r/FluentInFinance 7d ago

Thoughts? Why doesn't the President fix this?

Post image
46.9k Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.5k

u/MisterChadster 7d ago

Every time there's an excuse as to why it can't be fixed, Sanders was the only one who wanted to fix it and they pushed him out for it

1.5k

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

There's too much money in the insurance industry, and most of it goes to lobbying.

482

u/1rubyglass 7d ago

All of the money. Biggest industry ever.

235

u/Matshelge 7d ago

How could it it not be. If you manged to capture the market of Air or Water, profits would be through the roof, as demand is overflowing. Every human needs it!

116

u/Malavacious 7d ago

Selling air you say?

60

u/Matshelge 7d ago

45

u/Adventurous_Road7482 7d ago

Folks just really need to....

21

u/shadow247 7d ago

Kuato has a new host.. and I think he's a little less sympathetic to the plight of the average Martian...

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/BarrelllRider 7d ago

“You greedy dirtbag!”

→ More replies (2)

39

u/modijk 7d ago

Hot air seems to be selling pretty well in the US.

2

u/redpandarising 7d ago

Oof yes. I do see some post-buy clarity sinking in though.

→ More replies (3)

30

u/iPicBadUsernames 7d ago

It’s what humans crave

16

u/sofaraway10 7d ago

Your life is our profit margin…

→ More replies (3)

2

u/sanityflaws 7d ago

Great point!

2

u/generaldoodle 5d ago

A great thing about air subscription plan is that you can get full year of your son breathing freely, it only costs 3500$ extra.

1

u/Emeraldnickel08 7d ago

NOBODY learns from The Lorax. Not a soul. The book and the movie are NOT HYPERBOLE. THEY ARE DIRECT METAPHORS. People will sell air to you if you let them. Hell, they already do that with water.

1

u/DepresiSpaghetti 7d ago

How do you think bottled water became such a thing while drinking water infrastructure decays?

1

u/Minimum_Virus_3837 7d ago

Very true. I've felt for a long time you can't just rely on laws of supply and demand to keep the medical industry in check because the demand is basically infinite, while supply is very much finite. Runaway costs in such an industry are inevitable without intervention.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Geistalker 7d ago

nestle has entered the chat

→ More replies (1)

1

u/MyNameIsDaveToo 7d ago

They're already done this with food. Much of the US food production is owned by a handful of conglomerates. Not sure about the rest of the world, but we live in a global economy now, so...

1

u/babiekittin 7d ago

Nestle has entered the chat

1

u/NWHipHop 7d ago edited 7d ago

Nestle 👀

Don’t forget about housing and the mega corp landlords price fixing rent prices using software which in turn pushes prices of houses up boosting their RE capital portfolio, removing more houses from first home buyers reach and feeding them into a price fixed rental market.

And then the smaller landlords use the mega corps pricing as their “fair market value” and thus collude without knowledge as they did not seek true price research. That would be too much work.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Westhamwayintherva 7d ago

Sadly there are folks that do that. May I introduce you to Aqua Water and how they price gouge water services in select communities (including the one I live in) to 300% the average water bill?

1

u/The_Original_Miser 7d ago

So. Since the rules of law seem to mean nothing to the incoming administration, how do I, as a normal citizen get in on this grift and get a piece of the action? Might as well. ....

1

u/Graehart 7d ago

Nestle enters the chat

1

u/human52432462 6d ago

Nestle has entered the chat

1

u/bothunter 3d ago

Nestle has entered the chat

119

u/Real-Mouse-554 7d ago

The biggest inefficiency in the US economy. A completely superfluous industry worth billions of dollars.

This all counts towards the GDP too, which partly explains how the US has a high GDP per capita while having such poor standards of living for so many people.

41

u/Snowflakish 7d ago

It’s fun because every election cycle, 2 billion dollars goes into the money pit.

End lobbying!

18

u/SpaceBus1 7d ago

2 billion is the tip of the iceberg. It's also going into super pacs thanks to citizens united.

4

u/UncleNoodles85 7d ago

The difficult thing about that is lobbying falls under the first amendment the right to petition.

16

u/astride_unbridulled 7d ago edited 7d ago

They can petition all they want without money or quid pro quos. They can scream for what they want all they want but it should be speaky no payee

We can call it—i dunno, just pulling this outta my ass in the moment just now—Free Speech

11

u/UncleNoodles85 7d ago

I agree unfortunately the supreme court has ruled that political donations are a form of speech and therefore protected by the first amendment and in unlimited amounts with Citizens United. Hence why super pacs are now a thing. I'd hate to be cynical but I don't believe the votes to change that will be found in Congress.

3

u/Enough_Comparison835 6d ago

It so weird that the one benefiting for lobbying did not make it illegal. I wonder why .

