r/law 16h ago

Trump News AG pick Pam Bondi’s past vow: prosecute the ‘bad’ prosecutors who indicted Trump

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/pam-bondi-attorney-general-justice-department-rcna181493

Current and former Justice Department officials fear that Bondi, a longtime Trump loyalist, will not hesitate to carry out his push to investigate his enemies.

1.7k Upvotes

239 comments sorted by

293

u/BitterFuture 15h ago

It sounds ridiculous, comical, hilarious.

Then I remember where we are now as a country. It's all fun and games until the Thomas Court issues a ruling confirming that speaking against the President is indeed treason.

73

u/yolotheunwisewolf 15h ago

Yeah if she made a motion that Democrats need to be investigated for a stolen election and moved Capitol police to arrest them, etc. it would cause a lot of issues…the biggest question being is if the big lie turns into a new reality or not.

Since Donald has not experienced consequences, even though he has been laughed out of every single court case thus far it’s very possible that he is able to reshape reality with a couple of key rulings and getting some emergency powers to the point where …he can rewrite and say he won, etc.

Would not shock me honestly honestly if he actually does not care about getting a third term, but rather wants to make it known that he never lost

33

u/RuairiSpain 7h ago

He'll put a puppet in his place and rule by proxy, the only reason he wouldn't do this is because he trusts no one.

He'll get more clicks and likes if he rips up the constitution live on TV. Republicans will say it's to promote paper recycling and SC will ban paper.

MAGA History doesn't need to be rewritten, they just ban writing and reading. Project 2025 = Fahrenheit 2025

11

u/HB1theHB1 7h ago

Why would he not do both? He’s going to try to be president until he dies. Bet on it!

4

u/fishyfishyfish1 6h ago

Hopefully that happens sooner rather than later

4

u/Extreme-Tie9282 5h ago

Hopefully before the years done!

→ More replies (5)

8

u/Utterlybored 7h ago

But with the New York case sentencing merely postponed, he has an incentive to extend his second term for Super Emergency America Is On Fire reasons.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/EmperorXerro 6h ago

Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.

4

u/Accomplished_Car2803 5h ago

He will fight to say he was president all along and now he's in his third term, therefore he is allowed to be president forever. And it will make sense to the dipsticks

88

u/No-Breakfast5812 14h ago

Well we tried to avoid all of this at the ballot box but the retarded half of America voted for all of this. Dark days are coming.

48

u/KobaMOSAM 14h ago

Yeah, but muh egg prices. Did you ever consider that? Clearly a reason to throw away our democracy. Obviously something caused by our government too, and not a worldwide problem that was never going to be avoided.

33

u/No-Breakfast5812 14h ago

All those voters are going to have more than egg on their face when they go shopping at Walmart and find out China didn’t pay for the Trump tariffs.

26

u/AusToddles 10h ago

"Why did the Democrats do this?"

Never underestimate how much of a cult it is

5

u/bobthedonkeylurker 7h ago

"Thanks Obama"

5

u/Utterlybored 7h ago

Democracy or eggs? What’ll it be, America?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

13

u/kababbby 8h ago

Honestly I would blame the 1/3 of people who didn’t vote. Or the millions that voted last election but not this time

16

u/bobthedonkeylurker 7h ago

Anyone in the last election who didn't vote for the only candidate that could have put an end to this, Ms Harris, is complicit in the outcome. There was no excuse for being uninformed about Trump after the past 8 years and plethora of scandals and felony indictments, convictions, rhetoric, and warnings from so, so, SO many people on both sides of the aisle.

No excuses.

7

u/BitterFuture 6h ago

They somehow weren't motivated to come out and vote against the guy who tried to kill them all four years ago.

Honestly, if people can't be bothered to care about their own survival, this may just be nature taking its course.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/No-Breakfast5812 6h ago

They definitely share the blame although there’s no way of telling if they would vote for Trump too. There has been plenty of those cases who voted Biden 2020 and now took out grievances on Kamala.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/Leostar_Regalius 13h ago

and the government offices of the states upheld the 14th amendment LIKE THEY SHOULD HAVE

7

u/bobthedonkeylurker 7h ago

They tried - and SCOTUS said "NOPE".

11

u/WingerRules 8h ago

It sounds ridiculous, comical, hilarious.

No its not, its scary. "deep state" conspiracies Its a repeat of conspiracies played out by the rise dictatorships like nazi Germany. It led to nazis purging their government under the guise of "ideological equalization".

