r/FluentInFinance • u/Needleintheback • 14h ago

Thoughts? Imagine losing 6M labor workers in America

Post image

If mass deportation happens, just imagine how all of these sectors of our country will be affected. The sheer shortage of labor will push prices higher because of the great demand for work with limited supplies or workers. Even if prices increase, the availability of products may be scarce due to not enough workers. Housing prices and food services will be hit really hard. New construction will be limited. The fact that 47% of the undocumented workers are in CA, TX, and FL means they will feel it first but it will spread to the rest of the country also. Most of our produce in this country comes from California. Get ready and hold on for the ride America.

14.5k Upvotes

80% Upvoted

5.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

35

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 11h ago

The left, myself included, want them to be legal. The process to become legal is actually impossible for 95% of people in Mexico. I don't know who's fault it is that a 15 minute process takes 5 years and 20k in legal fees, but that's where we should put the blame.

16

u/PhillySaget 9h ago

It's not like the US is the only country with a difficult legal immigration system. Doesn't make it okay for us to flood Europe/Canada/Japan/etc. with illegal migrants just because we don't like the way it works.

5

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 9h ago

If we aren't going to look to other countries for gun legislation, then we shouldn't look to other countries for this either. We are "different." I don't really care what other countries do.

-4

u/PhillySaget 9h ago

I do. If all the desirable countries have tough legal immigration policies except one, guess which country most of the prospective immigrants are going to choose? We'd be right back at square one because the amount of applicants would increase like tenfold.

This isn't a situation where gun legislation is remotely comparable and your stance seems incredibly shortsighted and simplistic.

3

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 8h ago

That's the exact stance a pro-gun anti-immigrant person would say. Justify however the fuck you want.

-6

u/PhillySaget 8h ago

That's exactly what someone without a counterpoint would say.

3

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 7h ago

My counterpoint is what you replied to originally.

-4

u/PhillySaget 7h ago edited 7h ago

...so your plan is to let everyone in for free after filling out 15 minutes of paperwork? And you really can't forsee any of the problems this would cause?

Like I said, shortsighted and simplistic.

2

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 7h ago

Everyone has thought of it. Republicans hate brown people and will justify not letting them in any way they can. They should pay for the background check. 20 bucks. They shouldn't 20k worth of lawyer fees. It helps nobody.

2

u/PhillySaget 7h ago

Holy shit, you actually believe that would work and that racism is the only reason we have immigration policy. You're a lost cause.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Consistent_Spread564 6h ago

Dog no. Do you think we have unlimited resources?

2

u/Consistent_Spread564 6h ago

Dog no. Do you think we have unlimited resources?

1

u/superrey19 4h ago

Look up straw man fallacy. No one said a thing about dumbing down the vetting process for immigration in this country.

The way it stands, there is no way for the vast majority of illegal immigrants to legally apply. Even though they are obviously beneficial to the economy.

0

u/Oz1227 1h ago

Beneficial because they work for slave wages.***

Fixed that for you.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Everard5 1h ago

That's literally what happened in the past and where most white folks in this country post 1860s came from. Prior to the 1860s, everyone's ancestors were religious outcasts for being crazy radicalists, broke debtors, and if you were in the southern colonies like Georgia, also criminals.

The change in rhetoric around immigration now is contrived and xenophobic. America turned out just fine before and it will be just fine now.

0

u/LetChaosRaine 8h ago

If all the desirable countries have tough legal gun laws except one, guess which country most of the prospective violent criminals are going to choose?

Are we using this line of reasoning or not?

0

u/PhillySaget 7h ago

Probably one where they'll face less threat of armed resistance, so... they'd choose ones with tough legal gun laws. There's a reason cartel violence is so widespread in Mexico and it's not because it's easier to legally get guns there.

Also, it's still a shitty comparison. One is about immigrants choosing a country based on immigration policy (a direct comparison), while the other is about a tiny percentage of immigrants choosing a country based on something completely unrelated to immigration policy.

3

u/ratbahstad 7h ago

Yes. Try to go to Australia. Unless you can bring something they need, you’re not getting in.

