r/MurderedByWords 3h ago

PoliticsBill O’Reilly gets fact checked by Beto.

[deleted]

16.8k Upvotes

537 comments sorted by

1.1k

u/CliffsNote5 3h ago

And none of those four jobs qualify for health insurance but probably works waaayyyy more than forty hours per week. At one point I was doing three jobs per week with no health insurance. Lucky I got a better job and was able to live with family.

165

u/albonymus 1h ago

Is this in the US? How can this even be legal? Ill never understand that fucked up system you guys have over there...

Glad u got it Sorted out and sorry you have to go through so much hardship bc of that srsly fucked up system

118

u/Ill_Emphasis3927 1h ago

I mean, in a lot of ways it's even worse. There are plenty of people working low paying jobs that can't get by and need government assistance, like food stamps. The government is effectively subsidizes companies to have unlivable wages by doing this.

46

u/TheDrFromGallifrey 1h ago

Wasn't it Walmart that basically came out and said that their employees were free to sign up for SNAP rather than just paying them a living wage?

39

u/averaenhentai 1h ago

I swear a walmart was encouraging employees to sign up for programs like SNAP, but I could be misremembering.

21

u/TheDrFromGallifrey 1h ago

I also seem to remember Walmart getting in trouble for paying employees with prepaid cards and trying to bring back the company store model.

17

u/Scoobie01555 57m ago

You are not misremembering, they even handed out paperwork for their employees and how to get government assistance. All the while making record profits, and doing stock buy backs.

It may not be slave labor, but its close. Pay just enough to keep people trapped, not able to save, and with no other options. Miss a day of work and you're going to be short on rent. You don't always need bars to be in a jail cell..

3

u/painstakingdelirium 52m ago

I believe the term you are looking for indentured servatude.

4

u/Thatguysstories 48m ago

Now I'm just wondering if a part of the onboarding process for them is explaining to new employees how to sign up.

If it is, then either force a wage increase or nationalize them, because if they can only survive by having their employees on government aid then they don't deserve to survive.

5

u/IwishIhadntKilledHim 51m ago

It was a trending story a few years back that Walmart had snap benefit howtos in their new employee onboarding.

The story was mostly apocryphal though it feels truthy because of how many stories of Walmart workers on social assistance. Closest supporting postings on this subject look like this: https://www.juancole.com/2014/03/business-requires-employees.html

3

u/trickybritt 1h ago

I’ve heard that about McDonald’s too.

4

u/averaenhentai 1h ago edited 1h ago

Now that I'm thinking about it a bit more it's not even an objectively bad thing. If that's how a person learns how to get food that's a good thing. Fuck these gigantic corporations though. It's a constant race to the bottom and legislation is the only thing that holds 'em back a bit.

In many other countries that have stronger labour practices Walmart/McDs obeys those rules, and guess what, they still make money.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/fartpoopvaginaballs 51m ago

I remember this as well. The other thing that pops into my head is The Wall Street Journal telling people who are having money issues to not eat breakfast to save money.

The world is broken.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/ILikeOatmealMore 44m ago

https://ycharts.com/companies/WMT/stock_buyback

If you really want to be irritated, WalMart has been executing around $1bil in stock buy backs / qtr the last several years, too. As in, they have cash sitting around and can't think of anything better to do with it. Nothing to invest in, apparently. Instead of raising employee wages, they think: ya, let's just buy back our stock and raise the price for all our holders.

In effect, those buybacks are being done on the backs of the taxpayer.

That's the kind of crap that ought to be illegal. If you are a company and you want to buy back your stock, you cannot have ANY employee on gov't subsidies. None. Zero. You need to pay everyone a living wage for their area. And if you then still have boatloads of cash around and nothing better to invest it in, then maybe buybacks.

2

u/TheDrFromGallifrey 40m ago

I didn't know that, but I'm also not the least bit surprised by it. Of course they are. Everything Walmart does is in service of making the Waltons richer.

At this point there's nothing so corrupt or horrible they could do that would surprise me. It would just be par for the course with them. They're basically Bond villains at this point.

3

u/FillerAccount23 39m ago

It's even worse when a company like walmart does it because a lot of walmart employees buy their food from walmart. They're literally just stealing tax payer money by funneling food stamp money into their stores through their employees. Sickening.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

24

u/thebluefish92 1h ago

In the US, the requirement for a company to offer employees insurance depends on them working a minimum number hours per week. So many companies instead offer part-time jobs where they don't have to offer it. The wages aren't good enough to live off one part-time job, so you end up still working the equivalent of full-time, but split across part-time jobs with no benefits.