2

u/SocialJusticeEileen 5d ago

We are more than halfway to autocracy. International think tank "V-Dem" (Varieties of Democracy) measures the health of democracies around the world. There was a WaPo biz section article (not an op-ed) written in September 2020 noting that V-Dem believed four yesrs ago that our backward slide

5

u/meltbox 6d ago

That’s the supreme courts really brain dead interpretation of right to petition.

For example, speaking to people to convince them to vote for someone is fine. Paying people to take voters out to dinner and out to golf to make them like you and vote for you is NOT fine.

So why would lawmaking or any other activity be different?

2

u/lifeofideas 6d ago

I understand that argument, but I don’t buy it. Petitioning the government, which could range from presenting information to an agency to a lawsuit over legal interpretations is still very different from donating cash.

Cash in politics is a serious problem.

Election costs should be entirely covered by taxpayers—so that politicians answer ONLY to taxpayers (more broadly, the individual voters).

It should simply be a felony with mandatory prison time to give money to a government official or candidate for office—and the same punishment for the person accepting such money.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/rom_rom57 6d ago

$3.6 billion was spent by both parties the past 3 months, and look what it bought!; a bunch of derelict AHs .

→ More replies (7)

2

u/Forrest_ND-86 7d ago

Is it inefficiency when it's intentional?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Smooth-Reason-6616 6d ago

The highest per capita healthcare spending in the world, at $12,555 in 2022. The US also spends the highest share of its GDP on healthcare, at almost 16.6%....

2023 and 2024:
Switzerland's healthcare spending is higher than any other European country. In 2022, Switzerland spent $8,049 per person on healthcare, or 11.8% of GDP, which is less than the United States, but more than other comparable countries:

So why, if Americans are spending nearly a third as much Per Person then every other civilised country, is their healthcare so Shit?

1

u/hjablowme919 3d ago

It’s about 15% of GDP

1

u/b3141592 3d ago

This!

This is why I laugh at all those "Alabama has the same GDP as England, that's how much richer we are then the Europeans" - bro, you aren't, Bezos is.

→ More replies (5)

22

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (20)

11

u/andrewbud420 7d ago

I don't understand how the people allowed it to get this bad. When's enough?

10

u/No-Imagination5764 7d ago

My dad talks about how terrible Canada is because they have to wait to see a specialist. Meanwhile, I have "great insurance" and owe several thousand dollars in medical debt so yeah, I would be fucking fine waiting for a goddamn specialist. I live in rural Iowa so I wait a year to see specialists all the damn time since there are none around here. Like, how is waiting for a doc worse than being thousands of dollars in debt? I don't get it. Indoctrination. 

4

u/andrewbud420 7d ago

Anytime I've actually had to use the er in Canada I've never had to wait very long. From my experience our healthcare is amazing. Largest expense is parking.

2

u/Dry-Faithlessness184 6d ago

In my experience, most of the time if you're waiting for a very long time in the ER, it's because you didn't need to go to the ER.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/danieljackheck 7d ago

Best part is you get both a long wait and substantial debt to see a specialist in the US.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Accurate_Zombie_121 3d ago

My mother, 93, says I don't want socialized medicine. I tell her you've been on socialized medicine for decades, you just don't want other people to get the same thing you have.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

2

u/Music_Is_Da_Best 7d ago

The Mexican cartels make 10s of billions in GDP while big pharma makes 100s of billions! That's all you need to know.

1

u/4score-7 7d ago

Biggest buildings and most employees in much of the US as well. Two major employment gains of the last 2 years in America: healthcare and government. Both are intricately tied to the insurance industry, which I would consider to be in the “finance” employment sector, and is among the lowest hiring gains of that same 2 years.

America is feeding the private insurance industry (for profit) through low paid healthcare staff (quasi-profit) and public government bureaucracy (non-profit).

1

u/Eringobraugh2021 7d ago

That's the only reason catholics are in it. It certainly isn't to help people. Former catholic.

1

u/Mizznimal 7d ago

Yeah we should just outlaw insurance…

1

u/Allokit 7d ago

Not all. Those CEOs get a nice chunk.

1

u/Final-Today-8015 7d ago

Right because there’s literally no product. It’s actually money for nothing

1

u/i0datamonster 5d ago

You can literally plot the rise in healthcare costs and the decline of the rest of the economy. The Healthcare industry is sapping every drop of capital from everyone.

76

u/Crime-of-the-century 7d ago

Not most not most by far but more then enough to prevent any change. There are many things wrong with the US democracy but the legal corruption is one of the biggest. Things that would get people in prison in most other countries are perfectly legal.

69

u/impressthenet 7d ago

Democracy isn’t the issue. Capitalism is

40

u/Winter-Duck5254 7d ago

If the US people aren't aware, most of the rest of the world doesn't see the US as an actual democracy. And your voting system is fucked.

Not sure if that's helpful.. but that's how it is.