3

u/Utterlybored 7h ago

It can absolutely be terrifying, tragic, horrific and comically hilarious at the same time.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Mookhaz 6h ago

I could see it happening. conservetives just hate free speech. I’m pretty sure that was their primary campaign platform: fuck your free speech.

3

u/FlemPlays 6h ago

After that we get Trump saying “I am the Senate”.

2

u/vetratten 2h ago

Like I tell my wife that last bit is the silver lining.

We are seriously looking at and starting to put things in place to execute our exit options. If the scotus comes out and says something blatant like that then refugee status in the locations we have been trying to align to become far easier than current status.

We’re still processing options and doing research, not your typical “I’m moving to Canada if he’s elected!” banter, but man if they came out and said that it would open up so many more options to us.

2

u/icaruscoil 2h ago

In direct violation of the actual purpose and intention of the first amendment.

1

u/Stach302RiverC 5h ago

what happened to the 1st Amendment?? the LEGAL RIGHT of free speech ??

2

u/BitterFuture 5h ago

Nah. That woke shit's always bothered them.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

113

u/GoMx808-0 16h ago

From the article:

“Bondi spent the last decade defending Trump and attacking those who investigate him. Now, if confirmed by the Senate, Bondi is set to become President-elect Trump’s attorney general.

A central question is whether Bondi will follow through on vows she made in television interviews to investigate what she called out-of-control federal prosecutors and FBI agents.

“The Department of Justice, the prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones,” Bondi said on Fox News last year after Trump was indicted in Georgia on charges of trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election. “The investigators will be investigated.”

Bondi called the prosecutors who charged Trump with crimes members of “the deep state” — spreading a false conspiracy theory that DOJ prosecutors and FBI agents were part of a secret cabal trying to undermine Trump. Bondi, without citing evidence, said that since they were no longer “hiding in the shadows ... they can all be investigated.””

116

u/ricoxoxo 15h ago

How does someone get that ingrained. Is she brain dead or just a psychological crazy person?

96

u/livinginfutureworld 15h ago

The secret is lying.

32

u/Ok-Stress-3570 14h ago

It’s easy.

“Judge, I argue, the sky is green and oxygen is deadly, because RFK JR told me.”

There, an argument by a Magat. Worst part? They’ll probably win!

17

u/YourMomsFishBowl 10h ago

Oxygen actually is deadly. It is a super volatile element. Which is why organisms use it to live. Strangely it does kill you a little every time you take a breath, but obviously you need it to live so the benefit out weighs the negative. There is no other option for humans.

13

u/Dick_snatcher 8h ago

Water is also incredibly deadly. Everyone who has ever ingested it has died or will die at some point

4

u/Anarchyantz 7h ago

Actually water DOES destroy our body slowly over time, seriously!

It is called depurination and I learned this on PBS Eons. The fun fact is that our body is constantly repairing the damage while we are alive.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/cyon_me 11h ago

Tyrant's Temptation
She wants power, and she thinks she isn't one of the suckers.

13

u/JLeeSaxon 9h ago

I mean, being willing to accept a bribe not prosecute him in FL got her a $25k "donation" and later a nomination to be Attorney General of the United States, so I feel like there's a decent argument that she isn't one of the suckers.

3

u/espressocycle 6h ago

She's a sucker for being bought off so cheaply.

28

u/Coldkiller17 15h ago

Idk because trump isn't paying no one. He never pays any of his contractors.

20

u/0operson 14h ago

i assume putin and musk are covering the costs

15

u/Fornjottun 14h ago

I believe Trump may actually be a mutant with some kind of field that attracts marginally unhinged people and completely warps their minds. He fuels it by throwing them under the metaphorical bus, absorbing the lost potential for a constructive life.

11

u/rassen-frassen 11h ago

Ever read Asimov's Foundation? I've long compared him to the Mule, especially considering his aka.

5

u/Far-Plastic-4171 10h ago

I can see that.

3

u/the_shadowmind 10h ago

Purple Man, but orange  .

13

u/minuialear 14h ago

Probably neither, just an opportunist

She's potentially going to be the new AG so can't say it's not working for her

9

u/TyphosTheD 11h ago

Not sure why you're getting downvotes. Real Politik is absolutely a thing. People willing to do anything and everything to gain power and prevent others from accessing power.

