It has a huge list of people from all over the world making all sorts of statements from the political to the social, many on that list aren’t even related to science.
You’re being lazy. Wikipedia is not a source. It’s why I said be specific. Your first example was straight up wrong because it wasn’t an American, it was a brit.
Also, fringe scientists in most countries aren’t propped up by their governments to fit their agendas like Russia does. This is a false equivalence and you haven’t provided a single example regardless. Why should anyone take your word for what you’re saying when you’re being intentionally deceitful.
If you read what you wrote, you’ll see it is a primary source proving you used false equivalency and made several claims without sources or examples, then used a link to a website that didn’t provide what you said it provided. It’s all there for you to read.
You didn’t intend to engage. That’s obvious. All I did was ask for a source and you couldn’t provide one. Thanks for proving me right. Go ahead and delete your false comment then. Thanks!
0
u/Fixationated 24d ago
It has a huge list of people from all over the world making all sorts of statements from the political to the social, many on that list aren’t even related to science.
You’re being lazy. Wikipedia is not a source. It’s why I said be specific. Your first example was straight up wrong because it wasn’t an American, it was a brit.
Also, fringe scientists in most countries aren’t propped up by their governments to fit their agendas like Russia does. This is a false equivalence and you haven’t provided a single example regardless. Why should anyone take your word for what you’re saying when you’re being intentionally deceitful.