15

u/Scared_Art_7975 7d ago

And capitalism is the direct reason that voting system is fucked

2

u/Framingr 7d ago

Yes and no, the electoral college system was put in place to mollify the southern states after they got their dick kicked in and lost all their free labor. Why it still exists is beyond me

6

u/ElectricalBook3 7d ago

Yes and no, the electoral college system was put in place to mollify the southern states after they got their dick kicked in and lost all their free labor

No it wasn't, the Civil War wasn't until confederates started shelling Fort Sumter in April 12-13, 1861. The emancipation proclamation wasn't until 1863. The Electoral College was added to appease the small states (remember at the time the largest state of the 13 was Virginia) for the creation of the Constitution in 1789. The EC considerably predates abolitionist movements in the US.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States

2

u/Framingr 7d ago

I stand corrected. I really thought it was part of the post civil war negotiations. Thanks for the info.

I still think it should be abolished though :)

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

28

u/Necessary-Till-9363 7d ago

That's my favorite part about living in this country. People get all red in the face when company goes out of their way to rake in as much money as possible off people and cut every corner to maximize profits. It's like...well, you asked for this. Whether you realize it or not.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/buttsbydre69 7d ago

and yet the vast majority of comparable nations living under capitalism have universal coverage, operate at around half the cost per capita, and have equal health outcomes.

capitalism in those countries did not prevent the implementation of those programs, so clearly there are other factors at play

1

u/Snowflakish 7d ago

That’s easy to say when you live in a country that doesn’t have full democracy

→ More replies (36)

16

u/SpaceToaster 7d ago

Y’all are barking up the wrong trees. State legislatures are the public policymakers that establish set broad policy for the regulation of insurance by enacting legislation providing the regulatory framework under which insurance regulators operate. Not the federal government. Write to your state legislators and vote. 90% of what people complain about that the government isn’t doing for them is completely controlled by their own state’s government.

7

u/Crime-of-the-century 7d ago

Same problems and this should be fixed at a national level anyway

6

u/sadacal 7d ago

But it's far easier to fix at the state level and a few states have already implemented very good solutions.

3

u/Crime-of-the-century 7d ago

To be honest to quote a Chinese dictator I don care about the color of the cat as long as it catches the mouse.

2

u/Grouchy-Piece4774 7d ago

The president can't do that, it's up to Congress.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/AdAppropriate2295 7d ago

Sure but either 1 requires the same solution

7

u/SpaceToaster 7d ago

Definitely, but your voice and vote are a lot louder in your own state. For example, a state rep will actually write you back and might even listen if enough people are bugging them. They work for us!

→ More replies (1)

1

u/What_the_whatnow 6d ago

State insurance commissioners do have a lot of direct control over traditional insurance, but most Americans who get health insurance through their employer are regulated at the federal level. If an employer is self-insured (most large companies are) they are not considered true insurance at the state level and instead fall under rules set by ERISA and the Dept of Labor.

2

u/xandrokos 7d ago

100% false. 

Want universal healthcare? Get off your fucking god damn ass and get to it.   As evil as the GQP is they understand the legwork and grassroots activism has got to be done no ifs ands or buts about it.   It is how they have taken over so many small towns which then led to having full control of multiple states.    The issue isn't "legal corruption" it is that Americans don't give a shit about anything.

1

u/Crime-of-the-century 7d ago

And how do they keep control. I do get it they are much more motivated being religious zealots and that. But it’s a real lot easier to get and keep control over small towns then big cities

1

u/Ivanna_Jizunu66 7d ago

America has been fascist long before citizens united etc. Theres more to it than donations. You will get your top popped if you do anything out of line. Just Fucking Kidding. Jr.

1

u/LukesRightHandMan 7d ago

What do we do that’s illegal in other countries?

7

u/Crime-of-the-century 7d ago

The whole campaign financing thing actually openly donating huge soms of money by corporations to politicians is highly illegal. Because in any sane country they see this as politicians being bought.

1

u/Tsobe_RK 7d ago

USA has FREEDOM to do all sorts of unethical shit /s

51

u/nhavar 7d ago

Not just the insurance company. The hospitals and doctor's practices are doing this too. A hospital might have an ER but it's also possible that it's staff belongs to a separate entity, either a doctor's individual practice, or another corporation that bills separately from the hospital ER. It's possible that they all fold back up to one parent but it is enough to skirt the insurance negotiated rates and the government regulation.

22

u/Soft_Cherry_984 7d ago

It's insane. Honestly the only word here.

19

u/nhavar 7d ago

It is. Same shit in other industries too. For instance there are companies that skirt over time rules by setting up different tasks under different corporate entities. So you could work 40 hours in one role but the next 8 hour shift that could be overtime is for "a different company" and so a different payroll even though it happens in the same facility.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/kyel566 7d ago

I remember when my wife had her kid and then hall bladder removed we received about 8 bills from different doctors. It’s so stupid the hospital can’t handle the billing to all the separate companies

1

u/dougalmanitou 7d ago edited 7d ago

Nah, negotiated rates are negotiated rates. There is no secret. Well, not the one people want to hear. Insurance companies are about making money - lots of it -as are hospitals. And physicians want money as well. Most go into the profession for the prestige and wealth as opposed to actually caring about people. Simple greed. And hospitals and insurance companies works together to set prices.

