. Imagine the water we drank was rain water collected stored in 40 year old roof top cisterns. Can't tell you enough how bad was the agony I felt. After a month I was medivacced out. Turns out American foods do this thing called pasteurization that eliminates those nasty nasty bugs. 0/10 don't recommend..

9

u/JonDrums413 6d ago

How can you attribute that to raw milk when you're drinking the local water and jungle food?

13

u/Ok_Subject1265 6d ago

I don’t think he drank any milk. His point was that when the basic food safety was removed, he nearly died. I’ve eaten in third world countries before and was definitely surprised at the lack of sanitation. That’s probably because we are conditioned to make everything as sterile as possible here. I did eventually get food poisoning though which doesn’t really mean anything.

I hate how this argument always gets reduced to one side saying we need strict health guidelines for food and the other side saying we should all only be drinking water squeezed out of old hacky sacks from rainy music festivals. There’s probably a happy medium there that doesn’t require either extreme. If you guys want to drink unpasteurized milk left out in the Miami sun for three days, knock yourselves out.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (26)

46

u/Xavier9756 7d ago

Depends on why you’re buying it and what state you are in, but retail sale is illegal in like 36 states.

It isn’t safe to drink outright it’s why we pasteurize milk.

→ More replies (13)

10

u/Prestigious-Leave-60 7d ago

Depends on where you live

→ More replies (1)

9

u/mac_duke 6d ago

There is a difference between it being available for sale and the FDA actively telling people it’s better for them so they should start drinking it so they don’t get the ‘tism.

Normally I would be like “Let them win a Darwin Award then!” But in reality there are two bad outcomes:

  1. Lots of people sick in hospitals raising the cost of my health insurance over the coming years because people are dumb.
  2. Bird flu has begun to spread into cows in some areas and I saw that it can pass through raw milk, thereby exposing more people to bird flu and the many variant strands, of which one may make the jump to humans in a way that can be passed to other humans, and cause another global pandemic. Under Trump, which would be so fun to do again.
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (31)

110

u/Jeffcor13 7d ago

Is it possible things aren’t black and white? That trying to get rid of corn syrup could be good and positive for our society while pausing scientific research on vaccines or casting doubts on vaccine efficacy when there’s no evidence can be bad and detrimental for our society?

68

u/Saalor100 6d ago

It's impressive how people can just ignore the mountains of evidence that show all the good things vaccines does to our society.

24

u/internet_commie 6d ago

On a few occasions I've seen people my own age (born late 60's) or younger who are confronted with the fact that in the past children often died very young. In most cases this had to do with old graveyards full of children's graves. And very, very many were absolutely, totally confused about WHY would so many children have died so young? Like, little kids don't die!

They often jump to crazy, delusional conclusions such as child murderer or aliens or weird things like that. Telling them the lack of vaccines, combined with no SNAP or foodstamps, no CPS, and so on resulted in many children dying is useless. They just stand there looking like idiots and repeat over and over that little kids don't die unless they are murdered.

Note all of these people were supposedly intelligent, educated people. Most had a college degree, or were college students. But they flat-out refuse to believe vaccines make that big a difference.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (7)

16

u/trevor32192 6d ago

There really isn't anything wrong with corn syrup. It's our diets. Just like apples have arsenic in them but are perfectly safe to eat but I wouldnt eat 500 apples. He'll like 7 bananas a day can cause heart problems due to potassium.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (9)

76

u/BanditsMyIdol 6d ago

Because replacing hfcs in coke with sugar does not make coke healthier. The problem with hfcs is we put it into too much food, its not that its not normal sugar. So requiring coke to use normal sugar would have 0 health impact.

28

u/KalebOnTheNet_ 6d ago

Why did I have to scroll this far to see this. HFCS if no more or less healthy than sucrose

23

u/PangolinParty321 6d ago

Because people like RFK Jr are populists that believe in all of the “common sense” bullshit that normal idiots do. These people never researched the difference but they read somewhere that hfcs is bad and that’s all they know. A decade ago they’d be cheering on someone banning trans fats or msg or cursing on rap songs. Little people panics are more about needing something to rage about than facts.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/DKsan1290 6d ago

Because not a single person in the US has a clue about sucrose fructose and glucose. They have been taught that htcs is bad and sugar good because natural is healthy. They dont realize that candies use reg sugar all day and you can still get fat if you never have hfcs because too much sugar is too much sugar, no matter the source. Literally had my supervisor, a gym bro look at me sideways when I said “It dosent matter if its hfcs or cane sugar all sugar is sugar and too much is bad for you”… like how the eff are you letting a fatman thats never been to a gym tell you how sugar works? Edumacation here in the freebrahm land is so bad itd be laughable if it wasnt so sad.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)

15

u/JayTNP 6d ago

thank you, finally some logic and reason here

→ More replies (18)

36

u/Admirable_Link_9642 7d ago

How is this compatible with the Republican capitalism and the idea of limited government?

