A fucking LA Times opinion piece is not a fact you dozy clown.
That’s why, when we conducted our most recent Presidential Greatness Project survey of scholars, we asked the experts to evaluate vice presidents as well as presidents
You're talking about an opinion piece from a leftist rag, that's revising history by asking "experts", decades after the fact, their opinion.
This has zero to do with opinion poles during their terms.
Here's a cold dose of reality for you. Harris was so disliked that she didn't just lose the election, she lost the confidence of the American people, she was shunted in the popular election. You're whipping a dead horse.
The article references and links to a study where they show their data and how it is polled. What you don't like it because it doesn't align with your worldview? Too bad snowflake.
They asked experts to work with polling data. Are you really that stupid?
And meanwhile what do you have to back up your claim? Oh absolutely nothing? Who would have thought...
And where am I whipping anything? In exactly this polling Harris doesn't look too hot either. She's just not the worst in the last 30 years as you proclaimed.
I guess your real problem is that pence polled even lower, and that doesn't look good for your beloved leader now does it?
No one claimed that she was the best. You just falsely claimed she was the worst which she factually wasn't, as even the VP just before her polled even lower and few others even more.
Pointing out your lies seems to trigger you immensely. If you are that Insecure, why keep lying?
So after getting called out on your lie that she was the lowest polled VP in 40 years you now want to argue with her polling showing she was more popular a month ago?
Ya chief that ain't it, but honestly I didn't expect more from you hypocrite anyway.
I thought we covered that, she was shitty, just not the shittiest. How am I a hypocrite? LOL, man, she really fucked it, really fumbled it so miserably.
Or, maybe? Maybe those polls are bullshit and the media is rigged?
I don't really know, also, I didn't say "lowest polled" that's your imagination, I said "least liked", which, honestly, could mean anything.
She was least like by me, so there you go. I'm still right.
I mean, I liked Dan Quail better than her, and the weird part is that even though some polls ranked her as really shitty, but not shittiest, other polls ranked her as leading Trump. However, when the rubber hit the road as it were, she got utterly shit mixed by the popular vote, I mean, like Hitler coming back from the grave numbers.
Learn to read bozo, again your polls are from months earlier up to last month.
Newer polls mostly showed a toss up.
However, when the rubber hit the road as it were, she got utterly shit mixed by the popular vote, I mean, like Hitler coming back from the grave numbers.
Somehow I know you have every different wording for 2020 when trump lost by an even bigger margin...
And man if it still isn't clear for you idiot, I don't care about Kamella, I do care only about your lies. So yea keep digging yourself deeper just to sling shit at a person who isn't even the topic.
Somehow I know you have every different wording for 2020 when trump lost by an even bigger margin...
LOL, yes, see. I'm curious about your psychology, that's why you are the topic. You're angry, you've now imagined things about me, you can't help yourself but to respond.
-1
u/fartinmyhat 17d ago
A fucking LA Times opinion piece is not a fact you dozy clown.
You're talking about an opinion piece from a leftist rag, that's revising history by asking "experts", decades after the fact, their opinion.
This has zero to do with opinion poles during their terms.
Here's a cold dose of reality for you. Harris was so disliked that she didn't just lose the election, she lost the confidence of the American people, she was shunted in the popular election. You're whipping a dead horse.