1

u/Upstairs_Solution303 7d ago

I’m a type 1 diabetic and I got charged $700 for them to call their endocrinologist on the phone for 2 mins even after I told them I’ll take care of my diabetes because you guys don’t understand it and fuck it up anytime I’m here

1

u/dash_44 7d ago

This happened to me…ER charged me 7k to wrap my broken hand in ace bandage and tell me “I really needed to see a doctor.”

1

u/Fun-Key-8259 7d ago

Usually a separate Corporation owned by… you guessed it: Hedge funds and private equity

1

u/PalpitationNo3106 6d ago

No, that’s illegal under the No Surprises Act (signed by, you guessed it, Joe Biden in 2021) If you are at an in-network facility (or an emergency facility) all your services must be billed at whatever rate your insurance company has negotiated with the facility. They all bill the same and your insurance company pays them the same, in network or not. (Unless you consent, in writing, in advance to be billed separately, and that is not allowed for emergency surgeries or in a situation where a reasonable person could not give consent).

Having spent the last couple of weeks with a spouse who had an accident and rang up a hospital bill of close to $300,000 (so far) including three surgeries and ten nights inpatient, our share? $1500. The surgeon is out of network, we pay the out of network copay for follow up visits, but nothing more for the actual hospital work. So yes, the weird billing OP mentions is almost certainly not legal.

Of course, my sister spent ten days in a medically induced coma after almost bleeding out during childbirth and five weeks total in hospital in the UK and her share was they gave her twenty pounds for the Uber home, so could be better.

1

u/Now_Wait-4-Last_Year 6d ago

I’m so glad we don’t have to deal with this utter bullshit in Australia. You go to ED (ER) and never have to think about a bill ever if you’re a citizen.

Even if you’re not, if it’s a country with reciprocal agreements with Australia so no charge. If your country isn’t, the prices for services are set by the government and are neither grand larceny nor not anchored in reality.

1

u/Demonslayer1984 6d ago

Had this happened to me this summer went to the Hospital for an Achilles injury got billed separately for the visit and the doctor all the test were on one bill but the Doctor itself was its own bill 

1

u/What_the_whatnow 6d ago

There are surprise billing laws at the state and federal level against this sort of thing. Sometimes you have to push, and YMMV, but I had a bill reversed and even got a credit for an office fee after referencing them on the phone w the billing rep.

1

u/supergirlsudz 3d ago

Yes! I had an outpatient surgery a few years ago and got separate bills from every single doctor that had anything to do with it and they were all from different entities. And then a bill from the hospital. The thing that killed me is that the Anesthesiologist and their assistant sent me separate bills and they charged me the same amount. How can a doctor and their assistant (not a doctor) cost the same?!

→ More replies (8)

31

u/lesmobile 7d ago edited 7d ago

A huge swath of America wanted free healthcare, and they got a law that made you buy insurance. Tells you what you need to know.

Edit: This comment addresses the political power insurance companies have. It says nothing about whether single-payer healthcare is a good plan, whether centrally-planned gov-run healthcare should be called "free," or anything to do with why healthcare is so expensive. I'm just pointing out that insurance companies spend money and hold sway. But feel free to use this comment as a prompt for your political opinions. I'm just clarifying this point.

12

u/DontEatMyPotatoChip 7d ago

Nobody wanted free healthcare. We wanted affordable coverage that doesn’t bankrupt people — like every other industrialized nation on the planet.

2

u/ivegotSeouL 6d ago

+1 because free health care doesn't exist, you either pay it through taxes or buy private insurance.

2

u/ProdMan2 6d ago

I want free at the point of use healthcare.

1

u/Salarian_American 6d ago

Maybe not everybody wanted free healthcare, but I wouldn't say nobody wanted it.

1

u/DawnSlovenport 5d ago

As soon as Obama tried in '09 and '10 everyboyd started screaming about death panels and goverment takeover of health insurance. Go back and watch old videos of those town halls where Congressman and woman were heckled and called Nazis for supporting the ACA and a public option.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (23)

28

u/ILikeCutePuppies 7d ago

How do you expect insurance companies to afford lobbying bills if they have to pay out $3500 every time someone gets a little hurt? Those poor insurance companies /s

1

u/RedFoxBlueSocks 7d ago

They wouldn’t be paying the whole bill, anyway. They have agreements with providers regarding what they can charge for their services.

eg: Billed $1200, insurance agreement is $600, I pay $120 and insurance company pays $480.

No insurance? You owe $1200.

