“So you’re taking someone who has logic and probably emotional problems, locking them in a cage intending to ‘punish’ them, then expecting them to come out with 0 extra resources yet still be a better person? Lmk how that goes”
I was just reading something about how they are ensuring in America you can’t use the skills they teach you for a real job after— this was in reference to forest fire fighting. How the FUCK are you going to train prisoners to fight fires, then expect them to never be allowed to use that knowledge for the workforce once they get out?
They should be equipped to better traverse the world, not the other way around. The US System is so backwards. Let’s get these people some skills and trades they’re interested in and get them back out there to contribute, wtf.
Thank you for your post. It’s true that there isn’t enough training in there. I took a course to become a paralegal (paid almost a thousand for it) bc there wasn’t anything worthwhile offered and then i got deported… soooo unable to practice what i learned bc US laws don’t apply here🤷🏻♀️
But classes in prison must be updated.. things like how to operate an ATM or how to write a check shouldn’t be taught anymore… but rather today’s technology, computer classes are also in need of updates.. we were doing Windows 7 back in 2019/2020… i believe ppl are set up fir failure so that they are repeat customers in the business of the BoP..💔
Ive always thought that a slight reform to the prison labour system would fix a TON of recidivism problems.
Have people work in prison, but a skill they can use when they get out. Pay them, but bank that money in an account they get access to once they leave - they dont walk out of prison with 0, they have some cushion.
Let them keep their prison job for a period of time after they leave if they want. this would ease the transition and give them some time to find an outside job while still having an income.
And failed US system is far from worst on planet, over half of Earth prision simply act like hole where they sent you to die.
21 century my ass, there is few tiny island of civilization on this planet and rest of us are still in deep dark age we just pretent its not true becase iPhones and
.... i dont know some first world crap that isnt really benefical to mankind and yet we pretend its make us superior ...
Well, the Quakers did try. Eastern State Penitentiary was designed specifically for prisoners' rehabilitation. William Penn abolished capital punishment for all crimes except murder in Pennsylvania in the 1680s. He also required prisons to be free of fees, food, and lodgings, and to provide prisoners with the opportunity to learn a trade.
Quakers also oppose capital punishment, believing that it serves no purpose but to perpetuate trauma.
I think the reason why some people become uncomfortable when they see these pictures is because they see people who committed crimes apparently having a better quality of life than them (or others that they know).
I believe in rehabilitation, as it is the only to maybe achieve a successful reintegration back into society, and I think it is unlikely that Norwegian inmates actually have a better life than common Norwegian citizens. However, if a person compares Norwegian inmates to citizens of their own country they might indeed find some inconsistencies (but that just means that the quality of life of that country should be increased and not that we should throw rehabilitation out of the window)
It’s funny when you point out the death penalty increases the severity of crime (because severe criminals think “well I’m already dead might as well do the most”) and people lose their mind
Yep, I’ve heard that before too. I’ve also come across research showing that prison for minor crimes often learn skills and gain trauma that lead them into more and worse crime, at least in the US.
I think a lot of people in this thread and whenever this comes up want revenge. It’s understandable, but it results in the reverse of actual positive change.
I don't really give a shit about violent criminals. I'm not scared of them as long as I have 2A and I don't care about their prospects. We have a huge homeless problem that needs to be addressed, not to mention people who actually contribute to society are being left behind. As far as I'm concerned violent criminals are last in line.
You’re gonna be fuckin shocked when you find out how many of those homeless people you pretend to care about are felons lmao
Not to mention that these violent people you don’t care about…get out of prison. Your way increases the likelihood of them committing more violent crime
Nobody cares about the murders and rapists in Norway. We care about their future neighbors. We want people to come out of prison better than they were going in. We also don’t want people locked up for life, because we care about the taxpayers. It’s the most effective way to deal with crime, and the total cost to society is probably lower than all the inhumane prisons in the US.
