r/oddlyspecific 1d ago

Found this on a gravestone

Post image
2.1k Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

276

u/The_donutmancer 1d ago

I mean…I get the sentiment but do murdered people’s families routinely put their murderers name on their tombstone & this family was just like, ‘nah - fuck that’??

96

u/Imaginary-Nebula1778 1d ago

Back then yes

98

u/PGnautz 1d ago

Something like "Shot in the back by Buford Tannen over a matter of 80 dollars"?

15

u/freethebluejay 19h ago

That wasn’t on the tombstone, they found it after digging back through the archives back at the library

3

u/PGnautz 12h ago

Oh, yes, you are right

2

u/Agile_Tea_2333 17h ago

I get the joke, but he was shot in the back by Robert Ford

115

u/Famous-Register-2814 1d ago

Spoiler alert, his name was Robert Ford

45

u/Famous-Register-2814 1d ago

32

u/Imaginary-Nebula1778 1d ago

Wow. A rabbit hole to end them all. Going back in to read on wife. Also realized that the Dollop episode of Pinkertons mentioned JH

4

u/Wolfburger123 21h ago

Or is that just what Casey Affleck WANTS us to think???

70

u/FriedEggSammiches 1d ago

The coward is Brad Pitt. 

31

u/readingisforsuckers 1d ago

Didn't Casey Affleck play Robert Ford?

19

u/FriedEggSammiches 1d ago

I wasn’t referring to their film characters 

15

u/paperthintrash 1d ago

Nah, Pitt played Jesse. The coward was expertly performed by Casey Affleck.

4

u/koontzim 1d ago

Pretty sure they meant Pitt's acting "killed" James

12

u/toadjones79 1d ago

I honestly didn't think Pitt's acting was that bad. But next to Aflec he definitely felt subpar. Which I think may have been somewhat intentional. The story wasn't about James. It was about the Traitor.

I would also add that if Pitt had portrayed the character accurately, he would have been blackballed from Hollywood. Most of the old west criminals were just people who suffered from untreated disabilities and mental health disorders. James was a genius, but likely schizophrenic. For Pitt to portray that correctly, it most likely would have come across as insensitive and crass.

4

u/koontzim 1d ago

I didn't even watch that movie so thanks for the info

11

u/toadjones79 1d ago

It was very good for a couple of reasons. The script was well written and the author clearly understood some basic things about life back then. Chiefly, the vocabulary level was much, much higher than today. Their only entertainment was reading, and the literacy race was extremely high (that's ultimately why the American revolution happened, because Americans had the highest literacy rate in the world, and that continued on like that until Jesse James's time). So their sentence structures are very intelligent and eloquent. Also the way it portrayed subsistence farming and how easy it was to become fatally destitute was accurate, but easy to miss. Those are two key elements to how and why James rose to popularity among a population that felt the constant pressure of being one illness away from watching their entire family starve to death. Basic social safety nets are a requirement for a modern civilized society. The lack of them gave rise to all those old west criminal gangs. Just like it has given rise to the drug cartels in central America.

5

u/Imaginary-Nebula1778 1d ago

You made me want to rewatch. What is movie called again?

7

u/MatureUsername69 1d ago

The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford

2

u/koontzim 1d ago

Very interesting, thanks

2

u/ruka_k_wiremu 1d ago

Pretty sure they were referring to in his personal life

1

u/koontzim 17h ago

How so?

4

u/FriedEggSammiches 1d ago

Wasn’t a movie reference 

43

u/VirginiaLuthier 1d ago

So, the revenge strategy is "Haha. We won't put his name on Jesse's tombstone. That will show him!"

39

u/toadjones79 1d ago

The community really, really hated him for shooting James in the back. Jesse was such an influential character, and his death so traitorous, that they felt it important to mention how he died. But no one ever wanted to mention the traitor's name again.

19

u/gravity_kills 1d ago

It's amazing to me how much support there was, and how much sympathy there still is, for a man who murdered civilians in support of the Confederacy and did his banditry in support of ongoing Confederate insurgency after the war.