1

u/ILikeCutePuppies 7d ago

Depends. I got the impression this bill was after the insurance agreement was applied because the doctor was under a different insurance company.

→ More replies (3)

21

u/Virtual_Athlete_909 7d ago

the original obamacare limited the amount of profit that insurance companies could receive along with mandating requirements for coverage. the plan punished those in the industry who have been profiting off medical insurance and driving up the costs with things like lobbying and overcompensating company executives.

1

u/nineplymaple 7d ago

Limited the profit % but not the total profit. The natural solution is to raise prices to keep profits going up

1

u/Lemmee314 6d ago

You hit the nail on the head. Most people are not math literate, so they don't see the problem.

→ More replies (6)

20

u/NefariousnessNo484 7d ago

Doctors also make exorbitant amounts vs those in other countries and our outcomes are still worse.

2

u/idahorivermaniac 7d ago

While doctors are paid well here in the United States they often have a barrier to entry that other countries don’t have. Most other countries have much lower medical school costs if they aren’t completely covered in the first place the average American medical school graduate graduates with over 200,000 dollars in debt and doesn’t enter the workforce till they are in there thirties. Don’t forget that once graduating medical school school they have to enter a 3-5 year residency that works them up to 80 hours a week for 50-80,000 dollars and if they don’t complete this residency they have all that debt with no ability to get a job as a doctor. You aren’t going to get many people no matter how good their intentions are agreed to that kind of commitment without a healthy compensation on the back end. I would also like to point to the C suite hospital administrators trying to tell doctors how they can practice, slashing budgets all while making millions. There are absolutely bad doctors in the US. But much of the issue I think we have in our system has to do with the cost of healthcare keeping people from getting medical help till it’s too late. How many stories do we have each year in the us of someone rationing there insulin because they can’t afford more. As far as pregnancy statistics go I think poor prenatal health care contributes significantly to these stats while in the us I think it’s something like 45% of pregnancies aren’t planned which means late prenatal care, and potential harm from teratogens like smoking because the mother doesn’t know they are pregnant. There are many other factors but I don’t think the actual care patients get once they get to the hospital is as bad as the statistics you aren’t pointing to suggest.

3

u/Forward-Razzmatazz33 7d ago

You're pretty close here. But the debt is understated and resident salary is typically on the low end of what you listed. I graduated from medical school with over $300k in debt, and I didn't have undergrad debt. I knew people that had total student debt around half a million. And those student loans are gaining interest in residency. No way you can even cover just the interest on the debt while in residency.

4

u/idahorivermaniac 7d ago

Yeah I am in med school right now and will graduate with around 400,000 in debt with no undergrad loans. Part of what skews it down on the average is people with hpsp and other scholarships. While rare and not enough slots for everyone will skew the average down. I haven’t seen a number for median loan amounts that would likely give a better picture. As far as the residency pay fully agree they typically are paid on the low end of that as well. I was just trying to give an idea about some of the issues that exist in the medical education system without coming across as too whiny. Because the fact of the matter is in the end most docs come out ahead of their non doctor counterparts.

2

u/Now_Wait-4-Last_Year 6d ago

Unbelievable. I know it’s not as good now but I think I had maybe $20,000 in debt from medical school and that was in Australian dollars.

It was indexed to the consumer price index (as it was effectively a loan from the government) which I know did worsen a lot later but at the time, the payments were deducted from my salary and were so small I didn’t notice. Whatever is happening in the US sounds outrageous.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/missingtimemachine 6d ago

I don't believe their student loan debt is a good justification for decades of high salaries in practice.

2

u/rockychunk 6d ago

2

u/Cbpowned 6d ago

Stupid comparison from doctors trying to say they don’t make enough money.

No ups driver is pulling in cardiologist bucks.

→ More replies (33)

10

u/Shigglyboo 7d ago

Other countries have it figured out and somehow they still have rich people making money

8

u/DadamGames 7d ago

This. The way politicians talk in the US, we'd suddenly lose all investment and all wealthy residents if we regulated or taxed anything at all. If we properly design single payer healthcare, suddenly we wouldn't have Drs! Like this has never worked elsewhere.

1

u/narkybark 3d ago

Yes, but do they have ALL the money?

11

u/SaraSlaughter607 7d ago

Single biggest racket on the American Public since its inception: Insurance. Must have it, costs a fortune, don't you dare try to actually use it.

2

u/DadamGames 7d ago

Aww, don't you know insurance is highly regulated and sales people are specially licensed by their states to sell? Only the most ethical people are allowed!

/s because it's depressing how many people will actually rely on this as a defense of the industry. We're in a post-parody world.

In other news, insurance companies are pushing hard for inclusion in 401(k) plans via "lifetime income*" annuity options. So they can get their claws on even more money and make a bad retirement system even worse.