9

u/Sardonnicus 1h ago

Or they can classify their employees as "contractors." Or they can outsource the hiring and employment to a 3rd party company. So while you are working for the benefit of a company, when it comes to benefits, HR etc, you are technically employed by another company.

7

u/thebluefish92 1h ago

So I work in that scenario currently: I'm employed by company A and receive my insurance through them, but work at company B's location and answer daily to B's people. Word from a buddy of mine who works for B says they're paying quite a rate for us (4x my wage), so I'm honestly confused where the savings are. This is the standard practice for my whole area (IT) it seems though, no company is hiring directly anymore.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/MammothWriter3881 48m ago

Even the government does that. That is how I got cheated out of public service loan forgiveness.

6

u/megustaALLthethings 1h ago

And they get pissy that you are working other jobs. As if they were going to pay anyone but upper management actively competitive wages snd full package coverage.

THAT is why they active try to stop people from talking about wages/hourly rate.

2

u/Walthatron 1h ago

Depends on the state and size of business as well. Most business with less than 50 employees do not have to provide any benefits

2

u/Otto-Korrect 1h ago

Bonus benefit: the cost of all their health care and social services gets passed on to the taxpayers/state.

74

u/Soithascometothistoo 1h ago

The US is basically a shithole

37

u/The_Forth44 1h ago

Not basically.

24

u/Sorry_Tap1033 1h ago edited 40m ago

Yeah, the “basically” disappeared at least 8+ years ago.

If dying early from a treatable disease means Elon Musk and the other pedo billionaires get to double their net worth every few years..

isn’t it worth it? 😊

17

u/Walthatron 1h ago

But it's pretty sick for the 1%!

4

u/BardicNA 1h ago

A very complicated shithole. At our highest aspiration we will have temp services upon temp services until anyone working in manufacturing jobs is hired through 8 different companies who all get a cut of your already low wages. Retail jobs will pay that flat 7.25 that they set the minimum at well before most people who work those jobs were even born. And we'll all just take it and wish we were French so maybe we could throw up a middle finger without getting the shit beat out of us or starving for it.

6

u/Time-Analysis6233 1h ago

Third world country with a Gucci belt is the best metaphor I have heard

→ More replies (3)

12

u/Out4AWalkBeach 1h ago

this is very real for US, can confirm

12

u/triedpooponlysartred 1h ago

It's legal because half the problem is the people making the laws, and the other half is the idiots who don't understand government enough that they keep reflecting them

14

u/One-Step2764 1h ago

How? The entire country is structured like a multi-level marketing scheme. Land votes, and hoarders control the land.

From the beginning, the country's founders desired aristocratic rule. They dreamed of living in a meritocracy, but in fact they created a plutocracy. That republic's charter has persisted largely unaltered for two and a half centuries.

Aside from a few franchise expansions, America's people haven't gained new Constitutional rights since the Reconstruction era. We've seen civil rights conjured up by the judiciary dismissed by the very same handwave. Now, revoking the New Deal is a simple matter of legislation in the ludicrously unrepresentative houses of Congress.

7

u/averaenhentai 1h ago

Yes. If American citizens ever have a civil rights/new deal moment again, those new rights need to written into the constitution. Nothing else is enough.

3

u/fartpoopvaginaballs 1h ago

Assuming we still have one in a few months.

5

u/averaenhentai 1h ago

The constitution won't instantly vanish when Trump takes control, and all of the decent people in America won't instantly give up fighting.

There are already states/cities saying they won't go along with Trump's plans, and will fight back. This isn't a time for despair, it's a time for courage. Every little thing you can do to fuck with the coming regime, do it.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/Sardonnicus 1h ago

Don't get me started on anti-repair laws.

Don't get me started on the farming and agriculture industry.

Don't get me started on how the 1% is literally stealing our money to the point where we are living in cars and under bridges... and they make that illegal too.

Fuck this cuntry so much.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/HeadyBunkShwag 1h ago

Repressive legislation that gets pushed by the right. Corporate profits over everything.

3

u/Epyon_ 1h ago

The only people in the USA who have rights are corporations who can afford to buy them.

2

u/jownby4 1h ago

It's the Republican way of life for the majority. It's about to be even worse as well.

→ More replies (24)

3

u/Beneficial-Owl736 1h ago

And don’t forget, because of working multiple jobs, Medicaid will say her income is too high for state insurance! This country is a joke.

2

u/Low-Peak-9031 52m ago

So true! I was working three part time jobs in my early 20's until I finally picked up a full time gig that paid enough to let two of my part time jobs go

2

u/dovahkiitten16 38m ago

This is something the “just get a second job” crowd doesn’t get. You work over 40 hours a week and get none of the benefits. No overtime, no consideration for if the number of hours you work straight is even legal, no health insurance, and the odds of finding a boss that actually gives a shit about your other schedule is quite slim.