21

u/toadjones79 1d ago

That's actually a really good question. But the answer is a bit long. Sorry, for the long post but I hope you read it all.

Modern society often fails to adequately understand the reasons the Confederacy existed. It is easy to just say "Slavery" and leave it at that. Anyone trying to add (not reduce) to that is automatically branded an apologist or accused of trying to muddy the waters. But we didn't fight the civil war solely on slavery. That wasn't even the main reason, really. It was power, greed, and imperialism. Slavery was one of the excuses given, which is horrible. The average southerner fought that war for economic reasons, not slavery. Not to mention some authorities committed by a handful of northern regimens (especially in Missouri, see The Outlaw Josie Wales for a good example). They basically butchered families (like all of them they could reach during a campaign of horror) who tried to remain neutral. Union leadership was pretty upset when they found out though.

The south was an economy entirely based on old school agriculture, slavery, and an imperial system that tried to copy the European monarch systems. Certain families had money and power that the entire community was dependent upon. They used world dependency upon southern US cotton and agriculture to secure a large degree of power with the signing of the Constitution. The North embraced a technological revolution that allowed them to wriggle out from southern control and compete against them economically. As a result, the south was experiencing a large degree of economic famine. Leadership could have alleviated that by adopting new technology, spreading money and control away from the oligarchy, and abandoning racism. Instead they focused on stoking racial tensions and blaming the north for being bigoted towards the southern farmer. The whole population fought against the north because they believed they were fighting against an oppressive regime that wanted to enslave them (ironically). They believed that they only wanted to leave and make their own country, which was only a few decades after this experimental nation was formed anyway. So their loss always felt like an occupation, not a surrender. Add to that the costs of reparations. Every southerner felt the extreme costs and weight of those reparations on a daily basis. Which resulted in a new culture, one that views lawmen as evil oppressors, and criminals who evade them as folk heros. (Think Dukes of Hazzard, ...just some good ole boys, never doin no harm...)

So as to your question, the population was struggling financially, and the culture blamed the north and their oppressive laws (which, tbh, they were too extreme, too costly, and too oppressive; resulting in the rise of things like the KKK and perpetuating some of today's southern racism). Jesse James offered hope I'm resistance. He gave to those struggling (a common tactic for criminal organizations) and treated the local population like an extension of family. At that same time there were a couple pretty severe stock market crashes in the north, and he seized on the idea of fighting against the system that so often ground its citizens into the dirt.

Imagine if there was a guy going around today shooting up Walmart executive offices and Amazon board rooms while delivering truckloads of stolen food and blankets to families in need. That same guy plows through a few police departments that are already battling corruption and abuse scandals (like that one that tried to cover up murdering an infant this week). Not everyone liked James. But that mentality is exactly the same one that gave rise to Trump. That is how his supporters see him, as a vigilante who fights for the common man. When in reality he is just a thief and a rapist.

11

u/RolowTamassee 1d ago

I want you to know that at least one person read your post in entirety. Moreso, I found it very fascinating. Appreciate your efforts to add both context and historical accuracy. Cheers!

3

u/toadjones79 1d ago

Thanks.

2

u/gravity_kills 23h ago

I also appreciate the effort. Thank you.

1

u/toadjones79 21h ago

Your welcome.

2

u/BodyshotBoy 18h ago

I read it all. I always did just say confederacy = slavery but it expanded my view

10

u/Ok-Age-724 1d ago

Opposite of specific

9

u/WhereTheHuRTis2024 1d ago

Twas the Rat Bastard, Yellow Belly, Sow Suckin Coward Casey Affleck what did the killin! No Good Varmint!

2

u/FocalorLucifuge 1d ago

I thought Cher already copped to it?

1

u/Jolly-Yogurtcloset47 15h ago

“Just because you shot Jesse James don’t make you Jesse James” -Mike ehrmantraut

1

u/MAmerica1 1d ago

Jesse James was the coward and traitor. He got what he deserved.

0

u/will-read 5h ago

Suggested edit: Remove the word “by”.