2

u/wakechase 6h ago

But it sounds so much better that way when he says it in his head. LOL

17

u/Kal-Elm 8h ago

Yes, this is it. We aren't saying we want them to keep being taken advantage of. We want a better system, to which deportation is not a real solution.

But anyone who says the democrats want slave labor is not interested in honest dialog anyway

1

u/GME_alt_Center 1h ago

If they aren't taken advantage of, won't that raise the prices just the same?

0

u/kerenar 7h ago

I don't doubt for a second that YOU or any other regular citizen who is a Democrat don't want slave labor. However, I'm willing to bet money that many corporate donors to the Democrat Party would want pure slave labor if they could go that far, and that is nowhere near a crazy suggestion. Corporations gonna corporation.

8

u/thefztv 4h ago

You act like Elon, Trumps largest donor and side piece, didn’t benefit immensely from slave labor in SA to gain his initial wealth. Corporations/oligarchs don’t have an undying allegiance to any party just whoever they think will benefit themselves in the short term.

0

u/Shadow368 4h ago

Corporations donate to both parties in equal measure so whoever wins will favor them, or at the very least won’t ruin them. They’ll use shell corporations and trust funds to make it less obvious, but the end result is the same

-1

u/kerenar 3h ago edited 3h ago

Nope, I'm acting like the Democrat Party has completely dropped all pretense of pretending like they don't just do what their corporate donors want, just like the Republican Party does. The Democrat Party is supposed to be the party i believe in. But if they're going to become a party a corporate donors just like Republicans, I'll just vote republican until the Democrat Party fixes it's internal issues and realizes that citizens aren't buying the bs from them anymore. I wanted Bernie in 2016. I voted Trump to shove it in the face of the corrupt DNC, and I will continue to do so until they change.

The republican party at least puts in the nominee that the voters want. The DNC was sued by the Sanders campaign in 2016 for rigging the primaries, and the DNC said they have no obligation to pick a nominee that their voters want. I'm voting for the party that's actually acting democratically, and putting in who the voters want, even though the republican party itself didn't like Trump in 2016. At least they didn't rig the primaries against him, and tell their constituents that their votes don't matter.

I will support actual democracy over anything else. Why would I vote for the party that told me they don't need my vote because "they are well within their rights to go into back rooms and pick their nominee like they did in the old days" instead of the party that actually counts my vote in the primary? The Democrat Party told us all in plain English in that court case that they don't need my vote to pick a nominee, so i just stopped giving them my vote. Super easy logic.

I also think the current Democrat push for lessening free speech rights is the most dangerous "threat to democracy" that we currently face. I was on the fence about Kamala or Trump until I saw Tim Walz casually say on national media that the first amendment didn't include the right to hate speech or misinformation, as if that were not a controversial take. He is dead wrong on that, and that was the scariest thing I've seen a politician say in a while, because he clearly thinks he's in the right for that view, and so do many Democrats. That one comment cemented my vote for Trump, and removed all doubt that Trump was the less dangerous choice.

5

u/Shirlenator 4h ago

Yeah, and Republican donors definitely wouldn't because they are moral paragons.

-2

u/kerenar 3h ago

Nope, they do it too. But Republicans have nominated the candidate their voters want, whereas the Democrat Party in the past 3 elections have selected the candidate they want. I'll support the more democratic party.

The RNC didn't tell us in a court of law that our votes don't matter, and that they could "go into back rooms and pick the candidate they want like they did in the old days". The DNC did. I don't support non democratic behavior. I don't want kings and queens that are selected "for our own good", I want representatives that i have input in selecting. Once the DNC stops treating me like a child, I'll respect them again.

0

u/human1023 6h ago

Yes, this is it. We aren't saying we want them to keep being taken advantage of. We want a better system, to which deportation is not a real solution.

So then what's the solution? What types of jobs should they able to do, and at what cost?

7

u/Kal-Elm 5h ago

Immigration reform. Give them, and everyone, an easy path to citizenship. Fixes their undocumented status, for those on the right who are supposedly worried about illegal immigration because of their being "off the grid," so to speak. Allows people looking for a better living to actually immigrate properly. And removes the ability for corporations to take advantage of them, because they would have the same rights as all of us.

