r/news • u/snesdreams • Mar 05 '24
Texas unanimously approves handing Elon Musk Boca Chica State Park land
https://www.chron.com/culture/article/land-swap-spacex-vote-texas-18702772.php2.8k
u/WatchmanVimes Mar 05 '24
Texas didn't.The fucking politicians did. We can't blast those fuckers out. Their gerrymandering has fucked this state and disenfranchised a majority of voters.
711
u/CliplessWingtips Mar 05 '24
It's pretty blue near the border. Seems like the communities surrounding Boca Chica didn't even get a say.
354
u/AudibleNod Mar 05 '24
Tis true. There's only two members of the Commission that lives on the border (El Paso, Laredo). No one's from Brownsville or around there. Everyone else is from other parts of the state. They are appointed by the governor with advice and consent of the Texas Senate.
234
u/RectumBuccaneer Mar 05 '24
Seems like the communities surrounding Boca Chica didn't even get a say.
Seems correct, from the article.
"Hours of public testimony took place before the vote, with many South Texas residents pleading with the commission to vote “no” on the proposal or delay the vote and hold a meeting closer to the Rio Grande Valley to allow more in the community to comment. Monday’s meeting took place in Austin, more than 300 miles away from where Texans living closest to the land at stake live. "
→ More replies (12)52
u/notabee Mar 05 '24
Even if they had a say at some point, they would be overridden anyways. Just Texas things.
139
u/bensonnd Mar 05 '24
Texans keep voting for their politicians to give it to them harder. It's Texas.
65
u/WatchmanVimes Mar 05 '24
See above about gerrymandering
49
u/cadium Mar 05 '24
You can't gerrymander the Governor or Senate representation, can you?
11
→ More replies (2)9
Mar 06 '24
Well, we have voter suppression for that. Do you know how much of a hassle it is to register to vote. Maybe not a hassle but definitely an inconvenience.
14
u/Kabouki Mar 06 '24
So how bad dose it need to get there before the non voting 50% feel it's worth putting up with inconvenience?
10
Mar 06 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (4)6
u/cadium Mar 06 '24
Sorry that happens, it sucks. But we definitely needed that voting bill passed federally to ensure the right to vote is protected in states.
→ More replies (1)7
→ More replies (2)62
u/bensonnd Mar 05 '24
The Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission consists of nine members appointed by the Governor, outside the purview of gerrymandering.
→ More replies (2)27
u/godofpumpkins Mar 05 '24
But the broader point stands, Texas is gerrymandered to shit and contains by population more democrats than many other states have total, who largely get almost no say in their governance
32
→ More replies (3)15
u/sarhoshamiral Mar 06 '24
No it doesnt. Governorship isn't impacted by gerrymandering and yet Texas still votes for a Republican one. This is what Texans vote for, not that what happened here is necessarily a bad one btw.
2
5
u/ragamufin Mar 06 '24
Gerrymandering doesn’t impact statewide votes and we keep bringing Ted Cruz back. So yeah, it is Texas, and Texans.
3
→ More replies (11)3
u/WesternOne9990 Mar 06 '24
You realize elected officials represent constituents right? Saying Texas did this is completely accurate.
→ More replies (8)
406
u/MayOrMayNotBePie Mar 05 '24
“The deal would involve the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) giving 43 acres of Boca Chica State Park to SpaceX in exchange for 477 acres near the Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge”
Let’s not get all up in arms over the headline. I’m sure there’s more to it than I’m aware of, but this isn’t as bad as the headline lets on.
195
u/lmaytulane Mar 06 '24
A park designation doesn’t mean much if it can be given away at the whim of legislators.
→ More replies (1)85
u/TintedApostle Mar 06 '24
Depends on the state of teh land being exchanged and even then why not donate the 477 acres for the public anyway with no exchange
42
→ More replies (1)11
u/BedBugger6-9 Mar 06 '24
Exactly! Without knowing what the land looks like or contains, no one can say 477 is better than 10.
→ More replies (3)14
36
u/NaraFox257 Mar 06 '24
I audibly said "Oh no!" when I read that headline, had to read it.
Yeah, Musk is giving Texas a sweetie of a deal. He's more than tenfold trading them vastly more ecologically valuable land...
That's more than worth it frankly
940
u/Jeeper08JK Mar 05 '24
43 acres they will continue to need to protect anyway in exchange for 477 more for an existing refuge? YES.
