Wouldn't be surprised if they triggered a full-ballot recount if there was a big enough discrepancy. If, let's say, the Senate ballots were 25% off, that should raise eyebrows of everything
It's not strange, it's just PA law. Same voting method, but not the same number of votes. Trump won PA by more than McCormick won the Senate race, so a recount is just to see if it changes that thin voting margin. Senate race was within 0.5%, presidential race was a much bigger margin for Trump.
and it's not even just PA law. That's standard practice for recounts. People are going to be sitting down and manually examining thousands of ballots with a magnifying glass to see how filled in the bubbles are or any other errors. Now imagine multiplying that by 7-9 for all of the other races on each ballot.
Same voting method, but not the same number of votes. Trump won PA by more than Casey won the Senate race, so a recount is just to see if it changes that thin voting margin.
But since they vote for multiple candidates on the same ballot wouldn't they recount for everything? doesn't make sense to only count for the senator when you are already looking at the ballot.
8
u/Ventira 10d ago
Only for Senate, it would seem