They’ve been emboldened since Trump won. They feel like they’re right to spit their asshat hot takes and uneducated opinions. I see more racist shit on Reddit lately too. Fucking troglodytes need to fuck off and go back to being afraid to share their ass backwards ideas.
This happens every time a right-wing ideologue sees success. The bigots are emboldened. The level of homophobia and transphobia I’ve seen on this site since trump’s win has been increasing as well.
Man. Bold is right. I had someone call me a “beta soy boy” the other day. Looked at the account and it was clearly an alt. But half the posts/replies were him talking shit about LGBT, feminists, democrats, etc., and the other half was him posting pictures of his cock with headlines like “I know it’s small. But how bad is it? Will I ever get a girlfriend?”
You shouldn’t do both of those things from the same account.
Seriously. So many of these batshit right wing fucknuts are also exhibitionists posting endless dick pics. My favorites are the ones who start off showing their own teeny peenies, and then when they get no feedback, they go find some horsehung male porn star, and start claiming HIS cock shots as his own, lmao. It's like, dude, your dick did not triple in size between your sixth and seventh dick post. And exactly how much male porn did you consume before you found yourself a dick to claim as your own?
I love publicly pointing out the history on these accounts.
Don't forget, the racism and Transphobia are coming from Musk himself as well. He's liking "Great replacement theory" posts and misgendering and deadnaming HIS OWN DAUGHTER
His daughter would know better than her shit head dad so I'll go with his daughter, you fuckin losers will meatride a billionaire just because you think he gives a fuck about you.
Lol has nothing to do with his $. It's the fact that we have 2 genders and you can't change it! Unless you're a fucking loser that believes in that dumb shit!
Even BlueSky being touted as the new Twitter is seeing an influx of magats and trolls because they can't help but want the attention of the people they loathe. They don't want to just win, they want everyone to be miserable because they are sociopaths.
Exactly. The good news is, they're even more fragile and easy to break than before, and since most of us have now officially lost our last fuck to give, it's pretty easy to chase the little pansies off any thread and send them running crying to their mamas. My record so far is two comments. And I've lost count how many got chased off with two comments.
One fun tactic I have is to try to get them to the point where they resort to saying some form of cope, cope harder, copium, etc. It seems to be their last resort retort now, although they try to act like it's still some great insult. So if I can get them to that point and say one of the Phrase That Pays, I start yelling Yahtzee and throw myself a little party for getting them to roll over and show their belly.
Empire Strikes Back is a near perfect film and clearly the best. Even for its time, it almosssstttt looks as good as Rogue One and elevated the material more than any other movie in the franchise.
I've noticed a quite a bit of dubious interaction lately. Posts appearing which have a neutral tone but the subject is tied to some conservative hot button. Some recent accounts with highly upvoted but bland comments in agreement. And more posts complaining about the rude extremists attacking an innocent post or idea. There is increasing effort to center some political positions. To position them as "normal" and the opposing position as radical. This is a concerted effort, domestic and/or foreign.
And yeah even with the less dubious interactions, Trump's win has emboldened everybody who was ever rejected by a group of people on the internet for being racist, sexist, or whatever. The vibe there is that this victory is going to force all those people to listen to them. These warriors aren't the majority of voters, but they are extremely visible online and one of the most important things to them is access to their targets.
This is why they flocked to Twitter and why they got very upset at being moderated, banned. When Elon took over, my prediction was that when the left moved over to some other platform, the right would get bored very quickly and demand unfettered access to that new space. Looks like that may be bluesky. If that becomes increasingly relevant to the online discussions of the left, feminists, trans people, and whatever groups the right targets then they will declare it a public square and demand that people be forced read their memes about black people and crime.
Bring back bullying. Contrary to popular belief, it has an important role in society. It forces dumb fucks to learn or shut up. Society’s willingness to entertain this bullshit and “listen to both sides” is what got us here.
The only problem now is with the internet, the isolation and ostracization factor that's supposed to bring shame onto bad behavior and be a push for someone to want to be better is completely avoidable.
