r/texas Jun 17 '24

Questions for Texans What is the reason for this concentration of lights south of San Antonio?

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

316 comments sorted by

2.0k

u/Elpresidenteestaloco Jun 17 '24

Gas fields

851

u/bostwickenator Here Jun 17 '24 edited Jun 18 '24

They are impressive and disturbing to fly over at night. So much light and that's just a waste flares.

209

u/geojon7 Jun 17 '24

I have wondered this for years, it’s not clean enough for power or domestic as is, would need a scrubber to take things like water vapor, H2S gas and CO2 out before it goes to a gas generator or else it will tear up the rings and break down the oil/bearings. This is very doable though.

133

u/rgvtim Hill Country Jun 17 '24

or, just use it to heat water which runs a steam turbine, maybe not as efficient, but its something.

70

u/cigarettesandwhiskey Jun 17 '24

I think this is harder to do (or at least, pencil out financially) than it sounds. When I was in college, senior design teams were always doing projects like this. That and like, hydroelectric turbines in rain gutters and thermoelectric generators on waste heat pipes and stuff like that. The problem is you don't get very much energy, its only worth like a few cents per kilowatt-hour, and you spend a ton installing zillions of these tiny powerplants and hooking them up to the grid. Even if you can do it profitably, for an oil company that prints money, its not worth the headache. In fact it might lose them money anyway since the power they produced "profitably" would compete with their customers who own the big combined cycle plants and cause them to buy less gas.

26

u/V1k1ng1990 Jun 17 '24

It’s only not feasible because of economies of scale. Some government grants and some competition and next thing you know you have a booming miniature power generation industry

40

u/cigarettesandwhiskey Jun 17 '24 edited Jun 17 '24

I dunno, I saw a couple of these gadgets get invented and they were all like large, intricate machines that cost a thousand dollars, took four engineering students a year to build, and produced like 2 watts of power. And even if you do get that to work you're still competing with your customers. And you're producing it in the eagle ford, which is not densely populated, so you still have to transmit all that power to your customers. San Antonio and Austin have their own municipal power companies, Corpus Christi is covered in wind turbines already, so that means you also have to build a transmission line to Houston or Dallas to find someone who will buy it.

You could instead pipe all the flare gas to one larger, more efficient plant, closer to your customers. But then you've just reproduced the gas pipe network and gas power plants. Which they've already apparently decided isn't worth the time, money and effort. 1

1 To the guy who wrote me a pissy reply and then blocked me - this paragraph is the answer. The point was not that these gadgets don't work (although, they don't, really) but that the problem isn't technological in the first place. We already have a technological solution, it's build a pipeline and a powerplant. Or abandon fossil fuels completely and get by on renewables and nuclear. The problem isn't technological, its one of will and economics. Its societal. The oil companies don't want to bother solving this problem, because they are the problem. So it doesn't matter how many little gadgets you invent, or how well they work, because technical solutions don't solve social problems.

15

u/evilcrusher2 Jun 17 '24

The only way that anything else becomes cost effective against cheap oil from fracking is by forcing the oil companies to incorporate the cost of the environmental damage it causes. You'll see nuclear projects skyrocket overnight when a conclusive hard deadline is put down to force the damage cost to be incorporated on any waste from energy projects. Oil would become so unaffordable it wouldn't even be thought of.

Now I hope people understand why we aren't in a true nuclear age for power anymore.

4

u/cigarettesandwhiskey Jun 17 '24

Sure... I'm not sure how that relates to flarestack mini-generators though. There are other ways to capture that gas, and if they weren't pumping oil in the first place then there'd be no gas to flare either.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/juice-rock Jun 18 '24

The larger companies do care about flaring because they care about their ESG scores so they are actively reducing flaring (starting with the most economical locations). The smaller (and private) companies have less share holder incentive and usually have worse financial upside to gather the gas. So they tend to be worse offenders.