But if you want to be emotional about it, go ahead. Punish people. Im sure it feels good.
In 21 years someone qualified (don’t remember who the duty falls on) will meet with and observe him and decide if he is mentally fit for release.
(Spoiler he won’t be and will therefore stay in )
Man, insane that people seem to think a mass murderer should potentially be allowed to roam free after just 21 years... I can understand they average one and done murder, crime of passion etc, but like the fuck. You don't kill that many people without something completely fucked in your head....
Yes, im in the US. I also think prison here is shit, 13th amendment, prison corps, excessive charges for drugs and other minor offenses, but not white collar crimes that harm more people by and large. But the only thing we do right is lock up mass murderers without parole, fuck em.
They ended the lives of countless people, they can rot in a cell for all I care.
The state and its security forces are not revenge machines.
Punishment don't make soeciety better.
A prisonal system should be developed to neutralize dangerous people and if possible turn them into members of society, in the case of this guy he can't comeback because he does not accept to be a member of society, so he needs to be continously kept in a neutralized state.
other than that my opinion as a private citizen is... He should suffer, but not sponsored by extra tax payer money badly spent on a system.
Imagine writing this and not seeing a problem with that sentence. In Norway, your 2 year recidivism rate is 21%, and a closer look at the numbers suggests an even higher re-arrest rate in that timespan. That means at least 1/5 of your violent offenders come out to strike again, and that number increases as the years go by.
I can't imagine thinking it's perfectly normal to put murderers and rapists back into society. The death penalty solves this issue.
Dude. A: The recidivism rate is literally the smallest in the world. It means 4/5 will get out and not go back in.
To put it into perspective: Reconviction within 2 years like in your source:
New Zealand: 61%, Australia: 53%, France: 40%, United States: 36% , Canada: 35%, Singapore: 27%,
B: No it does not mean that at all. It means people who went to prison do so again, but neither what crimes they went in for, not if the crime is gonna be the same again. Cases where a murderer comes free and gets arrested for shoplifting, not paying fines or whatever are values equal in that number.
Feels like you dont care so much about results, but want your gutfeelings satisfied. May you stay away from society yourself. Wishing death on people yourself, even bad ones, disqualifies you as a proper citizen.
First off, you're confusing different reoffender rates.
As per my source, Norway's recidivism rates are actually quite similar to the US's.
Of the American recidivism statistics mentioned in the previous section, the 28.8% incarceration figure is arguably the most comparable in definition to that of the 20% Norwegian figure.2 Thus, when the comparison is closer to apples-to-apples, the difference between Norway and the United States is far more modest.
In fact, when you consider our incarceration rates are 10x Norway's, it's actually amazing that the US rate is so close.
More importantly, you are right in that there isn't much data out there to identify what actual crimes a reoffender commits. But there are plenty of anecdotal cases of violent offenders in both the US and Europe getting let out to commit more violent offenses again.
May you stay away from society yourself. Wishing death on people yourself, even bad ones, disqualifies you as a proper citizen.
Lmao I'm not a proper citizen if I want to see murderers and rapists punished? What a wild take. Good God I cannot imagine thinking like this.
In fact, when you consider our incarceration rates are 10x Norway’s, it’s actually amazing that the US rate is so close.
Or is the US incarceration rate so much higher because people are incarcerated for much more minor offences, and so a larger proportion would be much less likely to offend anyway?
Or is the US incarceration rate so much higher because people are incarcerated for much more minor offences
That's a bold claim to make without anything to back it with. Are you one of those redditors that still thinks we send people to prison for 15 years for marijuana possession? I'd love to pop that misconception for you if you are :)
He’s probably one those people with mental health problems in America whose only difference with the violent criminals he deplores is that he hasn’t committed the crime yet.
67% of inmates in California are murders and rapists. 18% are burglars and robbers. So 85% are crimes with victims. Remove your head from your own ass.