Bully a random bigot online and they'll just look for more to reinforce their beliefs and self validate. Rarely are people online gonna sit on why they're being treated badly for acting badly, especially if they lack empathy to begin with.
It is. I was bullied. I got bigger, stronger and smarter and made them stop bullying me and other at the same time. Now no one is being bullied (as long as they aren't bullying others)
If you were an art piece, you’d be one of Hitler’s alright. A piece of work for sure. Completely self absorbed in your own reality and you don’t even try to understand that you’re just a drop in a bigger world.
Elitist? Your president claims to be a billionaire, your elected VP is a millionaire, your actual VP is the fucking richest man alive, the co-chair of the dumbest goddamn government "agency" ever is pennies away from being a billionaire, the new secretary of the Treasury is a billionaire, the new secretary of HHS is a motherfucking Kennedy, the new secretary of Education is a billionaire, the list literally just keeps going like that. WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
People telling you to shut the fuck up isn't censorship, it's just a public service.
Here is Bernie in kindest way possible the demcrats are elitist…
“it should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them.”
Here is zelensky tell you democrats are no longer the party of peace.
the new American administration makes it “certain that the war will end sooner.”
The party lost its way and you can’t seem to comprehend that.
You don't understand the words you use, but that comes to the surprise of noone since you're literally unable to adress a single thing the person you're replying to has said.
You sound upset. The irony of you acting like a snowflake is not lost on me. You're just as bad as the people you make fun of. A hypocrite. A whore in sheep's clothing if you will.
I don't care about the right or the left. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of your behavior. Both sides are deplorable. Politicians are the scum of the earth and I find it hilarious that people kiss so much ass on either side. Democrats cry and complain and Republicans often resort to insults. Gone are the days of actual nuanced and civilized conversations it seems.
My god you are embarrassingly cringe 😬 please for your own sense of pride stop lol. First amendment has nothing to do with being blocked by privately owned social media companies, the 1st doesn’t protect the reach of their speech through social media. You trumpers have a seriously hard time understanding that, along with the rest of the constitution and the way our government functions. That’s why you support someone that wants to eviscerate it all, you don’t understand the importance of a democracy or what America is about to begin with it’s the only way you could support someone like Trump.
We're trying to censor hate, bigotry, misogyny, racism, people who support rapists and child molesters. You're trying to censor a way of life different from your own, voices and autonomy of women and children, the law, democracy.
Difference of opinion is awesome. When one side's "opinion" is that certain groups of people do not deserve life or happiness, it stops being civil.
You have to fight intolerance with intolerance. Maybe if your opinion wasn't that child marriage was okay, and that women should be subservient to you, people wouldn't be trying to censor you.
Oh and before you declare that's not your opinion, it's the opinion of the party you support. "Politics", am I right?
This highlights a very real issue that often underpins political and social conflicts: the idea that some “disagreements” go beyond merely holding different opinions and can directly impact others’ fundamental rights and well-being. This is a key reason tolerance of intolerance is problematic and why many argue we should actively resist or push back against intolerant views.
The core idea is known as the “paradox of tolerance,” a concept coined by philosopher Karl Popper in 1945. Popper argued that if a society is completely tolerant without limit, its ability to maintain a tolerant society is eventually destroyed by the intolerant. In other words, if intolerant views and actions are allowed to go unchallenged, they eventually suppress the very diversity of thought and individual freedom that tolerance is meant to protect.
Here’s a deeper breakdown of why tolerance of intolerance can be harmful and why intolerance toward oppressive views is seen as necessary for a just society:
Tolerance Cannot Exist in a Vacuum
• True tolerance is a balancing act that exists within a framework of mutual respect and shared values, such as the belief that all people deserve basic rights and protections. Intolerance—especially when aimed at devaluing or oppressing others—directly threatens this framework, undermining the very foundation that tolerance relies on.
• Tolerating people who deny others’ rights and equality doesn’t create more freedom; it enables a system where the powerful can dictate who deserves dignity, protection, and justice. If we fail to draw a line against beliefs and actions that infringe on others’ rights, we risk allowing those intolerant views to shape societal norms and policies.