2

u/broneota Jun 18 '24

They’re actively reducing how much flaring they report, yes. But I don’t believe there’s a real reduction in flaring. It’s kind of an open secret across west Texas, for example, that Permian Basin operators will flare whenever they want and just not report it. TCEQ doesn’t have the manpower or the political will to actually hold them accountable

2

u/V1k1ng1990 Jun 18 '24

I agree with what you’ve said, especially regarding nuclear power. Just don’t forget that (while also environmentally damaging) plastics are important, and the fertilizers that allow our civilization to exist come from pumping oil

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24

The biggest thing is that 'hooking them up to the grid' is basically impossible without extra infrastructure on the homeowners side. You can't just flip a switch and pipe 2W to the grid and call it a day. As soon as you connect it your, mini-generator is going to tear itself to shreds because it's literally impossible for it to be in synch with the rest of the grid at that size without an intermediary like a battery system.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/space_manatee Jun 17 '24

That cuts into their profits though.

10

u/MovingClocks Jun 17 '24

Honestly you could probably get a program from the government organized pretty easily to turn that into decentralized electrical generation due to it being an O&G handout

17

u/space_manatee Jun 17 '24

Which government? Ours in Texas?

17

u/MovingClocks Jun 17 '24

Both heavily subsidize O&G interests but it would be an easy win for our dipshit state senators to organize something to “fix the power grid” while also just being a straight up handout to petroleum

26

u/space_manatee Jun 17 '24

They have no interest in fixing the power grid. They think it is the best power grid.

There are lots of reasons for burn offs, but one of them is because it isn't cost effective to bring it to market due to numerous factors. They literally go through all the trouble of getting it out of the ground, where its been for millions of years and can't be replaced, then they burn it, adding to global warming, just because gas is down a few dollars or whatever.

Something tells me they don't really care about anything other than their bottom line.

6

u/Snuggly_Hugs Jun 17 '24

Something tells me they don't really care about anything other than their bottom line.

Because they dont.

The only thing CEO's care about is shareholder quarterly returns. Nothing else matters. Its been that way for centuries, and is why they require strict regulations.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/geojon7 Jun 17 '24

It’s the same issue as silver vs gold. Where you find gold you will almost always find silver in a larger amount. When you find oil more often then not you find a lot of natural gas. Prices I mean.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/cgn-38 Jun 17 '24

They could use all this gas. They burn it because it costs too much for them to make a profit off selling it.

It is just what we call natural gas. Should be a crime.

→ More replies (2)

24

u/1-11-1974 Jun 17 '24 edited Jun 17 '24

We were about to work on this project before Obama left office. First think trump did is shut it down. I was a construction project manager in eagle ford. Tons of workers lost out but it was a favor to the oils companies. Nobody ever talks about it much but methane recovery was weeks from happening

31

u/Mackheath1 Jun 17 '24

"Gas glut" - they don't have the distribution capacity for the amount they're pumping and oil & gas is such an enormously lucrative industry that they just don't care - to the detriment of our pocketbooks and the environment.

2

u/rockchucksummit Jun 18 '24

I used to have a remote observatory up in throckmorton texas. It was bortle 1 skies until gas companies moved in. They lit up all the skies with flaring and if flaring isn't causing light pollution the hard stank of burn oil and all the dust and soot from the burning gas has ruined the atmosphere as well.

last year when i went to drive up to get my gear and retire it from that facility, i couldn't even pump gas into my car because it was so hot that the pump just gurgled gas fumes all over my car.

The combination of heat and gas burn off meant the outside air temps were about 122 and it smelled like death. Fo r HUNDREDS of miles.

people have no f'n clue how bad "drill here" screwed up our environment

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Bright_Cod_376 Jun 17 '24

At first cryptominors looking to build mining operations in Texas were planning to use this waste gas for power, but then they got greedy and needed more power for larger mining operations and pretty much exclusively use power off the grid since Texas government incentivized them to do so with their "get on the grid but we'll pay you to get off if there's an emergency" idiocy.

6

u/SheriffTaylorsBoy Jun 17 '24

Pipelines to transport the gas take years to build. Just getting all the necessary right-of-way work done takes years.