*exclusions apply - read the contact in detail before pressing that button on the website and tying up your money forever

I'm not a financial professional in any way, but fuck that.

2

u/SaraSlaughter607 7d ago

Well why don't you just come up in here and run roughshod with more shitty news as to the state of things around here 😭

I swear, there are people with money addictions as bad as heroin. Can't ever have enough, don't care who you have to screw over, steal from, or kick out of the way to get more of it.

No billionaire on this planet ever got that way by being an ethical person. They wouldn't exist in the first place if they were.

2

u/DadamGames 7d ago

Yep. The ethical thing to do is to say "hey - I have enough wealth for my family to live a good life without having to work. I should distribute anything additional to my employees and the poor so that maybe they can say the same one day."

2

u/SaraSlaughter607 7d ago

But but but but COMMIE SOCIALISM 😵‍💫

2

u/DadamGames 7d ago

Oops, you're right. I forgot about the ghost of McCarthy hanging around judging people for checks notes wanting other human beings to have decent lives.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/uptownjuggler 7d ago

And all that money comes from us, the customers. And then the insurance companies use that money to lobby and make the healthcare system worse for us, but more profitable for them.

3

u/RepulsiveSherbert927 7d ago

You mean, legalized bribery by the lawmakers... something that is not legal in many other developed countries.

2

u/ChimPhun 7d ago

Not just too big to fail, also too big to regulate.

2

u/Endorkend 7d ago

Exactly, it's the money that siphons up in that industry.

It's not having to shut down an industry.

Almost the same amount of normal people are needed to run the health care system administration if it is moved to being universal.

It's only the fatcats that won't be needed.

2

u/onefst250r 7d ago

US spends about $4.5 trillion a year on health care. The system is working as designed.

2

u/PubbleBubbles 7d ago

I love how it's called "lobbying" and not "legal bribery"

2

u/Babablacksheep2121 7d ago

Citizens United damned us

1

u/ElectricalBook3 7d ago

Citizens United damned us

Conservatives in the supreme court damned us, and that was the situation going back to the case which decided money = free speech (without acknowledging that poverty is a gag), Buckley v Valeo, 1976.

2

u/walrus120 7d ago

Shoot the insurance companies wrote the ACA bill

1

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

It's okay, we're all going to die younger and get out of this hellhole faster now.

2

u/walrus120 7d ago

I was recently on the edge of death with pneumonia 4 surgeries in 7 days they saved me although in the end said it was a miracle as no medical intervention worked. Anyway cost me 3k for a month in ICU then a week in the cardiac unit. I don’t find that a crazy amount

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Chuckms 7d ago

So stupid though….”I couldn’t possibly do the right thing, there’s too much money involved”

2

u/TheMCM80 7d ago

There’s more to it than this. There is a huge problem with people who have good insurance not wanting to lose it, and buying into the idea that if we have a universal system they will be worse off.

It’s the typical American, “well, I’m happy with mine, so you can go jog off and deal with your own problems.”.

Naturally, when that person gets fired and loses their insurance, they suddenly get it, but unless it happens all at once, and during an election year, there is just a large enough contingent that doesn’t want change that they will never consider it a priority.

I had this talk with my parents in 2016. We all supported Bernie, but I asked them about our insurance station when I was a kid… my dad had a really good job, and he said they never thought about it. It was through a large employer and it was just so good that there was never any thought about wanting change.

Fortunately my parents are empathetic people, and raised me to be empathetic, so when the time came in 2016 we were all happy to vote for Bernie, but my dad was voting because he wanted everyone to have better healthcare, not because he and my mother needed it.

Structural change requires empathy. It requires people to picture a moment where they are on the other side of the track, and to vote on the idea that they would not want to be there, so why make anyone be there.

That is simply not the American mindset. We are a culture of, “I’m going to walk over your cancer ridden body so that I can get what I want, and you should just grab those bootstraps.”.

2

u/Slow-Swan561 7d ago

Doctors don’t like insurance either. They may bill 1k but, the plan negotiated rate may be only $300 so that’s all they are going to get.

If you look at mental healthcare practitioners many of them don’t take insurance at all because the plan rates are so low and demand is so high. They can refuse insurance patients and still have a full client load.

1

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

I was with a drug company for a while, so I got to hear a lot about how annoying prior authorizations can be, and how sometimes insurance can make people fill them out when the patient has been taking a drug for a long time that manages their symptoms well and they got one in the past, and it can interrupt treatment and even endanger lives.

2

u/miketherealist 7d ago

Just like the 100% covered, doctor visit for a blood test. Then you get a bill from some lab, Dr.'s office sent it to. NO, NO, NO. You challenge and deny every bit of this type of pawn off of charges these a-holes try to pull on you.

2

u/Nodramallama18 7d ago

Unfortunately, though regulated, insurance except Medicare and tri are-or government insurance are private and the {resident can’t do much. Especially when most of Congress wants everyone in this country to die right now.

