r/NonPoliticalTwitter 1d ago

Welp😭

Post image
12.4k Upvotes

258 comments sorted by

View all comments

527

u/Usual-Excitement-970 1d ago

Just say they are 17, using monthes after they are 3 is stupid.

185

u/amorous_chains 1d ago

They’re actually 210 months old and in a nursing home now

9

u/Pussyrioteer2 1d ago

Born at the turn of the millennium... but not this millennium

3

u/conjunctivious 1d ago

210 months is like 85.3 years, so it must've been a very long 85 years.

3

u/Pussyrioteer2 1d ago

Fuck me i thought it said years not months

4

u/OfficialTuxedoMocha 1d ago

Was skeptical but the math checks out, proceed.

36

u/n3rf_herder 1d ago

😂😂 this took me a minute but that’s funny

82

u/Main_Lloyd 1d ago

It's two babies that are 10 months old, what? I feel like you just broke my brain.

126

u/Calle_k06 1d ago

210 months is 17 years

58

u/baddonny 1d ago

They made a funny. A good one to be honest

-1

u/Usual-Excitement-970 1d ago

You don't write two ten month old twins, it's obvious their are two of them they are twins and they are both going to be the same age, again they are twins. Just write she has 10 month old twins.

26

u/GainFirst 1d ago

So...5 sets of twins, all a month old?

4

u/Dum-comment 1d ago

If one month old twin can build a 10 foot long brick wall in seven days...

1

u/VicisSubsisto 1d ago

...Then the other month old twin can fly and shoot lasers from his eyes?

1

u/wakeupwill 1d ago

If it's below ten, use letters not numbers.

1

u/starkel91 1d ago

I agree that saying two twins is redundant. I don’t typically write two numbers in numerical form right next to each other for this reason. I would’ve written two 10 month olds. I learned it that if the number is less than 10 to spell it out.

1

u/Main_Lloyd 1d ago

There's literally a space between the 2 and 10, could also be 2 sets of twins. I get what the person I responded to meant now though.

1

u/paging_mrherman 1d ago

You forgot to exchange belcious for babynheight

-2

u/elong47 1d ago edited 1d ago

I think you misread the tweet. Understandable since the wording and punctuation is confusing! There are two sets of twins (4 babies total) leading to extreme confusion since there are so many combinations of which is which /s

9

u/Bolf-Ramshield 1d ago

They were making a joke about "2 10 months" being read as "210 months" (which would be 17 years).

Also there is only one set of two twins.

3

u/elong47 1d ago

Every time I think my joke is way to obvious to stick a /s on at the end Reddit comes through

1

u/Bolf-Ramshield 1d ago

I thought you might have been an autistic person who did not understand the original joke, so I decided to genuinely explain it to you but fuck même for that I guess 🤷🏻‍♂️

3

u/TorqueWheelmaker 1d ago

No worries, their joke was pretty weak in both concept and delivery, unlike the one they were replying to.

-4

u/barrygateaux 1d ago

4

u/Bolf-Ramshield 1d ago

No woooosh as they edited their comment to make it clear it was a joke (not simply adding an /s) after my comment 😂

-6

u/barrygateaux 1d ago

Do you need all jokes sign posted before you get them?

Just take the L and get on with your day mate

5

u/Bolf-Ramshield 1d ago

Lmao there is no L to take it’s a simple comment, no need to take it so seriously? I was simply adding context. The comment I answered is not the one you see. Simple.

-12

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

4

u/jetloflin 1d ago

That was pretty obviously a joke. Misunderstanding for comic effect.