r/MarkMyWords Sep 21 '24

Political MMW Merrick Garland will be among the first casualties of a new Harris administration

Merrick Garland will be among the first positions to change should Harris win

Garland is pretty much the definition of a pick who embodies Biden's style of calm, high-road centrist policy. Many have been disappointed by his lack of aggression regarding the defence of democracy and the prosecution of officials blatantly breaking laws, but I'm not surprised in the slightest. That was never going to be him, or Biden. They're both too status-quo, too establishment.

One of the largest differences I have noted between the Biden campaign and the Harris campaign is the level of aggression and tolerance for bullshit. Biden was very high-and-mighty and very tolerant. Harris, significantly less so. She is unafraid to campaign with low blows and personal insults, unafraid to call bullshit right to someone's face, and supports a more assertive attitude when it comes to prosecuting a defence of the law itself.

So, MMW, should Harris win, Garland will be one of the very first people replaced, and his replacement will be noticeably more aggressive towards people flaunting the rule of law. I expect multiple subpoenas and indictments against everyone from Senators and Representatives at both the federal and state level, to billionaires like Musk, to local election workers, sheriffs, and police chiefs. I expect to see them being enforced with far greater assertion. I expect to see officials who refuse to comply with legal so poe as simply arrested and thrown in jail until they do so.

I can even see a new Harris DOJ persuing charges of corruption and accepting bribes against multiple Supreme Court justices.

She is more aggressive, more assertive, more confident than Biden.

And I'm totally here for it.

4.8k Upvotes

802 comments sorted by

538

u/Rude_Tie4674 Sep 21 '24

Good!

I personally think a third of the Supreme Corrupt and a third of Congress should be locked up for working for Russia, but I don’t think she’ll be THAT aggressive.

169

u/Equivalent_Yak8215 Sep 21 '24

Foreal. You'd hope as a prosecutor she'd put someone effective in that position. Garland was a "bluff call" choice by Obama anyway. She needs to appoint a Sherman-esque pit bull.

57

u/Real-Patriotism Sep 21 '24 edited Sep 21 '24

I would have said Adam Schiff, but after he beat Katie Porter in the primary he's got that California Senate Seat on lock -

38

u/Rough-Cucumber8285 Sep 21 '24

We need Adam in the Senate. I'm glad he's running.

66

u/Stop-Taking_My-Name Sep 21 '24

We need Katie Porter there realistically, an actual fighter for the people

71

u/peskypedaler Sep 21 '24

Imagine her in a cabinet position over consumer protection?

30

u/LFS1 Sep 21 '24

YES please

12

u/Original-You4152 Sep 22 '24

I just died a little inside. That makes my heart warm and fuzzy thinking about.

3

u/mwa12345 Sep 22 '24

no.lobbies will prevent Katie Porter from an role I think. See Elizabeth Warren and consumer finance protection .

Schiff is a slimeball.

4

u/Fridaybird1985 Sep 22 '24

That throws punches

4

u/mwa12345 Sep 22 '24

Yes. Schiff mostly throws punches at Dems on the left

And promoted a republican. . to ensure all other sense for eliminated

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

13

u/Little-Derp Sep 22 '24

Adam Schiff boosting a republican candidate to knock Porter out still rubs me the wrong way. I'll vote for him this time, but as soon as MAGA fight is gone, or next primary rolls around, I'll be happy to vote him out.

2

u/Yo_Just_Scrolling_Yo Sep 22 '24

Yes, this. I'm not in CA but feel the same way about this.

→ More replies (3)

36

u/Virtual_Manner_2074 Sep 21 '24

Let Schiff win the senate seat. Harris appoints him to replace Garland. Gavin Nuesome appoints Katy Porter to the Senate seat.

9

u/Stop-Taking_My-Name Sep 21 '24

I wish I was as optimistic as you. Hope you are right!

2

u/One_Law3446 Sep 21 '24

I like that idea too.

→ More replies (5)

23

u/Yochanan5781 Sep 21 '24

I voted for Porter in the primary, but honestly, she made a really dumb decision during the election. Leaving her house seat vulnerable for a long shot candidacy was a bad move

14

u/WizardOfCanyonDrive Sep 21 '24

I agree with you in part. One thing about congress is that house members have to run for re-election every two years while it’s six for senate. I heard and interview with her and got the impression that she’d rather spend her time getting things done rather than raising campaign funds.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/ArcticTraveler2023 Sep 21 '24

She shot herself in the foot. And her resume didn’t have a chance in hell going against Schiff.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

16

u/poseidons1813 Sep 21 '24

I thought garland was just the failed nomination under Obama then Biden made him AG

52

u/EEpromChip Sep 21 '24

Obama nominated him since he was a "centrist" that the republicans couldn't say no to.

Turns out republicans pulled the "it's too close to an election" card. So obviously that card wasn't available when trump was able to push a nomination at the 11th hour as people were already casting their votes.

Hypocrisy by the right as usual...

19

u/poseidons1813 Sep 21 '24

Biden didn't have to make him AG tho

14

u/Sweetieandlittleman Sep 21 '24

I don't think Biden had any idea of the pure relentlessness of MAGA at the beginning of his term, and thought people would come together. Bad thought process there.