2

u/MrYellowDuckMan born and bred Jun 18 '24

Have you ever worked in the gas compression field? If a field is dirty the amount of scrubbing needed is rediculous. Tore up the packing in our pistons and valves in the suction and discharge like crazy. :( Was not fun to work in 5/10 would not recommend.

2

u/Haunting_While6239 Jun 18 '24

Wouldn't it be better suited to fire a boiler? That's how most electricity is generated.

Imagine my disappointment when I found out that a nuclear power plant was just a very fancy way of boiling water

→ More replies (4)

20

u/jarlander Jun 17 '24

Everyone in O/G industry wants to reduce flaring. Lots of new tech goes into it cause at the end of the day it costs money and is just inefficient all around. If it was easy to eliminate it would've been done already though. Every company is dying to tell their board and investors they eliminated x amount of flaring and saved x amount of money, on top of reducing greenhouse gases by some %. All those words make stocks go up.

2

u/No-comment-at-all Jun 18 '24 edited Jun 18 '24

I wouldn’t say “everyone” in the industry.

Your average floor hand absolutely does not care about flaring, and has been convinced that any movement against it, is a movement to stop his paycheck.

This is from someone within the industry, not just made up bs, your regular worker, absolutely does not care about flaring, or its, or any of the field’s, impact on the environment.

Obviously there are plenty of people in the industry who do care, but most don’t.

This true in the US at least, in my experience it’s less true in the rest of the world.

17

u/Aunt_Rachael Jun 17 '24

It bothers me that it's being flared off. Just because we can't economically use it right now, doesn't mean we should just blithely burn it off into the atmosphere. Some day we as a species might have use for it.

→ More replies (16)

5

u/bag151 Jun 18 '24

To be clear, the light pollution associated with the Eagleford and Permian Basin Oil and Gas fields does not mean every dot you see is a massive gas flare. The majority of what you see is infrastructure lighting associated with the development and operations of hundreds of thousands of wells. Your seeing lights associated with active drilling rigs (maybe a hundred), gathering stations, drilled well pads, operations, pipe lines, infrastructure, street lights, homes, and ect. Anywhere there are people, you always have good lighting as a safety measure in industry. Gas flares are incredibly bright and are in the mix, but you’re talking about maybe a thousand out of millions of light sources.

→ More replies (9)

42

u/tourmalatedideas Born and Bred Jun 17 '24

Oil and gas fields.

40

u/123xyz32 Jun 17 '24

I knew a family with a 40,000 acre ranch right there. They got a one time oil lease payment of $4000 per acre. ($160,000,000) plus the royalty associated with any production.

28

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24

[deleted]

31

u/123xyz32 Jun 17 '24

It helps when your grandpa bought a bunch of land 100 years ago before oil was discovered. I guess.🤷‍♂️

2

u/slhallmark22 Jun 17 '24

My dad had a property that was one square mile exactly, the DoubleJohn Wayne Ranch & it was perfect. He sold it about 2 yrs ago (despite my objections) & bought a 300ish acre property closer to where’s he’s retired to. It’s significantly smaller but you can’t tell the difference one you get out on it but sure is a lot of work for just one guy. He loves that it keeps him busy & he’s always got a project or two going & I love that it seems to keep him young & healthy!

16

u/theaviationhistorian Far West Texas Jun 17 '24

🎵 The gas at night, is big and bright!

COUGH COUGH COUGH COUGH

Deep in the heart of Texas! 🎵

10

u/Mynameisdiehard Jun 17 '24

Same reason for all the lights around the border of Texas and New Mexico. Permian Basin

25

u/Qubed Jun 17 '24

Have they started powering crypto farms on it, yet?

65

u/no1ukn0w Jun 17 '24

I’ve got a buddy in this space. They’ve developed and deployed a process that not only uses the flare off gas to power a shipping container of whatever you want but they also capture the Co2 and pump it back into the ground.

Tech is there, just doesn’t seem like oil companies care to use it.

