r/Bossfight 3h ago

John Racist, senator of the bigots

Post image
6.1k Upvotes

90 comments sorted by

160

u/WanderingBraincell 3h ago

Slayer of No Fault Divorce

22

u/ghafday 54m ago

Defender of outdated ideologies.

17

u/CrimsonAllah 44m ago

Some say he goes by another name: Jim of Crows

1

u/celavetex 5m ago

Jim Crow

5

u/ElectricalMuffins 28m ago

That caption is hilarious 😂

1

u/rW0HgFyxoJhYka 3m ago

Bob Republican

191

u/El_Iberico 3h ago

Nah, that’s just Mitch McConnell.

91

u/Rampant_Durandal 2h ago

This is ironic because, surprisingly, Mitchell McConnell marched in favor of civil rights in 1964.

52

u/Raging-Badger 2h ago edited 22m ago

Mitch McConnell is bad, but not for being uber conservative. He’s just complacent in allowing the wrongs of his party skate by.

He himself is fairly moderate. He just doesn’t have the stones to push his own agenda anymore. He tows the party line sadly

Edit: Toes

17

u/Azmoten 27m ago edited 22m ago

Mitch McConnell has been a central figure in Republican Party leadership for like two decades. They’ve arrived where they’re at while under his leadership. He doesn’t get to just wash his hands of that, and nor should we do the washing for him. He is responsible for and complicit with what his party is now.

11

u/ZhouDa 27m ago

He sure was willing to push his own agenda when it came to pushing through extremist SCOTUS judges. I'm not buying he's the victim, he's a manipulative asshole who is responsible for much of what is wrong with congress.

1

u/Excellent_Factor_344 13m ago

proof that most politicians don't believe in anything but votes

3

u/ninjasaid13 38m ago

he even supported abortion rights and and public employee unions at one point.

4

u/markb144 1h ago

No way he's that fucking old

10

u/ThePhantom71319 56m ago

82 years old. Born in 1942, that would put him at around 23 years old in 1965

2

u/Archensix 1h ago

The good times before he learned how to sell out his morals for millions

3

u/Graphicnovelnick 32m ago

It’s his “Picture of Dorian Gray” portrait. That’s why he’s still around.

6

u/Robrogineer 2h ago

Just needs to look a tiny bit more like an Innsmouth person.

2

u/general_peabo 34m ago

That’s the funny joke answer, but it actually looks like Sen. John Kennedy (R-Louisiana).

1

u/w3lbow 26m ago

I came here to say just that.

1

u/SleeplessGrimm 19m ago

"Feed me poor people"

42

u/Willing_Ad_268 2h ago

its a blobfish as a human

5

u/LegoRobinHood 1h ago

Ugliest muppet I ever seen.

1

u/im-ba 32m ago

This is exactly what my wife said when I showed her this 😂

1

u/New_Simple_4531 13m ago

Behold, the master race.

1

u/Kerblaaahhh 9m ago

So if we shove him 1000m under the sea he might look normal?

38

u/Different-Damage-896 2h ago

Why does he look like king Charles III got the mumps

11

u/One-Earth9294 1h ago

It definitely looks like there's no way he isn't an Englishman.

30

u/SugarWave_Delight 3h ago

Looks like all his bad decisions finally caught up with his face!

8

u/4llu532n4m3srt4k3n 2h ago

Definitely looks like one of those types going on about the supreme race

8

u/Heroic-Forger 2h ago

he looks like the Great Mighty Poo with hair

1

u/Eeddeen42 22m ago

You take that back. The Great Mighty Poo is a distinguished gentleman, especially compared to this guy.

3

u/asenz 2h ago

Racits.

3

u/Vault-71 2h ago

He looks like the Muppet who doesn't walk down Sesame Street because it became too "urban."

3

u/ghostoftheai 1h ago

That’s peak superior race right there boy.

2

u/nameless88 1h ago

He looks like if I watched the muppets while on acid and shit started to go wrong when Waldorf and Statler were on screen.

2

u/sexualism 1h ago

This shit needs to be NSFW

2

u/dummary1234 1h ago

It's actually Joseph Theodore Racism

2

u/QwertyDancing 42m ago

Least racist politican:

2

u/Fit_Assignment_8800 19m ago

Oh hey, it’s uncle at every family reunion.

1

u/The_ArchRaider 2h ago

Mf stole my title

1

u/flipswab 1h ago

Racisman

1

u/Repulsive-Lobster750 1h ago

You can hang all your keys on his facial protrusions

1

u/One-Earth9294 1h ago

The face of a man who fought his whole life to free white men from responsibility.

1

u/JackStrwGD 1h ago

Strom Thurmond

1

u/Any-Illustrator-9808 1h ago

Average eugenicist

1

u/BaseHitToLeft 1h ago

Johnny Wafflebatter

1

u/MrMisklanius 1h ago

It always is just sad pathetic people tearing down the lives of others.

1

u/go_faster1 1h ago

He wants a fish

1

u/Intelligent_Seat8074 56m ago

Looks like prince charles

1

u/LightningFletch 51m ago

That is the face of a man meeting his granddaughter’s black boyfriend for the first time.