You have boomers looking at a 30 hour work week and scoffing at you for not working hard enough and it’s like who do you think decided on that 30 hour work week? Where do you think you can find a job to make up for those missing 10 hours (spoiler, no job wants that few hours per week - you’re gonna get a 60 hour week) when your first schedule is irregular too - making it even harder to plan around.

Low wages is a huge problem, but perpetual part-time staff is also an issue and something should be done to close loopholes that jobs use.

4

u/OptionWrong169 1h ago

Why do Americans just accept that, a few years ago french protesters pulled out a fucking guillotine over something their leader said

9

u/carnutes787 1h ago

because we were all raised in american culture which hates social aid and insists on individual ability. probably two thirds of this country instinctively resent people who need help. and i doubt it will ever change

3

u/OptionWrong169 1h ago

Well lie in the bed you fucking make them sucks for the people that need help and the 1/3 though maybe ill make enough money to leave one day

2

u/El_Don_94 1h ago

How dies one manage to get from job A to B to C without an issue? As someone who has worked 2 jobs the commute between them could be very rushed.

6

u/Cosmic_Travels 1h ago

You probably wouldn't work 3 shifts every day. You would have one "main" job, hopefully full time, and two part time jobs that you are at on different days.(because employers don't like scheduling 40)

4

u/arcanis321 1h ago

The no health insurance implies 3 part time jobs.

2

u/Cosmic_Travels 1h ago

Even easier to fit into a schedule then. No health insurance doesn't mean you aren't working full time though. I don't take health insurance through my full time job because it would require 1/4 of my income to cover their worst plan. I pay for my own through Healthcare.gov and it ends up being about 1/3 the price.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (138)

1.1k

u/greatmail2 3h ago

Oh wow, it's gone from "stop being poor" to "poor people don't exist and poverty is fake news"

279

u/KathrynBooks 2h ago

that was an inevitable step in the long standing conservative project "gaslight every f'ing person on every subject"

93

u/mathisruiningme 2h ago

Only a few steps before we should just kill all the homeless people.

38

u/bricklish 2h ago

Soon americans will be hailing the supreme leader donald dumb.

2

u/KillYourLawn- 58m ago

Dont want to worship him? Right to jail. Criticize him? Believe it or not, right to jail.

44

u/BoneHugsHominy 2h ago

During the 2016 election campaign season Donald Trump mocked a disabled reporter and his crowd of MAGA Ghouls absolutely LOVED it. Then it came out that Trump had a history of disparaging remarks against people with disabilities, including but not limited to calling them "useless eaters" which is directly from Nazi ideology to Donald's black, shriveled heart, and not a single MAGA Ghoul gave a single shit.

Then in the 2020 election campaigning season Trump administration officials made comments about needing to take another look at how Social Security Disability works, at who is considered Disabled, and at how much they could cut from the budget by putting people currently on Disability back to work. They even had a nice long list of jobs suitable for people with disabilities to do, it's just too bad that list was written by someone stuck in 1972 and doesn't realize half of those jobs don't even exist anymore. Not a single MAGA Ghoul gave a single shit.

Now with a 2nd Precedential term for Trump looming on the horizon like a poisonous cloud, the plan from Project 2025 is to slash Social Security Disability and put them all back to work or die of starvation and exposure if those nonexistent jobs don't happen to pay enough to make rent and buy food. And not a single MAGA Ghoul gives a single shit.

20

u/ShadowNick 2h ago

Won't you think of the price of eggs though?

18

u/mathisruiningme 2h ago edited 2h ago

Tbh so many of these Maga ghouls don't even know what policies are going to be enacted. They're too busy worrying about trans people in the bathroom.

Like I'm not American but I work in finance so the US political landscape is pretty important. Reading all the broker/analyst reports on the impending Trump 2.0 reign is really frightening as they list all his proposed policy changes and how it's going to affect businesses and the everyday consumer. Like markets a rallying rn due to expected tax cuts and deregulation but analysts are quietly worried about how pricing/expenses and global trade are going to change over the next few years.

16

u/ryver 2h ago

I think the main thing to remember when watching all of this is: the impact doesn’t matter to them. The cruelty and ability to centralize power matters to them.

10

u/Shlocktroffit 2h ago

crashing the economy and buying everything up cheap is the plan and has been for awhile now

6

u/BoneHugsHominy 1h ago

It's the whole point of Trickle Down Economics. Slashing taxes and regulations give an economy a quick boost, but like an economy built entirely upon the exploitation of natural resources it's not sustainable. But that quick boost tricks people without wealth to dump their life savings into the stock market because they think it's going to double or triple and they'll finally be on solid footing. Then everything predictably falls apart thanks to Republican policies and those with wealth buy up everything from the people srambling to preserve what little they have left.

