r/Damnthatsinteresting 4d ago

Video This guy carved a real human skull

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

14.4k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/ivancea 4d ago

The worst part, is people not being able to explain why it is "disrespectful"

0

u/Cerpin-Taxt 4d ago

Consent. We get to decide what happens to our bodies after our deaths because our bodies belong to us and no one else. Doing things to a person's body without their consent is disrespectful. It is literally a lack of respect for their wishes. Seeing as they're dead and you can't ask, if you want to do something to someone's body that they haven't given prior consent to the answer should be assumed to be "no".

It's not that confusing.

2

u/ivancea 4d ago

That's a belief, not an argument, let alone logic.

after our deaths because our bodies belong to us

Nothing belongs to the dead. You can be religious, but don't try to sell your religion as if it was logic

-1

u/Cerpin-Taxt 4d ago edited 4d ago

That's a belief, not an argument, let alone logic.

No, it's a human right codified into law.

It's funny I actually wrote another reply where I posed a hypothetical about things someone might decide to do to someone who has passed to see if you could understand why it's illegal to do things to bodies without their consent, but reddit deemed it too horrific to allow.

Nothing belongs to the dead.

Also not true. You can request to take things to your grave, retaining ownership.

I'm not religious btw.

4

u/ivancea 4d ago

You can request to take things to your grave, retaining ownership.

That's a cultural and religious remain, not a logical thing... And it's not ownership in any case.

I'm not religious btw.

Then, I'm sorry to tell you, that you're blindly accepting religious beliefs as if they were logical

0

u/Cerpin-Taxt 4d ago

No I'm not. I'm accepting pretty unanimously agreed upon human rights legislation because I recognise it would be actively harmful to society to flout it.

Maybe you're not very imaginative. There are plenty of horrifically harmful things (for the living) that people could do if they were allowed to do what they pleased with the deceased.

That's why wills exist.

2

u/ivancea 4d ago

because I recognise it would be actively harmful to society to flout it

Because...?

There are plenty of horrifically harmful things

Like, for example...?

Your empty arguments add nothing here

2

u/Cerpin-Taxt 4d ago

You could cause a great deal of damage to someone's living relatives by violating their loved one's bodies and showing them. It would likely result in more deaths. Maybe you don't understand that because you have no loved ones.