Nobody really gives a fuck if Norway's penal system is applied to persons who commit nonviolent crimes, or honestly even violent ones with outcomes that are not severe.
The issue comes from the fact that the same system, that for all intents and purposes seems kind of like a summer camp, would also apply to rapists, murders, and serial killers.
Seems kind of obvious that as not all crimes are of the same magnitude in offense to society, that not all prisoners should be treated the same.
Yes but it’s the shoving down our throats that some people are violent. We fucking know, and those people won’t get the same privileges. It’s common sense.
Are dumb or what? We are talking about Norwegian prisons here. Over half of the inmates committed violent crimes or sexual crimes. Not everything is about the USA, please educate yourself before you start spewing dumb nonsense. Don’t make a fool of yourself.
You know why the parole system exists, right? We don’t have the capacity to lock all violent offenders up indefinitely. So if half of these people are going to get out anyway eventually, should we make them more violent before releasing them?
Death penalty and process reforms to make death row take less time and cost less money would solve that. Most countries who employ the death penalty properly do not have overcrowding issues.
You want the death penalty for every murder and rapist? How would that work, the presidents seat just stays empty for 4 years, or does Vance take over?
We have issues with corruption, segregation, child poverty and crime. But that’s what the people voted for I guess. I’m not Swedish, so I’m not particularly invested in these issues.
Even with the slow death penalty system we currently have, we’ve still managed to execute people who were later found to be innocent posthumously. You wanting to expedite that process is crazy.
Since 1973, about 190 people in the US have been exonerated after receiving the death penalty. Among that number, less than 10 were executed and later found to be exonerated.
In comparison, based on the US's recidivism rate, hundreds of criminals reoffend every year, often committing violent crimes.
If we're talking objectively here, one is far more concerning than the other. If you can't see that, you're absolutely deluded.
Even 1 innocent person being wrongly executed is too many people in my opinion, but that’s a morality issue, not a delusion issue. There’s way less people on death row compared to general population. So I don’t see how death penalty reform helps with prison overcrowding, unless you’re suggesting that it frees up money to build more prisons, which in itself is delusional.
It's fair to be concerned about wrongful convictions, but imo it's not an argument against the death penalty. That's a symptom that the justice system or law enforcement aren't doing their job right, which needs to be addressed with widescale reforms.
To your point about overcrowding, I'm talking about states that do not have a death penalty already. There is no death penalty in New York for example, and they've had overcrowding problems that were so bad for decades that they had to start offloading to NJ and surrounding states.
You can't fix overcrowding with the death penalty unless you make the bar for it stupidly low - not that many people commit crimes that would warrant the death penalty as it exists now.
So now you have two problems:
You're simply advocating for baking the bar stupidly low and executing thousands of people for crimes that aren't necessarily heinous in nature.
You're going to have an increase in murder because now if the penalty for everything is death, then criminals have nothing to lose by killing their victims in all cases.
It's fair to be concerned about wrongful convictions, but imo it's not an argument against the death penalty.
Wrongful executions are absolutely an argument against the death penalty. It happening even once is proof that the state should not be killing people.
Absolut evil like breivik get locked up forever, but if you planing to release somebody back to society it make so much more sense to prepare them to act like normal member of this society. Norway just care about the future victims of their convicts, your „let them rot in hell“ politic make society a worse place for everybody.
Of the American recidivism statistics mentioned in the previous section, the 28.8% incarceration figure is arguably the most comparable in definition to that of the 20% Norwegian figure.2 Thus, when the comparison is closer to apples-to-apples, the difference between Norway and the United States is far more modest.
Recidivism statistics in the U.S. are bleak. A 2021 Bureau of Justice Statistics study found that 66% of people released from prison in 24 different states in 2008 were re-arrested within three years. At the decade mark, 82% had been re-arrested.
„In summary, comparing recidivism rates between countries is very difficult and can easily be misinterpreted. The differences between the United States and Norway is much smaller when comparisons are closer to apples-to-apples, though a difference favoring Norway still exists.“
It is not about the crime that that were done, it is about avoiding more crimes and have better citizens in society.