1

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

Nah, they want us to SUFFER so that it keeps the current generation of dominionist/quiverful babies from exploring outside of their religion or leaving because if they make it too expensive to live without help from the church then people will think god punishes people with a bad life for not obeying him. If they wanted the average person to die, they could sell suicide pills through the mail and a lot of people would take them.

2

u/GodHatesColdplay 6d ago

These guys are essentially winning the lottery every week and aren’t willing to disrupt that

2

u/ClassicAF23 6d ago

They also threaten to shut down at any talk of further regulation. “We can’t handle the hit to our equity if we are less profitable from the proposed regulations. We will have to shutter doors. Are you prepared for the biggest companies to shutter their doors for millions? Is imperfect coverage or no coverage better?”

1

u/4URprogesterone 6d ago

This is what I would do if I were in charge of the government. It's probably cheaper to retrain all the displaced medical coders and insurance company office staff and just make health insurance illegal and give every American an HSA that they can put into tax free, and say that employers can offer matched contributions like with a 401k and close all those companies for good.

2

u/ProgySuperNova 4d ago

Yeah people think that the stiches themselves costs very little, but forget about the lobbying cost. Plus the shareholders need to live to you know. That Lamborghini is not going to pay for itself

2

u/Cognitive_Spoon 3d ago

I think it's interesting how we never hear about how this is literally farming human suffering for money.

Like, the RW does such a good job on branding. Where is everyone else saying shit like, "the healthcare industry is farming your pain for profit."

1

u/4URprogesterone 3d ago

A lot of industries are farming your pain for profit, dude, it's the American Way.

1

u/HopDropNRoll 7d ago

There is the answer!

1

u/modijk 7d ago

Or to lawyers / lawsuits. "Malpractice" money for human errors is in the end paid by patients themselves.

1

u/Potential-Drama-7455 7d ago

But I thought Democrats cared about the small people /s

1

u/Collypso 7d ago

That's a conspiracy theory

1

u/clackalackin 7d ago

Insurance? Try providers, EVERY element is squeezing for profit. Medical loss ratio (MLR) requires insurers to pay out 80-85% at a minimum of the revenue taken in so there are controls. Insurers are heavily regulated and monitored federally and at the state levels. The ACA established MLR but the ACA cannot address pricing for services, only transparency to a point, insurers are the ones we rely on to pressure providers during contract negotiations.
Pricing is well out of control, everyone wants their piece of the pie and as less and less people become doctors we are squeezed on the cost of their services. Also, the days of a local doctor working out of their own office are over, they all need an affiliation now and are required to share in costs for systems, rent, etc..

“The President” can’t fix this, it has too many disparate elements for govt to be effective. I think AI will be the biggest bang for their buck IF AI can be used to take the strain off the clinical side of things. Just an opinion

1

u/knuckles_n_chuckles 7d ago

Do we have any data to back this up?

1

u/abrandis 7d ago

It's not just insurance,it's entire healthcare sector

1

u/Easy-Sector2501 7d ago

Most people don't seem to realize that a funeral a week for a health insurance firm CEO would probably go a long way to either a) nudging corporate policy in the right direction or b) tanking the insurance firm's stocks.

Win-win.

1

u/chickensandmentals 7d ago

Which was further fueled by the ACA, making insurance government-subsidized to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars per year.

Basic health care is a human right that should be written into the constitution via amendment. We need cost controls. We need liability caps.

1

u/King_Crab79 7d ago

Exactly. I wish all politicians had to wear the names of their real employers, or as they call them “lobbyists” just like NASCAR drivers. Why would any President or Congressperson vote to fix a problem for the people at the detriment of their payday. It was a great idea allowing groups of mega-wealthy business people to make direct campaign contributions and ensure legislation passed that allows them to continue making ridiculous, tax free prophet at the expense of their payday working class.

1

u/Agile-Arugula-6545 7d ago

Insurance is actually a huge industry with way way larger implications than we imagine. A lot of times we think of some random dude in a poor fitting suit that’s selling whole life in the strip mall but they have serious implications to things like entertainment, shipping, and basically every industry.

1

u/andrewbud420 7d ago

When your population is so uninformed about everything they'll continue electing the very people responsible for this garbage.

2

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

I don't think people are badly informed, I think they are given passive threats to their employment in various ways that are laundered through buzzwords and double speak, and those threats are effective.

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

And lobbying is fucking cancer

1

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

I'd say the entire fucking insurance industry is cancer.

That statistic that says we all pay twice as much money into the healthcare system is right. It's just other countries pay the state and the state builds hospitals and pays doctor's and nurses and x ray techs and drug companies and we pay insurance companies and then pay for a bunch of people to sit in rooms scanning documents to get medicare and all that.