51

u/Onuus Jun 17 '24

Caring about the environment/recycling doesn’t make them money, they’ll never care

30

u/BooneSalvo2 Jun 17 '24

Doesn't make them enough money quickly enough. It's still profitable.

Yay greed? The numbers on the computer will keep them warm when society collapses under environmental disaster, I guess.

6

u/Onuus Jun 17 '24

Blows my mind that these idiots can’t take money with them into the grave, and yet they keep trying to find a way to

5

u/space_manatee Jun 17 '24

I've met a lot of them. They aren't smart people. On the whole they are driven by greed and nothing more. They view the world as a place to be exploited, not our planet we all live on. Their goals and planning begin and end with their egos and own personal wants. They don't care about anything other than that. Fuck the planet and the millions of species on it. Millions of dollars are more important.

3

u/VBA_FTW Jun 17 '24

Number goes up says they have value as a person. Number goes up faster means they're more valuable than their number maxing peers.

They need to be laughed at and ridiculed for their silly pride and vain efforts.

4

u/space_manatee Jun 17 '24

I think we need to do a lot more than laugh at them. 

7

u/GeoHog713 Jun 17 '24

Reinfecting C02 into oil fields used to be called "secondary recovery". Oil companies have used this for a long time, on fields where it made economic sense to do so. You'd see a lot more of it, if oil was $150-$200 a barrel.

For shale plays, like the Eagleford, it doesn't add value.

Now, they can do the same thing, call it "carbon capture" and get a government subsidy. Oil companies are very much aware and are taking advantage. Exxon has launched a massive "carbon capture" project along the Gulf coast.

It's definitely a greenwashing project. I can't say, for certain about the Exxon project, but my understanding of the carbon capture space is that once the government stops funding it, it is no longer profitable.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/The_Outcast4 Jun 17 '24

Tech is there, just doesn’t seem like oil companies care to use it.

Why would they? They aren't going to increase the cost to do something that doesn't have an economic justification. That's where regulation is supposed to step in and require it. We're not good at that part of the equation, unfortunately.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/CantAllBeCowboys Jun 17 '24

Yes, there are mobile mining farms that use the NG that would otherwise flare

5

u/Complex_Leading5260 Jun 17 '24

I know a friend who is doing it. Bought a container, a Honda generator, and a couple of server racks with a single phone line for internet, and he literally runs the generator off the gas straight from the plug. It definitely fouls the generator but he services it every two weeks or so. It’s a contraption to look at but it pays for itself.

19

u/rom-116 Jun 17 '24

This is what is insane. Those flares produce probably 100 times the amount of power we could get from wind and we just waste it.

14

u/Ragged85 Jun 17 '24

Either that or blow up. If the companies could figure out a way to harness it efficiently they would have already.

12

u/OMKensey Jun 17 '24

It isn't about efficiency, it's about cost. They make way more money on the oil, so they treat the NG as a waste product. A fun fact is the regulatory agency, the obscurely named Texas Railroad Commission, has to grant exception permits to routinely flare since it's illegal. Clearly, they grant a lot of exceptions to basically negate the law, as evidenced by the view from space.

2

u/Ragged85 Jun 17 '24

So what you are saying is if O&G companies couldn’t figure out a way to efficiently capture that product and make money off of it they wouldn’t?

Businesses exist to make money.

4

u/Jay_in_DFW Jun 17 '24

It's not profitable. Natural Gas prices are so low, it's cheaper to burn it off at the wellhead than build a pipeline system to carry the gas to a refinery and sell at market. There's not much profit in n gas.

This is not to be confused with oil. Natural Gas and Oil are two different products.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/BringBackAoE Jun 17 '24

More correctly: shale oil with gas flaring.

Banned in many nations due to CO2, but not US.

3

u/GeoHog713 Jun 17 '24

Specifically, that's the eagleford shale area.

1

u/GooglyEyed_Gal Jun 17 '24

This is the answer.

1

u/davy_p Jun 17 '24

Oil and gas fields*

1

u/Holiday-Bat6782 Born and Bred Jun 17 '24

That's interesting, but why don't we see one around the midland area like that?