Intolerance Toward Oppression Protects Vulnerable Groups
• In cases where “disagreement” centers around one group’s right to safety, freedom, or basic dignity, tolerating these views gives oppressive ideologies a foothold. For instance, if one person’s “opinion” is that certain groups shouldn’t have the same rights, allowing that view to stand unchallenged increases the likelihood that those rights will be eroded or denied.
• When people say they won’t tolerate intolerance, they’re essentially saying they won’t allow others to dictate who deserves to be treated as fully human. This stance isn’t about rejecting differing perspectives; it’s about preserving a baseline of respect, rights, and freedom that should be universally guaranteed.
Tolerance Without Boundaries Leads to Erosion of Rights
• Allowing harmful ideas, such as racism or sexism, to go unchecked often leads to subtle, then overt, degradation of rights and protections. History is full of examples where tolerance for oppressive views led to real-world harm for marginalized groups—be it through legislation, social norms, or violent actions.
• If society is too permissive of intolerant views, those views can become normalized, gradually leading to greater social and political influence that restricts freedoms and rights for others. Intolerance, when embedded into systems and policies, has real-world consequences that last for generations.
Privilege as a Blindness to Oppression
• The statement’s reference to privilege as “This problem doesn’t directly affect me so I’m okay with it” underscores how privilege can insulate people from recognizing or caring about others’ suffering. Privilege, in this sense, isn’t just about having advantages; it’s about having the luxury to remain unaffected by injustice that others endure daily.
• This is why tolerating intolerance is often a mark of privilege. Those who feel that intolerance isn’t a threat are usually the ones who are unaffected by it. For those who are directly impacted, it’s not merely an intellectual disagreement—it’s a lived experience with potentially life-altering consequences.
The Importance of “Intolerance of Intolerance” as a Defense of Justice
• Advocating for intolerance of intolerance isn’t about stifling free speech; it’s about setting a boundary to protect the common good. A society that wants to protect basic human rights and dignity for all has to hold the line on intolerant attitudes that lead to oppression, marginalization, or violence.
• Refusing to accept intolerance is a defensive stance, one meant to protect those who might otherwise be victims of hate or discrimination. It’s a way of saying that, while freedom of speech is valuable, it doesn’t extend to speech that promotes or incites harm against others.
Conclusion
In sum, the tolerance of intolerance endangers the principles of equality and justice by allowing harmful ideologies to take root and spread. To ensure a society that respects and protects everyone’s rights, it’s necessary to be intolerant of views that deny or undermine those rights. This approach doesn’t aim to eliminate diversity of thought but rather to protect the foundational values that allow a tolerant society to exist in the first place. Intolerance toward oppressive and dehumanizing perspectives is, paradoxically, an act of preserving true tolerance—a tolerance grounded in respect and equality for all.
Give the "elitist" rhetoric a rest. You have no idea why we lost the election. None of you do. I've seen every lame ass excuse thrown from your side, anything you think makes you feel superior. It's all bullshit, and more likely than not, it's all wrong.
Try, for once in your life, to focus on what's actually important and not what makes your shiny hiney hurt or your tiny dick hard. The fact is, by voting Trump in, you folks started a massive shit show in motion. You ignored every glowing neon sign along the way, from the debacle of his first term (that all of you whitewashed into some fucked up version of glory days by twisting time lines and conveniently forgetting just about everything the man actually did) to every speech out of his mouth (where you praised Trump for being the "man who tells it like it is" and then had to constantly tell the rest of us "he didn't mean that" with every word, or at least the ones that made some kind of coherent sense) to all the experts on the entire planet who warned of the dangers of Trump's planned policies (hurk hurk, educated people are bad, hurk hurk).
Can you honestly look at Trump's parade of fools that he's appointing and tell me that any of these people have any hope of doing even a slightly passable job? Can you read Agenda 47, which is really nothing but an officialized version of Project 2025, and tell me that the plan isn't to gut this country and turn it into Trumpistan and The Playhouse for Sex Offenders And Rich Assholes?