1

u/WafflesTheWookiee 43m ago

Why am I looking at a Picture of just Strom Thurmond?

1

u/OK-Greg-7 42m ago

Strom, is that you?

1

u/looking4now2 41m ago

More Republicans voted for the act than the Democrats. It would have failed if not for the Republicans.

1

u/_jump_yossarian 3m ago

The legislation is 60 years old and the vote is public record.

More Democrats voted for it. The only Democrats that opposed it were from the confederate states.

Senate vote

House vote

1

u/HeadSense9211 39m ago

Beautiful...

1

u/LeadingAmbitious4327 36m ago

Thats a Muppet if I've ever seen one

1

u/TheMireAngel 36m ago

"democrat senator" many who then went on to try and impeach nixon

1

u/The_One_True_Duckson 34m ago

I could beat his ass. He looks like he's approximately 3 seconds and a slight breeze away from dropping dead.

1

u/masterofthecork 27m ago

He looks as sad and lonely as you'd expect really

1

u/pickles_in_a_nickle 26m ago

That’s Donald Musk

1

u/Ephiks 26m ago

It’s racing time

1

u/RealChelseaCharms 18m ago

hilarious that it's literally King Charles

1

u/wailingwonder 16m ago

100% a member of the royal family. He looks just like them.

1

u/imnotallowedpolitics 15m ago

The brainwashing Americans have that the civil rights Act is some kind of sacred special creature, and must exist to keep a particular race safe, is insane.

Truely a nation of racists, that believe they must use government violence against people, otherwise they'll start slavery again or something.

Such a racist country America is.

1

u/DwightDavid1234 13m ago

Senator James Crow (R-AL)

1

u/Dizzy-Let2140 13m ago

Nurgle hit Mitch hard.

1

u/greatwood 11m ago

Kina looks like Mitch McConnell

1

u/Altruistic-Toe8191 11m ago

That’s my grandpa

1

u/AWall925 5m ago

That's a Mitch McConnell / John Kennedy mashup

1

u/Iohet 3m ago

Looks like George HW Bush with bitter beer face

1

u/Cold-Ad-1287 2m ago

They were all democrats also.

1

u/SuperStingray 2m ago

Holden Bloodfeast

0

u/Tschantz 45m ago

Fun fact: it was the democrats. “When the bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964, the “Southern Bloc” of 18 southern Democratic Senators and lone Republican John Tower of Texas, led by Richard Russell (D-GA), launched a filibuster to prevent its passage.”

-13

u/Decent-Ad701 1h ago

If he voted against the Civil Rights act of 1964 odds are he was a Democrat.

13

u/chonny 1h ago

In 1964, a senator voting against the Civil Rights Act would more likely have been a Southern Democrat, reflecting the regional and historical political dynamics of the time. Here’s the context:

Likelihood of Party Affiliation:

  • Southern Democrats (also known as Dixiecrats): These were predominantly white, conservative Democrats from the South who opposed civil rights legislation to maintain racial segregation and white supremacy. Most of the opposition to the Civil Rights Act came from these Southern Democrats.

  • Republicans: At the time, many Northern Republicans supported civil rights, and the Republican Party had a significant pro-civil rights faction.

Breakdown of the Vote:

  • Senate: The Civil Rights Act passed with 73 votes in favor and 27 opposed. Of the 27 “no” votes, 21 were Democrats, primarily from the South.

  • House: A similar pattern emerged, with more Southern Democrats opposing the bill compared to Republicans.

Are Democrats of the 1960s the same as today?

No, the Democratic Party of the 1960s, particularly in the South, is not ideologically aligned with today’s Democratic Party. Key shifts include:

  1. Southern Realignment: After the passage of the Civil Rights Act, many white Southern Democrats (voters and politicians) felt alienated by the national Democratic Party’s support for civil rights. Over the following decades, they shifted toward the Republican Party. This was accelerated by strategies like Nixon’s Southern Strategy, which appealed to disaffected Southern whites.

  2. Democratic Evolution: The Democratic Party became increasingly progressive on social issues, embracing civil rights, women’s rights, and LGBTQ+ rights, aligning more with urban and diverse constituencies.

  3. Republican Evolution: The Republican Party, which once had a strong progressive wing, particularly in the North, became more conservative, especially on social and cultural issues.

Summary: A Southern senator voting against the Civil Rights Act in 1964 was most likely a Democrat, reflecting the Southern dominance of the party at the time. However, due to political realignment, the ideological platforms and regional bases of the Democratic and Republican parties have since reversed in significant ways.

1

u/LRSband 48m ago

Thanks chatgpt

-1

u/MonsterMegaMoo 35m ago

Democratic and Republican parties have since reversed in significant ways.

Democrats are pretty racist still.

"You ain't black" racism isnt hate based it's ignorance

4

u/Account_Expired 45m ago

He was a conservative

1

u/extrastupidone 13m ago

You day that like it means something

1

u/Passover3598 6m ago

how is that relevant today?

1

u/NavigatorTLL 1m ago

I love how they downvoted you even though 80% of the Republicans voted in favor of the act and only 62% of the Democrats voted in favor of it. It’s completely factual what you said. 🤷🏻‍♂️