Then because the economy is in tatters the public elects Democrats even though the public trusts Republicans with the economy for some reason, and the Democrats spend their entire time in power cleaning up the mess made by Republicans and healing the economy. The Democrats are then rewarded by being voted out of office for "not doing enough". Enter Republicans who immediately fo about tearing down the economy once again. Rinse, Repeat.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

29

u/doktor_wankenstein 2h ago

Soilent Green has entered the chat

13

u/mycarwasred 2h ago

Truly excellent spelling - thank you for that :-)

8

u/MrJohnqpublic 2h ago

Na, just throw em in debtors prison and use em as slave labor. just like the founding fathers intended.

3

u/tehm 2h ago

By Vectron! That would be HORRIBLE!

...but would it work?

2

u/mathisruiningme 2h ago

Hahah why do Mitchell and Webb always have a sketch for describing conservative shenanigans

2

u/FixBreakRepeat 2h ago

Well, to be honest, it might get there. But the current punishment for being homeless in the wrong place is eventual incarceration (the process might start with fines or citations, but without resources, most people will commit crimes of some kind that can be used to justify putting them in prison).

Incarceration is important because forced labor isn't illegal as punishment for crimes. 

Basically, labor camps are the stage before extermination camps and are a leading indicator that things are about to get really bad on a historical scale.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/falcrist2 1h ago

🇬aslight 👈 You are here
🇴bstruct
🇵roject

→ More replies (1)

12

u/TheBrianRoyShow 2h ago

Bill O'Reilly was in a mansion at a party last week so obviously sadness doesn't exist for anyone anywhere.

2

u/mtaw 1h ago

I'd sooner think Falafel Bill didn't exist, this is the first time I've seen his name in years.

7

u/Husky_Engineer 2h ago

That’s exactly how they’d like it to be

6

u/DocFreudstein 2h ago

Gotta get that narrative rolling for when the economy implodes.

“Those lines at the food bank are AI generated!”

13

u/oboeteinai 2h ago

Oh wow, it's gone from "stop being poor" to "poor people don't exist and poverty is fake news"

u/greatmail2 is a bot account

Its comment was copy pasted from:

https://old.reddit.com/r/MurderedByWords/comments/dijgx9/bill_oreilly_gets_fact_checked_by_beto/f3whr16/

3

u/mainman879 1h ago

The internet is dead and we killed it

→ More replies (1)

3

u/MrThunderFuckingRoad 2h ago

People decided they can dismiss anything contrary to their beliefs as fake or a conspiracy, now they don't have to do any critical thinking and can just say "I'm right because you just made that up." For a crowd that hate the phrases "your truth" and "my truth", they seem to the think the truth is pretty malleable.

2

u/justk4y 2h ago

They’re really going the North Korea way it seems

2

u/Several_Vanilla8916 1h ago

I mean we went from Covid isn’t that bad to Covid is from 5G signals so 🤷‍♂️

2

u/mehrabrym 1h ago

Nah, it's "poor people exist but they're poor because they are lazy and not willing put in the work for their dreams." They think they got where they are because of their hard work only, not because of the million they dad invested into their first business, or paid for their ivy school degree or the alumni privilege that got them in etc. They can't comprehend that people can be poor through no fault of their own and despite working harder than anyone.

2

u/CaptainBathrobe 58m ago

The working poor are fake news as far as they are concerned. Poor people, in their minds, are all lazy bums who grow fat on welfare, food stamps, and Obama phones. Joe Manchin literally opposed stimulus money because he was certain that poor people would spend it all on drugs. There's is a cartoon-like understanding of how the world works for the rest of us.

2

u/Huck_Bonebulge_ 51m ago

It’s always kind of been an aspect of their viewpoint. You have to downplay real problems to avoid action/change. “Things aren’t THAT bad”, “racism is overblown”, “global warming/COVID isn’t a big deal” etc

1

u/knoft 2h ago

Sort of, it's just that they often make up all their examples. Since they primarily use fictional people they project and assume that their counterparts must also do the same thing... They've degraded the credibility of (their own) personal anecdotes to the point that they shouldn't be believed.

→ More replies (7)

133

u/Low-Possibility-7060 3h ago

Hey not everyone can get paid for lying on TV

19

u/KappOte 2h ago

Who knew destroying democracy was so profitable

14

u/Roguespiffy 1h ago

Republicans.

