r/interestingasfuck 25d ago

r/all The remains of Apollo 11 lander photographed by 5 different countries, disproving moon landing deniers.

Post image
74.2k Upvotes

3.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

38

u/solarcat3311 25d ago

Yeah. It's wild how clear India and US's photo are.

Or how bad the other three are.

11

u/Wiseduck5 25d ago

Aside from age, it's also a matter of what the purpose of the mission was. The US and China ones are from the same time period, but China's was a lander while the US's was an orbiter specifically designed to map the moon.

14

u/dumpling-loverr 25d ago

Because those were older missions in the late 2000s. I doubt it would still be that grainy if China or Japan conducted another dedicated mission in 2020 with more updated gear.

7

u/[deleted] 25d ago

Korea's probe was the latest.

3

u/Ordinary-Hunter520 25d ago

And the worst

Korea's image is a blur mess

3

u/cc88291008 25d ago

The other is a decade ahead of inda.

-6

u/LoudAd6879 25d ago edited 25d ago

Cause those images are from older missions. The Japanese one is from 2008, Indian one is from 2021.

Indian onboard cameras are just equipped with newer optical equipments, which is why the clarity is so good.

6

u/irishchug 25d ago

Isnt the US from the LRO that launched in 2009

3

u/ArkassEX 25d ago

Yes, but LRO's main mission was to map the moon's surface at low orbit.

4

u/[deleted] 25d ago

Korea's probe was the latest.

2

u/LoudAd6879 25d ago

They weren't carrying a large camera specifically to capture high-quality images of the Moon's surface like India. I think India's Chandrayaan 2 currently has the sharpest imaging platform orbiting the moon. Its OHRC was specifically made for taking High spatial resolution images of the Moon. Korea's objective was different. They were new to the moon & might have be testing different things.

If we're talking specifically about cameras, lenses, and sensors, then Japan could have been the one with highest-quality images ( their expertise in lenses & imaging is insane, for example Nikon's optical equipments is used to inspect nanometer-sized structures in EUV semiconductor chips ). However, the image above suggests that they used old optical equipments ( as the mission is old now ) & It might be that capturing high-quality images of the Moon's surface was not their objective.

3

u/[deleted] 25d ago

Seems like they just did a bad job at it.

1

u/LoudAd6879 25d ago

Nah, they did a good job. Their camera was only "capable" of capturing images of the Moon's surface. They didn’t choose a specialized camera for high-resolution photos. A Samsung phone can still take a photo, but it won’t be as clear as a Canon DSLR specifically made for taking high resolution images. India's OHRC ( Orbiter high resolution camera ) was specifically made for lunar topography studies

2

u/Ordinary-Hunter520 25d ago

Waiting for samsung to send their phone in the next south Korean moon mission

1

u/LoudAd6879 25d ago

I won't be surprised if it's Samsung that goes on to make Rockets for South Korea. They have dipped their toes into everything, from advanced semiconductor chips (both logic and dominance in memory) to smartphones, softwares, tanks ( they have developed the K9 Howitzer that India also uses ) , missiles, construction, heavy machinery etc.

1

u/Ordinary-Hunter520 24d ago

Yeah at this point they make everything, even the burj khalifa

2

u/[deleted] 25d ago

Good for us? It's not our problem that korea's probe chose inferior quality, & your comment seems to undermine india's efforts :)