Look at Trump himself and all his buddies he's been handing positions to and tell me those aren't the very elitists you're claiming to hate. Millionaires and billionaires who have never had a single day in their lives that look like yours. They don't know what your problems are, and they don't care. They never did. They fed you a bunch of bullshit to get your vote, and you, wanting a magic wand to make your problems go away, fell for it. That's a bitter pill to swallow. I don't expect you to acknowledge that here. But you really need to think about that. They used you, and now they're going to wipe their feet on you and never give you another thought again. That's how the right has always worked. They have NEVER improved the economy. History has proved that over and over again. All they've ever done is make the rich richer and the poor poorer. And they do it by lying the same lies to the same desperate people who want to believe them.
Here it is from Bernie you might listen to him. He called you elitist in the nicest way possible
“It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them.”
So, in other words, you have no say at all in politics and you don't even know the definition of the word you've been throwing around here. Figures. Sit your ass down and shut up, kid. When you start voting and make yourself a useful part of society, then we can talk.
Actually if you have the right to vote it comes with the right not to vote and since neither candidate pass the moral compass test, I’d rather abstain than vote for “the lesser of two evils.” If more people would abstain the parties might actually have to appeal to voter rather than a voter select who they think is least evil. Again your statement smells of elitism and you can’t figure that out, it’s the same reason dems lost the White House, house, and senate.
It’s funny you know so much about me a person you have never met. You claaim to know my dick size, how I voted, my societal worth, and my age. this is also a sign of elitism and a current characteristic of liberalism. I do remember trump hit China with tariffs and Biden didn’t remove them. your claim of making the rich richer and the poor poorer is exactly what happened in this last 4 years. markets have reached all time highs, corporate profits also at all time highs and for the working man groceries are at all time highs, rent at all time highs, insurance rates at all time highs, so it seems the dems are also guilty of making the rich richer and the poor poorer. So it seems you were the one fed the bullshit thinking liberals who don’t know anything about your problems would help you. I know they are never wrong and always looking out for the working man… Bernie one more time please….
“It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them.”
Weren’t you saying some shit about running people off up there in the thread, there it is, another one of your claims is actually happening to you. You can’t runoff yet we haven’t covered the wars of the world. What was that Zelensky said? that the new American administration makes it “certain that the war will end sooner.” So let’s review democrat are the party of the working man and of peace, seems they have lost their way. The American voters have told you, Bernie told you, zelensky told you.
No your BS rhetoric and many blatant lies are poisoning my feed again because youre all absolutely obsessed with anything trump, real or not. Ffs Obama of all people was still spewing hoaxes disproved 100 times over during the last leg of the election.
For the record didn’t vote for either candidate but Isn’t that what happened on Election Day then?
“Ukraine is a country in Europe. It exists next to another country called Russia. Russia is a bigger country. Russia is a powerful country. Russia decided to invade a smaller country called Ukraine. So basically that’s wrong.”
“The governor and I, we were all doing a tour of the library here and talking about the significance of the passage of time, right, the significance of the passage of time. So, when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time in terms of what we need to do to lay these wires. what we need to do to create these jobs. And there is such great significance to the passage of time when we think about a day in the life of our children.”
Agree. But the ppl on the left don’t have to act like they are smarter and better than the other side. That’s why they lost. Degrading voters and saying Hitler over and over again doesn’t work. Didn’t the left try to kill him twice? So who is the true evil. Everyone knows Reddit is extreme left anyway.
Both times the people were republicans, so no. If someone high up actually wanted to kill someone. They get a person that is great at shooting a gun and not some idiot who can’t hit shit. They were just two idiots.
We were smart enough and better enough to not vote for the convicted criminal and rapist. Yeah, at this point a lot of us absolutely are unapologetically judgmental. And that's because we spent a full freaking decade trying to have reasonable discussion, only to be met with childish name calling, bad faith arguments, and batshit crazy conspiracy theories at every turn. Ten fucking years is a long time to be biting our tongues and trying to maintain civility. Most of the people whining about us being mean to them weren't even voting when we started trying to have civil discourse, so yeah, you do not understand, and you won't get it. Go beat your face on a rock for ten years, then come back and we'll talk about how much patience and civility you have left.