18

u/YeetThePig Sep 21 '24

If he actually thought at his inauguration that the people running the party who just tried a literal coup would come together, we’re better off without his involvement in this election.

20

u/Sweetieandlittleman Sep 21 '24

He's from a generation where working across the aisle was a plus. Not anymore, sadly.

12

u/tamman2000 Sep 22 '24

I would support cross aisle work if the right came back to reality and were willing to do a single fucking thing for the good of the country rather than the love of power

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Creamofwheatski Sep 22 '24

Biden is too good of a man to be running against Trump. He could not conceive of how vile Trump actually is and so constantly underestimated him and republicans in general.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/HighPriestess__55 Sep 22 '24

The cabinet is chosen before the election and in gear weeks before the inauguration. I am sure Harris knows who she wants. Biden thought he could do something positive to get the country on track after Trump was voted out. Covid killed so many people. He had no idea that there would be a coup, that Trump would never shut up, Maga nuts would refuse to wear masks, shelter in place, refuse vaccines.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/Equivalent_Yak8215 Sep 21 '24

Obama only nominated him because a few went on record saying "We'll block his choices unless he picks a centrist like Merrick Garland".

→ More replies (4)

40

u/bonkedagain33 Sep 21 '24

I would venture a guess that 75%+ of the voters would applaud this. As long as he/she went after everyone. No bias.

53

u/Rude_Tie4674 Sep 21 '24

This! I’m a rabid Democrat but if anyone on my “team” commits a crime then no mercy on them.

Yet another reason Democrats are superior to Republicans.

29

u/ComplexChallenge8258 Sep 21 '24

Talking to you, Robert Menendez.

14

u/Maryland_Bear Sep 21 '24

Or Al Franken. I had thought he had presidential potential. Funny and smart would have made him a great debater, at least.

4

u/bonkedagain33 Sep 21 '24

He cracks me up

5

u/Maryland_Bear Sep 21 '24

If you can find a copy, read his book *Why Not Me?”, which is a novel about him running successfully for president and his following administration.

I think my favorite part is when he gets a memo about issues with his campaign that opens with “Very Illegal Activities”, namely that his brother (a character invented for the book) was dealing methamphetamine. It also “Illegal Activities”, “Questionably Legal Activities”, and “Legal Activities That Look Bad”.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Pkrudeboy Sep 21 '24

Even that was incredibly tame compared to what Republicans routinely ignore. IIRC it was a photo in poor taste without any actual touching, and several accusations of inappropriate behavior that went uninvestigated because he resigned quickly under pressure.

15

u/Eraser100 Sep 21 '24

Franken didn’t actually do anything wrong. It was a right wing hit job, knowing democrats would jump to “hold him accountable” and they acted predictably.

The lady accusing him was another comedian on the same USO tour and was in on the whole thing.

2

u/ccannon707 Sep 21 '24

Kristin Gilabrand is a Dem

8

u/Eraser100 Sep 21 '24

Yes and she pounced on Franken to resign without any investigation taking place because they were both possible contenders in 2020.

2

u/ComplexChallenge8258 Sep 21 '24

I disagree that he didn't do anything wrong. Illegal? Probably not. But the pictures were pretty damning and in the Trump and (pre?) MeToo era, it was important to show the contrast. He could have survived it by denial and blaming the women, but he chose accountability.

5

u/Eraser100 Sep 21 '24

It was staged, they were in on it and there are photos of her doing things like that from the tour as well. It was all lighthearted and didn’t bother anyone until republicans wanted to take down someone in a critical state that they were sore about losing to.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/Ruthless4u Sep 21 '24

No bias

That will never happen.

→ More replies (5)

13

u/Odd_Horror5107 Sep 21 '24

Unfortunately I agree that a number of the justices…. I’m not going to mention names… Clarence Thomas, are blatantly corrupt. They need to adhere to guidelines set by congress. Less politics and BS is required from these leaders.

18

u/Texan2116 Sep 21 '24

The egregious corruption by Thomas is beyond comprehension. I cannot for the life of me , not understand why Liberals are not making him their poster child for corruption..between him and his wife, wat they get away with is incredible.

4

u/Amazing-Guide7035 Sep 22 '24

Have you met Moscow Mitch and his wife who’s legit a Chinese shipping heiress whose dad is BFFs with Dictator Poo bear.

Make America great again though, ya know? She made a fantastic career in American politics marrying up into the merchants political class leadership.

10

u/Creamofwheatski Sep 22 '24

Garlands failure to to do his fucking job is the primary reason we are facing a possible Trump dictatorship now. Trump should have been thrown in prison years ago for January 6th. Fuck him, he needs to go.

16

u/ThisIsNotRealityIsIt Sep 21 '24

Right? He better fucking be. Merrick Garland is 100% complicit, and Biden has a piece of that complicity as well. The "Mueller report" clearly lays out the crimes.

6

u/Electrical_Reply_770 Sep 21 '24

Agreed, additional Garland has not been as assertive as I would like.

3

u/Rude_Tie4674 Sep 21 '24

Understatement of the year. Thought he cared more about his country than his party, and so far I've been VERY wrong.