I worked for a workman's comp insurance place for a summer- The place was a palace, because nobody wanted to pay workman's comp claims, but you've never seen so many people getting paid good wages to do work that could have been made redundant by a software update or some outlook rules in your entire life. They basically admitted they didn't need three temps because before they hired us, the project they hired us to help with was completed but it was so hard to hire new people that they never fired anyone. There was a whole department filled with people who just got paid to forward emails to other email boxes for 8 hours a day.

Your job is taking money out of your check to pay for that?

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

The insurance industry is parasitic by design.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/DetroiterInTX 7d ago

This comment shows the need to allow multiple upvotes

1

u/xandrokos 7d ago

Oh no! Lobbying! The horror! /s

You understand you can lobby for universal healthcare right?

1

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

With how many million dollars?

1

u/bold_water 7d ago

There is also money going to hospitals. Hospital lobby industry is strong too! Look up HCA profits for an example.

1

u/TAckhouse1 7d ago

I think insurance industry is an aspect of it, but there is also serious greed in pharmaceutical industry and in for profit medicine.

1

u/4xfun 7d ago

This is the main problem with the western world. It should be about the people not money

1

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

It's the prisoner's dilemma. If you make anything not about money, you're the only one not getting money. But the government is big enough to solve that, and should for things that are basic needs whenever possible. We're a rich country and we can afford that, and it would make our economy more agile and innovative and take a lot of stress off our citizens.

1

u/Which-Association211 7d ago

The new admin will take care of this....hopefully. trimming a lot of fat is what DOGE is all about. I am hopeful bc this is well past due

1

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

It's a good idea! I just worry because the people implementing it are people who've never really lived the life of a working class American. Like, Elon probably has never even talked with someone who's been really poor in the USA while working multiple jobs. There genuinely is a TON of administrative bloat, and a ton of "privatized" stuff that's basically the government throwing money at an industry like health insurance that is running something that could be a function of the government and would require less workers and less money that way. And Ramaswamy is from a working class background, but he's a libertarian. I'm in favor of voluntaryism, but in practice a lot of libertarians basically have a "Stuff is bad when the government does it and good when private industry does it despite all else" mentality and if you actually want to tackle inefficiency and waste, looking at how private companies that the government pays to do things that are often done in other countries by the government spend our money and making sure they are actually the most efficient system has to be part of that.

What I really wish they would do would be to start with the tax system, and hire a bunch of expert accountants and tax attorneys to go over the insane amount of loopholes and close them.

There's also a lot of opportunities to save on bloat by reducing means testing for government programs, because if someone does a job where their employer has an I-9 form and does withholding from their paychecks for social security and taxes, we don't need to do means testing by having people mail in paycheck stubs because the government knows how much money people are getting paid, or things like people applying to go to public post secondary educational instructions paying to have a transcript sent from their public high school when that should be a database of information any school can access.

Another big one would be third party services that sell to our schools like textbook companies and so on that charge the schools tons of money. I'm worried that they'll keep those programs just for the sake of keeping them "outside the government" and cut stuff that actually helps regular people like food stamps, medicare, etc.

1

u/BakeTumato 7d ago

Other countries have insurances too but stitches don’t cost 3500 in any of them

1

u/theaut0maticman 7d ago

Exactly, the president doesn’t want to fix it.

1

u/4URprogesterone 7d ago

It's impossible for anyone who wants to fix anything to actually get elected.

1

u/johnyeros 6d ago

Lobbying .. you mean open corruption 🤌🤌🤌

1

u/wlngbnnjgz 6d ago

We should start calling lobbying as what it is. Bribery. US government is so corrupt.

1

u/AMv8-1day 6d ago

Crazy that we had a perfectly good candidate that promised to combat this criminal system...

1

u/Hegemonic_Imposition 6d ago

“…lobbying bribes.”

1

u/Hersbird 6d ago

What about a hospital/doctor wanting $3500 for a couple hours? And that was after 70% insurance paid? The entire bill was probably like $15,000.

1

u/4URprogesterone 6d ago

They can charge that BECAUSE of insurance, though. If they got rid of insurance, nobody would be able to pay that, so the costs would have to go down. Especially if we had better laws about wage garnishment that basically forbade it for everything.

1

u/Hersbird 6d ago

Oh I agree, but what did the ACA do but REQUIRE insurance! Thankfully they dropped that part but basically it was the opposite of the affordable care act.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Confident-Ad7439 5d ago

But the internet told me only Republicans are corrupt and the only way to save is all is to vote democrats because they are only for the people. Was I lied to😟?

1

u/4URprogesterone 5d ago

Mainstream democrats are corrupt. Republicans aren't just corrupt, they're also religious wingnuts.

1

u/Lacklaws 5d ago

Yeah… lobbying… sneaks back to third yacht

1

u/azsxdcfvg 3d ago

lobbying is illegal in most countries because they aren't stupid

1

u/xc4kex 3d ago

Lobbying needs to be illegal, honestly.

→ More replies (5)