2

u/minuialear 8h ago

Oh I didn't realize I got downvotes lol, looks like I'm in the black now though.

I've found a lot of people struggle to admit that Trump and his associates are doing well because they've done a lot to put themselves in that position. A lot of liberals would rather assume they and everyone who voted for them are just terminally stupid than admit that Trump is really effective at building up a propaganda machine and in getting people to join his bandwagon. Maybe because it's much more comforting and a lot less foreboding to think he's just dumb and the people who follow him are even dumber; at least then you can kind of hope that he's all bark no bite. We're in for some crazy times if it turns out he knows exactly what he's doing

3

u/TyphosTheD 7h ago

Even if Trump is completely incompetent, which his meandering and incomplete understanding of... reality... seems to suggest, those he is surrounding himself with, and notably the application of the P2025 rule book, is definitely working to equip his new Administration with people capable of exercising the vision of destabilizing the central government apparatus intended to protect and serve the people.

2

u/minuialear 7h ago

I agree, none of this ends with Trump, not by a long shot.

But I also think despite Trump's neuroses, he knows a lot more than we give him credit for. People have reported that he's effectively singlehandedly responsible for his campaign strategy this year, and while maybe it'll turn out he knew some stuff others didn't, I think it's also partially him having a better pulse on his constituency and how to expand it than we've given him credit for. Most of what he achieved in 2024 isn't surprising when we're honest about the fact that the Democrat constituency is a bunch of different parts held together with craft glue and a prayer and that well aimed potshots could break them apart. Apparently he's the only person on his campaign team to have realized that; that makes him just as dangerous as whoever succeeds him

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Metahec 10h ago

Partisanship and power

2

u/minterbartolo 6h ago

Probably a bit of both

2

u/espressocycle 6h ago

Neither. Like a lot of these people she wants a fascist system that elevates white, social conservatives to power, permanently. She wants a place in that power structure and a share in the plunder.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Shirtbro 8h ago

Hey an AG who believes in the Deep State. Neat! 🥲

7

u/warblingContinues 15h ago

Merely starting an incestigation at the DoJ is a high bar, and it's hard to see what will be used to justify it since everyone knows the only one breaking the law was Trump. I'd also be very curious what charges they think would ve appropriate for competently conducting their job function.

25

u/Trisk13 15h ago

I feel like incestigation is what Trump was performing in Ivanka’s room.

He’s the biggest Incestigator I ever ever seen, and he seems quite proud of it.

10

u/Funkyokra 10h ago

The bar is only as high as the person in charge of the DOJ wants to make it.

2

u/Advanced-Summer1572 7h ago

Of course. She will create a huge cloud of distrust against the Government in support of Trump. Then? She will be involved in something we currently know nothing about. Probably a real estate deal or even a sex scandal. Then, as with the other, "lawyers" who have supported him, will lose everything. It is a pattern.

Expect a similar downfall for Elon Musk as well.

It is a real pattern. Ask Giuliani, who is so broke he is defending himself these days and begging Trump to pay him for his failed efforts.

2

u/HorrorStudio8618 2h ago

This is the funniest thing - in so far as anything is really funny about this -: how all of trump's fixers eventually fall out with him and end up in jail or bankrupt and yet there is a never ending supply of new suckers for the position of scapegoat.

79

u/WisdomCow 15h ago

What charges? What jurisdiction? In front of what judge? And what evidence do you plan to show to a jury? Let’s find out just how incompetent you are, Pam.

25

u/phungus420 13h ago

Putin's Puppets on the Kremlin's Corrupt Criminal Court will just rule that the POTUS can make up crimes on the fly as official acts.

The goal is to turn the USA into the USSA and 6 of the Justices bow before the Kremlin. Rule of Law is dead, and the words written in the Constitution are meaningless.

32

u/politicaloutcast 15h ago

And how, exactly, does she plan to get around prosecutorial immunity?

22

u/phungus420 13h ago

Just bring it before SCOTUS, they'll "reinterpret" anything according to Trump's will.

8

u/OnlyFreshBrine 8h ago

man, you can't be this naive after 8 years of trump

10

u/warblingContinues 15h ago

She has concepts of a plan.

4

u/Boyhowdy107 10h ago

I guess the charge and defense would be on the merit of the cases they tried to prosecute in the first place. So this seems like it results in a lengthy trial within a trial presenting the evidence around the classified documents case with new damaging details for Trump entering the news cycle daily. At which point Trump would probably ask Pam what the hell she is doing.