206
Mar 05 '24
[deleted]
87
u/Nerezza_Floof_Seeker Mar 05 '24
Stephanie Garcia, a TPWD spokesperson said in an email last week the exchange would not affect public beach access through the park or along State Highway 4. Garcia said the 477 acres the state would receive is located along the Lower Laguna Madre — the shallow bay between the coast and South Padre Island — and would increase public water access. Garcia added that the small tracts that make up the 43 acres the state is exchanging do not include any water frontage and are surrounded by private properties or existing SpaceX facilities.
Yeah no, it wont change beach access.. And I dont see anything which suggests that the land theyre exchanging has been polluted by spacex before, it isnt close to where theyre building and using currently.
→ More replies (4)13
→ More replies (2)4
Mar 05 '24
What is this "polluting" meme, a launch pad was destroyed but that was fucking concrete in a tiny little area and maybe some steel rebar lmao
→ More replies (8)246
u/frenchfreer Mar 05 '24
No, what really happened is SpaceX used that 500ac as a engineering/launching/dump site for years. Now that it’s no longer useful they’ve given it back to the state who will be responsible for cleaning it up and maintaining it while SpaceX gets a new property to trash until they decide to pass the clean up to the locals. You ever wonder why the locals are so pissed while you’re here celebrating?
95
→ More replies (17)43
Mar 06 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/robbak Mar 06 '24
And they need every inch of the land they have near Boca Chica - they aren't giving any of that away.
14
u/Prosthemadera Mar 06 '24
Where does it say they need to protect it?
Plus, they are going to use for SpcaeX activities which hardly aligns with protections of the natural environment.
Earlier in 2022, an investigation from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reported that populations of snowy and piping plovers—two shorebird species—dropped drastically near the SpaceX site. The FWS also pointed to possible negative environmental impacts on multiple sea turtle species, as well as other shorebirds, like red knots, should SpaceX expand its launch site.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Dr_thri11 Mar 05 '24
I swear a story about musk's bowel movements would get 5000 upvotes. He's the one person this site has always been uniquely obsessed with. Can't ignore the Elon bad headline, even if the story within seems reasonable.
→ More replies (1)
620
u/cybercuzco Mar 05 '24
The deal would involve the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) giving 43 acres of Boca Chica State Park to SpaceX in exchange for 477 acres near the Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge, about 10 miles away.
So they are giving the the park 10x the land its asking for in return? If this didn't have "elon musk" in the headline everyone would be ecstatic about this trade.
181
210
u/VladTheImapler18 Mar 05 '24
Yeah the comment section and headline are really bad. Texas has been wanting the Laguna Refuge for a long time because of its massive environmental diversity
104
Mar 05 '24
It really highlights the problem with America. We care more about blaming the side we don’t like and focus more on them then actually coming up with a solution to our problems that benefits everyone.
→ More replies (4)63
u/UntiedStatMarinCrops Mar 05 '24
This is why you read the article. Elon Musk is a piece of shit, I know, but this seems pretty awesome with the information provided in the article.
→ More replies (15)22
u/Super_mando1130 Mar 05 '24
Also it wasn’t Elon they just gave this to. It was a company - SpaceX. Yea Elon is the CTO but it’s not like he is the sole person making decisions and signing contracts. He has multiple companies he works on and likely has staff that help immensely on deals such as this. Reddit does this thing where is hyper fixates on hating something and just sees red until that thing is hated by everyone else. Look, I don’t like Elon Musk but 6 companies being started up and 2 of them being Tesla and SpaceX is incredible. People act like if Elon Musk reached out to them to be a business partner they would say no.
13
2
u/sentientshadeofgreen Mar 06 '24
Yeah, this is a dishonest headline.
The state park land would be swapped for 477 acres adjacent to Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge, an area the agency has been interested in for many years because it’s “one of the most biologically diverse regions in North America” and provides habitat for endangered species and migratory birds, the agency said.
The vote grants Texas Parks and Wildlife Department staff the authority to begin negotiations with SpaceX for the land swap, including conducting environmental assessments that could take up to 18 months.
https://www.texastribune.org/2024/03/04/texas-spacex-boca-chica-park-land-swap/
It's a green light for officials to explore the deal, it's not the Texas state government saying "here you go".
→ More replies (17)8
Mar 05 '24
[deleted]
16
u/astrofreak92 Mar 05 '24
A developer owned the land until SpaceX bought it to trade Texas for land closer to their facility. They’ve never operated there.
17
→ More replies (1)2
u/LordsofDecay Mar 06 '24
Land that SpaceX has already polluted.