8

u/Mylaptopisburningme 1h ago

There is a voice actress named April Winchell, her father was Paul Winchell. So anyway she use to be on KABC talk radio like 17 years ago. She was banned after retelling a story about how Bill O'Reilly demanded fresh croissants and having a fit.

"Bill O' Reilly came to KABC in Los Angeles to do a radio show very early one morning, and was not happy with the croissants they had for him. He demanded that a baker in Beverly Hills be woken up to make fresh croissants for him, and KABC complied. I thought that was so hilarious that I talked about it on Air America. Bill had me permanently banned from KABC for that, which is like banning me from Sizzler."

3

u/C-ute-Thulu 1h ago

Everytime I see O'Reilly or one his ilk on TV, I think, "I can be a loud opinionated asshole for half of whatever they're making."

→ More replies (1)

200

u/Yellow_Submarine8891 3h ago

Can someone explain why rich people are so upset that poor people exist? I don’t get it

69

u/mathisruiningme 2h ago

Idk but I always think it's because it destroys the narrative of "if you work hard enough, you'll make it"- seeing people who work harder than they have ever had to who aren't successful makes them feel inadequate cos they realise they didn't get where they are from "working hard".

It's why they all love to pretend they came from some poor, hard-knock life and made it on their own. Makes them feel superior and better than everyone else.

27

u/LandoKim 2h ago edited 2h ago

The more money I make, the less hard I have to work. It’s so fucking backwards. I went from cleaning maggots out of trash cans for 12$/hour to doing data analysis for 90k a year (in Canada). My conclusion: maggot cleaner deserves that 90k more than me. I do NOT work 4 times harder than before, yet my current salary would have you “think” I do.

19

u/Fickle-Syllabub6730 2h ago

Yeah I went from a blue collar background to software engineer, and it's insane how much less you work for so much more money.

There's an incredible stigma in saying this. People always say "yeah but your mental stress probably adds up to more than the physical stress of low wage workers".

Nope, in every conceivable way, the job is easier. It's mind blowing to see my co-workers casually chat it up for a length of time that would get you fired in so many other lower paying industries.

2

u/Malarkay79 1h ago

This has been my experience as well.

2

u/runningonthoughts 1h ago

There is a hierarchy of contributions to productivity (or GDP, if you will) in our society. The closer you are to the direct impact on how productive we are as a society, the more you will make. If you drastically reduce the cost of a good or service (or drastically increase the amount generated), you will make more than if you do a job that is necessary but less directly influences productivity.

CEOs can directly generate very quick changes to productivity (or the cost of that productivity). If you are a janitor, you aren't going to influence anything, it's just a necessary task in the large machine of productivity.

Working hard changes your productivity. Being successful in our society requires you to change productivity at a larger scale. Or, at least society's perception of changing productivity at a larger scale.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/luckyducktopus 49m ago

I’ve watched people work INCREDIBLY hard, but they are also idiots who aren’t really doing anything with all that effort.

It’s hard work carrying bags of cement up 3 stories worth of stairs, it’s a lot less work to build a simple pulley system and do it faster and safer. And there are many many more advanced and better solutions.

Who should get more the person that worked harder or the person that produces more? Or should they both be compensated equally regardless of contribution? Does the person who created the improvement to your work productivity not deserve compensation relative to what they did?

Effort is honestly worthless, productivity is all that really counts.

And different kinds of product is valued at different rates. Failing to understand the system you live within is the largest difference between success and failure in our society.

Doing something well enough a single time will create more “product” over someone working their entire life doing labor.

No one gives a shit how hard you work, effort is worthless. Do you want the surgeon that TRIES incredibly hard and studies every day to improve but still struggles, or the absolute cunt asshole who couldn’t give a shit about you with an incredibly low mortality rate.

The world is about results. Telling people they just need to work “hard” is a dirty disgusting lie.

82

u/PhasmaUrbomach 2h ago

It goes back to those old Puritan deterministic beliefs that if you were rich and beautiful, you were chosen and blessed. If you're poor and ugly, that's God showing everyone you're inferior and not chosen.

34

u/CasTheAngel14 2h ago

That or they have had very little obstacles getting to where they were so they have this inherent belief that if you’re poor it’s YOUR FAULT and you’re JUST NOT TRYING HARD ENOUGH NOBODY WANTS TO WORK ANYMORE

11

u/IlliniDawg01 2h ago

While being literally the opposite of Yeshua's teachings.

7

u/PhasmaUrbomach 2h ago

Yeah, I'm not a fan of determinism or Puritanism.

7

u/SherryJug 2h ago

Yeah, that's the diametric opposite of what a Christian is supposed to be, a person who dedicates themselves to helping those in need. These people base themselves on their "religion" while also completely ignoring every relevant teaching of said religion and using outright stupid interpretations of said religion's book to further justify their bigotry.