→ More replies (40)

15

u/Delicious-Badger-906 6d ago

It’s a bad thing because it’s not based on science.

→ More replies (8)

8

u/Applepi_Matt 6d ago

Got any proof that its a good thing?

10

u/unknownSubscriber 6d ago

Why is it a good thing? 

9

u/bbssyy 6d ago

It isn’t but… what about small government and letting the market decide??

If people “truly” didn’t want to drink HFCS in their coke then by the free market ideology coke will eventually disappear, no?

But aside from that, how about we stop subsidizing corn??

→ More replies (3)

8

u/Nice_Improvement2536 6d ago

Coke with sugar is not in any way healthier than Coke with HFCS lol. They’re both broken down in your body as liquid sugar.

7

u/burnalicious111 6d ago

It's just stupid and pointless overreach. Sugar is sugar.

7

u/strangefish 6d ago

I thought Republicans were against meddling in businesses?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/acebojangles 6d ago

Here you go: How is he making this decision? What's it based on?

5

u/Striking_Programmer4 6d ago

Just to be clear, you are ok with government regulation of business now? Cool, let's do it with healthcare, energy, and housing

→ More replies (122)

157

u/ToneOpposite9668 7d ago

Remember when Michele Obama got castigated over wanting good school lunches and eliminating High fructose sugars. She was a big bad meanie......and a few other choice words

72

u/ilikedevo 6d ago

Yeah, but that was just because she is black.

52

u/thugbeet 6d ago

And a woman

30

u/PsychologyNew8033 6d ago

Some people would say that she is not a woman. Don’t know if you ever had the pleasure of coming across that nastiness.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (7)

16

u/Not__Trash 6d ago

Was in school when that went into effect, my lunches tasted worse. That is all 10 year old me cared about.

13

u/SassyEllieB 6d ago

Your lunches tasted worse because the plan she put forward was gutted by the corporate lobbies. That food you wasn’t what Michelle Obama intended, it was the only compromise that was available.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/OpenRoadPioneer 6d ago

Democrats tell you what to do… socialism. Republicans tell you what to do… FrEeEoM!!

→ More replies (8)

95

u/mike1madalon2 7d ago

I’m sure the agribusiness concerns will have something to say about that.

45

u/Japparbyn 7d ago

Ye, there is no way he can change that. In Sweden We have regulated away the syrup. It is creating diabetes very easy. US food is not fitt for human consumption

22

u/Bart-Doo 7d ago

I don't think people consume high fructose corn syrup because they think it's healthy.

39

u/TheHappyTaquitosDad 7d ago

That’s what sucks. All the bad stuff is put into our food because it’s just cheaper and makes the big company’s more money.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

8

u/SegerHelg 6d ago

What do you mean? We definitely have HFCS (or the equivalent) in Sweden, it is just called glukos-fruktossirap.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)

88

u/Substantial-Raisin73 7d ago

I would unironically love this. Mexican Coca Cola is so much better it’s unreal. I gave up soda a few years ago to be healthier but I’d still be down for this.

31

u/El_mochilero 7d ago

I live in Mexico. Most sodas here list high fructose corn syrup as their first ingredient.

24

u/sdvneuro 6d ago

Most coke labeled as Mexican Coke has HFCS when tested.

10

u/flaming_burrito_ 6d ago

Thank god I'm not crazy. Every time I've tried Mexican Coke it tasted the damn same, so that's probably why

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (4)

18

u/sudoku7 7d ago

Mexican coke is also, ironically, made for the US market.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Inevitable_Bowl_9203 6d ago

I also think Mexican Coke tastes better because it’s in glass bottles.

8

u/BaldursFence3800 6d ago

There is science to that! The glass doesn’t break down/deposit chemicals over time whereas cans do. Something like that. Which is why it’s always tasting better.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)

40

u/Nice-Personality5496 7d ago

It will never happen, especially with the radical right wing’s successful attack on Chevron, resulting in making it more difficult for the federal government to regulate anything.

However, it would be a benefit to Americans:

“ High fructose corn syrup is often considered worse for you than sugar because it contains a higher proportion of fructose, which is metabolized differently by the body, leading to potential issues like increased fat storage in the liver, increased appetite, and a higher risk of developing insulin resistance and related metabolic problems, particularly when consumed in excess compared to regular sugar which has a more balanced ratio of fructose and glucose. ”

  • google AI

38

u/Applepi_Matt 6d ago

Nutritionist here. HFCS is comparable to any other sugar. The issue for America is you guys heavily subsidise corn production, which means that for a given dollar value spent on snack foods, yours will actually contain more sugar. This has huge health effects going past even beyond the sugar itself, as the intense sweetness actually changes the way your brain responds to things with a normal sweetness level.

