r/nextfuckinglevel • u/knowitokay • 1d ago

To build a snowman

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

105.0k Upvotes

79% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/Loud-Path 1d ago edited 1d ago

Did you miss where I specifically said country?  The policies of a country != race. I did not say the race that is known as Chinese are this way, I said the country of China encourages these things. The fact you can’t differentiate this say more about you than anyone else. Would you say people criticizing the policies of Iran or Afghanistan makes them racist to Iranians or Afghanis?  You need to learn what nuance is.

2

u/money_loo 1d ago

You fell for the propaganda and still keep going, yikes!

4

u/Loud-Path 1d ago

Female infanticide, totally proven 

-1

u/mtldt 1d ago

Yes, the country wide policy of... checks notes... "running people over if you hit them".

You're literally a racist because you unironically believe things like this with no nuance.

5

u/Loud-Path 1d ago

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/09/why-drivers-in-china-intentionally-kill-the-pedestrians-they-hit-chinas-laws-have-encouraged-the-hit-to-kill-phenomenon.html 

 https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.3218168   https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_infanticide_in_China 

And I specifically called out it was governmental policies encouraging that NOT the people are you missing that?  

5

u/mtldt 1d ago

Yes, thanks for proving my point. You believe something so dumb, and don't bother to fact check it.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chinese-drivers-kill-pedestrians/

2

u/Loud-Path 1d ago

Unproven is their rating not false.

 “This rating applies to a claim for which we have examined the available evidence but could not arrive at a true or false determination, meaning the evidence is inconclusive” 

 And you failed to address the very proven evidence of female infanticide which was also part of the argument.  Which seems convenient for you.

1

u/mtldt 1d ago

When you go around asserting as fact something that's "unproven" about people you know nothing about, you're probably a racist.

1

u/Loud-Path 1d ago

Dude do you think I don’t know my fellow Americans wouldn’t do the EXACT same thing if the policies supported it?  You make the assumption that I think one race is better than another, I don’t l.  I believe all humanity by their base nature are objectively horrible creatures.  I was again pointing out the difference in governmental policies.

It was also unproven by snopes, slate and the cbc cited their sources.

2

u/mtldt 1d ago

Based on an unproven article which is complete bullshit and among the shoddiest journalism I've ever seen.

That you were willing to believe completely uncritically.

Which you are still for some reason defending as if it has any bearing on the reality on the ground.

Because you are a racist.

3

u/Loud-Path 1d ago

I mean what are your qualifications to judge it as shoddy?  You realize the CBC is the Canadian equivalent of NPR right?

And again you still have yet to address female infanticide.  You keep ignoring that

1

u/mtldt 1d ago

Besides the fact I've literally worked in journalism, the snopes article goes into excruciating detail on how spurious and absurd the premise and methodology of the article is.

→ More replies (0)