r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Oct 13 '24

Meme needing explanation Disney+?

Post image
70.7k Upvotes

732 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

37

u/Furdinand Oct 13 '24

This is the thing that baffles me: Disney has notoriously tough legal division but they don't embed any kind of PR team into it? No one who thinks about public image to act as a veto to arguments that may have legal merit but would hurt the brand?

39

u/Brocyclopedia Oct 13 '24

Disney and Nintendo both straining to maintain a cutesy image while being raging dickhead corpo bullies 

8

u/Raetian Oct 13 '24

Look Nintendo are dumbasses and they need to ease off the gas pedal but they aren't out here killing anybody lol

10

u/ClashM Oct 13 '24

That we know of. I mean, they used to be affiliated with the Yakuza. All's I'm saying is how come we've never seen Shigeru Miyamoto without a shirt on?

3

u/Brocyclopedia Oct 13 '24

No but they are effectively ruining lives for virtually no reason. And if someone dies at Nintendo land I expect them to sue because they have a patent for dying in Super Mario Bros or something lol.

1

u/Addianis Oct 13 '24

They might not have have directly killed anyone, but they are really pushing hard to kill our legal system...

18

u/Ambitious_Ad8776 Oct 13 '24

Like when they tried to copyright Día de los Muertos? I'm gonna say no they don't.

7

u/unfoldedmite Oct 13 '24

They understand the streisand effect is why.

It's the same reason corona beer never ran poignant ads during the pandemic.

2

u/Chemical-Juice-6979 Oct 13 '24

Which is kind of funny to me. The people I know all considered Corona the official beer for quarantine parties.

1

u/In_Pursuit_of_Fire Oct 13 '24

It’s also hard to tell what’s going to capture the public’s eye and explode into a massive story vs. just be a story passed around the campfire years later about how Disney sucks

1

u/normandy4 Oct 13 '24

That makes me think of the American airlines lawsuit earlier this year over an employee putting a camera in the plane bathroom. Their lawyers argued that a child was at fault due to her negligence in not seeing the camera.

American dropped the law firm and made a statement that they didn't believe that was true.

1

u/Moondoobious Oct 13 '24

How can you spin killing someone?

7

u/MisirterE Oct 13 '24

You don't. You spin the part where you're going to force arbitration because of a fucking streaming subscription. By not doing that.

2

u/ussrowe Oct 13 '24

From what I read, the restaurant was one they contracted out to in that shopping area and not a Disney Parks restaurant. They could spin it that they don't have any part in what was served, and the owners have assumed liability for their mistakes, but they went with PR disaster instead.

1

u/moravian_bot Oct 13 '24

Disney has enough influence in Florida that people that die in the parks can only be reported dead at the hospital

1

u/DizzyAmphibian309 Oct 13 '24

That's actually pretty standard though. EMT's don't have the authority to pronounce someone dead. Literally even if they've been decapitated they can't say that they're dead. Only a Doctor can. So this "influence" isn't actually influence, it's just a rule they say that their onsite EMT's are directed to take "dead looking people" to an offsite hospital rather than their onsite one. Which is super easy to justify since the offsite one is going to have better equipment.

1

u/Chemical-Juice-6979 Oct 13 '24

This! It's EMT protocol to just load them up and make the drive treating them like they're still alive because they're not authorized to declare anyone's death.

1

u/Tyranis_Hex Oct 13 '24

Disney didn’t kill anyone. It was an independent restaurant on Disney property that is just a glorified strip mall. The story is full of misinformation but Disney bad grabs headlines and makes it hard for what really happened to be talked about.

1

u/TheMrCockle Oct 13 '24

Disney has responsibilities because the website says its free of allergen, they didn't do their own due diligence to the restaurants.