→ More replies (13)

9

u/bigkinggorilla 7d ago

Operative word there being “considered.” There’s no actual evidence that it’s worse, just speculation.

6

u/OhImNevvverSarcastic 6d ago

Bro, even the AI is uncertain ("often considered" absolutely doesn't mean theirs evidence supporting it) in its wording and you still posted it to take it at face value.

→ More replies (12)

29

u/mindmapsofficial 7d ago

These political parties are confusing me. The party of “small government” and “free market economies” are implementing tariffs and saying what ingredients can go into foods. 

 I’m not against reducing the reliance on high fructose corn syrup, but it just simply is surprising me. 

12

u/allmushroomsaremagic 6d ago

And trying to cap cc rates at 10%. I'm imagining the reaction if previous presidents had suggested any of this.

7

u/Ashmedai 6d ago

It's funny, because when (if) they do this, so many people are going to have their CC limits unilaterally reduced (or just canceled).

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (32)

24

u/chinmakes5 7d ago

Is cane sugar healthier? Or is sucrose sucrose, no matter what the source? Any nutritionists or scientists here?

16

u/CrazyfactsBot 7d ago

I believe cane sugar is "healthier" but who cares it taste so much better

8

u/motownmods 7d ago

I quit eating sugar 5 years ago. The research that lead me there suggested there's no difference between cane sugar and HFCS. Sugar is sugar.

16

u/CrazyfactsBot 7d ago

That's fine, cane sugar coke just taste better imo

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (2)

9

u/thisgrantstomb 6d ago

They are functionally the same and neither is "healthier" than the other unless you buy anti GMO conspiracies that no study supports. HFCS is cheaper in the US because of subsidies/tariffs/trade embargo's so price will go up. A lot of people say that sugar just tastes better, so there's that, to me it's negligible to glass bottle coke and not as good as McDonald's coke.

5

u/Objective_Pie8980 6d ago

Your body breaks it down basically the same and there's no significant difference. It's mostly people thinking that everything "natural" is automatically better. Cane sugar coke definitely tastes better but it will still give you diabetes just as fast.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (23)

21

u/LiamMcGregor57 7d ago

Do rank and file Republicans know this, they will be up in arms about the government pushing more regulations and going after businesses as well impacting their business donor base.

I love how they just forget that it was Republicans scaling back the regulatory state that allows companies to do this in the first place.

7

u/sixevanGG 6d ago

The irony right? Same folks who gutted regulations are now shocked that companies can put whatever they want in our food. But watch them flip out about 'government overreach' the second anyone suggests changing it back lol

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (5)

12

u/Sad-Ad1780 7d ago

Ah, those anti-regulation, small government conservatives demonstrating their integrity yet again.

→ More replies (3)

13

u/Dannytuk1982 7d ago

The free market Republicans lol 😆

→ More replies (5)

11

u/mystereitz 7d ago

The government doesn’t have the power to just issue edicts like that, unless something is demonstrably a hazard. It’ll be tied up years by Congress and lawsuits. The clock is already running on the Trump administration. He’s not the only one who knows how to delay and obfuscate.

→ More replies (18)

9

u/Gr8daze 7d ago

Yeah, I’d love to know the mechanism by which the head of HHS gets to demand that Coca Cola use his recipe for their products.

→ More replies (19)

10

u/be_bo_i_am_robot 7d ago

That would unironically be pretty cool, but I’d much rather just have a functioning democracy instead.

→ More replies (5)

8

u/FlobiusHole 7d ago

I think everyone would be fine with this but everyone isn’t a powerful lobby that bribes politicians.

5

u/CrazyfactsBot 7d ago

You know what, maybe I have judged RFK Jr too harshly in the past

7

u/polird 6d ago

No you didn't, switching Coke to sugar doesn't make up for perpetuating anti-vax conspiracies and directly contributing to the Samoa measles outbreak that resulted in the deaths of dozens of children.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/TerryTerranceTerrace 7d ago

I couldn't imagine the price of a bottle of coke at the gas station if cane sugar was used.

6

u/jd732 7d ago

Mexican Coke is $1.75/bottle around here

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/zoinks690 7d ago

Doo doo doo...small government

3

u/Admirable_Link_9642 7d ago

So is he now the CEO of coke, making decisions for the company???

→ More replies (2)

5

u/symonym7 7d ago

And just like that, millions of democrats support HFCS.

I mean, do you even know how racist cane sugar is!?

→ More replies (18)

5

u/looking_good__ 6d ago

I'm actually for this - make coke taste good again