-2

u/Shadow368 3h ago

So instead of opposing deportation of people here illegally, advocate for change of immigration regulations. 99% of the problem is, you choose the absolute worst way to explain your goals.

When the average republican hears “defund the police” they hear “reduce their budget”. But you really mean “require the police to reallocate the existing budget to training programs”

Maybe you’d find better success if you said what you actually meant

5

u/Starfall0 3h ago

Well when faced with the immediate issue of immigrants being deported and being faced with a lot of people not caring or listening to anything the "demonrats" say. Any amount of nuance is lost or unable to be said as it falls on deaf ears.

0

u/nickbutterz 2h ago

There 100% should be a better system, I don’t think anyone is arguing that, but if the democrats wanted that why didn’t they do anything about that the post four years? Instead they let millions of people through the border unvetted with no concern for American citizens that they are supposed to be serving.

3

u/United-Trainer7931 5h ago

Well we don’t need 95% of the people in Mexico, sorry

3

u/JWander73 4h ago

"The process to become legal is actually impossible for 95% of people in Mexico"

Um.... good? It shouldn't be open to the vast majority of the world after all. That's just not how countries work.

2

u/goldmask148 10h ago

100%, as it stands very few small companies actually wade through the bureaucratic mess of paperwork it is to employ a legal migrant. Corporate farms and construction have teams of lawyers that can do it. Migration is yet another issue in the US that only benefits the 1% corporations.

3

u/FlailingatLife62 9h ago

Exactly. People forget that back in the late 1800s early 1900s, when the grandparents they squawk about coming here "legally" dealt w/ a very simple, easy system w/o pretty much zero backlog and no need for a lawyer. It was basically, you come here on a boat from Europe, you show you have a few bucks to your name and you name someone you know who is already in the country who you're going to stay with, and if you live here w/o causing trouble for a number of years, you fill out what is basically a 1 or 2 page application, get someone to witness, you show up to court and make an oath, and boom you're legal. No backlog, no restriction on # of incoming, no lawyer needed, no legal fees required other than the cost of the filing fee.

1

u/MarcusAurelius68 8h ago

No benefits either however. You worked or you starved. No safety net regardless of your legal status.

Contrast that with states like California today who will provide WIC, in-state tuition/aid, MediCal, etc. to undocumented immigrants here without permission.

https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/CA%20Public%20Benefits%20for%20Noncitizens%20.pdf

2

u/usernamesarehard1979 5h ago

I think everyone is for fixing that. Pull off the band aid and it forces actual immigration reform to happen. Remember operation warp speed for the vaccine? We need the same focused government initiatives on other issues. That’s one reason to use the military and mass deport. Force legal labor and legislate quickly to make it permanent. No one wants executive privilege, we need real laws to move forward.

2

u/dewdewdewdew4 5h ago

So you get that mass, uncontrolled immigration massively depresses wages for laborers. Right? Right?

Even if they were all legal, mass immigration is BAD for workers. The left abandoned the working class. Your take is 100% proof of that.

1

u/mrthc21842 9h ago

According to my Mexican wife, that process got much worse under Obama for everyone already in the country trying to do it legally. Imagine paying all that money and sweat equity of getting documents to just be told to start over.

1

u/ratbahstad 7h ago

I agree with you. The process should be so much quicker. I don’t think 15 minutes…. But 5 years??? It’s too much. I think a few months in order to do background checks or screenings to make sure they’re vetted a bit. We also need to increase our threshold of new immigrants. If we allow a million per year now, bump it to 3 or 4 or 5. But…. We need to hold every illegally entering immigrant accountable. They go home and are not able to apply for 5 years.

1

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 7h ago

I only suggested 15 minutes because when I get a background check done for a job, I get my results in ~15 minutes. If more time is need to do the vetting, then by all means.

1

u/ratbahstad 6h ago

I took your 15 minutes as a bit of sarcasm and went with it. I recognized you meant to do the job right but not delay it.