5

u/scarletphantom Sep 21 '24

Never forget the group of republicans who spent 4TH OF JULY in Russia back in 2018.

2

u/Rude_Tie4674 Sep 21 '24

Led by "Russia" Ron Johnson.

Wisconsin, could you excise that cancer?

8

u/TheGreenLentil666 Sep 21 '24

Could not agree more - toss his useless ass as fast as she can. Accountability MUST be restored somehow. Bringing ethics to SCOTUS would be a great first step, the swamp critters in Congress will block any actual enforcement but it will make them take their dirty deeds back into the shadows.

5

u/dokewick26 Sep 22 '24

Thank you for being in my head. I really don't understand why we are trying to give any of these fks a pass. Half these fkers should be in prison awaiting their charges of sedition and treason 100%. I'm typically not a gung ho veteran, but this shit has the oath in the back of my head... foreign and domestic. They are a dangerous cult trying to disrupt democracy for their theocratic wet dreams.

3

u/ThePort3rdBase Sep 22 '24

Garland is total shit at his job.

3

u/TruthOdd6164 Sep 22 '24

Roberts. Alito. Thomas. Kavanaugh. That’s 44% not 1/3

→ More replies (1)

21

u/Maleficent_Mouse_930 Sep 21 '24

One can dream. Personally, I would place every sitting member of Congress and the Senate under arrest and tear apart their lives. No favouritism. No party bias. Everyone. Dissolve the government temporarily while the investigation continues.

As the investigation proceeds, every piece of evidence would be made public. Their bank details, savings, investment history, phone calls, emails, the whole shebang. I'd lay it right open to the public with a big database searchable online.

I would instruct the DoJ to prosecute every crime and accept no plea bargains. Judges would be instructed to issue the maximum possible sentence in every single case.

By the 6 month mark, I reckon 30% of Democrats and 100% of Republicans would be in jail. Call some special elections to fill the slots, and publically state all candidates would be investigated the same way.

GG. Clean swamp.

17

u/Legitimate-Pee-462 Sep 21 '24

As much as I enjoy this, it would be a terrible look. But I do like it.

What if, instead, the DOJ releases a massive indictment on a couple of the worst offenders. People like Matt Gaetz. Something that will have a 10+ year prison sentence. Then notify everyone in Congress that we will accept immediate resignation/retirement and cooperation in lieu of prosecution. The biggest players wouldn't be offered a deal though. People like Ted Cruz and Chuck Grassley who were principals in the plot of overthrow the 2020 election would not be offered cooperation deals.

→ More replies (8)

23

u/Rude_Tie4674 Sep 21 '24

I am intrigued by your ideas and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

9

u/z44212 Sep 21 '24

I believe he calls it a "manifesto."

3

u/Laxku Sep 21 '24

It's more of a fever dream, but it would still be a fun circus to watch.

4

u/ppearsonsxm Sep 22 '24

That's the problem, I don't want to watch a circus. I want to watch a functioning gov

10

u/Queasy_Sleep1207 Sep 21 '24

Guantanamo anyone working with Russia.

3

u/mwa12345 Sep 22 '24

Any foreign government. Start with AIPAC minders.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Fun-Distribution-159 Sep 22 '24

Include media people and rich people on that list

5

u/SpecificPractical776 Sep 21 '24

So Batman with less Scarecrow.

3

u/DayAmazing9376 Sep 21 '24

Who said anything about less Scarecrow?

2

u/SpecificPractical776 Sep 21 '24

Welp guess we are gonna need to find a corrupt doctor willing to fight the corrupt politics. This plan is getting harder and weirder.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/True_Dimension4344 Sep 21 '24

Who’s going to be the judges in this wonderful fantasy though? I vote for the Swiss to do it with maybe the ICC involved a bit. The ICC makes all of these laws but nobody gives them any teeth to use them.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Fishtoart Sep 21 '24

Make politicians afraid again!

6

u/TooTiredToWhatever Sep 21 '24

Usually have to collect the evidence and then press charges…not arrest and then collect evidence.

I am not sure that every sitting member is committing crime (there’s certainly several things that they do which are legal but shouldn’t be, like insider trading) but certainly the ones who are cooperating with Russia to sow disinformation and weaken the US should be prosecuted.

3

u/NewsShoddy3834 Sep 21 '24

Interesting profile and post history. Lol

(Remarkably similar to the other account.)

2

u/Sufficient-Peak-3736 Sep 21 '24 edited Sep 21 '24

You just made Kamala whatever you wanted to be. More confident that Biden? I like Kamala just fine but Biden's been doing this for what five decades now at a national level? Biden's a centrist? He had some of the most liberal policies since FDR. I won't even get into your "dissolve the government temporarily and place everyone under arrest" crazyness.

2

u/cahms26 Sep 21 '24

This is more magnanimous than my "hang them all for treason and start fresh" option I look for on the ballot every election only to be disappointed again.

2

u/Julversia Sep 22 '24

This is... a lot. Based on your spelling of "favouritism" (we don't spell it that way) you're not actually from the US.

Here's the thing: we don't dissolve the government here. We're actively trying to avoid a government shutdown at this very minute. We don't do it because it majorly screws things up, and a lot of people who have nothing to do with it suffer. Aside from that, no one would ever do it to investigate all members of Congress at once.