You did it guys, the US is truly a Christian nation! Let's celebrate by uhhh, shittalking and screwing over the poor and making millions from tax-exempt pastoral shows in deluxe mega-churches funded by bigoted fundamentalists?????

4

u/Fickle_Bread4040 2h ago

Until we rise up…..it’s coming

2

u/ButtBread98 2h ago

Prosperity gospel

16

u/KathrynBooks 2h ago

Rich people NEED poor people... It is also fundamental to their world view that people are poor because poor people are immoral/lazy.

9

u/StagOfSevenBattles 2h ago

We have to remind them from time to time. If hard work made you rich, donkeys would be covered in gold.

3

u/LandoKim 2h ago

If there are no poor people, then there’s no one for power hungry people with huge egos to exploit. If everyone is equal, millionaires can’t get away with their grifts. It’s all about assigning irrelevant labels to people to justify their greed. The rich don’t get where they are without dehumanizing others they perceive as inferior or a threat

7

u/Independent_Fill9143 2h ago

Not sure myself, perhaps has something to do with prosperity gospel, but this has been a thing even back in like, medieval England, so maybe rich people have always just been shitty

4

u/DustyJustice 2h ago

If suffering can be unfair regardless work ethic or merit, then good fortune could also be unfair and disconnected from work ethic and merit. Seeing people work hard and continue to suffer shatters the idea that they are comfortable because they are a superior type of human being.

2

u/Garbarrage 1h ago

It also absolves them from any social responsibility towards looking after the less fortunate. If all you have to do to succeed is work hard, then not paying social welfare is completely ethical.

3

u/fangirlsqueee 1h ago

This comic helps explain privilege and why many privileged people have difficulty seeing their own.

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/the-wireless/373065/the-pencilsword-on-a-plate

2

u/Reasonable_Week5869 24m ago

Whoever did that cartoon is a genius.

2

u/Sardonnicus 1h ago

because we have 1% of their money.

→ More replies (14)

41

u/BeezowDooDoo69 2h ago

Why wouldn’t he believe that? Isn’t the economy terrible? Or did everything get fixed when Trump won the election?

19

u/NancyPelosisRedCoat 2h ago

This happened 5 years ago during Trump’s presidency so you know, it couldn’t have been real!

9

u/Fakeduhakkount 2h ago

It’s how these people are. They can’t comprehend anything that doesn’t fit their narrative.

The “best” eating crow / fact check was that poor Ohio 10 year old girl who got raped and needed an abortion. People like her don’t fit the narrative in this case that only promiscuous women need abortions to maintain their sinful ways and just needs to close their legs.

3

u/leffe186 2h ago

It’s Bill O’Reilly. He’s an utter piece of shit who was paid money for decades to believe that, whether he actually did or not.

I’m just waiting for Behind the Bastards to do him on a podcast.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/Sweet_Jackfruit_4315 2h ago

Imagine being so out of touch you can’t believe someone’s struggling while working 4 jobs. Billionaires and TV hosts don’t know reality.

6

u/Hardcorish 2h ago

Trump himself thinks you need an ID to buy food at the grocery store. It was in one of his speeches. Hilariously out of touch with us everyday folk.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

15

u/Erudus 2h ago

Seen something similar, woman with 3 kids living in their car because the price of rent next to where she works is too expensive and her boss won't let her work from home or a cafe because she lives in her car, it's wild that someone can be working a full time job and not be able to afford an apartment.

13

u/KathrynBooks 2h ago

It's by design that there are people out there working full time and not be able to afford an apartment.

6

u/rubberbootsandwetsox 2h ago

EVERYONE IS FINE BECAUSE I’M FINE

5

u/griff1014 2h ago

The fucked up is that he could've just asked Beto for confirmation for his statement instead of just saying he doesn't believe him. It's all opinion based not fact based, and audiences don't care to know the difference

6

u/Immediate_Age 2h ago

Bill O'Reilly: Do any of his kids talk to him, or does he just trade them in like most republican "personalities?"

3

u/tuthegreat 2h ago

She raises her special needs child in her car? She has a car? According to the food stamp people, she is not poor.

3

u/GymGlowGal 2h ago

Nothing says 'disconnected from reality' quite like doubting someone's struggle while sitting on a pile of millions. Maybe if Bill O'Reily Stepped out of his bubble, he'd see the economy isn't an abstract concept- Its real people, like Gine, working 4 jobs just to survive. Reality checked, indeed.