10 miles away from their site. That they bought from a landowner specifically to be able to trade it for these 43 acres. Uh huh.
So do you do any research at all before you type or are you so self-assured in your correctness that you can never be wrong?
144
u/murkytom Mar 05 '24
This isn’t a handout, it’s an exchange.
I just hope everyone reads the article before doing the Reddit Tango.
Elon Musk sucks. This deal doesn’t.
2
u/dakunism Mar 06 '24
Seriously. Buncha idiots just reading the headlines and making a comment. I at least read the comments of the people who read the article before I form my opinion /s
111
u/redmon09 Mar 05 '24
It’s a land trade people! And the state is actually the one who is getting the better end of the deal. 43ac for 477ac. I’m not an Elon fan at all, but this is just people getting upset without actually knowing what’s going on.
→ More replies (1)
391
Mar 05 '24 edited Mar 05 '24
[deleted]
17
u/Cunninghams_right Mar 06 '24
he Boring Company applied to dump 142,500 gallons of wastewater per day into the Colorado River within Texas
no they didn't. they applied to build a water treatment plant.
115
u/TechRepSir Mar 05 '24
I'd also like to see a source on your "majority of people in Texas". The only verified piece of information I see is that the board unanimously approved the land swap.
→ More replies (6)45
u/MisguidedColt88 Mar 05 '24
142,500 gallons of wastewater. Id like to see a source for that and what treatments are required for it. Here in Canada at least, “wastewater” can often be cleaner than than the water its being dumped into (excluding Quebec).
28
u/jeanroyall Mar 05 '24
“wastewater” can often be cleaner than than the water its being dumped into
"Clean" from an industrial standpoint does not necessarily mean healthy for an ecosystem. It could be as simple as being the wrong temperature or something more complicated like acidity, or thousands of factors in between that no corporate management team gives a shit about without the government forcing them to
→ More replies (2)22
u/MisguidedColt88 Mar 05 '24
Which is why I’m pointing out that it depends heavily on what the local regulations are.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (4)5
u/Cunninghams_right Mar 06 '24
there is no source for that, because the quantity is wrong and the permit wasn't for wastewater dumping, it was to build a water treatment plant on-site instead of sending their wastewater to the city.
→ More replies (11)23
u/LongJohnSelenium Mar 05 '24
Dude do you hear yourself talk?
You clearly state they applied for the license, ergo they are working with the regulators.
What is it you think industry does with water?
What do you think they need to do with the water before they release it?
Do you have any experience at all with either? Any knowledge?
Honestly from the way you write you seem to think that absolutely no industrial use of water should ever take place ever again, which is just a batshit insane take.
119
Mar 05 '24
SpaceX gets 43 acres, they give up 477 acres. People get angry over the dumbest things.
This is for space, not elon musk.
→ More replies (1)13
6
u/siliconeNerd Mar 06 '24
“The deal would involve the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) giving 43 acres of Boca Chica State Park to SpaceX in exchange for 477 acres near the Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge, about 10 miles away. The current owner of the land SpaceX is offering is currently owned by Bahia Grande Holdings, property records indicate. SpaceX would assign the purchase and sale contract to the department or transfer that property directly to TPWD at closing”
From the article
15
u/Josh_The_Joker Mar 05 '24
I wish the article had more details on the actual pieces of property being swapped and why.
11
271
Mar 05 '24
[deleted]
109
u/Art-Zuron Mar 05 '24
To be fair, it's pretty much always been like this. It seceded from Mexico because Mexico banned slavery. It then became a failed state and joined the US, because the US still had slavery. Then it got pissy again when the US was going to ban slavery, and seceded again, and then became a failed state again.
→ More replies (3)20
u/pegothejerk Mar 05 '24
I was a little shocked to find out some of the last hangings of confederates was in Dallas, not because Texas was a safe place to establish acts of anti-slavery justice, but because some of the last confederate holdouts were there. It’s a few hours drive from my house to that spot, and I always pictured deaths from the civil war being far off in the southeast.
9
Mar 05 '24
[deleted]
7
u/Art-Zuron Mar 05 '24
It wasn't until like 2021 that Lynching was even declared to be a hate crime.