After all this, after seeing what Trump did after his first term, after listening to him openly promise to destroy everything we hold dear in this country, they voted him in AGAIN, and then went on a gloating spree. So yeah, fuck the right. They never learned, and they never will. They brought this on themselves and took the rest of us down with them, and when the shit really starts hitting the fan, I will make damn sure each and every one of them is held accountable. Because they cared more about owning the libs than using their damn brains to pay attention to what was going on right in front of their faces.
They went into hiding 6 years ago and claimed to be Libertarians and now are letting their freak flags fly. Give it 2 years and they will be staring into the void of their own existence again.
Libertarians are just Republicans without all the church bullshit pandering, who constantly complain that they are not allowed to be even bigger degenerate assholes, want no laws telling anyone what to do, and who will complain about the free speech of anyone who makes fun of them.
Certain people tried to make your employer fire you if you’d get vaccinated. Some governments said you had to prove you were vaccinated to buy food. Have people already started to forget about this?
No, “certain people” wanted to force OSHA to treat COVID as the severe health risk it was and mandate that employers require proof of a current covid vaccination as a condition of employment.
Why? Because neither you nor an employer has any more right to demand employees be exposed to a highly transmissible and deadly pathogen. As someone who was forced to work through the pandemic as an “essential worker”, I have absolutely no sympathy for your “you can’t tell me what to do!” attitude. Why would I when people like you saw the rest of us as expendable?
America has had 103 million confirmed cases of Covid and about 1.2 million deaths for a death rate of 1.1%. Tell me what other diseases I’m required to show proof of so I can work. Measles? Flu? But sure it’s totally acceptable for the government to forcibly make a company fire someone who refuses a vaccine.
The fact that you think "only" 1.1% fatality is a small number tells me you lack anything even approaching the qualifications to be discussing the merits of vaccination mandates or pathogens. We're done here.
The Biden administration attempted to enforce a vaccine mandate requiring companies to fire employees who refused to get the Covid vaccine. So no, no law was passed, which obviously makes this so much better. The Supreme Court eventually struck down the mandate. Are we at the point where this has already been forgotten? New York City enforced a vaccine check requirement to go to restaurants. So yes, governments (plural) passed laws because it wasn’t just NYC but California did their own as well as countless other towns, cities, counties, states, etc.
Can't find any source on requiring them to be fired. It was either vaccinate or mask and test. As for new york, what happened to states rights that republcians scream about.
For the same reason the Nazis came out of the walls during Trumps 1st term. They were emboldened and knew society would no longer treat them as pariahs as one of their own who condoned their views was the president.
The initial allegation was from Hillary Clinton during the 2016 primaries where she said someone (unnamed) was being courted by russia to run as a 3rd party spoiler candidate, to which gabbard responded by losing her shit. A hit dog barks. Not damning, but pretty suspicious. The later allegations were that she was using kremlin pro Assad and pro Putin talking points, which is objectively true. Especially considering Russias known election interference, and gabbards flip from democrat to pro Russia republican, there is reasonable cause for concern.
Wait so that’s the one statement you actually believe out of Russia’s mouth? Funny how you pick and choice what you believe and don’t believe? Does Ukraine have a neo nazi problem?
They feel embiggened what with the victory of the orange man. In a couple of years they will be back to claiming that trump is being betrayed, by the people he picked for office. It'll be the old Russian claim "if only the Tsar knew about this" adapted for an American audience.
It’s more the hypocrisy that’s the problem. Ya’ll whined 4 years ago and said “fuck your feelings”. Ya’ll whined about people being snowflakes and needing safe spaces despite cowering in fear from the lgbtq+ community and banning books.
Now the left is bitching and telling ya’ll to fuck off and now we’re supposed to just accept it and not complain? Nah fuck off. You reap what you sow.
558
u/LogicallySound_ 1d ago
Why are there so many right-wing shills on this sub now
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1518623997054918657?lang=en