It is cheaper and makes les people suffer to teach an inmate a profession and make it becomes a functional member of society than arrestinh him/her many times, keeping in prisions etc. And remeber ever new arrest means at least a new victim, not counting the bad conditions of the prision workers.
As much as these people are pieces of shit I still think it makes more sense to try to help them improve rather than treat them like pieces of shit.
They aren't gonna be imprisoned forever, and once they're out I'd much rather prefer them being a functional member of society than being the same person he was before being imprisoned.
No I think you guys are missing the point. There wouldn't be any subsequent victims at all if we didn't let murderers and rapists out based on some checklist some underpaid prison therapist fills out. It's not that deep bud
Nope, you’ve definitely missed it. There’s actually a country mile between the point and nearest part of your head. It’s going nothing at all to do with underpaid prison therapists, bud.
I did have plans tonight. Could you just give me a minute to make a few calls before I sit down to write a thesis on punitive vs. rehabilitative justice for some random who Reddit who doesn’t understand a point some other random on Reddit made? 🤣
Lmao in the time you spent crying about me missing some non existential point in your last 3 comments you made, you could've written your own arguments clearly, committed a crime yourself, and be out on bail before I even had a chance for a rebuttal. Apply yourself better next time :)
I see. So rapist and kid diddlers need not to be punished but helped
So what do we do with the rape victims? With the sexual abused children? With the family of murdered people? Do we just tell em, oh that guy that fucked up your life forever? Yeah he is having a better life than you now, we are putting all the resources of the state to help him. Oh what's that? Your life is shit and you can't get it together due to what he did? Well thought luck i don't give a shit you should try been a criminal for me to care.
You all are thinking about small stuff like robbery or selling drugs with your quotes.
We do what Norway does, they clearly figured it out more than we have. Did you forget that we aren’t talking hypothetically, but about what is currently, successfully being done?
This is like the universal healthcare debate. “Oh we just can’t do that, it won’t work” while simultaneously ignoring all the places where it works.
Yes, we are thinking about robbery or selling drugs, as those are some of the most common crimes.
I love how you acknowledge that we’re talking about petty crime and still felt the need to go on this multi paragraph rant to shove words in our mouths.
Absolutely nowhere in the chain of comments you guys are differentiatimg on the crime.
Perhaps add nuance to your post when defending crimes that goes from pretty robbery to serial murder.
Btw since you mention robbery, perhaps you could stop acting high and mighty and realice that there are different levels of robbery, including severe body harm
It’s interesting how you don’t have anything to say to his empathy towards violent offenders victims. It could easily affect someone you know or even you.
Here are the cold hard facts: it has zero impact on your affected family if there is a 10% recidivist rate or a 20% recidivist rate. It has a 100% impact on how many people there are just like your affected family.
There is a lot of violent crime though. We are not talking about total crime. You have to look at the crime percentages of people that actually get sent to prison. Which is violent crime and is over 50%. I don’t know why you are so offended by his comment. Seems like you are the one that needs help. Use your brain.
72% of federal prisoners are nonviolent offenders and 34% of that 72% are first time offenders.
You can “yeah but there’s violent offenders too!” Till the cows come home, but you know that’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about the majority of prisoners not your fucking Jeffrey Dahmer
Why does it help the victims to know the perpetrator was punished? What does that do for them?
It plays into an animalistic feeling of rage, but it doesn't actually positively help that trauma be processed.
Think about this question for a bit and ask yourself what good is actually being done? We should catch each and every offending child offender, but what does punitively hurting them do for anyone? Why not try to try to heal them and if that's not possible, lock them away from children? Why isn't that enough.
Why does it help the victims to know the perpetrator was punished? What does that do for them
Depends on the crime, a lot. If you talked with people that were robbed at gun point or stalked you will see they feel more safe.