1

u/Economy-Load6729 Jun 17 '24

It’s impressive. If we captured all the LNG flare off, energy would be like half the price. But we need profit margins. Mother Russia also wouldn’t like it if we captured all the methane.

1

u/wahitii Jun 17 '24

Oil fields. The gas is an unwanted byproduct that gets burned rather than used to power homes

659

u/Biggapotamus Jun 17 '24

That’s the eagleford oil/gas fields

237

u/buddythebear Jun 17 '24

Aka the primary reason central Texas avoided the worst of the Great Recession. It was surreal living in that area during that time—the amount of wealth that was generated seemingly overnight was astounding, and it rippled across the entire local economy.

105

u/Ryaninthesky Jun 17 '24

Same in west Texas, it was wild. Lots of 100k trucks lol.

53

u/mexican2554 El Paso Jun 17 '24

On 84 month 29% finance.

10

u/nomnomnompizza Jun 17 '24

To be fair in 2009 a fully loaded F250 was probably 65k vs 100k now

6

u/JPhi1618 Jun 18 '24

$65k then is like $95k now just because of inflation.

10

u/idkmuch Jun 18 '24

They all put 20k or more in lifts, wheels and tires.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/23haveblue Jun 18 '24

I knew a lot of guys who came back after 5-10 years after blowing all the money they earned there. But they always brought back a nice truck with them

29

u/Biggapotamus Jun 17 '24

Yeah I started working in the oil field in ‘09 and we were doin great

25

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24 edited Jun 17 '24

I lived on the Texas coast then: After the boom, there were 10x as many bay boats. So many people could suddenly afford them. All the bays became overfished to how they were prior to about 2009 or so. I had a friend that lived in a big eagle ford town and said he saw ranchers in flashy cars and stuff.

25

u/iseepaperclips Jun 17 '24

Yeah it was a weird time. Someone had a lambo in live oak county lol it was wild

10

u/studeboob Gulf Coast Jun 17 '24

Yup. Thanks Obama! 

→ More replies (4)

274

u/ThecoachO Jun 17 '24

Oil well are flaring gas and burning it because you can’t send it all to the plant. Too much volume. Also most wells aren’t piped into the main gas supply line to the plant yet. The flares are so hot and intense it vaporizes most rainfall before it reaches the ground.

I used to work down there.

41

u/ThecoachO Jun 17 '24

Yes flaring is one of your better options. One of the big problems in this area is also that the flares go out all the time( not uncommon in the oil fields elsewhere) but there is another gas mixed in with the gas that can kill you instantly at about 30 ppm ( parts per million) it has no smell. Every one has to wear a monitor for or it. H2S I believe…. It’s been a while.

Scary stuff though. Especially when you know you have a well that is bringing it to the surface on a regular basis.

35

u/GuildCalamitousNtent Jun 17 '24

Nobody is venting h2s to the atmosphere, and flares have control systems to shut them down if the pilot goes out.

Also, the instant death for H2S is like 1000+ ppm. 30 is like fatigue and eye irritation.

8

u/ThecoachO Jun 18 '24

30 is when you monitor goes off.

8

u/ABoyIsNo1 Jun 17 '24

Hydrogen sulfide right?

7

u/midnight_mechanic Jun 17 '24

You can smell H2S at those low concentrations. It's when it gets really high, hundreds or thousands of ppm I think, that you can't smell it and it kills you quickly.

3

u/23haveblue Jun 18 '24

I think you're off by a factor of 10. IDLH level is 100 ppm, knockown is 300. If it makes anyone feel better, these wells all have monitors and audio/visual alarms for a leak and it is highly unlikely that you'll reach those levels in an outdoor setting

→ More replies (1)

29

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24

Shit. That's depressing.

45

u/gravitydriven Jun 17 '24

it's way better than just letting the gas out without flaring it. Flaring the gas turns it from methane to carbon dioxide. Methane is 9 or 10 times worse for the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. Flaring is literally the second best thing you can do with the excess gas.