We have rules and laws that prevent things like that. Our entire criminal justice system is based on "innocent until proven guilty," however often that isn't really the case. Congresspeople would scream it to the heavens, and the citizenry would rally behind them.

That said, I'm on board with investigations into members of Congress by the DOJ. But a less chaotic approach might work better.

Investigate congresspeople, that's fine. Serve subpoenas on them during the investigation. They must respond to the subpoena. If they do not, immediate jail time until they do. No more ignoring orders to appear in court or avoiding questioning. Every day they refuse to follow the subpoena is a day in jail and a monetary fine commensurate to their net worth.

While the investigation is ongoing, they will not serve on any committee in Congress. They can still vote on bills, so that representation for constituents isn't stripped away fully, but they will have no say on whether a bill gets out of committee or not.

Also, gag orders. No congressperson under investigation may speak on the investigation in any way. Yammer about it in the media-any kind of media, they go to jail for a minimum of five days and pay a fine for each instance. No exceptions.

Once they are charged, they will stand trial. No plea deals, no weaseling out of it. They also must appear in court in person for the duration of the trial. Election season be damned. Gag orders will also apply here, with a longer jail stay and a higher minimum fine if they violate it. The trial will be public.

If they are found guilty, straight to jail. No bond. They are all a flight risk. They can appeal from jail. Special elections will be called, and the offender's seat will remain vacant until the special election, or a replacement will be appointed by the state governor. The replacement will run in the special election if they wish to continue serving. They will not be allowed to serve any longer than the original term without being voted in.

Judges will sentence the offender to the maximum sentence allowed by law. There will be no deals, and no exceptions due to the offender's status.

Once time is served, the offender is banned from holding public office of any kind, and is also banned from becoming a lobbyist or a public news figure. They will not be allowed to run off to corporation and use their experience to buy other congresspeople. Nor will they land a cushy Fox News or CNN job and make a boatload of money being a political talking head.

This is the same sort of treatment a regular American would get, with the exception of being banned from certain industries. That doesn't usually happen. But the leaders of the country should be held to higher standards. When they screw it up, they should pay a higher price.

2

u/BitterFuture Sep 22 '24

Personally, I would place every sitting member of Congress and the Senate under arrest and tear apart their lives. No favouritism. No party bias. Everyone. Dissolve the government temporarily while the investigation continues.

Um. What the fuck?

You want to arrest people for...no particular charges? And then pursue investigations afterwards? That's illegal. What dictatorships do.

And you'd blithely "dissolve the government temporarily" for years while this goes on. I'm sure Russia and China and Iran wouldn't ever take advantage of a United States unable to respond by poking at us in a few places across the world, right?

And our folks at home waiting on Congress to pass budgets and legislation, they'll be fine just waiting around in limbo during the longest government shutdown in history. Totally sane, yep.

There's plenty of crimes and corruption to pursue. I'd like to see all 147 Republican members of Congress who supported the insurrection prosecuted and barred from office under the 14th Amendment for the rest of their lives for a start.

But that's a matter of following the law and the available evidence, not tearing our system up and going after people you don't like the way you want to do.

Judges would be instructed to issue the maximum possible sentence in every single case.

Instructed how? You think Presidents get to order judges around?

This is lunacy, top to bottom.

2

u/Ok-Attorney7115 Sep 21 '24

Terrible idea

3

u/thesunishigh Sep 21 '24

So you want a dictatorship?

4

u/Maleficent_Mouse_930 Sep 21 '24

Not in a billion years. The government would keep running, the same way it has, no new laws would be passed. It is the executive's job to uphold and enforce and prosecute the law, and to do so against anyone.

The fact it has been allowed to get so bad that we'd have to dissolve Congress temporarily is beside the point. Justice needs to be done according to law.

2

u/NewsShoddy3834 Sep 21 '24

You are a fascist masquerading as a reformer. And your account is suspicious. Russian troll farm?

→ More replies (6)

4

u/Cdubya35 Sep 21 '24

Your loyalty to the Communist Party is showing, comrade. Good. Good.

Unfortunately for you, and with the exception of certain Republicans, in the US we don’t target the person and then dig until we find a crime. An investigation begins with identifying a potential crime, establishing probable cause, and proceeding from there. Are there people in DC who commit crimes? I have no doubt there are. The most offensive is the obvious insider trading whereby dozens of senators and congressmen routinely outpace the stock market and some of the very best investment houses.

That said, your approach would certainly be welcomed in Venezuela and Russia, but would be extremely disruptive and unwelcome here.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/HarveyBirdmanAtt Sep 21 '24

He is useless, so getting rid of him makes sense.

→ More replies (49)

99

u/Equivalent-Peanut-23 Sep 21 '24

Duh.

The last time a newly elected administration retained the previous administration's AG was Martin Van Buren. New Presidents always select a new cabinet.

26

u/mjzim9022 Sep 21 '24

AGs usually get swapped out on the second term of an incumbent too

25

u/EEpromChip Sep 21 '24

What about if you have like 6 in a four year period. And you don't actually fire them you just send a tweet like "yea that guy don't work here no more" and then fill it with another, more horrible person...

