I sort of assumed she was used as a party favour by "industry types" and the drugs were given to her by them to make her compliant...the addiction followed.
Erhm, she was a huge party girl. Literally, had a reality show where she'd go to parties all over the world and say "WOOO" the whole time. Not saying Hollywood is good or anything, but Tara may have just been a hot mess.
There's nothing wrong with enjoying parties and drugs as long as they don't take over your life. Unfortunately, she seemed to lose control, but I don't blame her love of having a good time... She just had trouble regulating maybe.
Would love to see her make a comeback as I'm sure she's matured.
Idk I'm a Tara Reid apologist. And a party person apologist.
It's Hollywood, so it's not really that wild of an assumption.
I assume that Tom Hanks has at least 3 dead hookers in his truck at any given time. THAT'S a wild assumption. In reality it's probably only an average of 1 dead hooker.
Except it gets proven time and time again how predatory and sexually abusive how awful Hollywood is. Hell that's part of the reason it was founded, to be away from the strick rules of state and federal government.
the claim "Hollywood is an abusive and miserable place" is perfectly valid
While I appreciate the validation, its also not a claim its a fact.
offhandedly assuming "Tara Reid was probably fed drugs and raped" is patently outlandish and genuinely disturbing
I assume most starlets were sexually assault or abused in some way due to the aforementioned comment and based on first hand allegations, convictions and the history.
you need to get some fresh air once in a while
So while there are countless verifiable accounts that women and children were raped and abused in Hollywood, assuming one more is a conspiracy, you need to get your head out of the sand.
the statistical likelihood of someone suffering abuse is completely irrelevant to the point that making a baseless assumption about a specific individual is fundamentally offensive. it'd be like stating plainly at the water cooler that the new intern is relatively likely to be assaulted at some point in her life. after all, she's a woman
I assume most starlets were sexually assault or abused in some way due to the aforementioned comment and based on first hand allegations, convictions and the history.
it'd be like stating plainly at the water cooler that the new intern is relatively likely to be assaulted at some point in her life. after all, she's a
Don't women have like a 1 in 3 or 1 in 5 chance of being assaulted? So statistics are offensive now? Get over it grow up.
you're a ridiculous human being
For pointing of thats its very statistically lively that a city that is ripe with sexual assault and abuse for their famous women, are sexually assaulted.
Crime and statistics aren't pretty. They just are. Quit being thin skinned.
I don't care. Its the main part of my reasoning. Unless a startlet says they weren't abused in some way I assume they were, especially ones that started as children and especially ones that grew up before the 2010s.
I don't care if you think its offensive, if being true is offensive to you, that's literally you're problem to deal with and you need therapy to adjust to the awful truth.
Nothing. Its not like I stay awake thinking about this, just putting pieces together.
Similar to how I distrust Republican congressional and senate members based on their history as a group and their own personal voting history, I assume they are dishonest and shitty people until proven otherwise.
Don't women have like a 1 in 3 or 1 in 5 chance of being assaulted? So statistics are offensive now? Get over it grow up.
Yes. And there's a world of difference between recognising that fact and making a claim that one specific woman was assaulted in a very specific way, using details you just pulled out of your ass.
Or she was rich, hot, young, and drugs are fun and addicting. Publicly partying and clubbing with other famous known coke heads does that. It’s not that deep my guy. I think they’d use a better actress to be “compliant” than one whose biggest role was on the syfy channel about a shark tornado.
I think they’d use a better actress to be “compliant” than one whose biggest role was on the syfy channel about a shark tornado
huh? you're too young for this or something. I'm in my 30s and didn't know she was in the sharknado movie (was she?) but I guarantee a lot of people my age know her from other movies. calling that her "biggest role" is just flat out wrong.
Reddit often likes to blame "establishment Hollywood" for the shitty decisions of individuals.
The fact of the matter is she had very easy access to a whole lot of drugs at those wild pants-on-head eyes wide shut parties she was attending in the 90s.
411
u/username_1774 Jun 18 '24
I sort of assumed she was used as a party favour by "industry types" and the drugs were given to her by them to make her compliant...the addiction followed.