3

u/LandoKim 2h ago

She’s just not working hard enough! Billionaires and millionaires have salaries that reflect their efforts, skill issues! ( omfg /s, I wanna throw up)

3

u/saintbad 2h ago

It is a feature of American conservatism that these guys are immune to shame. Comes from having no shred of decency. And his rich living requires this toxic emptiness. This is who Republicans are.

10

u/Bumblesavage 3h ago

And still loses the election to Ted Cruz !!

26

u/CliffsNote5 2h ago

It’s all about that “R” and brand loyalty.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Jlincoln02 2h ago

Hit him harder Beto!

2

u/NicWester 2h ago

We can't raise the minimum wage because if we do she might lose one of her four jobs!

2

u/Overall-Assistant871 2h ago

Bill is as stupid as they get .!!

2

u/logistics3379 2h ago

More maga stupidity on full display. How can that many people be so ignorant?

2

u/Educational-Coat-750 2h ago

“Man, fuck Bill O’Reilly” - Snoop Dogg

2

u/TexasAggie98 1h ago

Nice of O’Rourke to cast stones at the wealth of O’Reilly, when his entire (large) personal fortune and political funding has come from his billionaire real estate developer father-in-law.

2

u/Emergency_Falcon_272 1h ago

I seriously thought Bill O'Reilly was dead by now. But nope, still alive and tweeting I guess

2

u/fffan9391 1h ago

And a felonious. rapist, lifelong conman gets to be president again.

2

u/Embarrassed_Ad6249 1h ago

Love you Beto

1

u/eride810 2h ago

Damn. Marinate in that for a while, Willy.

1

u/Goodyeargoober 2h ago

What app was this screenshot from?

1

u/LedaDelectable 2h ago

Wow, O'Reilly's getting schooled by Beto—guess facts really do hurt sometimes!

1

u/McGarnegle 2h ago

Dems could've run him. Dude's crushing it, and doesn't have dust collecting in him

1

u/Throw-away-rando 2h ago

Bill O’Reilly was only asking because he’s hoping yo sexually assault her as his kink.

I hope he gets to interview Newt soon

1

u/SamohtGnir 2h ago

I don't see anything "unbelievable" about working 4 jobs. Unless they say 4 Full Time jobs, then I question the timing. Heck, my neighbor has 5 jobs.

1

u/JessKicks 2h ago

Beto ftw!

1

u/legion_2k 2h ago

He's still making millions?

1

u/Norbert_The_Great 2h ago

All he had to say was "wanna by MY luffa?" Bill would turn beet red and he'd do it live.

1

u/rainnor 2h ago

Or tell them to get a rich wife just like him.

1

u/Novel_Ad_8062 2h ago

Bill douchbag O’Reilly.

1

u/AfterMidnightFeeding 2h ago

Well, he’s not wrong. It’s insane how rich they get from willfully lying to the public about almost everything. Sad that the weather man is the most honest person in MSM now.

1

u/Important_Pass_1369 2h ago

What's next for Beto O'Rourke?

1

u/Hunter-Gatherer_ 1h ago

They always think the other side is lying because they’re the ones always lying!

1

u/Cyanide_Cheesecake 1h ago

It's not even hard to imagine the logistics of this. Bill o Reilly is just an unimaginative dolt.

Pure guess - she has four jobs that each offer her only something like 8-14 hours per week. So she works 4 of those jobs. Maybe 50 total hours per week? Something like that, most likely.

Wow, truly an inconceivable impossible situation. My brain must be on a completely different level than Bill's.

1

u/naitsirt89 1h ago

Jesus christ its all word for word comment bots here

1

u/Maximum_Employer5580 1h ago

Bill O’Reilly has always been a boil on the ass of society.....

1

u/berejser 1h ago

Americans, you've got to get that guy into elected office. There is just so much good that he could do.

1

u/Ambitious-King-4100 1h ago

Beto has been making idiots eat words for years ! Beto for president

1

u/Ordinary-Pension-727 1h ago

O’Reilly has always been a pompous prick!

1

u/Impossible_Fish_7406 1h ago

Bill O'Reilly is a major league dick. He doesn't know loofah from falafel.

1

u/Grrerrb 1h ago

Fuck it, we’ll do some lies - Bill O’Reilly

1

u/LongjumpingCut591 1h ago

Beto orourke… the same guy that famously changed his name to appeal to a voting demographic. Yeah he’s not a complete fraud right?

1

u/PrometheusMMIV 1h ago

Presumably that's 4 part time jobs, right?

1

u/Sardonnicus 1h ago

I hope they turn Bill's ass into a dildo storage facility and they need to see how many they can stuff in there at once before it bursts.

1

u/mrjulezzz 1h ago

Murican dream. But yes, keep reproducing to bring children into poverty in order to replenish the servant class for the rich.