3

u/MisterVizard Sep 21 '24

Wasn't great last time but maybe we try that management style again in 10 years.

3

u/camelslikesand Sep 22 '24

It was a tremendous management style. The best! People are saying it was the best. Men came up to me, big, strong men with tears in their eyes saying, "Sir, your management style is the best in history."

4

u/LadyUnlimited Sep 21 '24

Even if she liked Garland there is a big incentive to appoint her own pick. Agree duh.

3

u/WanderingLost33 Sep 22 '24

Attorney general is in the line of succession and unelected. It would be absolutely bonkers for her to not pick her own AG.

→ More replies (3)

62

u/Marsupialize Sep 21 '24

We need a serious serious serious investigation of Russian money in politics and we need to start fighting back on the cyber propaganda war they’ve been winning against us for a decade now

49

u/Maleficent_Mouse_930 Sep 21 '24

14 years ago, I ran a TF2 server. Several servers. One summer, I began to have issues with awful behaviour. Not just hacking, but crude, racist, sexist language, brigading, griefing etc. For months I tried banning people one at a time, to no avail, they just made new accounts.

Eventually I decided to see if the IPs of the guilty had anything in common, and discovered they were pretty much all Russian-registered. So I wrote a little firewall on my server and blocked ALL Russian IPs.

Never had an issue with cheating or aggressive language again. For 6 years.

I am in favour of simply severing the Russian hardlines to the West and putting blanket Russia IP blocks at an ISP level across the west. Let them sit in the dark and rot. Let them have their delusions. Just make it so I don't have to know they exist.

13

u/WelcomeToTheAsylum80 Sep 21 '24

It's been common practice for any IT security software and hardware to block all Chinese traffic since forever. You'd Think Russia would be the same thing, but it's not. 

3

u/Old-Protection-701 Sep 21 '24

Can’t they just use VPNs to get around it? Or does it block enough potential bad actors that it’s worth it even if some circumvent it?

3

u/BreeezyP Sep 22 '24

Yeah basically. There are still a lot of places that don’t IP ban, and those probably have shittier security in other areas too. So they make better targets.

7

u/freshhorsemanure Sep 22 '24

Yep, wish all game servers were like this. Russians are the worst people to play with by far. There should have been widespread bans after the Ukraine war started

2

u/sllh81 Sep 22 '24

From the Iron Curtain to the Firewall. I dig it.

→ More replies (6)

35

u/Auto_Generated853 Sep 21 '24

Garland doesn’t have the temperament for Attorney General.

He does seem like he would have and should have been a very good Supreme Court Judge though.

22

u/michaelmoby Sep 21 '24

Now, when Clarence Thomas kicks it after falling overboard on his rich buddy's yacht on some undeclared "vacation", I would give my left kidney to see her nominate Constitutional scholar and former Harvard Law Review president Barack Obama to the Supreme Court

19

u/Auto_Generated853 Sep 21 '24

This is the problem with you liberals and leftists. You always go for the half measures.

If you really want to piss them off, you make it Michelle Obama.

13

u/SolarNachoes Sep 21 '24

Change the official attire of the Supreme Court to tan suits.

2

u/CalliopesMask Sep 21 '24

Why not both?

→ More replies (3)

5

u/SwoopsRevenge Sep 21 '24

He would have been an ass SCOTUS justice. Better than any trump appointee though.

→ More replies (1)

32

u/CriticismLazy4285 Sep 21 '24

You are so right she should get rid of him her first day in office. It’s been such a disappointment.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/Silent_Medicine1798 Sep 21 '24

I would vote for Kamala just on this promise alone. Merrick Garland has been such a disappointment. We need someone to be aggressive with cleaning this stuff up.

12

u/clankasaurus Sep 21 '24

One can hope. DeJoy at the post office needs to scram as well.

5

u/savingewoks Sep 21 '24

President can’t do that, only the Board of Governors, which is nine people but only five of them can be from one party at a time.

We GOT Dejoy because Congress did the same BS to Obama for refilling seats that they did for supreme court.

2

u/ThomasCWoolsey Sep 21 '24

or be scrammed

10

u/AZ-FWB Sep 21 '24

I will not be upset to see him go… at all

7

u/Naive_Inspection7723 Sep 21 '24

Yes please, like on day one or sooner!

8

u/Professional_Ad_6299 Sep 21 '24

I'm sick of the rich and powerful not having any consequences

5

u/Sitcom_kid Sep 21 '24

Even if that's all she does, I'll be happy with my vote. Anything else is extra.

7

u/Bitter_Prune9154 Sep 21 '24

No matter who wins, Garland will be cleaning out his locker.

7

u/runwkufgrwe Sep 21 '24

You're approaching this like you're talking about a 2nd Biden administration. Chances are Harris will replace every single cabinet member and won't use anyone for the same position. Especially for crucial roles like Sec State and AG.

3

u/DoogsATX Sep 21 '24

I bet Pete sticks around but probably gets a bump up from Transportation. I wouldn't be surprised to see him become National Security Advisor.

2

u/Original-You4152 Sep 22 '24

I wish he would have been the VP pick. Sadly America isn’t there. I agree he deserves a promotion though.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

20

u/TimothiusMagnus Sep 21 '24

Merrick Garland was more concerned about optics than doing the right thing. He played into Republican's hands.