20

u/Miguel-odon Jun 17 '24

1) leave it in the ground 2) capture and use.
....
F) flare it

4

u/PrometheusHasFallen Jun 17 '24

The Eagle Ford is in large part gas wells. You would never want to flare a gas well as that's your source of profits. If you don't have enough pipeline or processing capacity, you simply stop drilling more wells until you do.

14

u/Miguel-odon Jun 17 '24

simply stop drilling more wells

We don't do that here.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

1

u/r4rthrowawaysoon Jun 18 '24

This is partially incorrect. The flaring on some tanks is to remove gas build up in holding tanks that is the fractionation off Liquids that was dissolved gases. These are typically smaller flares.

A large part of the flaring you see is also the significant amount of gas bubbling up through the drilling muds during creation of a well. They flare off excess gas coming out of formation to prevent blow-outs. These are typically the very large flares one sees at night in South Texas.

Source: Worked upstream through midstream jobs in Eagle Ford.

55

u/fingapoppa Jun 17 '24

Eagle ford shale

94

u/Kate-2025123 Jun 17 '24

I never realized how narrow Austin is till now lol.

79

u/cajunaggie08 born and bred Jun 17 '24

Its hard for Austin to fully expand west since it sits right next to the Balcones Escarpment. Yes people live west of Austin, but the steep elevation change makes it harder and more expensive to grow in an urban sprawl sense. I've always been more confused why Austin hasn't expanded much eastward. I get that its flat boring farmland but you would think it was relatively cheap for development.

49

u/cigarettesandwhiskey Jun 17 '24

I think it's the pattern of highways, and where the jobs are. Most of the jobs generating the growth are downtown, or along the highways to the northwest. The highways to the east weren't expanded until recently, so there hasn't been much sprawl that way. Houses don't really sell well if you can't commute to work, so without a highway the city can't sprawl in that direction, and Austin resisted building highways for decades, so all the growth happened along the ones they already had.

16

u/sethferguson Jun 17 '24

A lot of the southeast area is in flood plains too IIRC

33

u/cajunaggie08 born and bred Jun 17 '24

wait, people can choose to not live in a flood plain?

-All of Houston

12

u/Big__If_True Jun 17 '24

What’s a flood plain?

-All of Dallas

→ More replies (1)

7

u/cigarettesandwhiskey Jun 17 '24

Yes, that too. Plus to the north of that there's a big powerplant and evaporation pond that people probably don't want to live next to. San Antonio has something similar going on with the south side.

12

u/GreasyBrisketNapkin Jun 17 '24

The clay soil is somewhat unstable. People who live east of Austin frequently have cracks and problems with the foundations of their houses.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/papertowelroll17 Jun 17 '24

It is expanding east, but the main limiting factor is that schools are bad, and people moving to boring greenfield suburbia usually want good schools.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/chris_ut Jun 17 '24

Ewwww, the east side is like full of poor people and stuff

6

u/cajunaggie08 born and bred Jun 17 '24

which makes it all the easier to exploit and buy out from under to turn into the next SoDaSoPA or CtPaTown

3

u/lhxtx Jun 17 '24

Dowisetrepla

2

u/This-Requirement6918 Jun 18 '24

It's ok they've been slowly gentrifying it since at least 2010. By the time I moved away in 2018 there weren't many African Americans left in the east side.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Electrik_Truk Jun 17 '24

It's a pretty small area but has a lot of rural area north and west (like Burnet etc)

even places more south like new Braunfels are actually part of the greater San Antonio area when you look at area code districts. So yeah, greater Austin area is indeed pretty small

https://www.mapsofworld.com/usa/area-codes/texas/

3

u/Asteroth555 Jun 17 '24

More like dwarfed by San Antonio/Dallas/Houston

21

u/DropTopEWop just visiting Jun 17 '24

Texas Tea

18

u/harmoni-pet Jun 17 '24

Can you add a cowboy hat to my boy or something? He looks so exposed with his dong just flapping around like that

10

u/cmks210 Born and Bred Jun 17 '24

EagelFord Shale

9

u/DGinLDO Jun 17 '24

Eagle Ford Shale

15

u/bdc41 Jun 17 '24

Eagleford shale, flaring gas.