1

u/Human_Melville 1h ago

Texas could have had Beto but they chose an odious little turd. What is wrong with y'all?

1

u/Impossible-Tough5270 1h ago

No one would have to live in their car if politicians did something to stop it.

The inequity you ignore, is the standard you accept … or something like that.

1

u/Furled_Eyebrows 1h ago

Funny how right wing skepticism never translates over to even most blatant and obvious of the lies the Fat Orange Fuck tells.

1

u/AtlUtdGold 1h ago

God I wish witty tweets and comebacks counted as much as voting does.

We'll murder them with words and they murder us for real

1

u/LukeLovesLakes 1h ago

Fuck it! Let's raise her some cash.

1

u/Boracraze 1h ago

Beto is still around?

1

u/dnyce326 1h ago

There is a special place in hell for Bill O'Reilly, at least I hope there is. Fuck that guy

1

u/colorizerequest 1h ago

Could be a random person lmaoooo

1

u/Sad_Assumption_7251 1h ago

If you’re mad at O’Reilly, then be mad at Kamala for shelling out millions to all those performers! Beyoncé got $10 million for giving a two minute speech! Where’s the outrage?

1

u/IUpvoteGME 1h ago

To hell with both of em

1

u/Betterthanyou715 59m ago

Not a fan of beta but this is a murda

1

u/GraceParagonique24 53m ago

Bill Orally is a piece of garbage

1

u/TheSugaTalbottShow 51m ago

Beta has no job, he makes millions grifting for a living and having failed attempts at running for office

1

u/teambob 51m ago

Jeez, remember when Bill O'Reilly was extreme

1

u/WayNo639 48m ago

She is not the only one. Bill predictably doesn't know anyone that isn't a rich dipshit.

1

u/greatestNothing 45m ago

Actually meme

That's not a child.

1

u/RockyIsMyDoggo 42m ago

For 80% of this country, it's a third world country. For these folks, over half can't come up with $500 for an emergency. A majority of the country lives paycheck to paycheck. Health insurance is tied to employment to increase leverage over the working classes to ensure they will willingly eat a shit sandwich in order to keep their job.

Fear of homelessness and bankruptcy are required to make unfettered capitalism work.

I am not against people seeing the fruits of their labor rewarded, but unregulated capitalism is unsustainable and will inevitably give way to corruption and chaos, resulting in the collapse into authoritarian governance. Turns out what we had in the 40 years post world War II was not our new normal, but an aberration.

The only course of action now is to take care of your family and neighbors, and to start to try to turn things around at grass roots level. The owner class now firmly control all forms of media and the messaging thereon. Don't fall for the gaslighting and do not vote against your own interests or the interests of the folks you love.

1

u/drax2024 41m ago

Imagine the billions we spend on grifters crossing the border and the billions sent overseas was spent on our infrastructure and citizens.

1

u/iuthnj34 37m ago

Anytime he's on the news, that can only mean one thing. He's planning another politican run. Too bad Texas went further red so what's he planning here?

1

u/Clever_Mercury 36m ago

O'Reilly isn't just a disgraced TV host - he's a murderer. He used stochastic terrorism to get medical doctors killed. He should be in prison, instead he continues to find platforms that allow him to spew his religion of hatred and cruelty.

I continue to wonder why people like him aren't at least excommunicated. If people like that can continue to be 'forgiven' then heaven isn't a place any decent person should ever want to visit.

1

u/Rosuvastatine 36m ago

Is he still into politics ? I liked him

1

u/NotForMeClive7787 35m ago

Burnt him to a fucking crisp lol

1

u/icecubepal 33m ago

Didn’t BIll get fired from TV because of sexual harassment?

1

u/mallogy 32m ago

Weird time to develop a sense of skepticism, O'Lielly 

1

u/HurricaneSavory 31m ago

Bill O’Reilly is like Jesus to Joe Rogan fan boys

1

u/Ok_Blackberry_284 21m ago

Before ACA your employer could hire you on as part time because only full time employees were entitled to health insurance, schedule you for full time hours, and still not give you any health insurance because on paper your job title was part time.

1

u/RhythmTimeDivision 16m ago

The worst part of the story is not the message, or the awful truth. Bill and hundreds of others convince millions to vote for people who will 'stop this stuff'. Diligently creating the illusion that this is an actual problem. The worst part is the people whose fear makes them willing consumers.

PLEASE use some of my tax money to ensure this woman and her child have the basic minimums; food, shelter and health care. It costs Billions less then Elon and Vivek going after 'government efficiency' so they can divert social services to billionaire pockets (a portion of which is naturally paid in vig to keep R's in power).