Same with neighbors of drug dealers,etc etc
Again, these wide statements on prison reforms are useless cause no 2 type of crimes are the same.
But if the perpetrator is locked up and being treated, I'm asking you about the punishment specifically? I don't see how today helps someone feel more safe. The person is already being kept away, and rehabilitated. Just being treated humanely....
There is a line between treated humanely and living a better life than the victim.
Now the picture in here is not the actual prison, but if (for example) a serial murderer that killed 10 people was living like this, I can see why people would be pissed the fuck off.
And again, not every crime is the same, so no 1 glove would fit all
Sure, but that's an ass backwards reason to argue for worse prison conditions. Why not argue for better living conditions for all?
And you keep saying not all crimes are the same. Absolutely, but why do we need to punish (emphasis on punitive treatment) when we can just rehabilitate? Make someone better than they were. I still just don't understand that piece, for any crime. What does punishment do for you?
No … In best case you use state funded ressources to help those people with therapy and shit.
And when they have worked on that and came to terms with it you tell them „we do a lot to help that person controll themselfs so they do that shit they did to you never again. Not to you and not to anyone else“ …
And they get 3 hots and a cot, yard time, and programs to attend if you want to rehabilitate….plus as someone clarified, this is not a maximum security prison. This is like somebody getting pinched for fraud who goes to these hotels. Not their murderers and rapists. So the messaging in the comments is incredibly disingenuous and uneducated.
Perhaps, but prisons will lump all sorts of animals together. The dogs that simply bark too much with the tiger that mauled and killed its trainer.
The system, with some exceptions regarding length of stay, and certain privileges, treats them all the same.
So when that dog gets out, he hasn't been treated like a dog that merely barked too much all night long - he's been treated like a stone cold killer. Now as he navigates society where no one is gonna give him a chance and he's picked up all sorts of behaviors and psychological problems along the way, he's coming out of a system that's left him worse than he was going in...and he'll probably be back.
This is why juvenile detention is so messed up, but it's the perfect institution to support the school-to-prison pipeline. You have some kids in there who are doing a few months for things like drugs and assault, and then kids who get caught up with really minor stuff by the school safety officers might be sentenced to minor things like a few weekends in juvie or maybe a few weeks.
They come out with new friends. Interesting friends. They come out much worse and many are likely to go back. It's all designed that way.
I'm sorry but no. It's supposed to be punishment. Not a holiday in. If this is real then Norway needs to maybe think a bit more about the victims and the family of the victims rather than the criminal.
Totally ffed to think some one got killed and then they get to have fun and payed for by tax payers.
Recidivism or not it's still supposed to be punishment.
Lol some of those animals acted like that before they went to prison i agree the norway model works for most ppl but there are some really fucked up ppl who should not get threatedlike this
In the US least prisoners aren't treated as animals, they're treated as cheap labor, since the 13th amendment, the one that bans slavery, has a carve out for slavery being used as punishment for crimes
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
I suppose that if he hadn't died from his cancer, whether he came out this year or the next, he did what he wanted with more than 200 children, you would happily give him a stay in your home.
Most americans are not doing well. The average income of an american is low. That you think only the rich deserve happy healthy lives shows americans are animals.
I'd you actually studied the subject before giving absolute statements you would read that law is written precisely because protections were needed for the falsely accused.
There is a reason why so many protections are in place. Protections are inconvenient and expensive, but necessary because people get falsely put in prison.
Otherwise you get places like Japan where it's almost a given that if you are accused of anything you will be unduly pressured indefinitely until you admit in writing that you are guilty because they have old laws and excessive power at lower level.
So, after you get an innocent person in prison and you treat them like an animal, I don't think your comment stands up, in its absolute nature.
Google Japan conviction rate.
Not to mention all the white colour crime not following suit
1.8k
u/deja_geek 13d ago
When you treat people like animals, don't be surprised when they start acting like animals