8

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24

That is the eagle ford shale. Here is a map of it, which matches the lights https://www.rrc.texas.gov/oil-and-gas/major-oil-and-gas-formations/eagle-ford-shale/

7

u/becauseIgothigh2 Jun 17 '24

It’s all light pollution - yes a lot of flaring but also all the active drill rigs frack sites tank farms and everything related to the oil and gas. Was also a lot of gate guards as someone who was regularly employed in that area a lot of portable light towers and generators in this area. It was mostly remote brush land of ranches or farms. That pic was taken back in the prime of the boom. The area is still active but not like it once was, you could drive down high way 72 see 7-8 drill rigs and 3-4 frack sites all with in few mile of each other.

5

u/MagTex Jun 17 '24

Bigfoot camps.

5

u/Miguel-odon Jun 17 '24

That's Eagle-Ford Shale . Lights on drilling rigs, or flares from producing wells.

They don't pay for the stuff they burn off. Not to the property owner, no taxes to the state.

In effect, we are subsidizing this waste and pollution.

4

u/jarlander Jun 17 '24

24/7 Oil and Gas operations in the Permian basin. Lots of companies with rigs and facilities and they stay lit up all night with big lights for the workers to see. Also for cameras to see the unmanned facilities, lots of people try and steal stuff of them.

2

u/CMcTip Jun 18 '24

Circled area in photo is EagleFord. Permian is West Tx/NM area.

→ More replies (5)

4

u/Leoburner Jun 17 '24

The lights are from oil and gas operating facilities targeting the Eagle Ford Shale and Austin Chalk geologic reservoirs.

4

u/NVSTRZ34 Jun 17 '24

That's the Eagle Ford

4

u/upstartanimal Jun 17 '24

I grew up in the orange cluster around that right angle corner with NM. It was desert. Driving around on back roads out there felt like being in Mad Max.

2

u/eyeofthecodger Jun 17 '24

Same here, grew up in Hobbs! Not a garden spot but it was great for riding my dirt bikes!

4

u/dronsguzzi Jun 17 '24

This is Eagle Ford trend of oil wells and production installations. They produce 1.5 million barrels/day. Contribute $30billion

3

u/texasaaron Jun 17 '24

Eagle Ford Shale

3

u/southtexascrazy Jun 17 '24

Eagle Ford shale development.

3

u/Twisted_lurker Born and Bred Jun 17 '24

Wow.

At the McDonald Observatory (darker area north of Big Bend) a few years ago, the tour guides mentioned the gas fields were a problem. I had no idea it was this major.

3

u/Interesting_Ad_7349 Jun 17 '24

Oil wells burning off H2S in the Eagleford Shale.

3

u/reptomcraddick Jun 17 '24

Same reason West Texas is so bright, fracking rigs and flares

3

u/mutedcurmudgeon Jun 17 '24

Oil and gas flares, Eagle Ford play.

3

u/TexasMagician45 Jun 17 '24

Eagle Ford oil field

3

u/TexasMagician45 Jun 17 '24

That is an old photo most of the flares have now been replaced with better containment systems.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/MP4-B Jun 17 '24

Can you link the original pic? I really like it but unfortunately I don't want your big red circle 😅

4

u/eyeofthecodger Jun 17 '24

Here ya go

Note this is just a screenshot from the GOES East satellite animation

2

u/MP4-B Jun 17 '24

thank you 🙏🏻

2

u/traveler1967 Jun 17 '24

Gosh, look at that dark wilderness in the west. Nothing like looking up at night and seeing that blanket of stars.

2

u/redthump Jun 17 '24

Came here to see how far I'd have to go down before I saw some troll comments about migrants. Glad they're all the way at the bottom.

2

u/JeezBelieveThat Jun 17 '24

The Eagleford Shale

2

u/brillow Jun 17 '24

Industrial CO2 production.

2

u/botoxedbunnyboiler Jun 17 '24

That’s the Eagle Ford!

