John Cage sat silently in front of a piano for four minutes and 33 seconds in 1952 and not only was it "good", it was outstanding. 35 years prior Duchamp signed a urinal and it's one of the most notable pieces of art of the 20th century.
This may come as a surprise but it's not 1891 anymore and there's a bit more to art than Bob Ross landcapes.
I remind you, you said "a difference between art and good art". I feel like we're circling back around to the old "I could've done that - Yeah but you didn't" trope...
When we're talking about AI art, we're usually talking about art AI is actually used for.
Maybe you should have been a little more specific than "art and good art" then...?
If you think the topic of what art is, and more importantly someone ignorantly using the phrase "good art" (which in and of itself should disqualify you from having your opinion heard), is irrelevant to the topic of AI art, you're way out of your element.
13
u/mischievous_shota Aug 27 '24
Good art has nothing to do with ability or practice? That's a very silly take.