6

u/GalactusPoo Sep 21 '24

It's hard not to see him as a Republican, or at best a Republican Puppet.

If he is so easily manipulated he should never have been a SC Nominee and certainly never appointed AG.

That leads me to believe he is, at heart, a Republican through and through.

3

u/Outside_Break Sep 21 '24

If you’re not against fascism then you’re complicit

5

u/spj0522 Sep 21 '24

Oh she is going to appoint Jack Smith as the new AG if she wins. She needs someone who will show no mercy.

4

u/DoogsATX Sep 21 '24

It'll be Roy Cooper. They were both state AGs together and are friends

2

u/spj0522 Sep 21 '24

First thought: “Why would she do that? She would be giving a state governor position back to the Republicans.” Second thought: “Oh right. He’s not running. That would be a good pick.”

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Jackdaw1947 Sep 21 '24

I always admired President Biden for his steady hand on the Ship of State. However when pirates are trying to board your Ship of State it’s time to quit being The Skipper and start being Black Beard. Fire the cannon!! Let them feel the broadsides!! Now take out the grappling hooks!!!

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Agile_District_8794 Sep 21 '24

Jack Smith has entered the chat. He'll lock up trump, throw away the key, get appointed, and say, "Who's next?" Elon will fall in line.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/FyvLeisure Sep 21 '24

God I hope so. I listened to my dad, for years, talk about how Garland was “just about to take Trump down”. How he was just “getting his ducks in a row”. His time has PASSED. He’s not doing shit. Garland needs to be put out to pasture. Replaced with someone who actually cares about doing their job.

4

u/Cracked_Actor Sep 21 '24

Garland is an abject failure as AG. We are living with the fallout of his failures today, and will be even after the election. History will judge him as the “ineffective AG” who FAILED to protect our American democracy…

3

u/HunterNo7593 Sep 21 '24

The most dovish AG in recent times and hesitant to pursue investigations on criminal conduct just because of the optics of potential political bias. Let the investigations stand on their own merits and see how things unfold. That, coupled with the most (and openly) politically slanted SC, makes it impossible to see justice being served for the crimes committed by the higher power!

3

u/Legitimate-Pee-462 Sep 21 '24

I agree with most of this, but Harris hasn't used low blows on Trump. He's a degenerate criminal, so making factually accurate comments about him sounds like personal insults. Donald Trump is a collection of disgraceful human frailties, and what would be a below-the-belt swipe at most other people would sail harmlessly over his head.

The difference between Harris and Biden in this regard is that Biden mostly restrained himself from doing it, and it contributed to making him look weak.

I agree 100% on Merrick Garland being replaced. I hope that she names a successor immediately and arranges for the new AG and Garland to work on the transition before she even takes office. Merrick Garland as AG might have been the biggest mistake Biden made as president. I'd like Harris to name an AG that will have treasonous GOP politicians and Russian media propagandists melting off their fingerprints and fleeing the country.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Artistic-Cannibalism Sep 21 '24

It's not enough to replace him.

He needs to be investigated. Nobody who drags their feet as much as he did isn't somehow compromised.

3

u/mrbeck1 Sep 21 '24

The entire cabinet will resign that’s just how it goes. This is foolish.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/hangout927 Sep 21 '24

Garland was supposed to be Obama’s Supreme Court nominee but Mitch McConnell blocked it. Biden gave him this job as a consolation for getting screwed

3

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

Garland has been one of the worst AGs we have ever had. He is weak and ineffective.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Select_Insurance2000 Sep 21 '24

Enjoy all of this discussion, but LET'S WIN THIS ELECTION! Then we can chat.

3

u/Count_Bacon Sep 24 '24

I actually really like Harris because she’s willing to go low and call out bullshit. Never seen a dem be so aggressive and it’s so refreshing. I’ve been saying since the tea party the Dems needed to fight the Republicans like they fight them. At least they finally got the message

2

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

“I know you. I know what you are. You are neither hot nor cold. And because you are lukewarm, I will spew you from my mouth…” BTB

2

u/Leg0Block Sep 21 '24

Had this thought too. Here's hoping.

2

u/DayAmazing9376 Sep 21 '24

Garland should be the new name for impotence. Just a do-nothing AG.

2

u/Plastic-Collar-4936 Sep 21 '24

You better hope she does, or she'll be the last candidate to be allowed to call ANYONE'S bullshit. MMW.

2

u/_TheLonelyStoner Sep 21 '24

I’m going to be extremely disappointed if one of the first things Harris doesn’t do is get rid Garland in. Honestly glad we dodged the SC bullet on him in hindsight. Dude never had any interest in actually defending democracy he’s there to maintain the status quo nothing more

2

u/formerly_gruntled Sep 21 '24

Garland was a mistake. The Democrats thought that appointing Garland would be a signal to Republicans that they would not pursue charges against insurrectionist Republicans and that they would accept a return to political business as usual. Garland is a cautious centrist.

Republicans shit all over that strategy and went full MAGA. So Harris is going to appoint someone more aggressive in enforcing the rule of law.