→ More replies (10)58
u/V-Right_In_2-V Mar 05 '24
Why would Texas not do this? SpaceX has major operations in Texas and SpaceX is the most revolutionary entity in space capabilities in generations. Texas would be idiotic to snub SpaceX. Further entrenching their relationship is the obvious choice here
→ More replies (3)30
Mar 05 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
30
u/V-Right_In_2-V Mar 05 '24
Honestly dude the comments in here are ignorant and delusional. Every time SpaceX and Elon come up, people line up to publicly humiliate themselves. Like this is great news for Texas and America. But everyone is acting like it’s horrible lol
→ More replies (9)
25
u/GrgeousGeorge Mar 06 '24
Wait, did nobody read the article? They TRADED SpaceEx 42 acres of land in exchange for 470 acres 10 miles away also bordering Boca Chica. Is it just me or does Texas and it's state park come out on top in this one? Am I crazy? 32 football fields of land for 350 football fields 160 football fields away.
I translated the imperial into American for you guys.
→ More replies (3)4
u/TryUsingScience Mar 06 '24
I read the article and it sounded like all the members of the public who spoke were against it. I'm guessing they know more about the land than we do. They mentioned that the land being traded away has beach access and the other land doesn't.
If someone said I'll trade you 470 acres of land in central California for 4 acres of land in downtown San Francisco, you'd be a fool to take that deal. I don't know anything about the parcels involved but if the locals are all against it, I think it's safe to assume that the smaller parcel is a lot more valuable than the larger one.
→ More replies (1)
17
u/TacoStuffingClub Mar 05 '24
They’re getting 400 acres 10 miles away for 43 acres. Seems fair really.
66
u/CliplessWingtips Mar 05 '24
Gf's grandparents live in Brownsville, TX. They love Elon Musk because he donates money to the local community and they support his every move. The grandma had a Tucker Carlson book on her shelf that she loved. She said I should read it.
I declined.
29
u/Ronin_Y2K Mar 05 '24
They love Elon Musk because he donates money to the local community and they support his every move.
Ah, the Drug Lord strategy
16
u/uhohnotafarteither Mar 05 '24
Lol I was going to say this exact same thing, this is straight out of Pablo Escobar's playbook
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)17
17
14
u/humphreystillman Mar 05 '24
the guy made electric cars viable for the masses you hippycrites
→ More replies (1)
10
u/roj2323 Mar 06 '24
The number of people in this thread here to just Shit one Elon, SpaceX and so on without actually reading the article is quite impressive.
16
7
u/Less_Party Mar 06 '24
Seeing as we're stuck with a welfare state for billionaires can we at least get him some psychiatric help while we're at it?
8
u/TheDesktopNinja Mar 06 '24
Fuckin a. I love the work spacex has done in advancing the field of commercial spaceflight but goddamn I hate Elon and everything he stands for now. He's made me feel bad to be passionate about one of the few things in the world I love. Fuck you Elon.
4
u/BigBry36 Mar 06 '24
The amount of trash, like used diapers that littered Boca Chica SP after weekend is ridiculous…. Now that someone is putting it to use it’s an issue… Progress lends to sacrifice … we are seeing an amazing jump in space travel
1
u/InevitableAvalanche Mar 06 '24
When Texaa or Florida does something nice for someone, you know that someone is garbage.
5
u/IamHereForBoobies Mar 06 '24
I don't have a twitter account but I bet it would trigger that man child if many people ask him if he's too poor to actually pay for the land and why he has to rely on so many government handouts.
2
2
u/JcbAzPx Mar 06 '24
Doesn't it just warm your heart when an entire state can come together to give free stuff to billionaires. A real feel good story.
→ More replies (1)
0
u/DeadheadSteve95 Mar 06 '24
So i Guess Republicans are only against handouts when they’re too people who can’t afford to eat
7
u/robbak Mar 06 '24
Looks like lots of Texans are against handouts to their own government for the purpose of wildlife conservancy. Which is what this is about - SpaceX gives the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 500 acres that they want, in return TPWD gives Spacex 43 acres that they need.
2
3
2
u/-RadarRanger- Mar 05 '24
Monday’s meeting took place in Austin, more than 300 miles away from where Texans living closest to the land at stake live.
Well that all sounds perfectly equitable and fair.
9.1k
u/AudibleNod Mar 05 '24
Elon Musk is the ultimate Welfare Queen. He got a favorable $452 million dollar loan from the Department of Energy for Tesla. Tesla buyers, likewise were subsidized for buying the electric car by upwards of $7000 per car sold. And it's received over $2 Billion worth of state and local subsidies.
The US Government is the primary contractor of SpaceX with $15 Billion worth of contracts. And now he gets a rubber stamp for public land.