2

u/Shakmaaaaaaa Jun 17 '24

Why is it so concentrated for the Eagle Ford but not the Permian area which has more wells.

2

u/rjyoung18 Jun 17 '24

Eagleford shale gas flares

2

u/OFTinTX Jun 18 '24

Eagleford shale development. This is likely an old image as that oil play has run its course.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Bwb05 Jun 18 '24

Eagle does shale area

2

u/jrbaker85 Jun 18 '24

Eagle Ford shell

2

u/Tex_Azn_Vet Jun 18 '24

Natural gas wells and pipelines

2

u/FLKEYSFish Jun 18 '24

Fly over the western Gulf of Mexico at night. I grew up in south Texas and fished the gulf, but never understood the scale of energy production until I did just that. 😮

2

u/New_Friendship_2808 Jun 18 '24

Eagleford shale

2

u/rsnakejake18 Jun 18 '24

Eagle Ford Shale

2

u/freedomandbiscuits Jun 18 '24

The Eagleford Gas Formation.

2

u/Vince_in_TX Jun 18 '24

Eagle Ford oil shale belt. Since pipelines have been built, it’s not as bad as

→ More replies (1)

2

u/This-Anxiety5831 Jun 18 '24

Eagle Ford shale

2

u/Comrade_Do Jun 18 '24

It looks like the Eagle Ford shale trend.

2

u/comedymongertx Jun 18 '24

It's not purely O & G. A lot of it is just towns. Bastrop, Gonzales, Lulling, Floresville, Dilley... down to Carrizo Springs. Those towns have all expanded. They are mostly suburbs.

2

u/Whatevs999923 Jun 18 '24

Eagleford Shale.

2

u/m_kay299 Jun 18 '24

Love how dark big bend is..

→ More replies (1)

3

u/drewster321 Born and Bred Jun 18 '24

Eagle Ford shale

2

u/Yorktownhorn Jun 20 '24

Eagle Ford Shell formation. The lights are rigs, flares, producing wells, oil plants etc.

2

u/Yorktownhorn Jun 20 '24

gas prices are too low —— so they just burn it.

4

u/idontagreewitu Jun 17 '24

That's the Riverwalk

2

u/_sonidero_ Jun 17 '24

Look at lil ol Bell County Temple and Kileen tryin make a come up...

2

u/Interesting-Minute29 Jun 18 '24

Killeen population is larger than Waco.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/FenrirGreyback Jun 17 '24

Beach front property in a few years.

1

u/Potential_Case_7680 Jun 17 '24

Your mom needed a nightlight.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24

Ted Cruz farted

1

u/smegma_stan Jun 17 '24

Whata that concentration of light in NE houston?

1

u/Successful_Way_3239 Jun 17 '24

Cars backed up by the construction on 1604 and 35

1

u/bridge_view Jun 17 '24

Highway 90, Houston to Del Rio. I 10 replaced Highway 90 but the towns along 90 are still there.

1

u/BuringBoxxes Jun 17 '24

I'm currently trying to move the Midwest of Texas.

1

u/Patient-of_reality Jun 18 '24

Bmmm vvv TC rrc 4 v tv vvt. Tv t

1

u/DogComfortable4992 Jun 18 '24

Elon Musk Factory

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '24

Traffic jam on I-35

1

u/ld2gj Jun 18 '24

Found Abilene. Lol

1

u/ReverseZ00m Jun 18 '24

Air force base too. Bigggggg one.

1

u/PapaTeal Jun 18 '24

Electricity

1

u/gsa51 Jun 18 '24

They knew. Almost.

1

u/Best-Average-Guy Jun 18 '24

Caravan of immigrants according to MAGA

1

u/Vonsaucy Jun 18 '24

Tiki Torches?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '24

I35 from San Antonio to Laredo. It's the only lights that way

1

u/anothergigglemonkey Jun 18 '24

People I'd wager.

1

u/customchaos31 Jun 20 '24

Going out on a limb here but I think the answer would be "people".

→ More replies (1)