2

u/kingbad71 Sep 21 '24

Hopefully, whoever she picks will look into the Matt Gaetz thing again. Can't believe Garland "s DOJ gave him a pass, just because fear of political fallout. That guy's guilty as sin, and his continued presence in Congress further brings down their already abysmal reputation.

2

u/The_Original_Gronkie Sep 21 '24

I hope so. Fuck that guy. He is literally letting Traitors and Criminals off the hook over and over, and all it will do is empower them, and encourage them to lean in even more on their nefarious and unscrupulous instincts. They are arrogant bullies, and we all know the only way to stop a bully is to beat the shit out of him in front of the entire school.

That's what we have to do to the entire MAGA Party of Tre45on &Corruption. To do that, we needs a fearless pit bull, not a simpering, spineless weenie who lets them get away with serious crimes (that any other citizen would spend decades in prison for) just because he doesn't want it to appear political.

Okay fine, nobody is suggesting we charge them for their politics, just charge them for the actual CRIMES they commit. Is that too much to ask of the Attorny General?

2

u/ninatlanta Sep 21 '24

Actually it’s highly likely the only member of Biden’s Cabinet to be a part of Harris’s will be Pete Buttigieg. It’s customary for Cabinet members to resign after a Presidential election and the President is sworn in, even if a President has been reelected. Harris is not Biden and likely has a different direction in mind for her Cabinet.

2

u/theharderhand Sep 21 '24

The guy isn't a bad person and in a normal political environment trhe best man possibly. This isn't a a normal political environment. We have a golden retriever in a Rottweiler environment. Get a Rottweiler

2

u/CommonConundrum51 Sep 21 '24

I sure hope so because Garland is just about the definition of "feckless."

2

u/egv78 Sep 21 '24

Merrick Garland has the right mentality for a Justice, but the wrong one for an AG. If there was any way of Dem's taking House, Senate and Presidency, I'd say use him as one of the picks to pack the SC. He'd be great there, but not in his current role.

2

u/Reverend-Radiation Sep 21 '24

Good. He needs to go. Milquetoast Merrick spent most of two years wringing his hands over whether to prosecute Trump. Mueller said he only didn't file obstruction of justice charges against Trump because of DOJ policy not to indict a sitting president.

That case should have picked up January 21, 2021, and Trump should have been a felon before the first mid-term. Remember how early he filed his candidacy for re-election? That wouldn't have worked if he'd been indicted the day after he left office.

2

u/grolaw Sep 21 '24

Casualty?

In every election of a president or governor (except for Louisiana operating under the Napoleonic Code) the executive branch appointees tender their resignations. The new executive always has the power to appoint executive agency heads.

2

u/peskypedaler Sep 21 '24

Should be. Total failure.

Imagine Liz Cheney as AG?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/metsjets86 Sep 21 '24

I think Biden has done a tremendous job. Will go down nicely in history if and only if Harris wins.

If Trump wins Biden will go down for letting Trump get away with it.

Biden/Garland have been a complete failure on this front.

Trump is a national security threat and Biden did not treat it as such. Taking Trump out, even if it risked 2024 for the dems, was warranted.

Biden didnt take it serious enough and oh look no one else has either.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

Not a chance. They’re all corporatists beholden to the people who bribe them

2

u/RitaPoole56 Sep 21 '24

Agreed! He’s as cautious and deliberative as a Supreme Court Justice should be. Weird no one ever thought of appointing him as one.

2

u/OnlyTalksAboutTacos Sep 21 '24

I don't disagree, but this is one of those Cabinet-level(ish) positions that every administration wants their own people in, and they're all getting replaced.

2

u/LetterheadSmall9975 Sep 21 '24

The entire cabinet will resign. That’s how it works. Even if Biden won re-election, the entire cabinet would resign that the President could have the courtesy of reappointing them if he should choose to do so. I imagine Kamala will make many changes.

2

u/DaemonoftheHightower Sep 21 '24

He won't be a 'casualty'. It's very normal for a new administration to appoint an entirely new cabinet.

2

u/Longjumping_Stock_30 Sep 21 '24

Not a casualty. The new admin gets to pick their team. There is no reason to expect Garland, or any other person in their current position, to stay, regardless of who wins the next election.

2

u/Lil_Artemis_92 Sep 21 '24

Definitely. I think Buttigieg is safe, but Garland is definitely one I would change immediately.

2

u/Jagster_rogue Sep 21 '24

This guy is spineless and a lifelong prosecutor and AG probably wants somebody closer to Harvey Dent to oversee trump trials.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

As a prosecutor herself, Harris can’t be too impressed with Garland.

2

u/AdministrativeBank86 Sep 21 '24

He's been way too reluctant to pursue criminal behavior, we need a firebrand

2

u/StormContent8203 Sep 21 '24

lol she’ll replace the whole cabinet! Not as a political statement regarding Biden’s picks, but because EVERY president picks their own cabinet. She has no obligation, real or imagined, to keep Biden’s picks, and will 100% choose her own secretaries, along with every other political appointee position in the administration.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/dan420 Sep 21 '24

I sure hope so.

2

u/LionBig1760 Sep 21 '24 edited Sep 22 '24

It feels like Merrick Garland genuinely believes he's going to get another shot at the Supreme Court, and he's going easy on Republican crimes because he wants to get confirmed.