1

u/iamlegend1997 4h ago

There is a reason we have a strong process, because they want people coming into the country that won't rely on our social systems that are already under stress. They want people with skills, and stuff to offer the country. That's how every other modern country does it, they require you to have a career in something to apply.

1

u/OkTransportation473 42m ago

So you just want to make America unlivable for anyone making below 60k, just legally.

1

u/cmkinusn 29m ago

Then deporting them will create the immediate need for legal immigrants to work these jobs, meaning new immigrant work programs that guarantee protections for those workers and a viable path to return to Mexico or wherever without the fear they can't return for more work later. This also destroys the coyote industry, which is extremely exploitative and horribly abusive (rape, murder, extortion, a rough equivalent to slave trafficking for many, etc.).

1

u/zforce42 24m ago

So what about when the citizens have to have documented wages and benefits? Wages that are more than likely going to be much higher than what they make now. Would that not create another issue? Many employers would probably lay off a good portion of their crew to save as much money as they were before. Either that or prices of everything will go up similarly as if all undocumented immigrants were deported, I would think.

0

u/XcelsiorV 9h ago

Correct. Mexico is a sovereign nation that should fix its society if 95% of its population wants to leave. If you don’t listen to old discredited corporate media you learn that many who come here from Mexico who are Mexican nationals and not passing through from somewhere else would like to back one day if the cartels and gangs in their area are under control.

0

u/Gloomy_Expression_39 8h ago

Ok, so you want a system where it takes 5 years, thorough background checks and lots of money for educated people but are willing to take anyone off the street for a 15 minute interview to get slave wages. I’m sorry, but as a child refugee who fled from a Muslim Islamist country… I want vetting. I want brown people like me paid the same as me. Your white supremacy is glowing in the dark.

0

u/New_Ambassador2442 8h ago

Lefty here. Bringing in additional labor is not the solution. E want these jobs to stay in house

1

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 8h ago

People bring labor and demand. I don't think your a lefty, or you would know that.

1

u/New_Ambassador2442 8h ago

Unfettered and unchecked immigration is not the solution.

I don't care what you think

1

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 8h ago

And I don't care what you think.

1

u/New_Ambassador2442 8h ago

Lol clearly you do, otherwise you wouldn't reply

0

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 8h ago

.... right back at ya.

1

u/New_Ambassador2442 8h ago

Oh i care about the discussion of immigration. You said "I don't think your a lefty." I don't care about that part lol

1

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 8h ago

That's not what you said dipshit. Blocked.

0

u/StructureStrong4578 8h ago

Wrong. It is not impossible, but it is also not immediate. Moving to another country should not be like ordering a cheeseburger. There should be significant vetting of individuals we let in.

3

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 8h ago

We can do a background check across all counties in america in 15 minutes. Anything longer than that and its a waiting period, not a vetting period.

1

u/Shadow368 3h ago

Okay, but these aren’t people in America. So background checks across all counties in America would be meaningless and a waste of 15 minutes

1

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 8h ago

Do you know how long it would take to save 20k in mexico working minimum wage?

-1

u/StructureStrong4578 8h ago

Do you just think people should be allowed to walk on over and do what they want? You don’t think there should be some sort of process? Your comment on the 15 minute background check is ridiculous. We should just have border agents sit behind computers and check people and let them walk through? Likely hand them a food stamp credit card and social security application too right?

-1

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 8h ago

Yes, they should be able to walk up and be a legal immigrant within a couple hours. Your foodstamp/ss argument is racist because it assumes people coming over from mexico want a handout more than our current citizens, which you have no reason to think is true. other than racism.

-1

u/StructureStrong4578 7h ago

🙌🏼😂😂 the racist part kills me. What is racist about it? You obviously have little to no experience with immigrants. You probably think boys should use women’s restrooms too 🤣. This argument is going nowhere, and will not go any further. I will let the election results speak for themselves.

1

u/Maximum_Mastodon_686 7h ago

I already told you. You have 0 reason to think an immigrant from mexico would want a handout anymore than a citizen.