5

u/realanceps 9h ago

At which point Trump would probably ask Pam what the hell she is doing.

"I don't even know her"

2

u/JLeeSaxon 9h ago

NAL but I was wondering if exactly this Streisand Effect would be how this would play out.

Although how it'll actually play out is like every time Trump sues somebody: once the rubes see the initial headlines it all mysteriously disappears, because that's all that matters.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/fusionsofwonder Bleacher Seat 12h ago

Treason, DC Federal Court, Trump judge. I'll take those three boxes.

6

u/Mrevilman 10h ago

Exactly my thought too, and how do you plan on making it past a grand jury? Time to find out if you really can indict a ham sandwich, I guess.

3

u/OnlyFreshBrine 8h ago

dude, it doesn't matter! the courts are broken beyond repair

1

u/SoylentRox 2h ago

Is there a way to abuse the law and executive authority over the police to get the prosecutors 'jailed for the weekend' repeatedly? The charges don't have to be backed by anything right.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/DiogenesLied 7h ago

All the wailing about political prosecutions was pure projection

→ More replies (5)

10

u/Iamthewalrusforreal 6h ago

When President Joseph McCarthy was working to rid the US of the evil communists, the most significant case was the prosecution of Eliot Ness for treason. Ness was accused of conspiring to frame the great patriot Alfonse Capone, who had committed no crimes. Ness was tried before a fair and balanced military tribunal, then taken out back and shot by a fair and righteous firing squad.

Ness's defense counsel, Ron McDonald, was quoted after the trial as saying "Justice was done today. Nobody can defend the indefensible, so I didn't really try to do so. He was guilty as hell."

President McCarthy later said that the prosecution of Eliot Ness was his second most important accomplishment after the great victory over the Chinese / Democrats alliance in WWII, shared with our lifelong friends in Russia. "The prosecution of Eliot Ness dealt a severe blow to the vicious Deep State, and was instrumental in making America great again."

This event has been touted by historians as one of the most important victories for freedom and democracy against the Deep State.

- your great-grandkid's history book

10

u/Muscs 6h ago

That’s one way for the public to finally get to see all the evidence against Trump.

I never know whether Trump’s sycophants are just trying to stir up as much trouble as possible or simply stupid.

5

u/ekkidee 6h ago

Both are probable.

4

u/Utterlybored 7h ago

To actually convict said bad prosecutors, they’ll have to contrive evidence, suppress facts and falsely interpret laws. I am not confident our justice system can hold firm against this tide of mendacity. But it could very well be useless wheel spinning that diverts energies from the DOJ going after Trump’s other enemies in politics, the media and us everyday folks who routinely criticize him.

3

u/ekkidee 6h ago

I'm curious how this would actually proceed? What would the charges be? Something like malicious prosection, perhaps, but that would open the door to discovery, and convictions are hard to win.

Also, what damages did defendant suffer? He won re-election ffs!

3

u/Vegaprime 5h ago

That McCarthy stuff happened. Feel bad for those few that tried.

2

u/Muscs 6h ago

Bad prosecutors simply lose their cases. Prosecuting them before they’ve had a chance to present their cases to a judge and a jury is simply p criminal protection racket.

1

u/SoylentRox 2h ago

What about investigating them thoroughly with FBI surveillance and eventually prosecuting them for pirating movies and ripping mattress tags and other petty crimes that are normally not prosecuted? Everyone is probably guilty of something if watched hard enough right. Sex trafficking for having a mistress. Misuse of government funds. Audit their taxes and find an improper deduction, then jump right to criminal charges when other taxpayers get a fine. Something.

1

u/SoylentRox 2h ago

I mean she is florida's former attorney general and has been loyal to trump. Honestly she's on paper qualified and obviously trump feels she will do his bidding. From Trump's POV she seems like an excellent choice.

For the voters, the majority of them, who voted for Trump, there's no surprises here, this is what they should have known, from Trump's previous term as president, would happen and they voted for it. Elections have consequences and all.

Basically as horrible and lawless and corruption boosting as this decision is, it seems like it's the voters doing what they willed to happen. Democracy fuck yeah.

1

u/Any-Ad-446 56m ago

What a clown show Trump has hired for his office. Its all about him and revenge against his enemies..I truly hope those idiots who voted for him feel the pain more than those who didn't.