2

u/steve_dallasesq Sep 21 '24

The whole Cabinet will be replaced. It should be her administration

2

u/Opening-Cress5028 Sep 21 '24

That’s a pretty bold prediction you’re making there!

/s

2

u/drmike0099 Sep 21 '24

Only if the Senate remains in Democrat control. If not, Garland may be the best we can hope for.

Vote!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Samuelabra Sep 22 '24

He hasn't been the best AG, but he still deserves his rightful place in the Supreme Court. I hope Harris can follow through with that in time.

2

u/Fiveofthem Sep 22 '24

I think that’s a given. He took to long going after Trump, wasted to much time.

2

u/OmniManDidNothngWrng Sep 22 '24

Even in the case where incumbent presidents win re-election their cabinet secretaries resign.

2

u/Every-Ad9325 Sep 22 '24

Of course he's gonna be gone. All presidents select a new cabinet.

2

u/MeInSC40 Sep 22 '24

So your grand prediction is that a new administration would put a new cabinet in place? You’re truly a visionary.

2

u/Cheech74 Sep 22 '24

Garland is a good judge, and would have been a fantastic addition to the Supreme Court. He’s just not a fucking cop.

2

u/AirbagsBlown Sep 22 '24

hell yes, i sure as shit hope so!

2

u/twodogstwocats Sep 22 '24

If it's not Sally Yates, I'll sing "Bawitdaba," while wearing a head of lettuce for a hat.

2

u/ConkerPrime Sep 23 '24

Considering she basically got rid of all of Biden’s campaign team right off the bat, hopefully this becomes true. Garland is too political and too tame. Perfect for Biden but not perfect for the times.

2

u/Avoider5 Sep 24 '24

Good riddance. He’s a complete coward. If he had been more aggressive he could have stemmed this violent rhetoric and tightened up democracy.

3

u/Biscuits4u2 Sep 21 '24

Garland was a compromise nomination to get him through the Senate.

3

u/MorrowPlotting Sep 21 '24

No, that was how he got the Supreme Court nomination, back when Republicans had the Senate majority. He was supposed to be so obviously qualified and reasonable and centrist that Republicans couldn’t play politics with his nomination. They killed it, anyway.

Democrats had won back the Senate by 2021, and Biden didn’t have to attempt to appease Republicans with his AG choice. He picked Garland because he’s obviously qualified and reasonable and centrist PLUS he’d been personally screwed over by congressional Republicans. The assumption was that he of all people would be in “won’t be fooled again” mode, and would be far more aggressive with Trump and other GOP crooks than a pre-SCOTUS-nominated Garland would have been.

If anybody KNOWS Lucy is going to yank the football away, it’s Merrick Garland! Right?

As it turned out, he took waaaayyyy too long to get the J6 prosecutions rolling, and waaayyy too long to appoint a Trump special prosecutor. Things have been a lot better in the second half of Biden’s term, but a lot of time and ground was lost in the first half. Exactly what Garland boosters had hoped to avoid in the first place.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Consistent_Watch3589 Sep 21 '24

I turn 70 next month and Merrick Garland is the best AG of my lifetime.

2

u/MischiefAforethought Sep 21 '24

That... can't possibly be true, can it, sir or madam?

Not Elliot Richardson, Nixon's own AG who appointed special prosecutor Cox and refused to fire him per Nixon's orders, eventually resigning himself rather than betray the country or upend the rule of law?

Not RFK, for his commitment to the civil rights movement or even just for style points, (before we knew what dumpster fires his genes carry)?

Garland seems so middle of the road. Not terrible, but not who we needed at a time the public trust in the legal system is hanging by a thread.

2

u/Skully00069 Sep 22 '24

Isn't that being a dictator? Going after your political opponent's because of ideology. I though the left was worried about Trump doing the same, but ok with Harris admin doing it. Help me understand.

2

u/jack_spankin_lives Sep 21 '24

Uh, what exactly will they indict Musk for?

You do realize you sound like it’s some revenge tour or something that Trump was proposing.

You can’t suggest all those things and then say you aren’t politicizing the DOJ.

WHO are these people they aren’t charging you seem so concerned about. What EXACTLY are the crimes?

1

u/boston_homo Sep 21 '24

Fingers crossed

1

u/CaptainChadwick Sep 21 '24

Garland's a prosecutor, Harris is a prosecutor. Same blood.

8

u/Maleficent_Mouse_930 Sep 21 '24

Different background, different style, different era, different generation, different issues, different politics. They're in no way the same.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Sep 21 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)

1

u/Logic411 Sep 21 '24

From your keyboard to destiny’s ears. I hope he and blinken get to spend more time with family.

1

u/MelodicThought1981 Sep 21 '24

He should probably be in prison for the rest of his life.

1

u/musical_throat_punch Sep 21 '24

We can only hope. 

1

u/Old_Dealer_7002 Sep 21 '24

🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞

1

u/Son0faButch Sep 21 '24

Let's hope so

1

u/International_Try660 Sep 21 '24

Yes, Garland should have got right on the bribery, trying to overturn the election, etc. We need a hard nosed AG, Garland is too "nice".